I've seen this a few times, only on Webkit. The scenario is that you have some text with a hover color, and it's using a webfont custom font. When you hover, part of the furthest right letter is not getting the hover color. To see what I mean, view this fiddle in Chrome or Safari, and look carefully at the "r" at the end of the text while hovering with your mouse, it is not completely red.
http://jsfiddle.net/jaredh159/xPZB8/
HTML from fiddle:
<a>Some Text Foo Bar</a>
CSS from fiddle:
#font-face {
font-family: 'stephanie_marie_jfregular';
src: url('stephanie-marie-jf-webfont.eot');
src: url('stephanie-marie-jf-webfont.eot?#iefix') format('embedded-opentype'),
url('stephanie-marie-jf-webfont.woff') format('woff'),
url('stephanie-marie-jf-webfont.ttf') format('truetype'),
url('stephanie-marie-jf-webfont.svg#stephanie_marie_jfregular') format('svg');
font-weight: normal;
font-style: normal;
}
a {
font-family: stephanie_marie_jfregular;
color: #000;
font-size:50px;
}
a:hover {
color: #ff0000;
}
What is this? Fixable? Is it just the case of a poorly created web-font file, or a bad font? Any one familiar with this issue or have a workaround?
The reason the right few pixels arent't given their :hover color is because they run outside the a container. Inspect it or give it a background color and you can see this. A workaround is faking the extra space by giving the a some extra padding-right.
I'm not sure how exactly the glyph is able to run outside the container, so I'm be interested if anyone else knows. For now I'm sharing celeriko's suspicion that this font's metrics are borked.
EDIT: Turns out it's the font's side bearings that allow for the glyph to run outside its bounding box. This is common with brush script fonts and allows individual letters to connect by slightly overlapping eachother. So it's a valid property of the font, unfortunately causing a problem the original typographers didn't have to account for — no hover states on paper ;)
Related
The font size on the charts are to small and hard to read on certain colors. Is there a way to change these attributes?
I can do this do make the whole pie red but setting color or font-size doesn't make a change:
.ct-series-x .ct-slice-pie {
fill: #f05b4f
}
<div class="ct-chart ct-golden-section ct-series-x ct-slice-pie" id="chart2"></div>
For anyone who comes across this - override ct-label in your css file:
.ct-label {
font-size: 15px;
}
I am making a simple fixed SoMe sharing button set for a blog. Everything is fine and dandy except in Safari. Hovering over one of the buttons changes the background-color of the siblings to a color I do not specify anywhere in my CSS. This behavior goes away as soon as I change the wrapper from fixed to relative/static/absolute.
Has anyone ever run into this?
Am I doing something wrong?
If not, is there a hack/fix/workaround?
HTML:
<div id="share-links">
<a class="share-twitter" href="#">a</a>
<a class="share-facebook"href="#">a</a>
<a class="share-linkedin" href="#">a</a>
</div>
CSS:
#share-links{
left:0;
top:5em;
position:fixed;
}
#share-links a{
display:block;
height:2em;
width:2em;
color:white;
background-color:#a16159;
}
#share-links a:hover{
background-color:#8a392e;
}
Fiddle: https://jsfiddle.net/u6vzq192/26/
I discovered this problem in a slightly different situation. I have pagination dots in a fixed div using links like you have set up. I am adding a class to the links with Javascript which in turn changes the background color. Every time this happens the background colors of all the other links go crazy. I believe that it is a rendering bug in Safari inverting the background of the links when one changes.
After much experimentation with your example I discovered that it stops if either the links themselves are much larger or the container is much larger. Since setting the links to be giant buttons affects design, it seems the best solution is to set the container to be larger. Since your example is a vertical set of links you would set the height of the container to be something much larger than the links. I used height: 100%; but a large px should work too. If you had links laid out horizontally you might need to make that width: 100%; instead.
CSS:
#share-links{
left:0;
top:5em;
position:fixed;
height: 100%;
}
#share-links a{
display:block;
height:2em;
width:2em;
color:white;
background-color:#a16159;
}
#share-links a:hover{
background-color:#8a392e;
}
I encountered a similar problem. As well as being fixed, one of the inside elements had transform:rotate 90 deg and had a hover effect that changed its position slightly (pulled out from the side of the screen). The background color of this element and its sibling were the same, and both would flicker randomly when elements on the page were changed / rendered.
I finally found a combination of styles that stopped the background colour flickering altogether.
I added the following to the parent element from here: https://stackoverflow.com/a/27863860/6260201
-webkit-transform:translate3d(0,0,0);
-webkit-transform-style: preserve-3d;
That stopped the flickering of the transformed/sliding element.
And I added the following to the remaining element from here: https://stackoverflow.com/a/19817217/6260201
-webkit-backface-visibility: hidden;
This then stopped the flickering of the background colour for the sibling element.
I am writing a small game using bootstrap and want the font size to remain proportionally consistent on a phone, tablet and PC.
<h1>Points: {{points}}</h1>
The trouble is that the above is much smaller on higher level resolutions and it wrecks the layout I have designed for the game.
How do I solve this issue?
As suggested by #ckuijjer, the vw unit works well. As you resize the window, the font size resized in proportion to the size of the window.
#media all {
h1 { font-size: 6vw;}
h2 { font-size: 5vw;}
h3 { font-size: 4vw;}
h4 { font-size: 3vw;}
h5 { font-size: 2vw;}
h6 { font-size: 1vw;}
}
You can use %. This makes the font size depend on the screen size. Media queries might help to find time this..
I was trying to add twitter/facebook icon to the site footer, much like side.cr footer. I got everything working, except that safari having unexpected vertical tile for twitter and facebook. I tried to upload screenshot but I am new user, so can't do that right now.
So I was searching for the answer and found this q/a here, Is <img> element block level or inline level?
So I went to side.cr again to see its css does have user agent stylesheet.
I added this line of code to my css:
.footer ul li img.t, li img.f {
width: 40px;
vertical-align: middle;
display: inline-block;
}
and it fixed the problem.
But I have a few questions in head:
why does side.cr's css show as non-editable user agent, while I have to add that display-inline to my css?
How does "display: inline-block" fix the problem?
Notice that: When mouse over to the gray twitter, it triggers swap.js, changing the icon image to the colored one, but in safari, the highlighted icon is bigger than the gray one. I think i almost know the answer. Just need someone who knows all the kinks behind this.
Thanks!
Solution:
To fix this problem make sure you set the height and width on the image so that it doesn't change during loading.
<img src="http://www.side.cr/images/contact/twitter_off.svg"
class="twitter_bird img_swap" height="52px" width="52px" />
or
.twitter_bird {
height:50px;
width:50px
}
Explanation:
When you switch the images name, safari begins to load the image but it doesn't know the height or width until it's done downloading. If you set the height and width it will not grow from 0px to 52px.
I'm building a Magento shop for a client, I uploaded some test images for the products but they seem to have a black background whenever I mouse over using chrome. Does anyone understand why? I don't see any problems with css so it has to be the images themselves.
URL: (I'm talking about those images below 'New products' and 'featured')
http://bit.ly/zuRH2O
I made those using photoshop and the png-24 save-for-web option (http://bit.ly/zGXTAo). Been doing that for years and this is actually the first time happening.
The problem is in your css. Look at the background image:
a.product-image {
margin-bottom: 10px;
width: 182px;
height: 239px;
border: 1px solid #2F3238;
background: url("/images/thumb_bg.png") 50% top no-repeat;
display: block;
border-image: initial;
If you right click on the images, and view in new tab you will see that they are transparent. Your background is dark, so the image picks that up.