I am using the code below to try and bundle a pre-minified version of the jQuery simpleModal plugin in an ASP.NET MVC4 project:
public static void RegisterBundles(BundleCollection bundles)
{
AddDefaultIgnorePatterns(bundles.IgnoreList);
bundles.Add(new ScriptBundle("~/ModalBundle").Include("~/Scripts/jquery.simplemodal.{version}.min.js"));
}
where AddDefaultIgnorePatterns() is defined as per ASP.NET MVC 4 ScriptBundle returns empty:
public static void AddDefaultIgnorePatterns(IgnoreList ignoreList)
{
if (ignoreList == null)
throw new ArgumentNullException("ignoreList");
ignoreList.Clear();
ignoreList.Ignore("*.intellisense.js");
ignoreList.Ignore("*-vsdoc.js");
ignoreList.Ignore("*.debug.js", OptimizationMode.WhenEnabled);
//ignoreList.Ignore("*.min.js", OptimizationMode.WhenDisabled);
ignoreList.Ignore("*.min.css", OptimizationMode.WhenDisabled);
}
Unfortunately, the requested resource is never included when rendered using #Scripts.Render() after being registered in Application_Start().
The following combinations do seem to work, but where possible I did not want to have to change the file name across a large number of projects:
jquery.simplemodal.1.2.3.min.js (exact version match)
jquery.simplemodal.{version}.js (removal of '.min', with corresponding file rename)
The following do not work:
jquery.simplemodal-{version}.min.js (hyphen before version, with corresponding file rename)
jquery.simplemodal* (loose wildcard, which is very suspicious)
I have verified that the file definitely exists in the expected location, but must be missing something else fundamental. None of my other script or style bundles suffer from this problem. Any ideas?
If you want to use the bundle system you must not use minified files.
When you are un debug mode, your system will load normal files.
When you are in release mode, your system will mingnify it automatically.
you can look a working configuration here :
https://myprettycms.codeplex.com/SourceControl/latest#MyPrettyCMSCommunityManager/Portals/MVC4Portal/App_Start/BundleConfig.cs
Related
I am using a pre-built C++ library in my Unreal project using a dynamic library file (let's say it's called MyPluginLib.dll). The library is contained in a plugin, let’s call it MyPlugin.
Building, packaging, playing in editor works fine. However, a packaged build doesn’t start, giving the following error: Code execution cannot proceed, MyPluginLib.dll was not found.
The packaging process places MyPluginLib.dll file in MyGame\Plugins\MyPlugin\Binaries. However, the execution process is seemingly looking for it in MyGame\Binaries – moving the library there manually solves this issue.
Why is the OS unable to find the dll in the first folder? Is there something wrong in the build.cs, or my folder structure?
The folder structure of the plugin folder is as follows:
Includes in Plugins\MyPlugin\Source\ThirdParty\MyPluginLib\
Binaries in Plugins\MyPlugin\Binaries\(PLATFORM)\
The plugin’s Build.cs looks like this:
public class MyPlugin : ModuleRules
{
public MyPlugin(ReadOnlyTargetRules Target) : base(Target)
{
PCHUsage = ModuleRules.PCHUsageMode.UseExplicitOrSharedPCHs;
string PluginRoot = Path.GetFullPath(Path.Combine(ModuleDirectory, "..", ".."));
string PlatformString = Target.Platform.ToString();
string LibraryDirectory = Path.Combine(PluginRoot, "Binaries", PlatformString);
PublicIncludePaths.Add(Path.Combine(PluginRoot, "Source", "ThirdParty", "MyPluginLib"));
if ((Target.Platform == UnrealTargetPlatform.Win64))
{
PublicAdditionalLibraries.Add(Path.Combine(LibraryDirectory, "MyPluginLib.lib"));
RuntimeDependencies.Add(Path.Combine(LibraryDirectory, "MyPluginLib.dll"), StagedFileType.NonUFS);
}
else if (Target.Platform == UnrealTargetPlatform.Linux)
{
// linux binaries...
}
}
Would appreciate any help.
Check your packaged games files, unreal loves to not include certain thing in packaged builds regarding plugins.
What I want to do?
I want to create and consume java objects in PowerBuilder and call methods on it. This should happen with less overhead possible.
I do not want to consume java webservices!
So I've a working sample in which I can create a java object, call a method on this object and output the result from the called method.
Everything is working as expected. I'm using Java 1.8.0_31.
But now I want to attach my java IDE (IntelliJ) to the running JVM (started by PowerBuilder) to debug the java code which gets called by PowerBuilder.
And now my question.
How do I tell PowerBuilder to add special options when starting the JVM?
In special I want to add the following option(s) in some way:
-agentlib:jdwp=transport=dt_socket,server=y,suspend=n,address=5005
The JVM is created like following:
LONG ll_result
inv_java = CREATE JavaVM
ll_result = inv_java.CreateJavaVM("C:\Development\tms java\pbJavaTest", FALSE)
CHOOSE CASE ll_result
CASE 1
CASE 0
CASE -1
MessageBox ( "", "jvm.dll was not found in the classpath.")
CASE -2
MessageBox ( "", "pbejbclient90.jar file was not found." )
CASE ELSE
MessageBox ( "", "Unknown result (" + String (ll_result ) +")" )
END CHOOSE
In the PowerBuilder help I found something about overriding the static registry classpath. There is something written about custom properties which sounds like what I'm looking for.
But there's no example on how to add JVM options to override default behavior.
Does anyone have a clue on how to tell PowerBuilder to use my options?
Or does anyone have any advice which could guide me in the right direction?
Update 1
I found an old post which solved my initial issue.
If someone else want to know how it works take a look at this post:
http://nntp-archive.sybase.com/nntp-archive/action/article/%3C46262213.6742.1681692777#sybase.com%3E
Hi, you need to set some windows registry entries.
Under HKEY_LOCAL_MACHINE\SOFTWARE\Sybase\Powerbuilder\9.0\Java, there
are two folders: PBIDEConfig and PBRTConfig. The first one is used when
you run your application from within the IDE, and the latter is used
when you run your compiled application. Those two folders can have
PBJVMconfig and PBJVMprops folders within them.
PBJVMconfig is for JVM configuration options such as -Xms. You have to
specify incremental key values starting from "0" by one, and one special
key "Count" to tell Powerbuilder how many options exists to enumerate.
PBJVMprops is for all -D options. You do not need to specify -D for
PBJVMProps, just the name of the property and its value, and as many
properties as you wish.
Let me give some examples:
Windows Registry Editor Version 5.00
[HKEY_LOCAL_MACHINE\SOFTWARE\Sybase\PowerBuilder\9.0\Java\PBIDEConfig\PBJVMprops]
"java.security.auth.login.config"="auth.conf"
"user.language"="en"
[HKEY_LOCAL_MACHINE\SOFTWARE\Sybase\PowerBuilder\9.0\Java\PBRTConfig\PBJVMconfig]
"0"="-client"
"1"="-Xms128m"
"2"="-Xmx512m"
"Count"="3"
[HKEY_LOCAL_MACHINE\SOFTWARE\Sybase\PowerBuilder\9.0\Java\PBRTConfig\PBJVMprops]
"java.security.auth.login.config"="auth.conf"
"user.language"="en"
Regards,
Gokhan Demir
But now there's another issue...
PB isn't able to create EJB Proxies for my sample class which is really simple with java 1.8.0_31. They were created with the default version, which is 1.6.0_24.
public class Simple
{
public Simple()
{
}
public static String getValue()
{
return "blubber";
}
public int getInt32Value()
{
return 123456;
}
public double getDoubleVaue()
{
return 123.123;
}
public static void main(String[] args)
{
System.out.println(Simple.getValue());
}
}
The error is the following. :D
---------- Deploy: Deploy of project p_genapp_ejbclientproxy (15:35:18)
Retrieving PowerBuilder Proxies from EJB...
Generation Errors: Error: class not found: (
Deployment Error: No files returned for package/component 'Simple'. Error code: Unknown. Proxy was not created.
Done.
---------- Finished Deploy of project p_genapp_ejbclientproxy (15:35:19)
So the whole way isn't a option because we do not want to change the JAVA settings in PB back and forth just to generate new EJB Proxies for changed JAVA objects in the future...
So one option to test will be creating COM wrappers for JAVA classes to use them in PB...
I am migrating an ASP.NET4.5 website to ASP.NET 5. One function we had returned images off the hard disk from an absolute location. The files arent stored within the web directory. Previously this worked fine, with the following code:
public ActionResult GetVideoImage(string serialNumber, int videoEntryId)
{
try
{
var serial = Device.FriendlySerialNumberToNumericalSerialNumber(serialNumber);
var entry = this.service.GetVideoEntry(serial, videoEntryId);
if (entry != null && System.IO.File.Exists(entry.FirstVideoFrameLocation.LocalPath))
{
return this.File(entry.FirstVideoFrameLocation.LocalPath, "image/jpeg"); // adjust content type appropriately
}
}
return this.Redirect("/content/noimage.png");
}
Unfortunately this doesnt work anymore and throws an exception. From what I can tell its because this.File now takes a virtualPath rather than an absolute one so balks at the idea of serving a file from outside of its web directory.
How can I get around this?
Also is ActionResult still the best
return type for this?
I found the answer on a MS thread here that links to a ASP github commit.
Long story short there are new classes available in the Microsoft.AspNet.Mvc namespace that allow the thing I'm looking for. I specifically chose PhysicalFileResult which works as expected
using Microsoft.Framework.ConfigurationModel;
---
public Startup(IHostingEnvironment env)
{
var config = new Configuration();
config.AddEnvironmentVariables();
config.AddJsonFile("config.json");
}
Using the above, with the config.json placed in the root directory under the project name, I get a null reference exception?
This is practically a brand new/empty solution, I've never had this issue before.
I've tried empty files, no file, the default generated contents, different file extension, all give the same error, leading me to think that it is looking outside what should be the root dir.
However, it also does the same when supplied with a direct filepath...
It also doesn't fail when adding env variables on the line above, so it's not likely to be an issue with the Configuration object itself.
Same behaviour across both dnx core/coreclr and full.
Turns out Microsoft.Framework.ConfigurationModel from beta4 was renamed to Microsoft.Framework.Configuration in beta 5/6
with the = new Configuration method being replaced with having to use a ConfigurationBuilder, specifying the app path with appEnv.ApplicationBasePath in it's constructor.
= new ConfigurationBuilder(appEnv.ApplicationBasePath)
See: https://github.com/aspnet/Announcements/issues/25
I've used package manager to install Squishit.Less 0.9.3, and I have two files
style.less - #import "test.less";
test.less - body{background-color: pink;}.
In my page I have:
<%= Bundle.Css().Add("~/less/style.less").ForceRelease().Render("~/less/combined.css") %>
But the output I get is: #import"test.less"; - the less processor hasn't tried to get the import for some reason?
I've tried ProcessImports but that made no difference.
I just verified in a sample project that it works correctly.
You should NOT need to call ProcessImports - the less preprocessor should do this automatically. ProcessImports is for #imports in standard CSS, which aren't processed by default.
I suspect what happened is that NuGet didn't add the file that registers the preprocessor. As a result the less preprocessor is never called. If you look under App_Start you should see a file called SquishItLess.cs with the following contents:
[assembly: WebActivator.PreApplicationStartMethod(typeof(MyProject.App_Start.SquishItLess), "Start")]
namespace MyProject.App_Start
{
using SquishIt.Framework;
using SquishIt.Less;
public class SquishItLess
{
public static void Start()
{
Bundle.RegisterStylePreprocessor(new LessPreprocessor());
}
}
}
If this file is missing, you can either add it or add the Bundle.RegisterStylePreprocessor line in your Global.asax.cs' Application_Start method.
If you're installing to a VB project this is a known issue (https://github.com/jetheredge/SquishIt/issues/232) and will be addressed when the plug is pulled on .net 3.5 support.