I am a newbie to Automated Testing using WebDriver, so I have a few questions just to clear some things in my head. On a few pages, I saw the samples of executing WebDriver tests on different platforms by just targeting these for the capabilities of the browser or OS.
capability= DesiredCapabilities.firefox();
capability.setBrowserName("firefox");
capability.setPlatform(org.openqa.selenium.Platform.ANY);
or
capability= DesiredCapabilities.internetExplorer();
capability.setBrowserName("iexplore");
capability.setPlatform(org.openqa.selenium.Platform.WINDOWS);
As mentioned in:
Executing tests Concurrently on different OS and Browsers with WebDriver using Java and TestNG
So, if I understand that correctly, actually it is possible to run tests and verify those on the different OS and Browsers just by using the libraries provided by the Selenium?
If so, how accurate are these tests for typical cross browser/platform html/JavaScript issues?
Thank you
This is a great question. I'm going to try to break this down into smaller packets of information so that it hopefully makes sense for old pros and newbies alike.
Without Selenium Grid:
For starters, it is possible to use individual drivers for all the different browser/OS combinations you wish to run the tests on. The drawback is you have to make some (though usually minimal) code adjustments for each browser's driver. This also means breaking the DRY principle. To learn more about writing these kinds of tests check out this documentation. (Also note that if you wanted to run these tests on each build via CI on something like Jenkins you need to have the actual browsers running on a slave on your own hardware, but these are more the DevOps concerns.)
Using Selenium Grid:
More commonly used for the sort of goals you mentioned (and referenced in the other post you linked to), Selenium Grid is a server that allows multiple instances of tests to run in different web browsers on remote machines. The more intro oriented docs for this are here and more forward looking docs are here.
Running Local or in the Cloud:
With Selenium Grid you are going to go one of two ways.
Run on your own hardware locally (or wherever your company has machines to remote into)
Use an online service like Sauce Labs or Testing Bot
A nice "what this might look like in Java" for having an online service provide the browsers is shown in this Sauce Labs page and for Testing Bot here.
Selenium Can be Written in a Ton of Languages:
Selenium follows the WebDriver API and for C#, Java, Perl, PHP, Python, Ruby, JavaScript (Node) or other languages, you still can write test scripts in any of these (and they provide the “frameworks” for some of these officially, while others are community driven) and still have the run tests run solidly in all modern browsers.
Concerning Mobile Devices
There is some good discussion over here that discusses how "close to the real thing" you want your mobile browser tests to be, since the iPhoneDriver and AndroidDriver are largely based on use through WebView, which is less close to the real thing. They are now finding themselves being replaced by ios-driver, Selendroid, and Appium.
To Sum It Up
So to answer what I think you’re getting at with,
... is possible to run tests and verify those on the different OS and Browsers just
by using the libraries provided by the Selenium
the answer is that you can use Selenium Grid and an online service or you will have to use base Selenium/Selenium Server along with a number of other libraries to test all modern browser and OS combinations, but I'm sure many shops do just that because they have the experience and expertise to pull it off.
Alternate (Non-Selenium) Option to Write Once and Test Across Browsers:
If you have a team with JavaScript experience and you're looking to hit the same goal of testing across browsers without the overhead of Selenium, Automates JavaScript Unit Testing
with Sauce Labs (formerly Browser Swarm) would be a good option.
Related
I am getting ready to start a new automation project and have done some reading on Cypress as a Selenium alternative. Given that Cypress apparently runs directly in the browser as opposed to Selenium's approach, is it difficult to perform test steps with Cypress tests that fall outside the browser such as communicating with a data store, interacting with services and interacting with product infrastructure such as remote file systems? With my limited exposure to Cypress, I have only seen browser tests so I was hoping someone could shed some light on this.
When it comes to automated testing for web applications, there are two main contenders: Selenium and Cypress. Both have their pros and cons, but which one is the best?
Selenium has been around for much longer than Cypress and is therefore more widely used. It is also more flexible, allowing for tests to be written in a variety of programming languages. However, Selenium can be slow and unreliable, and it is not as easy to use as Cypress.
Cypress, on the other hand, is a newer tool that is gaining popularity due to its simplicity and reliability. Cypress tests are written in JavaScript, making it easier for front-end developers to get started with automated testing. Cypress is also faster than Selenium and can run tests in parallel, making it more efficient.
So, which one should you use? It depends on your needs. If you need a more flexible tool that can be used with different programming languages, Selenium is a good choice. However, if you want a tool that is easier to use and more reliable, Cypress is the better option.
If you need access to things outside the browser, I would go with selenium. This is what I currently do, I have a webdriver wrapper which has "plugins" loaded so that I can make db statements, query the webserver and additionally issue selenium commands to the browser.
If you're looking for just test 100% within the browser, then cypress may be the way to go.
Alternatively, you could use selenium for workflow tests and cypress or even qunitjs for intra-browser unit tests.
In the app I work on, I actually ship a page which contains a qunit page with all of the in-browser tests. Then in a selenium test, in addition to the rest of the workflow, I browser to the qunit page and report on their status as well.
Closed. This question does not meet Stack Overflow guidelines. It is not currently accepting answers.
We don’t allow questions seeking recommendations for books, tools, software libraries, and more. You can edit the question so it can be answered with facts and citations.
Closed 3 years ago.
Improve this question
I am trying to understand testing framework better and been looking into Selenium. I've used HTMLUnit before, mainly when I needed to scrape some information off website or the likes.
In the context of writing test automation, what's the advantage / disadvantages of Selenium vs HTMLUnit? Looks to me Selenium is more complicated to set up than HTMLUnit, although at the same time there's a HTMLUnitDriver for Selenium which I think behave the exact same way as in HTMLUnit itself?
Selenium obviously provides more robust framework, it has the Selenium RC for pararel testing, it also has different browser drivers that can be used - although when you used the browser drivers, the test will actually open/close a browser application rather than headless.
May be I am not understanding Selenium correctly. Some directions and pointers would be great!
On another note - a separate question - I am also looking at doing automated testing on mobile browser, I see that Selenium has an IPhoneDriver for it, but then this is not a headless testing either as it requires actual iOS simulator.
Is there anyway to do headless testing on mobile sites? Would changing user-agent be sufficient? I've seen a couple posts around changing user-agent that seem to have their own challenges, eg. Set user-agent in Selenium RC
Thanks a lot!
well, would try to explain differences in detail.
Speaking about parallel testing, it better to use selenium grid.
Basic concept of selenium RC and selenium grid.
You can get into more details here
Some words about selenium webDriver:
The primary new feature in Selenium 2.0 is the integration of the WebDriver API. WebDriver is designed to providing an simpler, more concise programming interface along with addressing some limitations in the Selenium-RC API. Selenium-WebDriver was developed to better support dynamic web pages where elements of a page may change without the page itself being reloaded. WebDriver’s goal is to supply a well-designed object-oriented API that provides improved support for modern advanced web-app testing problems.
How Does WebDriver ‘Drive’ the Browser Compared to Selenium-RC?
Selenium-WebDriver makes direct calls to the browser using each browser’s native support for automation. How these direct calls are made, and the features they support depends on the browser you are using. Information on each ‘browser driver’ is provided later in this chapter.
For those familiar with Selenium-RC, this is quite different from what you are used to. Selenium-RC worked the same way for each supported browser. It ‘injected’ javascript functions into the browser when the browser was loaded and then used its javascript to drive the AUT within the browser. WebDriver does not use this technique. Again, it drives the browser directly using the browser’s built in support for automation.
WebDriver and the Selenium-Server
You may, or may not, need the Selenium Server, depending on how you intend to use Selenium-WebDriver. If you will be only using the WebDriver API you do not need the Selenium-Server. If your browser and tests will all run on the same machine, and your tests only use the WebDriver API, then you do not need to run the Selenium-Server; WebDriver will run the browser directly.
There are some reasons though to use the Selenium-Server with Selenium-WebDriver.
You are using Selenium-Grid to distribute your tests over multiple
machines or virtual machines (VMs).
You want to connect to a remote machine that has a particular browser
version that is not on your current machine.
You are not using the Java bindings (i.e. Python, C#, or Ruby) and
would like to use HtmlUnit Driver
Selenium-WebDriver’s Drivers
WebDriver is the name of the key interface against which tests should be written, but there are several implementations. These include:
HtmlUnit Driver
This is currently the fastest and most lightweight implementation of WebDriver. As the name suggests, this is based on HtmlUnit. HtmlUnit is a java based implementation of a WebBrowser without a GUI. For any language binding (other than java) the Selenium Server is required to use this driver.
Pros
Fastest implementation of WebDriver
A pure Java solution and so it is platform independent.
Supports JavaScript
Cons
Emulates other browsers’ JavaScript behaviour (see below)
JavaScript in the HtmlUnit Driver
None of the popular browsers uses the JavaScript engine used by HtmlUnit (Rhino). If you test JavaScript using HtmlUnit the results may differ significantly from those browsers.
When we say “JavaScript” we actually mean “JavaScript and the DOM”. Although the DOM is defined by the W3C each browser has its own quirks and differences in their implementation of the DOM and in how JavaScript interacts with it. HtmlUnit has an impressively complete implementation of the DOM and has good support for using JavaScript, but it is no different from any other browser: it has its own quirks and differences from both the W3C standard and the DOM implementations of the major browsers, despite its ability to mimic other browsers.
With WebDriver, we had to make a choice; do we enable HtmlUnit’s JavaScript capabilities and run the risk of teams running into problems that only manifest themselves there, or do we leave JavaScript disabled, knowing that there are more and more sites that rely on JavaScript? We took the conservative approach, and by default have disabled support when we use HtmlUnit. With each release of both WebDriver and HtmlUnit, we reassess this decision: we hope to enable JavaScript by default on the HtmlUnit at some point.
To investigate deeper into webDriver's setUp see this
From HtmlUnit documentation:
HtmlUnit is not a generic unit testing framework. It is specifically a way to simulate a browser for testing purposes and is intended to be used within another testing framework such as JUnit or TestNG.
So to conclude Selenium and HtmlUnit difference:
HtmlUnit is a java based implementation of a WebBrowser without a GUI and a way to simulate a browser for testing purposes and Selenium-WebDriver makes direct calls to the browser using each browser’s native support for automation. we can see that HtmlUnit provides API without GUI possibility for automation whereas WebDriver provides internal browsers' possibilities for automation.
Speaking about mobile automation,
Selenium also has an iPhone Driver
iPhone Driver wiki article
and Android Driver
Android Driver wiki article
See also this presentation
Unfortunately I can not give you my working experience evaluation of mobile drivers as I deal with web automation (no mobile). Also know that Cucumber (automation tool) is popular among mobile automators.
see this and this.
Hope it come a lil bit more clear for you now =)
Selenium and HTMLUnit are somewhat similar in concept, but Selenium is more mature/robust and has a lot more features.
Note that Selenium encompasses the recording (IDE) plugin for Firefox, which allows you to record tests and the RC/WebDriver automation framework which essentially drives a browser. The two can be used together to make test creation very easy.
The only advantage I could see to using HTMLUnit is that it is less resource intensive, so you could potentially run tests on less hardware, but with Selenium's parallel support even that isn't really true anymore.
When running tests from Jenkins overnight, you typically have no access to a windowing system such as X11 or Windows in which to run the web browser. I therefore see a benefit of using the HTMLUnit web driver in that case since it doesn't require access to a windowing system.
In my experience, HtmlUnit does a fine job with browsing automation, but might get a bit buggy when dealing with Javascript. I actually came to a case in which I wasn't able to automate an image download with HtmlUnit, and had to turn to Selenium, which performed beyond my expectations. The case is actually registered in an SO thread.
I have used Selenium WebDriver for automation.
There is a very easy method to causing the browser to be headless.
Simply apply ChromeOptions (In my case, other DriverOptions are available)
ChromeOptions("Headless")
There are many proficient methods that can come from using Options or Services, as another example
This will stop the Driver/CommandPrompt window from 'appearing' so it will remain 'silent' and unexposed.
ChromeDriverServices ("Silent")
At least at UX systems you can use for example Xvfb and point the browsers to that display to make them "headless"
See also http://infiniteundo.com/post/54014422873/headless-selenium-testing-with-firefox-and-xvfb
or How do I run Selenium in Xvfb?
Over 2 years I tested web application with help Selenium framework. I know the best design is testing on VM.
The only one downside of this - it's very slow testing. Why?
browser only gets so much memory, if you will run several instances.
site coud be very slow.
connections can be very slow.
Would be great if there was a framework that emulated the browser (engine/core) correctly and can provide some results (api) for surf on the page.
I don't mean to simulate just on the one browser with different version (like IE). I mean to simulate for all browsers with very popular and newest version.
Does anyone know a framework/tool that can do it?
Thank you.
You can try PhantomJS for example.
From their page:
PhantomJS is a headless WebKit with JavaScript API. It has fast and
native support for various web standards: DOM handling, CSS selector,
JSON, Canvas, and SVG.
You can use it in combination with Jasmine (as well as several other frameworks) for testing.
However the selection of available engines is limited to WebKit. I doubt that Selenium will be easy to replace. By the way it looks like Selenium will probably become a W3C standard over the next years.
You can also run Selenium with Xvfb - I use it to execute test on remote server and it is going very well.
What's the pro's and cons for both and why should I use either of them for functional testing?
Regards,
Jonas
Selenium is for integration testing, It will test how your web application behaves in an actual browser. This can find things that HTTPUnit cannot, e.g. browser compatibility of css and JavaScript.
HTTPUnit tests web applications by directly calling the web service and manipulating the response. This is a functional test framework as it tests what your web app does, not how it behaves across different platforms.
One advantage of HTTPUnit is that it is much quicker than Selenium. Personally I would (and do) use both. HTTPUnit for complete functional testing and Selenium for selective (not complete) integration testing to check browser compatibility.
HttpUnit is very simple, extremely easy to use, and requires very little to get up and running. It's a good place to start for simple tests, however it will require more coding to create complex tests.
Selenium is more than just a library, like HttpUnit. It equips you better for more advanced, stateful tests.
Selenium will use your browser to automate tests
- Selenium http://seleniumhq.org/
httpunit goes from the html specification and simulates a standards conformant browser
- httpunit http://httpunit.sourceforge.net/
Selenium is more specific and will let you use browser specific behaviour and not limit the application under test.
With httpunit the limits are set by what httpunit supports which is far less than most browser do. E.g. the javascript capabilities are reduced to a very small set. On the other hand if your app passes httpunit tests it will probably run on quite a few browsers and environments.
So if you are interested in supporting a mininimal common set of features httpunit might be for you.
I have been looking around stackoverflow for automated GUI tools for testing our web app gui from a Business analyst point of view, so that means strictly requirements-record-playback kind of testing since we are not really programmers.
We have used selenium in the past but unfortunately it is no longer compatible with Firefox 4.
Is there a similar tool to selenium that allows recording and playback of GUI tests that does not require a lot or any scripting on a windows platform? thanks
You can use the FireFox add on compatibility reporter to get Selenium working on FF4
https://addons.mozilla.org/en-US/firefox/addon/add-on-compatibility-reporter/
Or alternatively drop down to FireFox 3.x and use that just for your testing!
For the server component Selenium-RC (necessary to execute tests), You must run Selenium-RC 2.0b3 (or higher if it become) to be compatible with Firefox 4. I have used it succesfully with FF4.
Selenium IDE, the recording tool, for firefox is indeed not available as a plugin for FF4 (but I speculate it will be coming soon).
I think that you can benefit from AutoIt (http://www.autoitscript.com/site/autoit/) I`d been using it to test Windows based GUI, but to the best of knowledge there are lot of scripts to test/play on-line games, thus it is applicable to Web Sites.
It does not require deep technical knowledge, but of course it will be much better and frequently mandatory to optimize the generated code. I`ve started my experience with this tool, and I was doing my work flawlessly.
At one company, I was developing automated tests for web app by means of TestPartner (Compuware company) it was one of the best tools Ive ever worked with, it generates VB code quite 'intelligently' and supports user with administration features. But Im not sure whether it is possible to use it without paying.
Good luck !