How to use parameters with RPostgreSQL (to insert data) - sql

I'm trying to insert data into a pre-existing PostgreSQL table using RPostgreSQL and I can't figure out the syntax for SQL parameters (prepared statements).
E.g. suppose I want to do the following
insert into mytable (a,b,c) values ($1,$2,$3)
How do I specify the parameters? dbSendQuery doesn't seem to understand if you just put the parameters in the ....
I've found dbWriteTable can be used to dump an entire table, but won't let you specify the columns (so no good for defaults etc.). And anyway, I'll need to know this for other queries once I get the data in there (so I suppose this isn't really insert specific)!
Sure I'm just missing something obvious...

I was looking for the same thing, for the same reasons, which is security.
Apparently dplyr package has the capacity that you are interested in. It's barely documented, but it's there. Scroll down to "Postgresql" in this vignette: http://cran.r-project.org/web/packages/dplyr/vignettes/databases.html
To summarize, dplyr offers functions sql() and escape(), which can be combined to produce a parametrized query. SQL() function from DBI package seems to work in exactly same way.
> sql(paste0('SELECT * FROM blaah WHERE id = ', escape('random "\'stuff')))
<SQL> SELECT * FROM blaah WHERE id = 'random "''stuff'
It returns an object of classes "sql" and "character", so you can either pass it on to tbl() or possibly dbSendQuery() as well.
The escape() function correctly handles vectors as well, which I find most useful:
> sql(paste0('SELECT * FROM blaah WHERE id in ', escape(1:5)))
<SQL> SELECT * FROM blaah WHERE id in (1, 2, 3, 4, 5)
Same naturally works with variables as well:
> tmp <- c("asd", 2, date())
> sql(paste0('SELECT * FROM blaah WHERE id in ', escape(tmp)))
<SQL> SELECT * FROM blaah WHERE id in ('asd', '2', 'Tue Nov 18 15:19:08 2014')
I feel much safer now putting together queries.

As of the latest RPostgreSQL it should work:
db_connection <- dbConnect(dbDriver("PostgreSQL"), dbname = database_name,
host = "localhost", port = database_port, password=database_user_password,
user = database_user)
qry = "insert into mytable (a,b,c) values ($1,$2,$3)"
dbSendQuery(db_connection, qry, c(1, "some string", "some string with | ' "))

Here's a version using the DBI and RPostgres packages, and inserting multiple rows at once, since all these years later it's still very difficult to figure out from the documentation.
x <- data.frame(
a = c(1:10),
b = letters[1:10],
c = letters[11:20]
)
# insert your own connection info
con <- DBI::dbConnect(
RPostgres::Postgres(),
dbname = '',
host = '',
port = 5432,
user = '',
password = ''
)
RPostgres::dbSendQuery(
con,
"INSERT INTO mytable (a,b,c) VALUES ($1,$2,$3);",
list(
x$a,
x$b,
x$c
)
)
The help for dbBind() in the DBI package is the only place that explains how to format parameters:
The placeholder format is currently not specified by DBI; in the
future, a uniform placeholder syntax may be supported. Consult the
backend documentation for the supported formats.... Known examples are:
? (positional matching in order of appearance) in RMySQL and RSQLite
$1 (positional matching by index) in RPostgres and RSQLite
:name and $name (named matching) in RSQLite
? is also the placeholder for R package RJDBC.

Related

R: Summary of SQL Tables

I am working with the R programming language.
Normally, when I want to get the summary of a table, I can use something like the "str()" function or the "summary()" function:
str(my_table)
summary(my_table)
However, now I am trying to do this with tables on a server.
For instance, I am trying to get the summaries of variable types for a specific table (e.g. "my_table") on a server. I found a very indirect way to do this:
#load libraries
library(OBDC)
library(RODBC)
library(dbi)
#establish a connection and name it as "dbhandle"
rs <- dbSendQuery(dbhandle, 'select * from my_table limit 1')
dbColumnInfo(rs)
My Question: Is there a more "direct" way to do this? For example, can I get information about each column (e.g. whether the column is integer, character, date, etc.) in a table without first sending the query and then requesting the information? Can I do this directly?
Thanks!
You could try using fetch() from "RMySQL" to turn your SQL query into an R object (e.g. data frame)
library(RMySQL)
rs <- dbSendQuery(dbhandle, 'select * from my_table limit 1')
# Get the results from MySQL into R
my_table = fetch(rs, n=-1)
# clear result
dbClearResult(rs)
rm(rs)
Then use the functions you describe.
str(my_table)
summary(my_table)

Writing dataframe to Postgres database psycopg2

I am trying to write a pandas DataFrame to a Postgres database.
Code is as below:
dbConnection = psycopg2.connect(user = "user1", password = "user1", host = "localhost", port = "5432", database = "postgres")
dbConnection.set_isolation_level(0)
dbCursor = dbConnection.cursor()
dbCursor.execute("DROP DATABASE IF EXISTS FiguresUSA")
dbCursor.execute("CREATE DATABASE FiguresUSA")
dbCursor.execute("DROP TABLE IF EXISTS FiguresUSAByState")
dbCursor.execute("CREATE TABLE FiguresUSAByState(Index integer PRIMARY KEY, Province_State VARCHAR(50), NumberByState integer)");
for i in data_pandas.index:
query = """
INSERT into FiguresUSAByState(column1, column2, column3) values('%s',%s,%i);
""" % (data_pandas['Index'], data_pandas['Province_State'], data_pandas['NumberByState'])
dbCursor.execute(query)
When I run this, I get an error which just says : "Index". I know its somewhere in my for loop is the problem, is that % notation correct? I am new to Postgres and don't see how that could be correct syntax. I know I can use to_sql but I am trying to use different techniques.
Print out of data_pandas is as below:
One slight possible anomaly is that there an "index" in the IDE version. Could this be the problem?
If you use pd.DataFrame.to_sql, you can supply the index_label parameter to use that as a column.
data_pandas.to_sql('FiguresUSAByState', con=dbConnection, index_label='Index')
If you would prefer to stick with the custom SQL and for loop you have, you will need to reset_index first.
for row in data_pandas.reset_index().to_dict('rows'):
query = """
INSERT into FiguresUSAByState(index, Province_State, NumberByState) values(%i, '%s', %i);
""" % (row['index'], row['Province_State'], row['NumberByState'])
Note that the default name for the new column is index, uncapitalized, rather than Index.
In the insert statement:
query = """
        INSERT into FiguresUSAByState (column1, column2, column3) values ​​('%s',%s,%i);
        """% (data_pandas ['Index'], data_pandas ['Province_State'], data_pandas ['NumberByState'])
You have a '%s', I think that is the problem. So remove the quotes

R equivalent of SQL update statement

I use the below statement to update to the postgreSQL db using the following statement
update users
set col1='setup',
col2= 232
where username='rod';
Can anyone guide how to do similar to using R ?I am not good in R
Thanks in advance for the help
Since you didn't provide any data, I've created some here.
users <- data.frame(username = c('rod','stewart','happy'), col1 = c(NA_character_,'do','run'), col2 = c(111,23,145), stringsAsFactors = FALSE)
To update using base R:
users[users$username == 'rod', c('col1','col2')] <- c('setup', 232)
If you prefer the more explicit syntax provided by the data.table package, you would execute:
library(data.table)
setDT(users)
users[username == 'rod', `:=`(col1 = 'setup', col2 = 232)]
To update your database through RPostgreSQL, you will first need to create Database Connection, and then simply store your query in a string, e.g.
con <- dbConnect('PostgreSQL', dbname = <your database name>, user=<user>, password= <password>)
statement <- "update <schema>.users set col1='setup', col2= 232 where username='rod';"
dbGetQuery(con, statement)
dbDisconnect()
Note depending upon your PostgreSQL configs, you may need to also set your search path dbGetQuery(con, 'set search_path = <schema>;')
I'm more familiar with RPostgres, so you may want to double check the syntax and vignettes of the PostgreSQL package.
EDIT: Seems like RPostgreSQL prefers dbGetQuery to send updates and commands rather than dbSendQuery

Postgres : Unable to pass the list of ids in IN clause in JDBC [duplicate]

What are the best workarounds for using a SQL IN clause with instances of java.sql.PreparedStatement, which is not supported for multiple values due to SQL injection attack security issues: One ? placeholder represents one value, rather than a list of values.
Consider the following SQL statement:
SELECT my_column FROM my_table where search_column IN (?)
Using preparedStatement.setString( 1, "'A', 'B', 'C'" ); is essentially a non-working attempt at a workaround of the reasons for using ? in the first place.
What workarounds are available?
An analysis of the various options available, and the pros and cons of each is available in Jeanne Boyarsky's Batching Select Statements in JDBC entry on JavaRanch Journal.
The suggested options are:
Prepare SELECT my_column FROM my_table WHERE search_column = ?, execute it for each value and UNION the results client-side. Requires only one prepared statement. Slow and painful.
Prepare SELECT my_column FROM my_table WHERE search_column IN (?,?,?) and execute it. Requires one prepared statement per size-of-IN-list. Fast and obvious.
Prepare SELECT my_column FROM my_table WHERE search_column = ? ; SELECT my_column FROM my_table WHERE search_column = ? ; ... and execute it. [Or use UNION ALL in place of those semicolons. --ed] Requires one prepared statement per size-of-IN-list. Stupidly slow, strictly worse than WHERE search_column IN (?,?,?), so I don't know why the blogger even suggested it.
Use a stored procedure to construct the result set.
Prepare N different size-of-IN-list queries; say, with 2, 10, and 50 values. To search for an IN-list with 6 different values, populate the size-10 query so that it looks like SELECT my_column FROM my_table WHERE search_column IN (1,2,3,4,5,6,6,6,6,6). Any decent server will optimize out the duplicate values before running the query.
None of these options are ideal.
The best option if you are using JDBC4 and a server that supports x = ANY(y), is to use PreparedStatement.setArray as described in Boris's anwser.
There doesn't seem to be any way to make setArray work with IN-lists, though.
Sometimes SQL statements are loaded at runtime (e.g., from a properties file) but require a variable number of parameters. In such cases, first define the query:
query=SELECT * FROM table t WHERE t.column IN (?)
Next, load the query. Then determine the number of parameters prior to running it. Once the parameter count is known, run:
sql = any( sql, count );
For example:
/**
* Converts a SQL statement containing exactly one IN clause to an IN clause
* using multiple comma-delimited parameters.
*
* #param sql The SQL statement string with one IN clause.
* #param params The number of parameters the SQL statement requires.
* #return The SQL statement with (?) replaced with multiple parameter
* placeholders.
*/
public static String any(String sql, final int params) {
// Create a comma-delimited list based on the number of parameters.
final StringBuilder sb = new StringBuilder(
String.join(", ", Collections.nCopies(possibleValue.size(), "?")));
// For more than 1 parameter, replace the single parameter with
// multiple parameter placeholders.
if (sb.length() > 1) {
sql = sql.replace("(?)", "(" + sb + ")");
}
// Return the modified comma-delimited list of parameters.
return sql;
}
For certain databases where passing an array via the JDBC 4 specification is unsupported, this method can facilitate transforming the slow = ? into the faster IN (?) clause condition, which can then be expanded by calling the any method.
Solution for PostgreSQL:
final PreparedStatement statement = connection.prepareStatement(
"SELECT my_column FROM my_table where search_column = ANY (?)"
);
final String[] values = getValues();
statement.setArray(1, connection.createArrayOf("text", values));
try (ResultSet rs = statement.executeQuery()) {
while(rs.next()) {
// do some...
}
}
or
final PreparedStatement statement = connection.prepareStatement(
"SELECT my_column FROM my_table " +
"where search_column IN (SELECT * FROM unnest(?))"
);
final String[] values = getValues();
statement.setArray(1, connection.createArrayOf("text", values));
try (ResultSet rs = statement.executeQuery()) {
while(rs.next()) {
// do some...
}
}
No simple way AFAIK.
If the target is to keep statement cache ratio high (i.e to not create a statement per every parameter count), you may do the following:
create a statement with a few (e.g. 10) parameters:
... WHERE A IN (?,?,?,?,?,?,?,?,?,?) ...
Bind all actuall parameters
setString(1,"foo");
setString(2,"bar");
Bind the rest as NULL
setNull(3,Types.VARCHAR)
...
setNull(10,Types.VARCHAR)
NULL never matches anything, so it gets optimized out by the SQL plan builder.
The logic is easy to automate when you pass a List into a DAO function:
while( i < param.size() ) {
ps.setString(i+1,param.get(i));
i++;
}
while( i < MAX_PARAMS ) {
ps.setNull(i+1,Types.VARCHAR);
i++;
}
You can use Collections.nCopies to generate a collection of placeholders and join them using String.join:
List<String> params = getParams();
String placeHolders = String.join(",", Collections.nCopies(params.size(), "?"));
String sql = "select * from your_table where some_column in (" + placeHolders + ")";
try ( Connection connection = getConnection();
PreparedStatement ps = connection.prepareStatement(sql)) {
int i = 1;
for (String param : params) {
ps.setString(i++, param);
}
/*
* Execute query/do stuff
*/
}
An unpleasant work-around, but certainly feasible is to use a nested query. Create a temporary table MYVALUES with a column in it. Insert your list of values into the MYVALUES table. Then execute
select my_column from my_table where search_column in ( SELECT value FROM MYVALUES )
Ugly, but a viable alternative if your list of values is very large.
This technique has the added advantage of potentially better query plans from the optimizer (check a page for multiple values, tablescan only once instead once per value, etc) may save on overhead if your database doesn't cache prepared statements. Your "INSERTS" would need to be done in batch and the MYVALUES table may need to be tweaked to have minimal locking or other high-overhead protections.
Limitations of the in() operator is the root of all evil.
It works for trivial cases, and you can extend it with "automatic generation of the prepared statement" however it is always having its limits.
if you're creating a statement with variable number of parameters, that will make an sql parse overhead at each call
on many platforms, the number of parameters of in() operator are limited
on all platforms, total SQL text size is limited, making impossible for sending down 2000 placeholders for the in params
sending down bind variables of 1000-10k is not possible, as the JDBC driver is having its limitations
The in() approach can be good enough for some cases, but not rocket proof :)
The rocket-proof solution is to pass the arbitrary number of parameters in a separate call (by passing a clob of params, for example), and then have a view (or any other way) to represent them in SQL and use in your where criteria.
A brute-force variant is here http://tkyte.blogspot.hu/2006/06/varying-in-lists.html
However if you can use PL/SQL, this mess can become pretty neat.
function getCustomers(in_customerIdList clob) return sys_refcursor is
begin
aux_in_list.parse(in_customerIdList);
open res for
select *
from customer c,
in_list v
where c.customer_id=v.token;
return res;
end;
Then you can pass arbitrary number of comma separated customer ids in the parameter, and:
will get no parse delay, as the SQL for select is stable
no pipelined functions complexity - it is just one query
the SQL is using a simple join, instead of an IN operator, which is quite fast
after all, it is a good rule of thumb of not hitting the database with any plain select or DML, since it is Oracle, which offers lightyears of more than MySQL or similar simple database engines. PL/SQL allows you to hide the storage model from your application domain model in an effective way.
The trick here is:
we need a call which accepts the long string, and store somewhere where the db session can access to it (e.g. simple package variable, or dbms_session.set_context)
then we need a view which can parse this to rows
and then you have a view which contains the ids you're querying, so all you need is a simple join to the table queried.
The view looks like:
create or replace view in_list
as
select
trim( substr (txt,
instr (txt, ',', 1, level ) + 1,
instr (txt, ',', 1, level+1)
- instr (txt, ',', 1, level) -1 ) ) as token
from (select ','||aux_in_list.getpayload||',' txt from dual)
connect by level <= length(aux_in_list.getpayload)-length(replace(aux_in_list.getpayload,',',''))+1
where aux_in_list.getpayload refers to the original input string.
A possible approach would be to pass pl/sql arrays (supported by Oracle only), however you can't use those in pure SQL, therefore a conversion step is always needed. The conversion can not be done in SQL, so after all, passing a clob with all parameters in string and converting it witin a view is the most efficient solution.
Here's how I solved it in my own application. Ideally, you should use a StringBuilder instead of using + for Strings.
String inParenthesis = "(?";
for(int i = 1;i < myList.size();i++) {
inParenthesis += ", ?";
}
inParenthesis += ")";
try(PreparedStatement statement = SQLite.connection.prepareStatement(
String.format("UPDATE table SET value='WINNER' WHERE startTime=? AND name=? AND traderIdx=? AND someValue IN %s", inParenthesis))) {
int x = 1;
statement.setLong(x++, race.startTime);
statement.setString(x++, race.name);
statement.setInt(x++, traderIdx);
for(String str : race.betFair.winners) {
statement.setString(x++, str);
}
int effected = statement.executeUpdate();
}
Using a variable like x above instead of concrete numbers helps a lot if you decide to change the query at a later time.
I've never tried it, but would .setArray() do what you're looking for?
Update: Evidently not. setArray only seems to work with a java.sql.Array that comes from an ARRAY column that you've retrieved from a previous query, or a subquery with an ARRAY column.
My workaround is:
create or replace type split_tbl as table of varchar(32767);
/
create or replace function split
(
p_list varchar2,
p_del varchar2 := ','
) return split_tbl pipelined
is
l_idx pls_integer;
l_list varchar2(32767) := p_list;
l_value varchar2(32767);
begin
loop
l_idx := instr(l_list,p_del);
if l_idx > 0 then
pipe row(substr(l_list,1,l_idx-1));
l_list := substr(l_list,l_idx+length(p_del));
else
pipe row(l_list);
exit;
end if;
end loop;
return;
end split;
/
Now you can use one variable to obtain some values in a table:
select * from table(split('one,two,three'))
one
two
three
select * from TABLE1 where COL1 in (select * from table(split('value1,value2')))
value1 AAA
value2 BBB
So, the prepared statement could be:
"select * from TABLE where COL in (select * from table(split(?)))"
Regards,
Javier Ibanez
I suppose you could (using basic string manipulation) generate the query string in the PreparedStatement to have a number of ?'s matching the number of items in your list.
Of course if you're doing that you're just a step away from generating a giant chained OR in your query, but without having the right number of ? in the query string, I don't see how else you can work around this.
You could use setArray method as mentioned in this javadoc:
PreparedStatement statement = connection.prepareStatement("Select * from emp where field in (?)");
Array array = statement.getConnection().createArrayOf("VARCHAR", new Object[]{"E1", "E2","E3"});
statement.setArray(1, array);
ResultSet rs = statement.executeQuery();
Here's a complete solution in Java to create the prepared statement for you:
/*usage:
Util u = new Util(500); //500 items per bracket.
String sqlBefore = "select * from myTable where (";
List<Integer> values = new ArrayList<Integer>(Arrays.asList(1,2,4,5));
string sqlAfter = ") and foo = 'bar'";
PreparedStatement ps = u.prepareStatements(sqlBefore, values, sqlAfter, connection, "someId");
*/
import java.sql.Connection;
import java.sql.PreparedStatement;
import java.sql.SQLException;
import java.util.ArrayList;
import java.util.List;
public class Util {
private int numValuesInClause;
public Util(int numValuesInClause) {
super();
this.numValuesInClause = numValuesInClause;
}
public int getNumValuesInClause() {
return numValuesInClause;
}
public void setNumValuesInClause(int numValuesInClause) {
this.numValuesInClause = numValuesInClause;
}
/** Split a given list into a list of lists for the given size of numValuesInClause*/
public List<List<Integer>> splitList(
List<Integer> values) {
List<List<Integer>> newList = new ArrayList<List<Integer>>();
while (values.size() > numValuesInClause) {
List<Integer> sublist = values.subList(0,numValuesInClause);
List<Integer> values2 = values.subList(numValuesInClause, values.size());
values = values2;
newList.add( sublist);
}
newList.add(values);
return newList;
}
/**
* Generates a series of split out in clause statements.
* #param sqlBefore ""select * from dual where ("
* #param values [1,2,3,4,5,6,7,8,9,10]
* #param "sqlAfter ) and id = 5"
* #return "select * from dual where (id in (1,2,3) or id in (4,5,6) or id in (7,8,9) or id in (10)"
*/
public String genInClauseSql(String sqlBefore, List<Integer> values,
String sqlAfter, String identifier)
{
List<List<Integer>> newLists = splitList(values);
String stmt = sqlBefore;
/* now generate the in clause for each list */
int j = 0; /* keep track of list:newLists index */
for (List<Integer> list : newLists) {
stmt = stmt + identifier +" in (";
StringBuilder innerBuilder = new StringBuilder();
for (int i = 0; i < list.size(); i++) {
innerBuilder.append("?,");
}
String inClause = innerBuilder.deleteCharAt(
innerBuilder.length() - 1).toString();
stmt = stmt + inClause;
stmt = stmt + ")";
if (++j < newLists.size()) {
stmt = stmt + " OR ";
}
}
stmt = stmt + sqlAfter;
return stmt;
}
/**
* Method to convert your SQL and a list of ID into a safe prepared
* statements
*
* #throws SQLException
*/
public PreparedStatement prepareStatements(String sqlBefore,
ArrayList<Integer> values, String sqlAfter, Connection c, String identifier)
throws SQLException {
/* First split our potentially big list into lots of lists */
String stmt = genInClauseSql(sqlBefore, values, sqlAfter, identifier);
PreparedStatement ps = c.prepareStatement(stmt);
int i = 1;
for (int val : values)
{
ps.setInt(i++, val);
}
return ps;
}
}
Spring allows passing java.util.Lists to NamedParameterJdbcTemplate , which automates the generation of (?, ?, ?, ..., ?), as appropriate for the number of arguments.
For Oracle, this blog posting discusses the use of oracle.sql.ARRAY (Connection.createArrayOf doesn't work with Oracle). For this you have to modify your SQL statement:
SELECT my_column FROM my_table where search_column IN (select COLUMN_VALUE from table(?))
The oracle table function transforms the passed array into a table like value usable in the IN statement.
try using the instr function?
select my_column from my_table where instr(?, ','||search_column||',') > 0
then
ps.setString(1, ",A,B,C,");
Admittedly this is a bit of a dirty hack, but it does reduce the opportunities for sql injection. Works in oracle anyway.
Sormula supports SQL IN operator by allowing you to supply a java.util.Collection object as a parameter. It creates a prepared statement with a ? for each of the elements the collection. See Example 4 (SQL in example is a comment to clarify what is created but is not used by Sormula).
Generate the query string in the PreparedStatement to have a number of ?'s matching the number of items in your list. Here's an example:
public void myQuery(List<String> items, int other) {
...
String q4in = generateQsForIn(items.size());
String sql = "select * from stuff where foo in ( " + q4in + " ) and bar = ?";
PreparedStatement ps = connection.prepareStatement(sql);
int i = 1;
for (String item : items) {
ps.setString(i++, item);
}
ps.setInt(i++, other);
ResultSet rs = ps.executeQuery();
...
}
private String generateQsForIn(int numQs) {
String items = "";
for (int i = 0; i < numQs; i++) {
if (i != 0) items += ", ";
items += "?";
}
return items;
}
instead of using
SELECT my_column FROM my_table where search_column IN (?)
use the Sql Statement as
select id, name from users where id in (?, ?, ?)
and
preparedStatement.setString( 1, 'A');
preparedStatement.setString( 2,'B');
preparedStatement.setString( 3, 'C');
or use a stored procedure this would be the best solution, since the sql statements will be compiled and stored in DataBase server
I came across a number of limitations related to prepared statement:
The prepared statements are cached only inside the same session (Postgres), so it will really work only with connection pooling
A lot of different prepared statements as proposed by #BalusC may cause the cache to overfill and previously cached statements will be dropped
The query has to be optimized and use indices. Sounds obvious, however e.g. the ANY(ARRAY...) statement proposed by #Boris in one of the top answers cannot use indices and query will be slow despite caching
The prepared statement caches the query plan as well and the actual values of any parameters specified in the statement are unavailable.
Among the proposed solutions I would choose the one that doesn't decrease the query performance and makes the less number of queries. This will be the #4 (batching few queries) from the #Don link or specifying NULL values for unneeded '?' marks as proposed by #Vladimir Dyuzhev
SetArray is the best solution but its not available for many older drivers. The following workaround can be used in java8
String baseQuery ="SELECT my_column FROM my_table where search_column IN (%s)"
String markersString = inputArray.stream().map(e -> "?").collect(joining(","));
String sqlQuery = String.format(baseSQL, markersString);
//Now create Prepared Statement and use loop to Set entries
int index=1;
for (String input : inputArray) {
preparedStatement.setString(index++, input);
}
This solution is better than other ugly while loop solutions where the query string is built by manual iterations
I just worked out a PostgreSQL-specific option for this. It's a bit of a hack, and comes with its own pros and cons and limitations, but it seems to work and isn't limited to a specific development language, platform, or PG driver.
The trick of course is to find a way to pass an arbitrary length collection of values as a single parameter, and have the db recognize it as multiple values. The solution I have working is to construct a delimited string from the values in the collection, pass that string as a single parameter, and use string_to_array() with the requisite casting for PostgreSQL to properly make use of it.
So if you want to search for "foo", "blah", and "abc", you might concatenate them together into a single string as: 'foo,blah,abc'. Here's the straight SQL:
select column from table
where search_column = any (string_to_array('foo,blah,abc', ',')::text[]);
You would obviously change the explicit cast to whatever you wanted your resulting value array to be -- int, text, uuid, etc. And because the function is taking a single string value (or two I suppose, if you want to customize the delimiter as well), you can pass it as a parameter in a prepared statement:
select column from table
where search_column = any (string_to_array($1, ',')::text[]);
This is even flexible enough to support things like LIKE comparisons:
select column from table
where search_column like any (string_to_array('foo%,blah%,abc%', ',')::text[]);
Again, no question it's a hack, but it works and allows you to still use pre-compiled prepared statements that take *ahem* discrete parameters, with the accompanying security and (maybe) performance benefits. Is it advisable and actually performant? Naturally, it depends, as you've got string parsing and possibly casting going on before your query even runs. If you're expecting to send three, five, a few dozen values, sure, it's probably fine. A few thousand? Yeah, maybe not so much. YMMV, limitations and exclusions apply, no warranty express or implied.
But it works.
No one else seems to have suggested using an off-the-shelf query builder yet, like jOOQ or QueryDSL or even Criteria Query that manage dynamic IN lists out of the box, possibly including the management of all edge cases that may arise, such as:
Running into Oracle's maximum of 1000 elements per IN list (irrespective of the number of bind values)
Running into any driver's maximum number of bind values, which I've documented in this answer
Running into cursor cache contention problems because too many distinct SQL strings are "hard parsed" and execution plans cannot be cached anymore (jOOQ and since recently also Hibernate work around this by offering IN list padding)
(Disclaimer: I work for the company behind jOOQ)
Just for completeness: So long as the set of values is not too large, you could also simply string-construct a statement like
... WHERE tab.col = ? OR tab.col = ? OR tab.col = ?
which you could then pass to prepare(), and then use setXXX() in a loop to set all the values. This looks yucky, but many "big" commercial systems routinely do this kind of thing until they hit DB-specific limits, such as 32 KB (I think it is) for statements in Oracle.
Of course you need to ensure that the set will never be unreasonably large, or do error trapping in the event that it is.
Following Adam's idea. Make your prepared statement sort of select my_column from my_table where search_column in (#)
Create a String x and fill it with a number of "?,?,?" depending on your list of values
Then just change the # in the query for your new String x an populate
There are different alternative approaches that we can use for IN clause in PreparedStatement.
Using Single Queries - slowest performance and resource intensive
Using StoredProcedure - Fastest but database specific
Creating dynamic query for PreparedStatement - Good Performance but doesn't get benefit of caching and PreparedStatement is recompiled every time.
Use NULL in PreparedStatement queries - Optimal performance, works great when you know the limit of IN clause arguments. If there is no limit, then you can execute queries in batch.
Sample code snippet is;
int i = 1;
for(; i <=ids.length; i++){
ps.setInt(i, ids[i-1]);
}
//set null for remaining ones
for(; i<=PARAM_SIZE;i++){
ps.setNull(i, java.sql.Types.INTEGER);
}
You can check more details about these alternative approaches here.
For some situations regexp might help.
Here is an example I've checked on Oracle, and it works.
select * from my_table where REGEXP_LIKE (search_column, 'value1|value2')
But there is a number of drawbacks with it:
Any column it applied should be converted to varchar/char, at least implicitly.
Need to be careful with special characters.
It can slow down performance - in my case IN version uses index and range scan, and REGEXP version do full scan.
After examining various solutions in different forums and not finding a good solution, I feel the below hack I came up with, is the easiest to follow and code:
Example: Suppose you have multiple parameters to pass in the 'IN' clause. Just put a dummy String inside the 'IN' clause, say, "PARAM" do denote the list of parameters that will be coming in the place of this dummy String.
select * from TABLE_A where ATTR IN (PARAM);
You can collect all the parameters into a single String variable in your Java code. This can be done as follows:
String param1 = "X";
String param2 = "Y";
String param1 = param1.append(",").append(param2);
You can append all your parameters separated by commas into a single String variable, 'param1', in our case.
After collecting all the parameters into a single String you can just replace the dummy text in your query, i.e., "PARAM" in this case, with the parameter String, i.e., param1. Here is what you need to do:
String query = query.replaceFirst("PARAM",param1); where we have the value of query as
query = "select * from TABLE_A where ATTR IN (PARAM)";
You can now execute your query using the executeQuery() method. Just make sure that you don't have the word "PARAM" in your query anywhere. You can use a combination of special characters and alphabets instead of the word "PARAM" in order to make sure that there is no possibility of such a word coming in the query. Hope you got the solution.
Note: Though this is not a prepared query, it does the work that I wanted my code to do.
Just for completeness and because I did not see anyone else suggest it:
Before implementing any of the complicated suggestions above consider if SQL injection is indeed a problem in your scenario.
In many cases the value provided to IN (...) is a list of ids that have been generated in a way that you can be sure that no injection is possible... (e.g. the results of a previous select some_id from some_table where some_condition.)
If that is the case you might just concatenate this value and not use the services or the prepared statement for it or use them for other parameters of this query.
query="select f1,f2 from t1 where f3=? and f2 in (" + sListOfIds + ");";
PreparedStatement doesn't provide any good way to deal with SQL IN clause. Per http://www.javaranch.com/journal/200510/Journal200510.jsp#a2 "You can't substitute things that are meant to become part of the SQL statement. This is necessary because if the SQL itself can change, the driver can't precompile the statement. It also has the nice side effect of preventing SQL injection attacks." I ended up using following approach:
String query = "SELECT my_column FROM my_table where search_column IN ($searchColumns)";
query = query.replace("$searchColumns", "'A', 'B', 'C'");
Statement stmt = connection.createStatement();
boolean hasResults = stmt.execute(query);
do {
if (hasResults)
return stmt.getResultSet();
hasResults = stmt.getMoreResults();
} while (hasResults || stmt.getUpdateCount() != -1);
OK, so I couldn't remember exactly how (or where) I did this before so I came to stack overflow to quickly find the answer. I was surprised I couldn't.
So, how I got around the IN problem a long time ago was with a statement like this:
where myColumn in ( select regexp_substr(:myList,'[^,]+', 1, level) from dual connect by regexp_substr(:myList, '[^,]+', 1, level) is not null)
set the myList parameter as a comma delimited string: A,B,C,D...
Note: You have to set the parameter twice!
This is not the ideal practice, yet it's simple and works well for me most of the time.
where ? like concat( "%|", TABLE_ID , "|%" )
Then you pass through ? the IDs in this way: |1|,|2|,|3|,...|

ROracle Errors When Trying to Use Bound Parameters

I'm using ROracle on a Win7 machine running the following R version:
platform x86_64-w64-mingw32
arch x86_64
os mingw32
system x86_64, mingw32
status
major 3
minor 1.1
year 2014
month 07
day 10
svn rev 66115
language R
version.string R version 3.1.1 (2014-07-10)
nickname Sock it to Me
Eventually, I'm going to move the script to a *nix machine, cron it, and run it with RScript.
I want to do something similar to:
select * from tablename where 'thingy' in ('string1','string2')
This would return two rows with all columns in SQLDeveloper (or Toad, etc).
(Ultimately, I want to pull results from one DB into a single column in a data.frame then use those results to loop through
and pull results from a second db, but I also need to be able to do just this function as well.)
I'm following the documentation for RORacle from here.
I've also looked at this (which didn't get an answer):
Bound parameters in ROracle SELECT statements
When I attempt the query from ROracle, I get two different errors, depending on whether I try a dbGetQuery() or dbSendQuery().
As background, here are the versions, queries and data I'm using:
Driver name: Oracle (OCI)
Driver version: 1.1-11
Client version: 11.2.0.3.0
The connection information is standard:
library(ROracle)
ora <- dbDriver("Oracle")
dbcon <- dbConnect(ora, username = "username", password = "password", dbname = "dbnamefromTNS")
These two queries return the expected results:
rs_send <- dbSendQuery(dbcon, "select * from tablename where columname_A = 'thingy' and rownum <= 1000")
rs_get <- dbGetQuery(dbcon, "select * from tablename where columname_A = 'thingy' and rownum <= 1000")
That is to say, 1000 rows from tablename where 'thingy' exists in columnname_A.
I have a data.frame of one column, with two rows.
my.data = data.frame(RANDOM_STRING = as.character(c('string1', 'string2')))
and str(my.data) returns this:
str(my.data)
'data.frame': 2 obs. of 1 variable:
$ RANDOM_STRING: chr "string1" "string2"
my attempted queries are:
nope <- dbSendQuery(dbcon, "select * from tablename where column_A = 'thingy' and widget_name =:1", data = data.frame(widget_name =my.data$RANDOM_STRING))
which gives me an error of:
Error in .oci.SendQuery(conn, statement, data = data, prefetch = prefetch, :
bind data does not match bind specification
and
not_this_either <- dbGetQuery(dbcon, "select * from tablename where column_A = 'thingy' and widget_name =:1", data = data.frame(widget_name =my.data$RANDOM_STRING))
which gives me an error of:
Error in .oci.GetQuery(conn, statement, data = data, prefetch = prefetch, :
bind data has too many rows
I'm guessing that my problem is in the data=(widget_name=my.data$RANDOM_STRING) part of the queries, but haven't been able to rubber duck my way through it.
Also, I'm very curious as to why I get two separate and different errors depending on whether the queries use the send (and fetch later) format or the get format.
If you like the tidyverse there's a slightly more compact way to achieve the above using purrr
library(ROracle)
library(purrr)
ora <- dbDriver("Oracle")
con <- dbConnect(ora, username = "username", password = "password", dbname = "yourdbnamefromTNSlist")
yourdatalist <- c(12345, 23456, 34567)
output <- map_df(yourdatalist, ~ dbGetQuery(con, "select * from YourTableNameHere where YOURCOLUMNNAME = :d", .x))
Figured it out.
It wasn't a problem with Oracle or ROracle (I'd suspected this) but with my R code.
I stumbled over the answer trying to solve another problem.
This answer about "dynamic strings" was the thing that got me moving towards a solution.
It doesn't fit exactly, but close enough to rubberduck my way to an answer from there.
The trick is to wrap the whole thing in a function and run an ldply on it:
library(ROracle)
ora <- dbDriver("Oracle")
con <- dbConnect(ora, username = "username", password = "password", dbname = "yourdbnamefromTNSlist")
yourdatalist <- c(12345, 23456, 34567)
thisfinallyworks <- function(x) {
dbGetQuery(con, "select * from YourTableNameHere where YOURCOLUMNNAME = :d", data = x)
}
ldply(yourdatalist, thisfinallyworks)
row1 of results where datapoint in YOURCOLUMNNAME = 12345
row2 of results where datapoint in YOURCOLUMNNAME = 23456
row3 of results where datapoint in YOURCOLUMNNAME = 34567
etc