Table '' could not be loaded - sql

I was hoping someone out there may have experienced this before.
I have a database that (as far as I'm aware) is in perfect working order. I have no problems with it whatsoever. I'm trying to add a column to some of the tables but when I save the changes I get the following message
This error message is then stuck in a loop and the only thing I can do is kill the SQL Management Studio process.
The database exists, the table exists, I can run any query I want against it, I just can't make any changes to it.
The steps I'm taking are:
Right click table
Select "design"
Right click "add new column" in designer
Fill in the details as normal
Click Save
Anyone know how I can resolve this?
Thanks.

It's telling you that you haven't specified the name of the table. The name of the table should be between the two single quotes.
Without knowing how you're doing this it's hard to tell more, but the first two possibilities off the top of my head are:
If you're looping through tables in code to do something, you may be hitting a record with no table name.
If it's pure SQL, perhaps an error in your syntax

Related

Microsoft Access Table Shows Up Blank, But Query Correctly Pulls Data From Table

I am having an issue with my Microsoft Access database. One of my tables looks completely blank, but it has 11632 records listed in the bottom. Take a look at this screenshot. Though the table shows up blank, when I run the query it pulls the correct data from this table, so I know the data is there, it is just not appearing for some reason. I have tried on Access 2013 and 2016 on a different computer, and both have the same effect. I have also tried compacting and repairing, and also exporting the table but the file it exports to also appears blank, aside from the field names. Any ideas on what I could try?
Thanks!
Turn your import into a 2 step process (or more...). Write it raw into a scratch pad table. Then fire an append query, that has the appropriate criteria to result in only valid records going into the final table.
This isn't unusual at all given that some outside data sources may not have the controls to prevent bad records. Sometimes one must "wash" the data with several different query criteria/steps in order to filter out the bad guys.

How do I find a table in DataGrip

Using JetBrains' DataGrip 2017.3.4 I have it linked to a Sybase TSQL database. All I wish to do is find a table in it so that I can find the structure.
I have selected all nodes and opened them 3 times - once for the dbo, once for the tables and procedures and once for the list of tables and procedures - and can now select the top line and "simply type the table I am a looking for", or so I am told.
If looking for tb_AllSaints, this does not seem to be a problem. However, when looking for tb_ZZTop, the table tb_MaxZZTop keeps "helpfully" popping up first and there doesn't seems to be a way to find the "next" table in the list. If it is a particularly long list, scrolling through by hand is murder.
The alternative, Ctrl-N, will enable me to select data from any table but I cannot get the table structure at all.
Help...
There are two solutions.
When using Speed Search with tb_ZZTop, press Down arrow - it will navigate you to the next match. There are some issues there, not always works: https://youtrack.jetbrains.com/issue/DBE-5927
If in your case it also doesn't work, please, comment with the screenshot there.
When using Ctrl+N navigation (it can be handy if the tree is not expanded or you have no idea where your table is), click on DDL button in the data editor. There you will see the DDL, where structure information is stored.

SQL Server missing row after entry but using info like its still there

I am using SQL Server and for some reason when I added a record it does not show up in the database. It has skipped the number and has saved the information somewhere but I am unable to view it in the table. If I use the login and password everything still works. Why would this happen? Now that I add another record it has moved on to the next number but for some reason row 73 does not show but is stored. Can anyone tell me what causes this or why it may happen when it still is using all the information from what was entered correctly.
Since you find your row when searching by id it must be there.
In edit mode the table is not always displayed in order of the ids but by in order of insertion of rows. I experienced this problem myself just like you. Then I queried with "ORDER BY ID" and found everything in place.
Hope that helps anybody experiencing the same problem when using the GUI.

Error adding vfp table to existing

I copied a new version of a table into an existing vfp installation and when it then tries to access that table it comes up with a variable not found error. The old version and new version of the table appear to have the same structure. Why could this happen? Does the dbc need to be updated in some way if I copy a new version of the table in. The structure is the same, but the data in it is different.
I copied the table in in Windows Explorer.
If the DBC in the same folder as the table? If not, are they in the same relative position on the two different drives? If not, you'll get errors, though I wouldn't expect "Variable not found."
Did you bring along the FPT and CDX for the new file? Again, that's not the error I would expect, but failure to do so would cause problems.
Assuming all that is right, what's the actual line of code that's failing?
Was the table that you've copied in "freed" from it's previous DBC before copying? If not, as soon as you attempt to USE it in the new location then I believe VFP will try to locate the DBC that it belongs to.
If you believe the table structure to be identical then you might be better off leaving the existing one in place and just ZAPping it to clean it out then appending the records from the other copy... of course you might need to temporarily switch off any INSERT triggers or row-level validation if you've got anything clever happening therein such as updating a "last modified" field. AutoInc fields will also need to be handled with care too, but it doesn't sound like this is something you're expecting to do on a regular basis so shouldn't be too onerous as a one-off exercise.

SQL Server 2012 Intellisense issue

My problem is that Intellisense does not provide complete auto suggest for the columns that I have in my tables .
Here is an example:
As you can see on SSMS it does give me auto suggest for my tables, but does not for columns. I have read couple articles about solving some Intellisense issues, but nothing helped. Here is things I tried described in this article: http://www.mssqltips.com/sqlservertip/2591/troubleshooting-intellisense-in-sql-server-management-studio-2012/
Any suggestions would be greatly appreciated, thank you for your time!
IntelliSense can't predict which table you're going to select from, and will wait until you have at least one table in the FROM clause, and probably only until you specify an alias. before populating the columns in the case of a join or other multi-table query.
There's a good reason for this. Imagine if you have CustomerID or InvoiceID in 20 different tables in your database. Should it list this 20 times? Which one should you pick? Do you really want all the columns in your entire database in a drop-down list? In a lot of scenarios this will be a very long list. And not pretty either, in things like SharePoint, NAV Dynamics, etc.
If you're not happy with the way the native IntelliSense works, there are 3rd party tools that might do what you want, but I'm not sure what you want will actually help you work any better.
First, that's because at the time of the screenshot SSMS does not know from what object you are selecting. In other words, it cannot guess what columns you're interested in when there is not a from clause in your select statement. If you try to type in the columns in the following select statement...
select from dbo.Invoices
you will see that SSMS will start to pick up your columns because you have already specified a from clause, so SSMS knows how to suggest you column names...because there is a table specified in the from clause
This is mainly occurs when you add any table in the Database OR Add any Column in the Table.
This is the known issue of the SQL Server 2012. You need to refresh the Cache for that.
You can achieve using 2 ways..
1) You can Refresh the Local Cache of the IntelliSense.
Open New Query window and Navigate to following menu.
Edit > IntelliSense > Refresh Local Cache
Shortcut key for this is (Ctrl + Shift + R)
2) ReConnect Your Database.