I have gone through the documentation of how we can integrate mule esb with mule mq. But i couldn't find any download link for mule MQ. Even i read on mule blog the mule mq is out of market now. Can anybody comment on this.
below are the ref links
http://www.mulesoft.org/documentation-3.2/display/MULE2USER/MuleMQ+Integration
http://forum.mulesoft.org/mulesoft/topics/where_to_get_mule_mq_software
MuleSoft has completely abandoned MuleMQ. Use another message broker, like HornetQ, ActiveMQ or RabbitMQ.
Mule MQ is now totally deprecated.But it provides a seamless integration between various MOM which utilized JMS and other tools.
By default, Mule provides a JMS endpoint that can be used to send and receive messages using JMS API.
We can prefer the queuing vendors based upon two need
1.AMQP
Advanced Message Queuing Protocol,which provides so many advanced features in queue to provide the routing needs.RabbitMQ,ActiveMQ etc..
2.MSMQ
MSMQ is MOM provided by Microsoft as a component.If required it can be enabled from Turn Windows Features On or Off.It doesn't implements much features that AMQP provide.It also doesn't have a topic feature which is available in MSMQ.
I hope this answer helps you.
Thanks and Regards
As of now Mule MQ is discontinued, You can user other third party Queue broker solutions like - RabbitMQ, ActiveMQ.
Related
I am just starting out to use Anypoint MQ and in the past have used Apache ActiveMQ.
In case of Apache ActiveMQ , Mule connector provides an option where we can choose if we want to publish a message as Persistent Vs NonPersistent
Dont see that option with Publish connector for AnypointMQ
Tried googling but am not getting any details regarding the same ....
any pointers would be appreciated .. Thanks !
Anypoint MQ doesn't used that terminology or has an equivalent feature. Having said that it always operates in a similar way to ActiveMQ persistent mode. You can find it in the public documentation:
Because the storage solution for Anypoint MQ is durable, messages that were already in the Anypoint MQ system before service was interrupted are retained.
I wanted to use queueing in my Mule applications deployed on cloudhub.
what are the options available?
As per my learning I think if we add VM component then we will be able to see the queue in cloudhub persistence queue option.
I have seen Anypoint MQ connectors as well..
are these two options are same?
If not, then which one is better?
Any other options??
VM queues are very basic point-to-point queues. You won't be able to browse the queue, access it through apis, use publish-subcribe, app to app, org to org and others.
For any non basic point-to-point use case, consider Anypoint MQ. Otherwise, any other cloud messaging solution could be used too if it has the appropriate connector.
use anypoint MQ, its easier to config with client. i suggest anypoint MQ becuz of pub/sub msgs
The only answer that I can find seems to say that the datapower appliance only support Websphere MQ, and it doesn't understand ActiveMQ brokers.
And, the documentation for Front Side Handler mentioned Queue managers, which ActiveMQ does not have.
Is there another way in datapower to fetch/poll messages from an activeMQ?
WDP does not support all possible brokers but just a few of them (Tibco, IBM etc). If you configure AMQ to provide a REST interface you can consume messages from it using plain HTTP instead of messaging.
REST/HTTP access to ActiveMQ won't be nearly as good as traditional OpenWire/AMQP connections. It will lack support for transactions and other things, but you can at least read messages.
I do not suggest using an ActiveMQ as messaging backbone for DataPower - go for IBM WebSphere MQ instead as they are nicely integrated. If you need to occasionally pull a message or two from an ActiveMQ broker - go for the above setup.
Mule Healthcare Toolkit is a collection of features that facilitates integration with healthcare systems by providing the tools needed to easily create, read and transform HL7 version v2.x messages within Mule... Unfortunately, it is available only for Mule ESB Enterprise!!!
Is there a way to implement a complete messaging service based on HL7 using the Community version of Mule?
Best regards, Vi.
Apache Camel has HL7 components that you can use to create HL7 routes. You could possibly then route this to mule via a web service call or a JMS call being hosted by the Mule ESB for example.
Apache camel does not require a full ESB (it is not a ESB) so it could act as some sort of translator proxy.
Might not be your cup of tea though.
I realize this is an old thread, but it appears that the Mule Healthcare Toolkit uses the open source HAPI library for (at least some of) the HL7 v2 message support. You'd have examine it more closely, but I suspect one could create their own Mule components using HAPI.
http://hl7api.sourceforge.net/
I have a cluster of Mule ESB containers, each of which is running an (identical) application which share responsibility for handling work which arrives as objects in a Hazelcast Distributed Queue.
Question: What's the best way to have these applications monitor the queue?
Conceptually, I imagine a "Hazelcast Queue Endpoint" that sits blocked on the queue until an object shows up-- but I'm not quite sure how to realize this.
(Mule ESB 3.3, community edition).
Thanks.
I would use DevKit to create a custom a Hazelcast Queue Endpoint and build it as a custom module.
This custom module would be usable in Studio and raw Mule.