How to avoid wrapping when using xml serializer format - wcf

I have developed WCF service using XmlSerializerFormat. When i test it in WCF Test client i get following response.
Response is wrapped under tag <AuthenticateUserResult>. But when service is consumed using client proxy I get response with out wrap. Can someone Please assist how can i avoid the response wrap or how can i get both responses match.
WCF Test client Response:
<AuthenticateUserResponse xmlns="http://tempuri.org/">
<AuthenticateUserResult>
<applicationStatus>Success</applicationStatus>
<authType version="3.0">
<authenticationType xmlns="http://aaaaaaaa.xyz">0</authenticationType>
</authType>
</AuthenticateUserResult>
</AuthenticateUserResponse>
Service Response from Client Proxy:
<AuthenticateUserResponse >
<applicationStatus xmlns="http://tempuri.org/">Success</applicationStatus>
<authType version="3.0" xmlns="http://tempuri.org/">
<authenticationType xmlns="http://aaaaaaaa.xyz">0</authenticationType>
</authType>
</AuthenticateUserResponse>
My sample application
Service contract:
[ServiceContract]
[XmlSerializerFormat]
public interface IService2
{
[OperationContract]
[XmlSerializerFormat]
AuthenticateUserResponse AuthenticateUser();
}
//[DataContract()]
public class AuthenticateUserResponse
{
[XmlElement("applicationStatus", IsNullable = false)]
public ApplicationStatusType ApplicationStatus
{
get;
set;
}
[XmlElement("authType")]
public AuthType AuthType
{
get;
set;
}
}
[XmlRoot(Namespace = "http://aaaaaaaa.xyz")]
public class AuthType
{
[XmlAttribute("version")]
public string Version;
[XmlElement("authenticationType")]
public int AuthenticationType
{
get;
set;
}
}
public enum ApplicationStatusType
{
Success = 0,
Failed = 0
}

Related

How do I overload method parameter using NET5 SoapCore

I'm trying to port an existing Soap WebService to .NET5 but am having issue with overloading a Soap method parameter.
In NET4 the code looks like this
namespace SoapWebServiceeTest.Soap
{
/// <summary>
/// Summary description for WsgSPServiceOrderService
/// </summary>
[WebService(Namespace = "http://tempuri.org/")]
[WebServiceBinding(ConformsTo = WsiProfiles.BasicProfile1_1)]
[System.ComponentModel.ToolboxItem(false)]
// To allow this Web Service to be called from script, using ASP.NET AJAX, uncomment the following line.
// [System.Web.Script.Services.ScriptService]
public class TextWebService : System.Web.Services.WebService
{
[WebMethod]
public string Test(
[XmlElement("object1", typeof(Object1))]
[XmlElement("object2", typeof(Object2))]
[XmlElement("object3", typeof(Object3))]
object request)
{
return $"{request.GetType().Name}";
}
}
public class Object1 { public string Param1 { get; set; } }
public class Object2 { public string Param2 { get; set; } }
public class Object3 { public string Param3 { get; set; } }
}
How do I achieve this in .NET5?
I have tried following but got reflection exception: System.Reflection.AmbiguousMatchException: 'Multiple custom attributes of the same type found.'
[ServiceContract]
public interface ITestWebService
{
[OperationContract]
string Test(
[XmlElement("object1", typeof(Object1))]
[XmlElement("object2", typeof(Object2))]
[XmlElement("object3", typeof(Object3))]
object request);
}
And also tried this but VS Add Connected Services errored with "More than one message named 'ISampleService_Test_InputMessage' was specified. Each message must have a unique name."
[OperationContract]
string Test(Object1 request);
[OperationContract]
string Test(Object2 request);
Any help would be awesome
You may try this
You can make it post or get based on your need
[OperationContract]
[WebInvoke(UriTemplate = "Test1", Method = "POST"]
string Test(Object1 request);
and
[OperationContract]
[WebInvoke(UriTemplate = "Test2", Method = "POST"]
string Test(Object2 request);
This way you can achieve objective

WCF with ws-address: creating bare parameters

I'm trying to create a WCF SOAP service that has a service method that accepts bare parameters in the body but I just cant make it happen. At the moment, the method name element is being created under the body. I'm trying to use ws-addressing so that the method name is part of the header and the parameters are the direct children of the body.
Here's my service implementation:
[SoapDocumentService(Use = SoapBindingUse.Literal, ParameterStyle = SoapParameterStyle.Bare)]
public class Service1 : IService1
{
[SoapDocumentMethod(Use=SoapBindingUse.Literal, ParameterStyle = SoapParameterStyle.Bare)]
public void DoWork([XmlElement(Namespace = "http://www.contoso.com",
IsNullable = true)] MyClass wrapper)
{
}
}
[XmlRoot(Namespace = "http://www.contoso.com")]
public class MyClass
{
public int Value { get; set; }
public string MyProperty { get; set; }
}
[ServiceContract]
public interface IService1
{
[OperationContract]
void DoWork(MyClass wrapper);
}
The above implementation generates the soap client below. But I'm trying to have the wrapper element as the direct child on body (trying to remove DoWork). From what I've read, decorating the svc method to use bare parameters should remove the service method name (DoWork) and use ws-addressing.
<soap:Envelope xmlns:soap="http://www.w3.org/2003/05/soap-envelope" xmlns:tem="http://tempuri.org/" xmlns:web="http://schemas.datacontract.org/2004/07/WebApplication2">
<soap:Header/>
<soap:Body>
<tem:DoWork> <!-- I want to remove this svc method name element -- >
<tem:wrapper> <!-- I want this to be under the body -->
<!--Optional:-->
<web:MyProperty>?</web:MyProperty>
<!--Optional:-->
<web:Value>?</web:Value>
</tem:wrapper>
</tem:DoWork>
</soap:Body>
</soap:Envelope>
I've followed the guide from msdn to decorate the service method. MSDN Link
I think you should drop the wrapper. in .net 2 this would work, wcf should be similar:
[WebMethod]
[SoapDocumentMethod(ParameterStyle=SoapParameterStyle.Bare)]
public String EchoString(String s, String s1)
{
return s;
}
I had to create message contracts wrapper for the MyClass and specify the message body.
[MessageContract]
public class MyWrapper
{
[MessageBodyMember]
public int Value { get; set; }
[MessageBodyMember]
public string MyProperty { get; set; }
}

WCF - CODEGEN: Generating message contract since message FileRequest has headers

I am aware that there is a similar question here with no solution.
I'm working on a WCF streaming service over HTTP.
Here are my MessageContract
[MessageContract]
public class FileRequest
{
#region Message Header
[MessageHeader(MustUnderstand = true)]
public Credential Credentials { get; set; }
#endregion
#region Message body
[MessageBodyMember(Order = 1)]
public FileInfo FileInfo { get; set; }
#endregion
#region Ctor
// ...
#endregion
}
[MessageContract]
public class FileRequestResponse
{
#region Message Header
[MessageHeader(MustUnderstand = true)]
public FileInfo FileHeader { get; set; }
[MessageHeader(MustUnderstand = true)]
public OperationResult<bool> OperationResult { get; set; }
#endregion
#region Message Body
[MessageBodyMember]
public Stream FileStream { get; set; }
#endregion
#region Constructor
// ...
#endregion
}
Here is my ServiceContract
[ServiceContract(Namespace = "https://service.contract.example.com")]
public interface IUpdateService
{
[OperationContract(Action = "GetUpdates")]
OperationResult<List<FileInfo>> GetUpates(ApplicationInfo applicationInfo, Credential credential);
[OperationContract(Action = "GetFile")]
FileRequestResponse FileRequest(FileRequest fileRequest);
}
Now the question is why I am getting this error:
// CODEGEN: Generating message
contract since message FileRequest has
headers
When I add my service reference. The end result is that the service contract wraps the FileRequest operation into a wrapper which I do not want.
public FileInfo FileRequest(Credential Credentials, FileInfo, out OperationResult<bool> OperationResult, out System.IO.Stream FileStream)
NOTE:
I have not checked the "Always generate message contracts" in the service reference.
Set [MessageContract(IsWrapped=true)] for all the message contracts in the service and then try generating the proxy .
You might want to try to use the IsWrapped attribute on the message contract:
[MessageContract(IsWrapped=false)]
Not 100% sure which one you'll need (true or false) but that's one of the options you could try.
Also, another observation: I think it's a bit risky to have a method called FileRequest and a message contract which also is called FileRequest.
The generally accepted best practive would be to have a method GetFile, a request message for that called GetFileRequest and a response message type GetFileResponse. Do not use the same names for different things.

Importing ASMX Web Service metadata to WCF Endpoint

I am interested in impersonating well-known Web Services and Wcf Services for integration test purposes. To this end, I would like to capture service metadata, auto-generate service stubs, and host service stubs in a self-hosted environment.
Following this article here, I am able to obtain remote Wcf Service metadata and generate contracts. However, I am having some difficulty doing the same for remote Asmx Web Services.
I have a set of mickey-mouse solutions for vetting this out.
My Asmx solution contains a default "Hello World" web service, found below
[WebService(Namespace = "http://tempuri.org/")]
[WebServiceBinding(ConformsTo = WsiProfiles.BasicProfile1_1)]
[System.ComponentModel.ToolboxItem(false)]
public class SimpleAsmxService : System.Web.Services.WebService
{
[WebMethod]
public string HelloWorld () { return "Hello World"; }
}
My Wcf solution contains a default "Hello World" service, also found below
[ServiceContract]
public interface ISimpleWcfService
{
[OperationContract]
string GetData(int value);
[OperationContract]
CompositeType GetDataUsingDataContract(CompositeType composite);
}
[DataContract]
public class CompositeType
{
[DataMember]
public bool BoolValue { get; set; }
[DataMember]
public string StringValue { get; set; }
}
public class SimpleWcfService : ISimpleWcfService
{
public string GetData(int value)
{
return string.Format("You entered: {0}", value);
}
public CompositeType GetDataUsingDataContract(CompositeType composite)
{
if (composite.BoolValue)
{
composite.StringValue += "Suffix";
}
return composite;
}
}
Finally, the little console-that-could looks like
class Program
{
public const string UrlWcf =
"http://localhost:8731/Design_Time_Addresses/SimpleWcfService/mex";
public const string UrlAsmx =
"http://localhost:1803/SimpleAsmxService.asmx?WSDL";
static void Main(string[] args)
{
EndpointAddress mexAddress = new EndpointAddress (UrlWcf);
MetadataExchangeClient mexClient =
new MetadataExchangeClient (mexAddress);
mexClient.ResolveMetadataReferences = true;
// NOTE: blows up if we use UrlAsmx
MetadataSet metaSet = mexClient.GetMetadata ();
WsdlImporter importer = new WsdlImporter (metaSet);
Collection<ContractDescription> contracts =
importer.ImportAllContracts();
}
}
It seems to me that I should be able to pull Wsdl from a well-known Asmx Web Service and generate contracts [and from contracts to code], but cannot seem to contort the preceding sample to do so. Any help would be much appreciated,
Thanks!
NOTE: the error generated when invoking MetadataSet metaSet = mexClient.GetMetadata(); above is a System.InvalidOperationException with message of
Metadata contains a reference that cannot be resolved : 'http://localhost:1803/SimpleAsmxService.asmx?WSDL'
With a System.InvalidOperationException inner exception with message of
<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-16"?>
<Fault xmlns="http://www.w3.org/2003/05/soap-envelope">
<Code>
<Value>Sender</Value>
</Code>
<Reason>
<Text xml:lang="en">
System.Web.Services.Protocols.SoapException: Unable to handle request without a valid action parameter. Please supply a valid soap action.
at System.Web.Services.Protocols.Soap12ServerProtocolHelper.RouteRequest()
at System.Web.Services.Protocols.SoapServerProtocol.RouteRequest(SoapServerMessage message)
at System.Web.Services.Protocols.SoapServerProtocol.Initialize()
at System.Web.Services.Protocols.ServerProtocol.SetContext(Type type, HttpContext context, HttpRequest request, HttpResponse response)
at System.Web.Services.Protocols.ServerProtocolFactory.Create(Type type, HttpContext context, HttpRequest request, HttpResponse response, Boolean& abortProcessing)
</Text>
</Reason>
</Fault>
The way to get it to work with an ASMX web service is to specify the MetadataExchangeClientMode
...
MetadataExchangeClient mexClient =
new MetadataExchangeClient (new Uri(), MetadataExchangeClientMode.HttpGet);
...
using MetadataExchangeClientMode.HttpGet for your ASMX services
and MetadataExchangeClientMode.MetadataExchange for your WCF services.

WCF - Sending data to server outside of contract

I have a WCF service with a client application. I have complete control over both the client and server implementation. I have hundreds of methods in the WCF contract which need a piece of information supplied by the client. Instead of modifying hundreds of methods, is there a way I can send specific data from the client with every call to the service, possibly somewhere in the channel?
Maybe when the client is setting up the proxy before making the call, it can store this data somewhere in an internal property of the proxy... the data would then get sent to the server and from within the service method I could inspect the OperationContext or some other piece of memory to get this data back and use it?
Any ideas?
It sounds like you are wanting something like headers like with SOAP webservices. I'm not a WCF expert, but this looks like the WCF equivalent.
It shouldn't actually be that hard. The best way I can think of is to write an IClientMessageInspector that adds a SOAP header into the Message.Headers in its BeforeSendRequest method.
See e.g. http://weblogs.asp.net/paolopia/archive/2007/08/23/writing-a-wcf-message-inspector.aspx
You can't do this trivially. It will take some work.
It's true that SOAP Headers are the perfect way to pass out-of-band data to and/or from a service. But you already have your contract defined, and adding headers will change the contract.
I believe you'll have to start using message contracts.
Original:
[DataContract]
public class ComplexObject
{
[DataMember(Name = "Id")]
public int Id;
[DataMember]
public string Name;
}
[ServiceContract()]
public interface IMyContract
{
void MyOperation(ComplexObject co);
}
public class MyService : IMyContract
{
#region Implementation of IMyContract
public void MyOperation(ComplexObject co)
{
// use co.*
}
#endregion
}
Using Message Contracts:
[DataContract]
public class ComplexObject
{
[DataMember(Name = "Id")]
public int Id;
[DataMember]
public string Name;
}
[DataContract]
public class MyHeader
{
[DataMember]
public string UserName;
[DataMember]
public string Password;
}
[DataContract]
public class OutputHeader
{
[DataMember]
public string Token;
}
[MessageContract]
public class MyOperationRequest
{
[MessageHeader]
public MyHeader Authentication;
[MessageBodyMember]
public ComplexObject TheObject;
}
[MessageContract]
public class MyOperationResponse
{
[MessageHeader]
public OutputHeader OutputHeader;
}
[ServiceContract()]
public interface IMyContract
{
MyOperationResponse MyOperation(MyOperationRequest request);
}
public class MyService : IMyContract
{
public MyOperationResponse MyOperation(MyOperationRequest request)
{
// use request.TheObject.*
// Can also read request.Authentication.*
return new MyOperationResponse
{ OutputHeader = new OutputHeader { Token = "someToken" } };
}
}