Morning all, I need some help please.
I have a database with several tables. I'm trying to write an INSERT INTO and SELECT query that copies all values from one Table (TableA) into another Table (TableD) but substitutes one value with a value it looks up in another table (Table B).
Table A with various fields including TableBRef
Table B includes various fields starting with TableBRef and also includes a field TableCRef
I want to copy all of TableA into Table D but replace The TableBRef with the TableCRef ie I know TableBRef, I need to search for it in TableB and return the associated value from the TableCRef field.
INSERT INTO TableD
(DRef, CRef, DData1, DData2)
SELECT TableA.ARef, TableB.CRef, TableA.AData1, TableA.AData2
FROM TableD AS TableD_1 CROSS JOIN
TableC CROSS JOIN
TableA INNER JOIN
TableB ON TableA.BRef = TableB.BRef
Sorry, I thought that calling them generic table names may help but it's actually a little confusing :-)
I don't understand how you relate each table but see if this query will work for you
INSERT INTO TableD
(DRef, CRef, DData1, DData2)
SELECT a.ARef, c.CRef, a.AData1, a.AData2
from tableA a
left outer join tableB b on a.ARef = b.ARef
inner join tableC c on b.CRef = c.CRef
Related
I have to join (required to use join) these 2 tables table and table B.
I have table A
CoverID
4!12569
3!18175
1!478931
And Table B
ID
Accountid
4
12569
3
18175
1
478931
Please advise how can I join the table using concat
From TableA A
Left join TableB B
On A.CoverId = (concat(B.ID, ‘!’, B.AccountId))
You need to make sure the data types match. So you’ll have to play around with whether or not you need to cast the data to match within the concatenation besides that it should work.
Questions similar to this one about using DISTINCT values in an INNER JOIN have been asked a few times, but I don't see my (simple) use case.
Problem Description:
I have two tables Table A and Table B. They can be joined via a variable ID. Each ID may appear on multiple rows in both Table A and Table B.
I would like to INNER JOIN Table A and Table B on the distinct values of ID which appear in Table B and select all rows of Table A with a Table A.ID which appears matching some condition in Table B.
What I want:
I want to make sure I get only one copy of each row of Table A with a Table A.ID matching a Table B.ID which satisfies [some condition].
What I would like to do:
SELECT * FROM TABLE A
INNER JOIN (
SELECT DISTINCT ID FROM TABLE B WHERE [some condition]
) ON TABLE A.ID=TABLE B.ID
Additionally:
As a further (really dumb) constraint, I can't say anything about the SQL standard in use, since I'm executing the SQL query through Stata's odbc load command on a database I have no information about beyond the variable names and the fact that "it does accept SQL queries," ( <- this is the extent of the information I have).
If you want all rows in a that match an id in b, then use exists:
select a.*
from a
where exists (select 1 from b where b.id = a.id);
Trying to use join just complicates matters, because it both filters and generates duplicates.
If I have a table with the following atributes:
A: id, race, key1
B: key1, driving_id
C: driving_id, fines
why would it be possible for us to have the following queries:
select A.id, A.race, B.key1, B.driving_id, C.fines
from A
left join B on A.key1=B.key1
left join C on B.driving_id= C.driving_id
even though there are no common keys for A and C in the last line of the SQL query?
The query that you have written is parsed as:
select A.id, A.race, B.key1, B.driving_id, C.fines
from (A left join
B
on A.key1 = B.key1
) left join
C
on B.driving_id = C.driving_id;
That is, C is -- logically -- being joined to the result of A and B. Any keys from those tables would be valid.
Although your original query is the preferable way to write it, you could also write:
select ab.id, ab.race, ab.key1, ab.driving_id, C.fines
from (select . . . -- whatever columns you need
from A left join
B
on A.key1 = B.key1
) ab left join
C
on ab.driving_id = C.driving_id;
The three versions are all equivalent, but the last one may help you better understand what is going on with joins between multiple tables.
Without seeing sample data from the three tables, we might not know for sure in the query makes any sense or would even run. Assuming it does run, then there should be nothing wrong with the join logic. For example, it is perfectly possible for table B to have a key key1 which relates to the A table, while at the same time having another key driving_id which relates to the C table. Note that either of these keys (but not both) could be a primary key in the B table, and if not then each key would be a foreign key.
The LEFT JOIN keyword returns all records from the left table (tableA), and the matched records from the right table (tableB). Furthermore, Similarly it returns all records from the result of first set, and the matched records from the right table (tableC). The result is NULL from the right side, if there is no match.
So A & C have a link through table B.
I have two tables. Table A and table B. Table A has a column that is a reference to the primary key to table B. I want to run a select query on table A and then populate the column that referrers to B with all of the data in that row of B.
SELECT * from A a LEFT JOIN B b ON a."b_id" = b."id" WHERE ...
That gives a result with each row containing all of the columns of A and all of the columns of B. It is a confusing mess to figure out which column is from which table. I want to be able to do something like.
row.A."column name"
row.B."column name"
I don't want to have to rename every single column using AS. There must be a better way to do this.
Not a 100% sure what your asking but what I think your asking is.
You want a way to have only column B values to show? If so you could do:
SELECT B.*
FROM A
JOIN B
ON A.b_id = B.id
That will only get you the B columns and data, If you want A also maybe do but you want to have it separate from b maybe do:
SELECT B.*,'|' AS ['|'], A.*
FROM A
JOIN B
ON A.b_id = B.id
Hopefully this is helpful, if not to you maybe another reader.
I have two tables, Table A and Table B. Each table have 4 fields, the name of the fields are the same for both. Both tables are extracted from other tables, and each record acts as a primary key.
I want to write a query in MS Access 2010 that gets the data unique to Table B and not shared with Table A. I am using the following image as a reference, and it looks like I need to do a Right Join.
Hello. There is something not right with my SQL, I've tested it and I am getting the incorrect result. Below is the closest I've gotten:
SELECT DISTINCT TableB.*
FROM TableB RIGHT JOIN TableA ON (TableB.Field1 = TableA.Field1) AND (TableB.Field2 = TableA.Field2) AND (TableB.Field3 = TableA.Field3) AND (TableB.Field4 = TableA.Field4)
WHERE (((TableA.Field1) Is Null));
I think it would be clearer for you to use not exists:
select tableb.*
from tableb
where not exists (select 1
from tablea
where (TableB.Field1 = TableA.Field1) AND (TableB.Field2 = TableA.Field2) AND (TableB.Field3 = TableA.Field3) AND (TableB.Field4 = TableA.Field4)
);
Your use of RIGHT JOIN is incorrect. As phrased, you want a LEFT JOIN. That is, you want to keep all rows in the first table (the "left" table in the JOIN) regardless of whether or not a match exists in the second table. However, the NOT EXISTS does the same thing and the logic is a bit clearer.
You want to have right join if tablea is in your select statement, but as you have
SELECT DISTINCT TableB.*
you may want to have a left join instead. My suggestion would be changing your code from right to left join.
TableB acts like table A from venn diagrams above.