Deserialization of incoming message - asp.net-mvc-4

Json is sent from the client to my api controller
Message
{"todo":{"title":"jo","isCompleted":false,"isDeleted":false,"testFK":null}}
I will list different consuming server side methods that should receive this message transformed into a object
public void Post(TaskEntity todo)
{
using (var context = new ToDoEntities())
{
context.Tasks.Add(todo.ToEf());
context.SaveChanges();
}
}
todo parameter is null.
public void Post(UpdateTodoInputMessage message)
{
using (var context = new ToDoEntities())
{
context.Tasks.Add(todo.todo.ToEf());
context.SaveChanges();
}
}
Message class
namespace MvcApplication1.Messages
{
[DataContract]
public class UpdateTodoInputMessage
{
[DataMember]
public TaskEntity todo { get; set; }
}
}
The todo property of the message class is null.
If I change the post method to a string then my client receives a 405 Method not allowed.
public void Post(string message)
{
using (var context = new ToDoEntities())
{
// context.Tasks.Add(todo.todo.ToEf());
// context.SaveChanges();
}
}
I am at a loss and would love some assistance as to how the deserialization of the string is taking place, and why I am getting these strange results.

The reason was that my Task Entity class didn't have a empty constructor

Related

Restore AJAX handling for ASP.NET Core to previous functionality

In previous MVC5 and below, you could make an ajax call that unwrapped the parameters properly:
JS:
$.post('/controller/endpoint',{intparam: 1, strparam: 'hello'})
CS:
public ActionResult endpoint(int intparam, string strparam){}
In the new aspnetcore, it has changed:
CS:
public CustomClassWrapper{
public int intparam {get;set;}
public string stringparam {get;set;}
}
public ActionResult endpoint([FromBody]CustomClassWrapper item){}
To sum it up, in the new framework, you need to write a wrapper class and can only pass one [FromBody] parameter to the method. Previously, the params would be unwrapped by variable name correctly.
So, i'm trying to re-implement this functionality in an aspnetcore middleware component. I'm having difficulty in how to accomplish calling the controller method properly with the parameters.
My current cut-down code:
public async Task Invoke(HttpContext context)
{
if (IsAjaxRequest(context.Request))
{
try
{
string bodyContent = new StreamReader(context.Request.Body).ReadToEnd();
var parameters = JsonConvert.DeserializeObject(bodyContent);
///What to do here?
}
catch (Exception ex)
{
throw new Exception("AJAX method not found ", ex);
}
}
else
{
await _next(context);
}
}
I'm really just not sure about what to do after deserializing the parameters. I have the URL for the endpoint and also the params correctly. Just need to know how to call the method and return the result as JSON. Should i be using Reflection to get the controller method? Or is there a better way using MVC?
Try implement custom IModelBinder.
public class BodyFieldModelBinder : IModelBinder
{
public Task BindModelAsync(ModelBindingContext bindingContext)
{
bindingContext.HttpContext.Request.EnableRewind(); // required to read request body multiple times
var inputStream = bindingContext.HttpContext.Request.Body;
if (inputStream.Position != 0L)
inputStream.Position = 0;
var bodyValue = new StreamReader(inputStream, Encoding.UTF8).ReadToEnd();
var jsonObject = (JObject)JsonConvert.DeserializeObject<object>(bodyValue);
if (jsonObject.TryGetValue(bindingContext.FieldName, out var jToken))
{
var jsonSerializer = JsonSerializer.Create();
var result = jToken.ToObject(bindingContext.ModelType, jsonSerializer);
bindingContext.Result = ModelBindingResult.Success(result);
return Task.CompletedTask;
}
bindingContext.Result = ModelBindingResult.Failed();
return Task.CompletedTask;
}
}
Be careful, the code above lacks error handling and etc.
And use it like this:
[HttpPost]
public IActionResult Endpoint([ModelBinder(typeof(BodyFieldModelBinder))] int intparam)
Also you could implement custom attribute to reduce complexity of declaration:
public class BodyFieldAttribute : ModelBinderAttribute
{
public BodyFieldAttribute()
: base(typeof(BodyFieldModelBinder))
{
}
}
it's very simple thing i don't know why it not working at your end
JS
$.post('actionMethodURl', { FirstName: '1', LastName: 'hello' }).done(Successfunction);
CS
[HttpPost]
public ActionResult endpoint(string FirstName,string LastName)
{
object Message = string.Empty;
if (ModelState.IsValid)
{
Message = "Pass";
}
else
{
Message = ModelState.Errors();
}
return Json(Message);
}

Is it possible to use one generic/abstract service in ServiceStack?

I am developing a (hopefully) RESTful API using ServiceStack.
I noticed that most of my services look the same, for example, a GET method will look something like this:
try
{
Validate();
GetData();
return Response();
}
catch (Exception)
{
//TODO: Log the exception
throw; //rethrow
}
lets say I got 20 resources, 20 request DTOs, so I got about 20 services of the same template more or less...
I tried to make a generic or abstract Service so I can create inheriting services which just implement the relevant behavior but I got stuck because the request DTOs weren't as needed for serialization.
Is there any way to do it?
EDIT:
an Example for what I'm trying to do:
public abstract class MyService<TResponse,TRequest> : Service
{
protected abstract TResponse InnerGet();
protected abstract void InnerDelete();
public TResponse Get(TRequest request)
{
//General Code Here.
TResponse response = InnerGet();
//General Code Here.
return response;
}
public void Delete(TRequest request)
{
//General Code Here.
InnerDelete();
//General Code Here.
}
}
public class AccountService : MyService<Accounts, Account>
{
protected override Accounts InnerGet()
{
throw new NotImplementedException();//Get the data from BL
}
protected override void InnerDelete()
{
throw new NotImplementedException();
}
}
To do this in the New API we've introduced the concept of a IServiceRunner that decouples the execution of your service from the implementation of it.
To add your own Service Hooks you just need to override the default Service Runner in your AppHost from its default implementation:
public virtual IServiceRunner<TRequest> CreateServiceRunner<TRequest>(ActionContext actionContext)
{
return new ServiceRunner<TRequest>(this, actionContext); //Cached per Service Action
}
With your own:
public override IServiceRunner<TRequest> CreateServiceRunner<TRequest>(ActionContext actionContext)
{
return new MyServiceRunner<TRequest>(this, actionContext); //Cached per Service Action
}
Where MyServiceRunner is just a custom class implementing the custom hooks you're interested in, e.g:
public class MyServiceRunner<T> : ServiceRunner<T> {
public override void OnBeforeExecute(IRequestContext requestContext, TRequest request) {
// Called just before any Action is executed
}
public override object OnAfterExecute(IRequestContext requestContext, object response) {
// Called just after any Action is executed, you can modify the response returned here as well
}
public override object HandleException(IRequestContext requestContext, TRequest request, Exception ex) {
// Called whenever an exception is thrown in your Services Action
}
}
Also for more fine-grained Error Handling options check out the Error Handling wiki page.
My solution was to add an additional layer where I can handle Logic per entity:
Base Logic Sample:
public interface IEntity
{
long Id { get; set; }
}
public interface IReadOnlyLogic<Entity> where Entity : class, IEntity
{
List<Entity> GetAll();
Entity GetById(long Id);
}
public abstract class ReadOnlyLogic<Entity> : IReadOnlyLogic<Entity> where Entity : class, IEntity, new()
{
public IDbConnection Db { get; set; }
#region HOOKS
protected SqlExpression<Entity> OnGetList(SqlExpression<Entity> query) { return query; }
protected SqlExpression<Entity> OnGetSingle(SqlExpression<Entity> query) { return OnGetList(query); }
#endregion
public List<Entity> GetAll()
{
var query = OnGetList(Db.From<Entity>());
return Db.Select(query);
}
public Entity GetById(long id)
{
var query = OnGetSingle(Db.From<Entity>())
.Where(e => e.Id == id);
var entity = Db.Single(query);
return entity;
}
}
Then we can use hooks like:
public interface IHello : IReadOnlyLogic<Hello> { }
public class HelloLogic : ReadOnlyLogic<Hello>, IHello
{
protected override SqlExpression<Hello> OnGetList(SqlExpression<Hello> query)
{
return query.Where(h => h.Name == "Something");
}
}
Finally our service only calls our logic:
public class MyServices : Service
{
IHello helloLogic;
public object Get()
{
return helloLogic.GetAll();
}
}

What's the best way to serialize an array based on an interface in WCF?

First the code:
[ServiceContract]
public interface IWorker
{
[OperationContract]
void Process(XmlElement data);
[OperationContract]
void Update(Rule rule);
}
[DataContract]
public class Rule
{
[OperationContract]
public string Expression { get; set; }
[OperationContract]
public List<IAction> Actions { get; set; }
}
public interface IAction
{
void Execute(XmlElement data);
}
A dispatcher encodes data as xml and sends it to an IWorker instance where each expression is evaluated. When an IWorker instance evaluates an expression as true, IAction.Execute is called and the xml/data is passed.
What's the best way to serialize Rule.Actions? I've started writing a custom serializer but I'd prefer to see if there is an easier way.
Thanks.
I dont think you can use interfaces in DataContracts (someone correct me if im wrong, but i assume thats like trying to use a generic too). What I do, is have a parent class, then add the KnownType attribute. For instance
[DataContract]
public class Action
{
//members and properties
}
[DataContract]
public class SomeOtherAction:Action
{
//more implimentation
}
[DataContract]
[KnownType(typeof(SomeOtherAction))]
public class Rule
{
[DataMember]
List<Action> Actions{get;set;}
}
Now you can stuff any object that inherits from the parent Action object in to the Actions list, and it will properly serialize all their respective class properties (as long as the object is listed as a knowntype).
*I used "Action" name as an example to relate to yours, obviously Action is a keyword in .NET
Serialization is the process of converting between an object data and bytes which can be transferred over the wire. Interfaces define behavior, so by default WCF can't serialize such data. If you have the exact same assemblies on the client and the server, however, you can use the NetDataContractSerializer, which will essentially serialize (and be able to serialize) all the type information for the objects being serialized, so it can be recreated at the other side.
The code below shows how to use the NetDataContractSerializer in a service for that (based on the main example for this, the post from Aaron Skonnard at http://www.pluralsight-training.net/community/blogs/aaron/archive/2006/04/21/22284.aspx)
public class StackOverflow_6932356
{
[ServiceContract]
public interface IWorker
{
[OperationContract]
void Process(XmlElement data);
[OperationContract]
void Update(Rule rule);
}
[DataContract]
public class Rule
{
[DataMember]
public string Expression { get; set; }
[DataMember]
public List<IAction> Actions { get; set; }
}
public interface IAction
{
void Execute(XmlElement data);
}
public class Service : IWorker
{
static List<IAction> AllActions = new List<IAction>();
public void Process(XmlElement data)
{
foreach (var action in AllActions)
{
action.Execute(data);
}
}
public void Update(Rule rule)
{
AllActions = rule.Actions;
}
}
public class Action1 : IAction
{
public void Execute(XmlElement data)
{
Console.WriteLine("Executing {0} for data: {1}", this.GetType().Name, data.OuterXml);
}
}
public class Action2 : IAction
{
public void Execute(XmlElement data)
{
Console.WriteLine("Executing {0} for data: {1}", this.GetType().Name, data.OuterXml);
}
}
class NetDataContractSerializerOperationBehavior : DataContractSerializerOperationBehavior
{
public NetDataContractSerializerOperationBehavior(OperationDescription operationDescription)
: base(operationDescription) { }
public override XmlObjectSerializer CreateSerializer(Type type, string name, string ns, IList<Type> knownTypes)
{
return new NetDataContractSerializer(name, ns);
}
public override XmlObjectSerializer CreateSerializer(Type type, XmlDictionaryString name, XmlDictionaryString ns, IList<Type> knownTypes)
{
return new NetDataContractSerializer(name, ns);
}
}
static void ReplaceDCSOB(ServiceEndpoint endpoint)
{
foreach (var operation in endpoint.Contract.Operations)
{
for (int i = 0; i < operation.Behaviors.Count; i++)
{
if (operation.Behaviors[i] is DataContractSerializerOperationBehavior)
{
operation.Behaviors[i] = new NetDataContractSerializerOperationBehavior(operation);
break;
}
}
}
}
public static void Test()
{
string baseAddress = "http://" + Environment.MachineName + ":8000/Service";
ServiceHost host = new ServiceHost(typeof(Service), new Uri(baseAddress));
ServiceEndpoint endpoint = host.AddServiceEndpoint(typeof(IWorker), new BasicHttpBinding(), "");
ReplaceDCSOB(endpoint);
host.Open();
Console.WriteLine("Host opened");
var factory = new ChannelFactory<IWorker>(new BasicHttpBinding(), new EndpointAddress(baseAddress));
ReplaceDCSOB(factory.Endpoint);
var proxy = factory.CreateChannel();
proxy.Update(new Rule
{
Expression = "Expr",
Actions = new List<IAction> { new Action1(), new Action2() }
});
XmlDocument doc = new XmlDocument();
doc.LoadXml("<root><foo>bar</foo></root>");
proxy.Process(doc.DocumentElement);
((IClientChannel)proxy).Close();
factory.Close();
Console.Write("Press ENTER to close the host");
Console.ReadLine();
host.Close();
}
}

WCF Web API UriTemplate Elements Found in Multiple Methods

Let's say I am using the new WCF Web API to build a RESTful service and, in my service, I have a section of the URI that will describe the target resource, but is used on (nearly) all methods of the contract. For example, if I have a User service that deals with eCommerce and may look like:
[ServiceContract]
public class MyUserService
{
private MyUserRepository _UserRepo;
private MyOrganizationRepository _OrgRepo;
[WebGet (UriTemplate = "{OrganizationName}/Users")]
public IEnumerable<User> GetUsers (string OrganizationName)
{
IEnumerable<User> Users = null;
var Organization = _OrgRepo.GetOrgByName (OrganizationName);
if (Organization != null)
{
Users = Organization.GetUsers ();
}
else
{
throw new WebFaultException<string> ("Organization not found.", HttpStatusCode.NotFound);
}
return Users;
}
[WebInvoke (UriTemplate = "{OrganizationName}/Users", /*yada...yada...yada*/)]
public User AddNewUser (string OrganizationName, User User)
{
// Find the organization, like above, and throw if null.
}
}
If I have to continually load the organization and test for null, this will bog down my code and is not very DRY. (So tempted to spell out DRY...) What I would like to do is load up a property in the MyUserService class that is populated when {OrganizationName} is included in the URI and throw a WebFaultException otherwise. Because this is apart of the URI, what would be the best way to accomplish this?
EDIT:
For those that may be interested, here is an example of the HttpOperationHandler I came up with. There doesn't seem to be a whole lot of information out there covering this. I also found more information about Processors that will be coming with the WCF Web Api suite and it looks like they will handle this sort of thing better replace HttpOperationHandlers and it seems they may be easier to use. (This is just a for-instance to cover some things I found hard to find. I wrote it up a bit differently in my application.)
using Microsoft.ApplicationServer.Http.Dispatcher; // For HttpOperationHandler
using Microsoft.ApplicationServer.Http.Description; // For HttpOperationHandlerFactory
public class OrganizationHandler : HttpOperationHandler<string, Organization>
{
private Repository<Organization> _OrganizationRepository;
public OrganizationHandler (UnitOfWork Work)
: base ("OrganizationName")
{
_OrganizationRepository = Work.Organizations;
}
public override Organization OnHandle (string OrganizationName)
{
var Result = _OrganizationRepository
.Get (O => O.UrlSafeName.Equals (OrganizationName,
StringComparison.InvariantCultureIgnoreCase));
if (Result == null)
{
throw new WebFaultException<string> ("Organization not found.");
}
return Result;
}
}
public class OrganizationHandlerFactory : HttpOperationHandlerFactory
{
private UnitOfWork _Work;
public OrganizationHandlerFactory (UnitOfWork Work)
{
_Work = Work;
}
protected override Collection<HttpOperationHandler> OnCreateRequestHandlers
(ServiceEndpoint endpoint, HttpOperationDescription operation)
{
var Collection = base.OnCreateRequestHandlers (endpoint, operation);
if (operation.InputParameters.Any (IP => IP.Type.Equals (typeof (Organization))))
{
var Binding = endpoint.Binding as HttpBinding;
if (Binding != null)
{
Collection.Add (new OrganizationHandler (_Work));
}
}
return Collection;
}
}
And then to wire it up in Global.asax (I am using Ninject for IoC):
// Add this reference to get the MapServiceRoute<T> extension
using Microsoft.ApplicationServer.Http.Activation;
public class Global : HttpApplication
{
protected void Application_Start (object sender, EventArgs e)
{
var Kernel = BuildKernel ();
var Config = HttpHostConfiguration.Create ()
.SetOperationHandlerFactory
(Kernel.Get (typeof (OrganizationHandlerFactory)) as OrganizationHandlerFactory)
.SetResourceFactory (new NinjectResourceFactory (Kernel));
RouteTable.Routes.MapServiceRoute<OrganizationService> ("Organizations", Config);
}
protected IKernel BuildKernel ()
{
IKernel Kernel = new Ninject.StandardKernel ();
// Load up the Kernel
return Kernel;
}
}
public class NinjectResourceFactory : IResourceFactory
{
private readonly IKernel _Kernel;
public NinjectResourceFactory (IKernel Kernel)
{
_Kernel = Kernel;
}
public object GetInstance (Type serviceType, InstanceContext instanceContext, HttpRequestMessage request)
{
return Resolve (serviceType);
}
public void ReleaseInstance (InstanceContext instanceContext, object service)
{
throw new NotImplementedException ();
}
private object Resolve (Type type)
{
return _Kernel.Get (type);
}
}
And here it is in my Service:
[ServiceContract]
[ServiceBehavior (InstanceContextMode = InstanceContextMode.PerCall)]
public class OrganizationService
{
[WebGet (UriTemplate = "{OrganizationName}/Products")]
public IEnumerable<Product> GetProducts (Organization Organization)
{
return Organization.Products;
}
}
This is exactly what OperationHandlers are for. You create a single OperationHandler that converts the URI parameter into a strongly typed object that you can just accept as a parameter on the operation.

Problem exposing custom complex interface types in WCF services

I'm trying to get hold of an object from another application using WCF. With built in classes it works fine but I run into probems when trying to return a custom interface type from the WCF operation.
Whether I include the interface in both applications separately, or specif it as a shared assembly, I get the same result: a CommunicationException with the message "There was an error reading from the pipe: Unrecognized error 109".
The interface looks like this:
[ServiceContract]
public interface IBase {
int IntTest {
[OperationContract]
get;
}
String StringTest {
[OperationContract]
get;
}
IOther OtherTest {
[OperationContract]
get;
}
}
[ServiceContract]
public interface IOther {
String StringTest {
[OperationContract]
get;
}
}
My server looks like this:
public partial class MainWindow : Window {
private Base fb;
private ServiceHost host;
public MainWindow() {
InitializeComponent();
fb = new Base();
host = new ServiceHost(fb, new Uri[] { new Uri("net.pipe://localhost") });
host.AddServiceEndpoint(typeof(IBase), new NetNamedPipeBinding(),
"PipeReverse");
host.Open();
}
private void Window_Closing(object sender, CancelEventArgs e) {
host.Close();
}
}
And here is my implementation of the interface:
[Serializable]
[ServiceBehavior(InstanceContextMode=InstanceContextMode.Single)]
public class Base : MarshalByRefObject, IBase {
public int IntTest {
get { return 4; }
}
public string StringTest {
get { return "A string from Base"; }
}
public IOther OtherTest {
get { return new Other(); }
}
}
[Serializable]
[DataContract]
public class Other : MarshalByRefObject, IOther {
[DataMember]
public string StringTest {
get { return "A string from Other"; }
}
}
The client looks like this:
public partial class Form1 : Form {
IBase obj;
public Form1() {
InitializeComponent();
ChannelFactory<IBase> pipeFactory = new ChannelFactory<IBase>(
new NetNamedPipeBinding(), new EndpointAddress(
"net.pipe://localhost/PipeReverse"));
obj = pipeFactory.CreateChannel();
}
private void button2_Click(object sender, EventArgs e) {
Console.WriteLine("Returns: " + obj.StringTest + " " +
obj.StringTest.Length);
Console.WriteLine("Returns: " + obj.IntTest);
Console.WriteLine(obj.OtherTest);
}
}
Everything works like a charm except this line:
Console.WriteLine(obj.OtherTest);
It give me a CommunicationException with the message "There was an error reading from the pipe: Unrecognized error 109". As far as I can tell that is a broken pipe due to a faulted state but I can't figure out why, or more importantly how to fix it. Any ideas?
I have no config file as everthing is done in the code above so I don't know how to turn on tracing, otherwise I would have included that too.
The returned property OtherTest needs to be a concrete type and not an interface, otherwise the serialization will not work.
This is typically a serialization error. Look to the [KnownType] attribute. The easiest way to test this out is to invoke the DataContractSerializer directly. You can use its WriteObject and ReadObject methods to get the true serialization errors. You can also inspect the stream(FileStream usually) to make sure you type serializes correctly.