Two aggregation in a single expression - qlikview

How to resolve the below expression:
sum({<Category={'Internal Ops SLA'}>}(RangeSum(Above(sum(InternalOpsSLA),0,12))/TargetOpsSLA)*Weight)
It is giving the error in expression, because of the double sum.
The multiplier Weight value is selected as per the category in the set expression modifier. Is there any other way, apart from variable with ONLY as I need to sum the final results, for the above expression ?


I know this post is pretty old. Responding to it, thinking that it might help a few.
I faced a similar problem in qlikview, while trying to compute Sum of Averages. With an error message:
(Error in expression: Nest Aggregation not allowed)
I realized that one work around for this is to use, aggregate functions. Instead of grouping them like:
sum(avg(<Dimension_Name>condition))
I grouped them as:
Sum(Aggr(Avg(condition), Dimension_Name))
and this worked well for me.
So for your problem, I would try something like this:
sum(aggr(if(Category = {'Internal Ops SLA'},(RangeSum(Above(sum(InternalOpsSLA),0,12))/TargetOpsSLA)*Weight),'Dimension Name'))

Related

Qlik sense: How to aggregate strings into single row in script

I am trying to aggregate strings that belong to the same product code in one row. Which Qlik sense aggregation function should I use?
image
I am able to aggregate integers in such example, but failed for string aggregation.

Have you tried maxstring() - this is a string aggregation function.

As x3ja mentioned, you can use an aggregation function in charts that will work for strings, including:
MaxString()
Only()
Concat()
These can result in the type of thing you're looking for:
It's worth noting, though, that this sort of problem is almost always an issue with the underlying data model. Depending on what your source data looks like, you should consider investigating your use of Join and/or Concatenate. You can see more info on how to use those functions on this Qlik Help page.
Here's a very basic example of using a Join to properly combine the data in a way that results in all data showing up a single record without needing any aggregations in the table chart:

SQL query to get the Count of System functions in SQL Server database based on type

How we could get the count of system functions based on type?
In system functions we have different type of functions, like "Mathematical", "Aggregate" etc..
In one of the use case I need check the count in an IF condition for specific type.
Example:
Use Case #1: for aggregate type functions, we should get result 15
Use Case #2: for mathematical type functions, we should get result 23
I found the quite similar answer here, but couldn't modify accordingly.
Could someone help me out here?
Thanks!!

Finding the total of an expression - SSRS

I am trying to get a row with the totals for the following formula:
=iif(Fields!CreditRatingCode.Value>4,COUNT(CInt(Fields!CurrBalance.Value)),CInt(0))
I have tried adding a SUM, but is incorrect.
=SUM(iif(Fields!CreditRatingCode.Value>4,COUNT(CInt(Fields!CurrBalance.Value)),CInt(0)))

I figured it out.
For anyone who might be having a similar question, this is the expression that I came up with:
=SUM(iif(Fields!CreditRatingCode.Value>4,CInt(1),CInt(0)))

How to use group by in qlikview

I'm taking data from the Database for loading into qlikview.
I have to create a chart with the percentage of inflow tickets group by SR(Column name). How do ido that? The expression for numerator and denominator looks the same to me. Is there a way to group by?

If I understand your question correctly you're trying to build something that looks like this
To add the relative % all you have to do is copy and paste the expression for the sum of calls and then add the relative tick to the 2nd expression
Notice that the expressions are exactly the same except for the relative tick. This tells QlikView to divide the dimensional answer by the dimensionless total.

SSAS: Two sets specified in the function have different dimensionality

I'm trying to run the following MDX query (I'm newbie in the matter):
WITH MEMBER [Measures].[Not Null SIGNEDDATA] AS IIF( IsEmpty( [Measures].[SIGNEDDATA] ), 0, [Measures].[SIGNEDDATA] )
SELECT
{[Measures].[Not Null SIGNEDDATA]} ON COLUMNS,
{[Cuenta].[818000_001],[Cuenta].[818000_G02]} ON ROWS
FROM [Notas_SIC]
WHERE ([Auditoria].[AUD_NA],[Concepto].[CONCEPTO_NA],[Entidad].[CCB],
[Indicador].[INDICADOR_NA],[Interco].[I_NONE],[Moneda].[COP],
[Tiempo].[2010.01],[Version].[VERSION_NA])
Where 818000_001 is a base member of my 'Cuenta' dimension, and 818000_G02 is a node or aggregation. I receive the following message:
"Two sets specified in the function have different dimensionality"
What am I doing wrong? If I put the query with only base members (many) or only differents aggregations, the result is ok as expected.
Thanks in advance!

By using commas in your WHERE clause, you are trying to create a set out of members from different dimensions. You should use asterisks to make a CROSSJOIN instead.
So replace this:
WHERE ([Auditoria].[AUD_NA],[Concepto].[CONCEPTO_NA],[Entidad].[CCB],
[Indicador].[INDICADOR_NA],[Interco].[I_NONE],[Moneda].[COP],
[Tiempo].[2010.01],[Version].[VERSION_NA])
With this:
WHERE ({[Auditoria].[AUD_NA],[Concepto].[CONCEPTO_NA],[Entidad].[CCB]} *
{[Indicador].[INDICADOR_NA],[Interco].[I_NONE],[Moneda].[COP]} *
{[Tiempo].[2010.01],[Version].[VERSION_NA]})
I added curly braces though I'm not sure if they're absolutely required.

This is maybe your problem:
{[Cuenta].[818000_001],[Cuenta].[818000_G02]} ON ROWS
You have put them as a set but you can only make a set out of members with the same dimensionality. From your description it sounds like [Cuenta].[818000_G02] is being classed as a different hierarchy which is unexpected.
Is [Cuenta].[818000_G02] created using the Aggregate function? Can you swap to using the Sum function? Does the script then work?
(not a great answer - just more questions?)

{[Cuenta].[818000_001],[Cuenta].[818000_G02]}
Your problem probably lies in the above statement. As is clear, they could be from different hierarchies(which is not clear from your example and I come to that below).
Try replacing the above with
{[Cuenta].[Hierarchy1].[818000_001]} * {[Cuenta].[Hierarchy2].[818000_G02]}
where Hierarchy1 and Hierarchy2 are the hierarchies to which these members belong. (If you are not sure, just try {[Cuenta].[818000_001]} * {[Cuenta].[818000_G02]}). I am assuming that the second aggregate members may be built on a different hierarchy and thus the engine is throwing an error.
It is generally a good habit to always use the fully qualified member name because then the SSAS engine has to spend less time in searching for the member.