I'm newbie in using ogre3D and I need help on a certain point!
I'm trying a library mixing ogre3D engine and qtml :
http://advancingusability.wordpress.com/2013/08/14/qmlogre-is-now-a-library/
this library works fine when you want to draw some object and rotate or translate these objects already initialise in a first step.
void initialize(){
// we only want to initialize once
disconnect(this, &ExampleApp::beforeRendering, this, &ExampleApp::initializeOgre);
// start up Ogre
m_ogreEngine = new OgreEngine(this);
m_root = m_ogreEngine->startEngine();
m_ogreEngine->setupResources();
m_ogreEngine->activateOgreContext();
//draw a small cube
new DebugDrawer(m_sceneManager, 0.5f);
DrawCube(100,100,100);
DebugDrawer::getSingleton().build();
m_ogreEngine->doneOgreContext();
emit(ogreInitialized());
}
but If you want to draw or change the scene after this initialisation step it is problematic!
In fact in Ogre3D only (without the qtogre library), you have to use a frameListener
which will connect the rendering thread and allow a repaint of your scene.
But here, we have two ContextOpengl: one for qt and the other one for Ogre.
So If you try to put the common part of code :
createScene();
createFrameListener();
// La Boucle de rendu
m_root->startRendering();
//createScene();
while(true)
{
Ogre::WindowEventUtilities::messagePump();
if(pRenderWindow->isClosed())
std::cout<<"pRenderWindow close"<<std::endl;
if(!m_root->renderOneFrame())
std::cout<<"root renderOneFrame"<<std::endl;
}
the app will freeze! I know that startRendering is a render loop itself, so the loop below never gets executed.
But I don't know where to put those line or how to correct this part!
I've also try to add a background buffer and to swap them :
void OgreEngine::updateOgreContext()
{
glPopAttrib();
glPopClientAttrib();
m_qtContext->functions()->glUseProgram(0);
m_qtContext->doneCurrent();
delete m_qtContext;
m_BackgroundContext= QOpenGLContext::currentContext();
// create a new shared OpenGL context to be used exclusively by Ogre
m_BackgroundContext = new QOpenGLContext();
m_BackgroundContext->setFormat(m_quickWindow->requestedFormat());
m_BackgroundContext->setShareContext(m_qtContext);
m_BackgroundContext->create();
m_BackgroundContext->swapBuffers(m_quickWindow);
//m_ogreContext->makeCurrent(m_quickWindow);
}
but i've also the same error:
OGRE EXCEPTION(7:InternalErrorException): Cannot create GL vertex buffer in GLHardwareVertexBuffer::GLHardwareVertexBuffer at Bureau/bibliotheques/ogre_src_v1-8-1/RenderSystems/GL/src/OgreGLHardwareVertexBuffer.cpp (line 46)
I'm very stuck!
I don't know what to do?
Thanks!
Related
I am creating a small game in the Unity game engine, and the map for the game is generated from a 2d tilemap. The tilemap contains so many tiles, though, is is very hard for a device like a phone to render them all, so the frame rate drops. The map is completely static in that the only moving thing in the game is a main character sprite and the camera following it. The map itself has no moving objects, it is very simple, there must be a way to render only the needed sections of it or perhaps just render the map in once. All I have discovered from researching the topic is that perhaps a good way to do it is buy using the Unity mesh class to turn the tilemap into a mesh. I could not figure out how to do this with a 2d tilemap, and I could not see how it would benefit the render time anyways, but if anyone could point me in the right direction for rendering large 2d tilemaps that would be fantastic. Thanks.
Tile system:
To make the tile map work I put every individual tile as a prefab in my prefab folder, with the attributes changed for 2d box colliders and scaled size. I attribute each individual prefab of the tile to a certain color on the RGB scale, and then import a png file that has the corresponding colors of the prefabs where I want them like this:
I then wrote a script which will place each prefab where its associated color is. It would look like this for one tile:
using System.Collections;
using System.Collections.Generic;
using UnityEngine;
public class Map : MonoBehaviour {
private int levelWidth;
private int levelHeight;
public Transform block13;
private Color[] tileColors;
public Color block13Color;
public Texture2D levelTexture;
public PlayerMobility playerMobility;
// Use this for initialization
void Start () {
levelWidth = levelTexture.width;
levelHeight = levelTexture.height;
loadLevel ();
}
// Update is called once per frame
void Update () {
}
void loadLevel(){
tileColors = new Color[levelWidth * levelHeight];
tileColors = levelTexture.GetPixels ();
for (int y = 0; y < levelHeight; y++) {
for (int x = 0; x < levelWidth; x++) {
// if (tileColors [x + y * levelWidth] == block13Color) {
// Instantiate(block13, new Vector3(x, y), Quaternion.identity);
// }
//
}
}
}
}
This results in a map that looks like this when used with all the code (I took out all the code for the other prefabs to save space)
You can instantiate tiles that are in range of the camera and destroy tiles that are not. There are several ways to do this. But first make sure that what's consuming your resources is in fact the large number of tiles, not something else.
One way is to create an empty parent gameObject to every tile (right click in "Hierarchy" > Create Empty"
then attach a script to this parent. This script has a reference to the camera (tell me if you need help with that) and calculates the distance between it and the camera and instantiates the tile if the distance is less than a value, otherwise destroys the instance (if it's there).
It has to do this in the Update function to check for the distances every frame, or you can use "Coroutines" to do less checks (more efficient).
Another way is to attach a script to the camera that has an array with instances of all tiles and checks on their distances from the camera the same way. You can do this if you only have exactly one large tilemap because it would be hard to re-use this script if you have more than a large tilemap.
Also you can calculate the distance between the tile and the character sprite instead of the camera. Pick whichever is more convenient.
After doing the above and you still get frame-drops you can zoom-in the camera to include less tiles in its range but you'd have to recalculate the distances then.
I'm new here!
I searched internet a lot for my question, but I didn't found anything - or I'm really thinking wrong.
I program on VB.NET since 2 years, and on XNA since 6 months. I built a game and an editor for the game, and they are running great.
The question i about my editor (for an RPG game), and I'll try to explain at my best.
I have a main form with menustrips on top and a big picturebox covering the entire form, a picbox that is binded to the Game1 object when it start with the command Run().
The Game1 object handles two classes, that are basically panels that it draws on the picbox of the main form: a tileset panel in the left down the tabpage, and a map panel on the right. This works perfectly.
The problem is when for the first time yesterday I tried to draw with XNA on a form. I have multiple forms to manage NPCs, equipment, conditions, events, variables, etc and in the event form, I have a tabpage that manages map teleport events. On this tabpage I have a list of maps and a picbox where I want to draw a small view of the selected map. For this, I created of course a minimap panel with it's own draw and update methods.
...but of course, the minimap appears on the main form on the normal map.
I tried to change in real time the DeviceWindowHandle, but I failed... apparently, it changes only during the Run()
I tried to create a new game object and binding him to the event teleport form, but in the moment of lunching the Run() of this object, the debugger stops saying that I cannot launch more that one game loop in a thread.
I can't believe that XNA doesn't let to draw multiple things on different forms... and I can not pause the main loop from the event form (which is called from the NPC form) to start the minimap loop!
I think that is something really easy that unfortunately I don't know...
I'm getting crazy and lost... what I can do?
Please help me, thanks!!
Here's an example of what I commented (Sorry it's in C# but I don't really write VB.Net. Translating it should be pretty straight forward though):
private MainGame mainGame;
private ToolboxGame toolbox1;
private ToolboxGame toolbox2;
// And this should be put in some Form Initialization method:
Task.Factory.StartNew(() => {
this.mainGame = new MainGame(imgEditorPictureBox.Handle)
this.mainGame.Run();
}
Task.Factory.StartNew(() => {
this.toolbox1 = new ToolboxGame(toolbox1PictureBox.Handle)
this.toolbox1.Run();
}
Task.Factory.StartNew(() => {
this.toolbox2 = new ToolboxGame(toolbox2PictureBox.Handle)
this.toolbox2.Run();
}
Something like that should do it. Obviously whenever you "move" variables from one "game" to another, keep in mind that they run on different threads, so anywhere you use it, you'll need to
lock (dummyObject)
{
// Use data
}
to make sure you're not accessing it in one game, while the other is trying to set it.
Locking in VB.Net: Is there a lock statement in VB.NET?
You'll obviously need to come up with some smart infrastructure to get this working smoothly, but since you've made a game and editor before, I'm sure this should not prove a humongous challenge.
All you want show to the player you need draw in the game window. You have one Game with one GraphicsDevice and by default all you draw will be rendered on the game window. But you can call GraphicsDevice.SetRenderTarget method to change render target. Call it with RenderTarget2D object as parameter and anithing you will draw after this will be rendered to that render target.
Next you need call GraphicsDevice.SetRenderTarget(null) to set game window as render target again.
There is my (uncompleted yet) custom GUI realization for XNA. I hope it can help you.
Update
class Game1 : Game
{
GraphicsDevice graphicsDevice;
SpriteBatch spriteBatch;
public RenderTarget2D MinimapRenderBuffer;
public RenderTarget2D AnotherRenderBuffer1;
public RenderTarget2D AnotherRenderBuffer2;
public EventHandler RenderBuffersUpdated;
void Initialize()
{
// Better initialize them only once, don't do it in Draw method
this.MinimapRenderBuffer = new RenderTarget2D(this.graphicsDevice, 100, 100); // any size you want
this.AnotherRenderBuffer1 = new RenderTarget2D(this.graphicsDevice, 50, 50);
this.AnotherRenderBuffer2 = new RenderTarget2D(this.graphicsDevice, 500, 500);
}
void Draw()
{
this.graphicsDevice.SetRenderTarget(this.MinimapRenderBuffer);
// draw minimap to MinimapRenderBuffer
this.graphicsDevice.SetRenderTarget(this.AnotherRenderBuffer1);
// draw whatewer to AnotherRenderBuffer1
this.graphicsDevice.SetRenderTarget(this.AnotherRenderBuffer2);
// draw whatewer to AnotherRenderBuffer2
this.graphicsDevice.SetRenderTarget(null);
// now draw to screen
if (this.RenderBuffersUpdated != null)
{
RenderBuffersUpdated(null, null);
}
}
}
And use rendertargets in your editor when event raised. And you can convert them to bitmaps.
I'm trying to use NAudio's FadeInOutSampleProvider to fade in a sample and fade it out. The fade in works OK, but instead of fading out gradually I get abrupt silence from where the fade-out should begin.
What's the correct way to fade out with FadeInOutSampleProvider?
Here's how I'm trying to do it:
IWaveProvider waveSource; // initialised by reading a WAV file
// The ISampleProvider will be the underlying source for the following operations
ISampleProvider sampleSource = waveSource.ToSampleProvider();
// Create a provider which defines the samples we want to fade in
// (including the full-volume "middle" of the final output)
ISampleProvider fadeInSource = new OffsetSampleProvider(sampleSource);
fadeInSource.TakeSamples = most_of_file; // calculation omitted for brevity
// Create a provider which defines the samples we want to fade out:
// We will play these samples when fadeInSource is finished
ISampleProvider fadeOutSource = new OffsetSampleProvider(sampleSource);
fadeOutSource.SkipOverSamples = fadeInSource.TakeSamples;
// Wrap the truncated sources in FadeInOutSampleProviders
var fadeIn = new FadeInOutSampleProvider(fadeInSource);
fadeIn.BeginFadeIn(500); // half-second fade
var fadeOut = new FadeInOutSampleProvider(fadeOutSource);
fadeOut.BeginFadeOut(500);
// doc-comments suggest the fade-out will begin "after first Read"
I'm expecting fadeOut to initially read non-zero samples from 500ms before the end of the original source, but fade out to zeros by the end of the source.
However, when I play fadeIn to completion, then play fadeOut, I find that the very first Read call to fadeOut fills the buffer with zeros.
Am I doing something wrong? Or is there a bug in NAudio?
Note: I'm handling the sequential playback using a ConcatenatingSampleProvider which I implemented myself — I can't anything similar in NAudio's API. It's pretty trivial, so I've omitted the source here.
The problem is you're trying to reuse sampleSource twice in your graph. So sampleSource has already been read to the end before anything is read from fadeOutSource. Probably for your usage, it would be better for FadeInOutSampleProvider to be able to "schedule" a fade-out after a known number of samples.
An alternative approach is a FadeOutSampleProvider that caches the fade-out duration, and then when it detects the end of its source has been reached, it returns the cached portion faded out. It does mean latency is introduced.
I made a game for Windows 8 in monogame but running into a problem. We finally got our hands on a Surface RT but we noticed that the loading times are really long on this device. We looked at several other games and noticed that this wasn't an uncommon issue. To fight the boredom of the user during the loading of the resources I want to draw a loading bar and some random facts onto the screen. The problem is that loading the resources blocks the rest of the game and doesn't allow me to draw anything because it stays stuck at the initializing part.
I searched for creating a lose Thread but found that Windows Store didn't support that so now my question to you how can I load my resources in the background or another way to not block the complete game and be able to call handle my Draw() function to draw a loading bar onto my screen.
I did something like this:
protected volatile bool ContentLoaded = false;
protected async override void LoadContent()
{
base.LoadContent();
Enabled = false;
await ThreadPool.RunAsync(new WorkItemHandler(LoadAllContent));
}
protected void LoadAllContent(Windows.Foundation.IAsyncAction action)
{
if (action.Status == Windows.Foundation.AsyncStatus.Error)
System.Diagnostics.Debug.WriteLine(action.ErrorCode);
// load your contents
ContentLoaded = true;
Enable = true;
}
And at the beginning of your Draw method:
if (!ContentLoaded)
{
// draw your loading screen
return;
}
If you want a progress bar you need a counter to increase every resource you've loaded, then in your Draw your bar has to relate to that counter.
Hey guys, I'm trying to make a 2D Platform style game similar to this game below:
http://www.gameshed.com/Puzzle-Games/Blockdude/play.html
I have finished making most of the graphic, and areas, and collision, but our character is still not able to carry things. I'm confused as to what code to use so that my character can carry the blocks. I need help as to how to make our character carry blocks that are in front of him, provided that the blocks that don't have anything on top of it. This has been confusing me for a week now, and any help would be highly appreciated. :D
I fondly remember my first AS2 game. The best approach is probably an object oriented approach, as I will explain.
In AS2, there is a hittest method automatically built into objects. There is a good tutorial on Kirupa here:
http://www.kirupa.com/developer/actionscript/hittest.htm
also
http://help.adobe.com/en_US/AS2LCR/Flash_10.0/help.html?content=00001314.html
First you'll want to generate your boxes using a Box class. Your class would need to look something like the following:
//Box.as pseudo-code
class Box {
var x_pos:Number;
var y_pos:Number;
var attachedToPlayer:Boolean;
function Box(_x:Number, _y:Number) {
this.x_pos = _x;
this.y_pos = _y;
}
//other code here
}
See this tutorial on how to attach a class to an object in the library:
http://www.articlesbase.com/videos/5min/86620312
To create a new Box, you'd then use something like
box1 = new Box(100,200);
// creates a box at position 100x,200y
However, you'll also want to store the blocks you want to pickup into some sort of array so you can loop through them. See http://www.tech-recipes.com/rx/1383/flash-actionscript-create-an-array-of-objects-from-a-unique-class/
Example:
//somewhere near the top of your main method, or whereever your main game loop is running from - note Box.as would need to be in the same folder
import Box;
//...then, somewhere before your game loop
//create an array to hold the objects
var boxArray:Array = new Array();
//create loop with i as the counter
for (var i=0; i<4; i++)
{
var _x:Number = 100 + i;
var _y:Number = 100 + i;
//create Box object
var box:Box = new Box();
//assign text to the first variable.
//push the object into the array
boxArray.push(box);
}
Similarly, you would need a class for your player, and to create a new Player object at the start of your game, e.g.
var player = new Player(0,0);
You could then run a hittest method for your player against the blocks in your array for the main game loop (i.e. the loop that updates your player's position and other game properties). There are probably more efficient ways of doing this, e.g. only looping for the blocks that are currently on the screen.
Once your array has been created, use a foreach loop to run a hittest against your player in your game's main loop, e.g.
//assuming you have an array called 'boxArray' and player object called 'player'
for(var box in boxArray){
if (player.hittest(box)) {
player.attachObjectMethod(box);
}
}
This is basically pseudo-code for "for every box that we have entered into the array, check if the player is touching the box. If the box is touching, use the box as the argument for a method in the player class (which I have arbitrarily called attachObjectMethod)".
In attachObjectMethod, you could then define some sort of behavior for attaching the box to the player. For example, you could create a get and set method(s) for the x and y position of your boxes inside the box class, along with a boolean called something useful like attachedToPlayer. When attachObjectMethod was called, it would set the box's boolean, e.g. in the Player class
//include Box.as at the top of the file
import Box;
//other methods, e.g. constructor
//somewhere is the Player.as class/file
public function attachObjectMethod (box:Box) {
box.setattachedToPlayer(true);
//you could also update fields on the player, but for now this is all we need
}
Now the attachedToPlayer boolean of the box the player has collided with would be true. Back in our game loop, we would then modify our loop to update the position of the boxes:
//assuming you have an array called 'boxArray' and player object called 'player'
for(var box in boxArray){
if (player.hittest(box)) {
player.attachObjectMethod(box);
}
box.updatePosition(player.get_Xpos, player.get_Ypos);
}
In our Box class, we now need to define 'updatePosition':
//Box.as pseudo-code
class Box {
var x_pos:Number;
var y_pos:Number;
var attachedToPlayer:Boolean;
function Box(box_x:Number, box_y:Number) {
this.x_pos = box_x;
this.y_pos = box_y;
}
public function updatePosition(_x:Number, _y:Number) {
if (this.attachedToPlayer) {
this.x_pos = _x;
this.y_pos = _y;
}
}
//other code here
}
As you can see we can pass the player's position, and update the box's position if the attachedToPlayer boolean has been set. Finally, we add a move method to the box:
public function move() {
if (this.attachedToPlayer) {
this._x = x_pos;
this._y = y_pos;
}
}
Examples of updating position:
http://www.swinburne.edu.au/design/tutorials/P-flash/T-How-to-smoothly-slide-objects-around-in-Flash/ID-17/
Finally, to make it all work we need to call the move method in the game loop:
//assuming you have an array called 'boxArray' and player object called 'player'
for(var box in boxArray){
if (player.hittest(box)) {
player.attachObjectMethod(box);
}
box.updatePosition(player.get_Xpos, player.get_Ypos);
box.move();
}
You have also specified that the blocks should only move with the player if they have nothing on top of them. When you call your attachedToPlayer method, you would also need to run a foreach loop inside the method between the box and the objects that might sit on top of the box. You should now have a fair idea from the above code how to do this.
I appreciate that this is quite a lengthy answer, and I haven't had an opportunity to test all the code (in fact I'm fairly positive I made a mistake somewhere) - don't hesitate to ask questions. My other advice is to understand the concepts thoroughly, and then write your own code one bit at a time.
Good luck!
The way I would do this is to design an individual hit test for each block he will be picking up, then code for the hit test to play a frame within the sprite's timeline of him carrying a block, and to play a frame within the block to be picked up's timeline of the block no longer at rest (disappeared?).
Good Luck if you're confused about what I've said just ask a little more about it and I'll try to help you if I can.