I am building a client-server application, this is all running locally on my computer whilst I am developing the system. However, eventually I would like to deploy the server-side part of the application to a server to run 24/7, enabling client applications to connect and consume the service at will. What I would like to know is, when I come to doing this would I simply just install the server-side application on the server, hit run and that's it? That just seems... well not right (to me), is this the way it is done? or is there a lot more to it? I imagine there is, but I can't seem to find any content on this subject.
FYI - the server is a self hosted WCF application.
You'd want to take your program's executable, support dlls and config files and drop them into a folder. Then create a Windows Service to run the program; if you don't use a Windows Service, the program will only run while you're logged on, which isn't good. As a Windows Service, a reboot of the server will bring the program back online even if you're not logged on.
Here's a knowledge base article from MS on how to make a windows service.
http://support.microsoft.com/kb/251192
If you're program is compiled as a DLL, then create a small .exe program to run it (a wrapper) then deploy the program as described in the article.
Good luck.
Related
I've got 2 vb.net solutions. One running my client-side code (which runs a Windows mobile application) the other is running my server side code. How can I debug my server-side code (a service) that exists in an entirely different solution?
From where? If from client code, run your server solution (sln) (via f5), then attach to the host via Debug/Attach to Process in the client sln. Alternatively, You could run both SLN at the same time then but break point in the server.
I have the following scenario:
We develop a silverlight 4 app for our customers, that will be used as an out-of-browser app. The app is working offline, i.e. app and database are on the users local machine. The app is using WCF-RIA-services to connect to the local database. The database will be an SQL Server Express, SQL Server CE or MySQL. We are using MVVMLight and MEF.
An external webserver is only used for updating the app from time to time or adding new modules to the app. To achieve this we do something similar as shown in Jeremy Likness blog (http://www.wintellect.com/CS/blogs/jlikness/archive/2010/05/25/silverlight-out-of-browser-dynamic-modules-in-offline-mode.aspx )
The reasons why we are doing such a scenario are complex. But to keep a long story short it is mainly for compatibility reasons for a later online version and we don't want to use WPF. So we need to get this working with Silverlight and WCF-RIA services.
Ok, that's the scenario and here's the question:
Do we need a local webserver in this scenario? The app is programmatically installed as out-of-browser, the database is local and connected via WCF-RIA.
If yes, which webserver would be sufficient? It should be installed and configured via an initial setup that is executed by the customer. The customer should not have to do anything with configuring the webserver.
Any other ideas or comments on this scenario? Any other possible solutions for this?
Thanks for your help
Dirk
silverlight wasn't meant to be used this way I think. So it would be like when you are developing app in visual studio and use Cassini to see result - everything runs locally - but you still need a web server. Maybe more info here - http://www.infoq.com/news/2010/06/WPF-vs-Silverlight
I´m not able to provide with a full answer to your problem, as we are currently facing the same problem. (WPF not being cross-platform, Very specific hardware on some clients)
But I may share some of our thoughts on our type of Thick-Silverlight-Client:
To keep deployment etc. simple we use a self-hosting process (installed as background process)
We may not use RIA as the background process has to run using Mono VM (but for MS-only solution see Can WCF RIA Services be self hosted? )
Architectural thoughts on standalone "Clients":
Depending on your requirements implementing a server for each client communicating with the "main"-server by messages (NServiceBus) may be overkill. But if you want to use a client database if offline and silverlight for ui you should consider using an event-driven-architecture.
There is a slideshow on combining "Event-Driven-Architecture" & "CQRS" with Silverlight. But i would not use it as a blueprint more like an inspiration.
http://www.slideshare.net/dennisdoomen/cqrs-and-event-sourcing-an-alternative-architecture-for-ddd
I have a scenario where I have to setup a test environment where I want to be able to tell my NAnt or other build tool to make an new IIS web application, put the latest bins in the newly created IIS web application, and post me an email where the new address and port where the new application are addressed, is this possible and how? which tool?
There are several ways to approach this:
Set up a continuous integration (CI) server on the test environment. This is a viable option if your test environment machine doesn't change often and it's a single machine.
Push the installation from your development machine using tools like PsExec
Combination of the two: you have a build CI server which pushes the installation to (multiple) test environments.
Of course, you also need a good build script which will set up the IIS application (NAnt offers tasks for this). Emailing to you can be done by CI server (CruiseControl.NET Email Publisher, Hudson...).
I suggest taking some time to read this excellent article series: Automation for the people: Deployment-automation patterns
Our CruiseControl .Net build server does exactly this as part of it's NAnt build-script process...
Once the code is retrieved from source control, it's all built/compiled in turn. Web projects are then handled slightly differently to normal .dlls, as they are deployed to a particular folder (either on the current machine or otherwise) where IIS (also set-up by the script) to serve the pages.
Admittedly, we're using Virtual Directories instead of creating and disposing of new website instances on the server, as otherwise we'd have to manage the port numbers for each website.
NAnt has the capabilities of doing all of this IIS work, as well as all of the email work too - I'd certainly recommend looking at this avenue of enquiry to solve your problem. Plus, you also get the continous integration aspect as a side-benefit in your case!
I'm part of a distributed development team. We all work through terminal services, accessing a remote server where our applications are located.
We're working on a project in which a client application consumes a WCF service, which exposes all the business logic functionality.
In our development process, a developer is often asked to develop an entire use case from user interface to database access, including the service and the business logic.
In such cases the developer must be able to debug the functions/methods on the server side that she/he has build for a given use case. The problem with that is that the service must be run and when another developer needs to debug his/her work, an exception is thrown (I think it is 'AddressAlreadyInUseException' not sure) and the 2nd developer is not able to perform any kind of debugging at the service. This happens even thought we (off course) have different windows usernames and hence we are working in different sessions.
It's still possible for the client app. to continue working with the 'original' service instance since we're catching the exception at the service, but debbugging is impossible. And if the first developer stops the wcf service then the app. fails.
I would like to know if you could have any recomendation for us. My be there's some sort of tool available (even if we must pay for it) that could somehow isolate each developers' workspace at the server... or may be we just need to change something in the way we work.
I would be very grateful for any kind of advice or clue.
Best regards,
Gonzalo
I would recomend that each developer had their own copy of the server services.
When we develop, each developer has a full environment on their machine. As things are completed, they are checked in to the version control system. When the other developers get the lastest version, new functionality is spread to the other developers.
If I understand your setup, all developers are working against the same server, in this case a programming error of one developer will stop all development.
Hey man, the debugger connects through IP communication. That means if a service or process binds a listener, no other service or process can bind this IP port a second time.
That is the reason for throwing the exception.
In Citrix you have the Virtual IP configuration.
You can also consider to place a VM on the server that serves only for one developer. This would also solve this problem
I have several different c# worker applications that run various continuous tasks: sending emails from queue, importing new orders from website database to orders database, making database backups and restores, running data processing for OLTP -> OLAP, and other related tasks. Before, I released these as windows services, but currently I release them as regular console applications. They are all based on a common task runner framework I created, and I am happy with that, however I am not sure what is the best way to deploy these types of applications. I like the console version because it is quick and easy, and it is possible to quickly see program activity and output. The downside is that the worker computer has several console screens running and it gets messy. On the other hand the service method seems to take to long to deploy and I have to go through event logs to see messages. What are some experiences/comments on this?
I like the console app approach. I typically have things set up so I can pass a switch like -unattended that suppresses the console screen.
Windows Service would be a good choice, it runs in the background no matter if you close current session, also you can configure it to start automatically after windows restart when performing a patches update on the server. You can log important messages to event viewer or database table.
For a thing like this, the standard way of doing it is with Windows services. You want the service to run on the network account so it won't require a logged in user.
I worked on something a few years ago that had similar issues. Logically I needed a service, but sometimes I needed to see what was going on and generally I wanted a history. So I developed a service which did the work, any time it wanted to log, it called to it's subscribers (implemented as an observer pattern).
The service registered it's own data logger (writing to a database) and at run time, the user could run a GUI which connected to the service using remoting to become a live listener!
I'm going to vote for Windows Services. It's going to get to be a real pain managing those console applications.
Windows Service deployment is easy: after the initial install, you just turn them off and do an XCOPY. No need to run any complicated installers. It's only semi-complicated the first time, and even then it's just
installutil MyApp.exe
Configre the services to run under a domain account for the best security and easiest interop with other machines.
Use a combination of event logs (with Error, Warning, and Information) for important notifications, and just dump verbose logging to a text file.
Why not get the best of all worlds and use something like:
http://topshelf-project.com/
It will allow you to run your program as command line or a windows service.
I'm not sure if this applies to your applications or not, but when I have some console applications that are not dependent on user input or they are the kind of applications that just do their job and quit, I run such programs on a virtual server, this way I don't see a screen popping up when I'm working, and virtual servers are easy to create and restart.
We regularly use windows services as the background processes. I don't like command-line apps as you need to be logged into the server for them to run. Services run in the background all the time (assuming they're auto-start). They're also trivial to install w/the sc.exe command-line tool that's in windows. I like it better than the bloat-ware that is installutil.exe. Of course installutil does more, but I don't need what it does. I just want to register my service.
We've also created a infrastructure where we have a generic service .exe that loads .DLLs based on an interface definition, so adding a new "service" is as simple as dropping in a new DLL and restarting the service host.
However, we started to move away from services. The problem we have with them is that they lock up the DLLs (for obvious reasons) so it's a pain to upgrade them. We need to stop, upgrade and then restart. Not hard, but additional steps. Instead we're moving to special "pages" in our asp.net apps that run the actual background jobs we need done. There's still a service, but all it does it invoke the asp.net pages so it doesn't lock up any of our DLLs. Then we can replace the DLLs in the asp.net bin directory and normal asp.net rules for app-domain restart kick in.