I am trying to compile a piece of Code at Runtime with the VBCodeProvider class.
It works great with one exception. I can't access any members of the System.Drawing
Namespace.
I do an "Imports System.Drawing" at the beginning of the code which does
compile without an error (so I guess the reference is there alright) but when I try
to define for example a graphics object with "Dim g as Graphics" or "Dim g as System.Drawing.Graphics" I get an exception on compilation: {[...] error BC30002: Der Typ "Graphics" ist nicht definiert. (The type Graphics is not defined)}
When I try to add the System.Drawing.dll to the ReferencedAssemblies of the CompilerOptions then I get a whole bunch of other compilation errors so I guess that's not the solution.
I don't really get why this problem is there. For example in the same code I use members of System.Math which work.
Does anyone have an idea or tip for me of what I may be doing wrong?
Thank you in advance.
Jens
edit due to lack of reputation:
Thank you for your help. Typical thing: You try and search for over an hour, then you ask here and 10 minutes later you find the solution yourself:
The problem was with how I referenced the system.drawing.dll in the compileroptions. I did use an absolute path "C:\Program Files (x86)\Reference Assemblies\Microsoft\Framework.NETFramework\v4.0\System.Drawing.dll" and that gave me 19 exceptions in some code I did not even write myself.!
What worked was to use a relative path. e.g.
PM.ReferencedAssemblies.Add("System.Drawing.dll")
I don't know what the real difference is, but at least this works. :-)
Thank you very much for your help!
Typical thing: You try and search for over an hour, then you ask here and 10 minutes later you find the solution yourself:
The problem was with how I referenced the system.drawing.dll in the compileroptions. I did use an absolute path C:\Program Files (x86)\Reference Assemblies\Microsoft\Framework\.NETFramework\v4.0\System.Drawing.dll and that gave me 19 exceptions in some code I did not even write myself.
What worked was to use a relative path. e.g.
PM.ReferencedAssemblies.Add("System.Drawing.dll")
I don't know what the real difference is, but at least this works.
Related
I got a problem recently that when I added a code to a lib, which is used by a dll, the dll cannot be loaded. I get an exception "Floating point invalid operation at xxx". When I comment out the code it works. The code added is just straight forward like creating a TADOQuery object, add the sql statment and the parameters, then do an open, check value etc. Nothing suspicious. Now when I uncomment the code and comment another chuck of code in the unit elsewhere, it starts to work. So obviously the newly added code was just tripping the issue caused elsewhere.
Now this error happens when LoadLibrary() call is invoked. There is no attach code. The DllMain, just has a return 1. When this happens the assembly code is always at FSTP tbyte ptr doing a System::Variant::Clear().
Anyone has come across such issues? Any tips on how to debug is also appreciated.
PS: It could also be Embarcadero's compiler issue. I recently figured out that the assembly generated for a combination of assignment and comparison is incorrect. The only suspicion here is the lib that the dll uses is large. When I do a clean and build of the lib, the total lines shows 5.7m. Maybe there is some setting for large libs?
IDE-XE4, c++ builder
OS-Win 7
Thanks,
Mathew Joy
C++Builder and Delphi have different default FPU settings than, say, MSVC and the DLLs written in it.
It probably goes like this: After DllMain, certain exceptions are masked to be hidden. But before the first floating point operation in C++Builder code occurs, that exception is unmasked and the exception occurs.
This is a known problem with C++Builder/Delphi floating point and DLLs.
I use the Directory.getLastWriteTimeUtc() method. If the path is too long for this method it throws an PathTooLongException. So I started to use Google finding a solution for this problem. A couple of search results adviced me to use \\?\ as a prefix. Using the Windows Explorer this solution works perfectly. But it does not work with Visual Basic. Adding this prefix to the path the result is an ArgumentException because the is an illegal character in the path.
So I want to ask you if you have a solution to handle long paths with Visual Basic.
The snippet of code that causes the problem is the following one. It is used to get the most recent file of a folder.
Oh, I'm sorry. Of course I will show you my snippet of code that causes the problem.
Try
If Directory.GetLastWriteTimeUtc(s) > Directory.GetLastWriteTimeUtc(latest) Then
latest = s
End If
Catch e As PathTooLongException
Console.WriteLine("error...")
End Try
I solved the problem by subsitute the Delimon.Win32.IO for the System.IO library. Now I can handle such long paths. Hope I can help anyone later.
Namely, a DLL name has an extra #8 at the end which is causing trouble. Apparently, using the --kill-at flag in gcc would solve this, but I can't find any similar suggestions for MSVC.
EDIT: A little more info:
I'm trying to get a C++ JNI dll to work, but I constantly get
Exception in thread "Thread-0" java.lang.UnsatisfiedLinkError: eveTimers.PollThread.checkKeyboardChanges()V
back instead of a functioning program. I used quickview to look at the dll and discovered it's decorated with #8 which http://www.velocityreviews.com/forums/t143642-jni-unsatisfied-link-error-but-the-method-name-is-correct.html suggests is a possible problem. Help would be greatly appreciated.
[Edited out as irrelevant, per comment below].
Another approach is to specify export names in a .DEF file.
Your calling convention and linker settings can affect this as well. It's a bit of a black art, to be honest. Use MSVC for a dozen years and you'll still occasionally run into pesky name-mangling issues that should be easy to fix, but are non-trivial to actually fix, given how the different settings interact.
I have a VB.Net solution that another developer created and I'm trying to compile it on our build machine (it compiles on their machine) but with one of the projects I get an error saying something along the lines of:
Imyinterface is ambiguous in the namespace anamespaceassembly.
I have tried with no success:
examined the references to see any obvious errors
removed and re-added the assembly in question
searched the system for the same dll
attempted to compile the original deve's src (.v the source control version)
examined the assembly with ildasm.exe
I usually code in C# and have not seen this error before (in this form at least), not that it is VB.Net specific but the UI for adding/viewing references is slightly different so I thought maybe VB.Net might do something different with references.
I also tried to compile on another machine, and it compiles ok. So I assume it is something with the build machine but I'm not sure what. Other conflicting assemblies somehow not referenced by the project, is that possible??
Any ideas?
Check your references if you have two versions of the same reference (eg. Microsoft.ReportViewer.Webforms version 10.0.0.0 and Microsoft.ReportViewer.Webforms 8.0.0.0) You will get this error. Delete the oldest and you should be good. I do this to myself all of the time.
There can be a few causes for this error. In VB, you should be aware that more names then you're used to from C# are available without class specification. Also, case does not matter in VB, which can further liken the chances on collisions.
Even in the event that you don't find the actual conflicting issue, you can resolve this in the same way you would in C#: rename it in the Imports statement:
Imports IM = yourAssembly.Imyinterface
Then change the code such that uses of Imyinterface are replace with IM.
NOTE: If the error does not point to a particular line, the conflict may be out of your hand. Normally, a full Clean Solution and Rebuild helps a lot, but occasionally a misbehaving file (i.e., another error) causes this error to popup first without clear source. Try to rollback recent changes to the place where it did work.
You also say it worked on another machine. Chances are that your machine is having a different version of MS Visual Studio or .NET. Check and compare the exact versions.
I was facing same issue. I upgraded my application from vb6 to vb.net and when i change the build configuration from DEBUG to RELEASE then i got AMBIGUOUS errors.
I found dulicate references folder in solution Explorer. I removed those duplicate referecnces and Build sucessfully. I Hope it may help others.
Thanks for the responses! I tried each but still was having issues.
One point of info I left out of the original question was that the VB.net projects are upgrades from VB6 projects. At the time I did not think that was relevant.
After investigating further the build machine was used to build the VB6 projects also. So I ran 'reg32 /u' on the vb6 dlls and that seemed to fix the VB.net issue.
Not exactly sure why this fixed it since I was not referencing the VB6 dlls, I'm guessing something to do with ambiguous entries in the registry confusing the vb.net project.
I've got a really strange error and any light that anyone can shed on this would be greatly appreciated.
I made some changes to some VB6 source which builds a COM object. The automated build which builds our app returned an error. No problem I thought--I'll just back out my changes. Well backing out my changes isn't making the problem go away.
Specifically when I attempt to build the app via a .vbg file, with a command line like path\to\vb6\vb6 ProjectFile.vbg /make
I get a message
"Compile Error in File '', Line : Object library
invalid or contains references to object definitions that could not be
found."
As I said, I reverted the source code so I'm really stumped as to why this error is still occurring. Any VB6 gurus around who might be able to point me at an answer?
I can post the exact code in question but the fact that it was building correctly, stopped building correctly and now refuses to build correctly makes me think this is not a problem with my code but rather some problem in the environment. Like something got put in the registry as a result of the previous build error.
Any tips, hints, or suggestions greatly welcome. I realize my question is a bit sketchy but I'm not even sure what's important to include and what isn't.
EDIT 1:
Thanks for the excellent suggestions guys. I think it is something to do with VB6 doing some sort of auto-registration.
Just to add a bit more detail: this problem does not occur when I build the referenced vbp file from the IDE. It only happens on the make on the .vbg which contains the vbp. Also the build tool in question automatically pulls latest source and the error happens on both my local box and the dedicated build box.
EDIT 2:
Hi again all,
The release engineering fellow figured out how to get this to build in his build environment so it's currently ok. Once we're past this crunch, I'll try to interrogate him about what he did and share the details with everyone.
Thanks again for all the great suggestions. This is what's so great about SO; that is, I asked about a 10-year-old technology and I got several great and on-point ideas.
Make sure that the VBG and all the VBP's got rolled back as well. That error is consistent with a project trying to reference a CLSID that is no longer valid for the dependency. Have you tried loading up the project group and building from the IDE, if that works and you save and check in all the changes to the group and project files, you might be fixed up.
I'm guessing the fact that you mention that it was a COM component might be the source of the problem. If any of the public method's or properties have changed then I seem to remember that VB6 will change the interface GUIDs and auto register the new ones.
My suggestion would be to check the registry to look for any mention of the component name, make a note of any associated CLSIDs, back up the registry, and then delete the references.
As cmsjr mentions it could also be a bad CLSID reference in your .vbp files.
The other option is that the failure has caused a problem with some .tlb (type library) or olb (object library) files.
The best thing to do is move all your compatibility DLL to a separate and combined directory. The reason for this is control over what VB6 is using to check for binary compatibility. In addition the Typelibs that are generated IMPORT the references. So if you using Binary DLL Ver 10 for compatibility however the import is pulling in Binary DLL Ver 9 you will have issues. By keeping all the libraries in a single folder and pointing your projects to the DLLs in that folder you ensure that the respective TypeLib Import the correct version.
Finally if you have multiple levels of DLL reference each other. You may run into mysterious error where the VB6 is unable to compile using binary compatibility. In such cases you need to compile the lowest DLL in the hierarchy (Utility DLL perhaps) copy it over into the compatibility folders. Work your way up the chain until everything compiles in one shot again.
This is because if have DLL A reference DLL B which Reference DLL C. VB6 will get sometimes get confused if you make a change to A and C. will compile fine but A will not until the compatibility libraries are updated.
Hunt down and delete any .obj and .exp files that may be lying around from the previous failed build.
You will have to open the project & re-type in the lines that you changed.
Save the project alongwith VBG and re-compile after that.
I think that will fix it.
EDIT: The idea is that the cls/bas file remember the class (CLSID) that you used. So, if you change the references but don't change the lines in the cls/bas - it is a mismatch of type (what was referenced vs what is typed in cls/bas file).