LIKE and NULL in WHERE clause in SQL - sql

I have a store procedure which i have planned to use for search and get all values.
Scenario:
If the parameter passed is NULL it should return all the values of the table and if the parameter passed is not NULL it should return the values according to the condition which is in LIKE.
//Query:
ALTER procedure [dbo].[usp_GetAllCustomerDetails]
(
#Keyword nvarchar(20) = null
)
As
Begin
Select CustomerId,CustomerName,CustomerTypeName,CustomerCode,CategoryName,CustomerMobile,CustomerEmail,CustomerAddress,CustomerCity,CustomerState,Pincode
from tblCustomerMaster CM
inner join dbo.tblCustomerTypeMaster CTM on CTM.CustomerTypeId = CM.CustomerType
inner join dbo.tblCategoryMaster CCM on CCM.CategoryId= CM.CustomerCategory
where CustomerName like '%'+#Keyword+'%'
In the above query it returns no values when i execute since the NULL is assumed as string by SQL, so what should i write in the where clause to get the desired output?

You can use condition like this in you where clause
where #Keyword is null or CustomerName like '%' + #Keyword + '%'

I just want to point out another way of solving this problem. The issue is that the default value for #KeyWord is NULL. If you change the default to '', then the problem goes away:
ALTER procedure [dbo].[usp_GetAllCustomerDetails]
(
#Keyword nvarchar(20) = ''
)
Any non-NULL customer name would then be like '%%'.

You just need to add SET #Keyword = coalesce(#Keyword,'') to your procedure like this :
ALTER procedure [dbo].[usp_GetAllCustomerDetails]
(
#Keyword nvarchar(20) = null
)
As
Begin
SET #Keyword = coalesce(#Keyword,'')
Select CustomerId,CustomerName,CustomerTypeName,CustomerCode,CategoryName,CustomerMobile,CustomerEmail,CustomerAddress,CustomerCity,CustomerState,Pincode
from tblCustomerMaster CM
inner join dbo.tblCustomerTypeMaster CTM on CTM.CustomerTypeId = CM.CustomerType
inner join dbo.tblCategoryMaster CCM on CCM.CategoryId= CM.CustomerCategory
where CustomerName like '%'+#Keyword+'%'

Related

Stored procedure ignoring Nulls and fetch result for only entered parameters

I am creating a stored procedure to do a search through a table. I have many different search columns, all of which are optional. Is there a way to create a stored procedure that will handle this? Let's say I have a table with four columns ID, N1, N2 and N3. I could do something like this:
Table:
INSERT INTO [dbo].[Sample]
VALUES ('1', 'A,B,C', 'A,B,C', 'A,B,C'),
('2', 'B,D,N', 'B,D,N', 'B,D,N'),
('3', 'A,N,S', 'A,N,S', 'A,N,S'),
('4', 'S,F,G', 'S,F,G', 'S,F,G'),
('5', 'D,F,K', 'D,F,K', 'D,F,K'),
('6', 'S,H,Y', 'S,H,Y', 'S,H,Y'),
('7', 'Z,B,C', 'Z,B,C', 'Z,B,C')
Stored procedure:
CREATE PROCEDURE dbo.Sample2
#n11 varchar(max) = null,
#n12 varchar(max) = null,
#n21 varchar(max) = null,
#n22 varchar(max) = null,
#n31 varchar(max) = null,
#n32 varchar(max) = null
AS
BEGIN
SELECT COUNT(*)
FROM Sample
WHERE
(#n11 IS NULL OR Sample.N1 LIKE '%' + #n11 + '%'
OR #n12 IS NULL OR Sample.N1 LIKE '%' + #n12 + '%')
AND (#n21 IS NULL OR Sample.N2 LIKE '%' + #n21 + '%'
OR #n22 IS NULL OR Sample.N2 LIKE '%' + #n22 + '%')
AND (#n31 IS NULL OR Sample.N3 LIKE '%' + #n31 + '%'
OR #n32 IS NULL OR Sample.N3 LIKE '%' + #n32 + '%')
END
If user enters #n11 as A and leave the rest, since N1 contains A in 2 rows, output should be 2 but above query is providing 7. If a parameter is not specified, I need that to be ignored and pass the rest to where condition.
I think you need to AND every separate input condition e.g.
SELECT count(*)
FROM [Sample] S
WHERE (#n11 IS NULL OR S.N1 LIKE '%'+#n11+'%')
AND (#n12 IS NULL OR S.N1 LIKE '%'+#n12+'%')
AND (#n21 IS NULL OR S.N2 LIKE '%'+#n21+'%')
AND (#n22 IS NULL OR S.N2 LIKE '%'+#n22+'%')
AND (#n31 IS NULL OR S.N3 LIKE '%'+#n31+'%')
AND (#n32 IS NULL OR S.N3 LIKE '%'+#n32+'%')
Note the alias, which is the best practice way to avoid having to repeat a long table name all over the query.
Try to remove the next conditions from your stored procedure query:
#n12 IS NULL
#n22 IS NULL
#n32 IS NULL
As the above conditions are returning always true while there were sent when calling the procedure.
Stored procedure code after modified:
Alter Procedure dbo.Sample2
#n11 varchar(max) = null,
#n12 varchar(max) = null,
#n21 varchar(max) = null,
#n22 varchar(max) = null,
#n31 varchar(max) = null,
#n32 varchar(max) = null
AS
BEGIN
select count(*)
from Sample
where (#n11 IS NULL OR Sample.N1 LIKE '%'+#n11+'%' OR Sample.N1 LIKE '%'+#n12+'%')
AND (#n21 IS NULL OR Sample.N2 LIKE '%'+#n21+'%' OR Sample.N2 LIKE '%'+#n22+'%')
AND (#n31 IS NULL OR Sample.N3 LIKE '%'+#n31+'%' OR Sample.N3 LIKE '%'+#n32+'%')
END
Now while executing exec dbo.Sample2 #n11 = 'A' the output will be 2 instead of 7
select
sum(iif(N1 like '%'+#N11+'%',1,0)
+ iif(N1 like '%'+#N12+'%',1,0)
+ iif(N2 like '%'+#N21+'%',1,0)
+ iif(N2 like '%'+#N22+'%',1,0)
+ iif(N3 like '%'+#N31+'%',1,0)
+ iif(N3 like '%'+#N32+'%',1,0)
)
from Sample
Any NULL variables will be ignored.

How to use wildcards correctly in Stored Procedures

I have stored procedure where is 1 variable as input.
CREATE PROCEDURE spExample
#name NVARCHAR(60) = ''
AS
BEGIN
SELECT [name], [dom]
FROM [DomName]
INNER JOIN [Domain]
ON LEFT([name], 1)+'%' LIKE #name +'%'
END
For now It returning records from table if first letter of the record is as input. For example if record in table is "Test", excecuting following procedure : EXEC spExample 'T' It returns correct record.
But It should return record even If I type T, Te, Tes, or Test as procedure inputs. Any ideas?
I am not sure why you trying to join two tables using variable.
SELECT [name], [dom]
FROM [DomName]
INNER JOIN [Domain] ON [name] LIKE +'%' + #var +'%'
I believe this should go to the where condition
SELECT [name], [dom]
FROM [DomName]
INNER JOIN [Domain] ON [[[Some condition here based on two table relationship]]]
Where [name] LIKE +'%' + #var +'%'
Try This:
Select column1,column2 from Table1 where column1 like '''+'%'+ #var +'%'+'''

SQL OR statement hit when previous condition is true - Full Text Search

In the query below I would expect the OR CONTAINS(d.Data, #SearchText) never to be reached due to #SearchText being set to NULL. However running this query throws a
"Null or empty full-text predicate."
error because the CONTAINS(d.Data, #SearchText) is called with a null value for #SearchText.
Any ideas why the second part of the OR statement is called when the first part is true?
DECLARE #searchText nvarchar(300);
set #SearchText = null
SELECT * FROM Person p
JOIN PersonDocument pd ON p.Id = pd.PersonId
JOIN Document d ON d.Id = pd.DocumentId
WHERE #SearchText IS NULL OR CONTAINS(d.Data, #SearchText)
Contains will get called because it's an OR statement, even if it the value wasn't null it would still get called due to the OR statement, I think you need a guard statement such as:
WHERE #SearchText IS NULL OR #SearchText IS NOT NULL AND CONTAINS(d.Data, #SearchText)
I got it working in the end like this:
DECLARE #searchText nvarchar(300);
set #SearchText = null -- imagine this parameter was passed in null
IF #SearchText is null
BEGIN
SET #SearchText = '""'
END
SELECT * FROM Person p
JOIN PersonDocument pd ON p.Id = pd.PersonId
JOIN Document d ON d.Id = pd.DocumentId
WHERE #SearchText = '""' OR CONTAINS(d.Data, #SearchText)

Simple SQL Query Help

I am building a query for a search in MS SQL 05
i have 4 things the user can select, and i want to use AND logic on it.
but i can't seem to get it to work when NULLs are being passed in.
this is what i have:
ALTER PROCEDURE [dbo].[sp_FindSource]
-- Add the parameters for the stored procedure here
#Code varchar(500),
#ssid varchar(50),
#serialNo varchar(50),
#category decimal(10,5)
as begin
SELECT *
FROM tblSource
WHERE Code IN (
SELECT Value
FROM funcListToTableInt(#Code,',')
)
and SSID LIKE '%' + #ssID + '%'
and serialNo LIKE '%' + #serialNo + '%'
and category = #category
end
NOTE: funcListToTableInt function, parses comma seporated values passed in (it works by itself, if i take the other where statements out)
The above search never returns anything, how can i ignore values if they are passed in black and only query the ones that have something in them? uuggh, it's been killing me.
You just have to wrap some OR #param IS NULL checks around your WHERE conditions:
ALTER PROCEDURE [dbo].[sp_FindSource]
-- Add the parameters for the stored procedure here
#Code varchar(500),
#ssid varchar(50),
#serialNo varchar(50),
#category decimal(10,5)
as begin
SELECT *
FROM tblSource
WHERE (Code IN (SELECT Value FROM funcListToTableInt(#Code,',')) OR #Code IS NULL)
AND (SiteSourceID LIKE '%' + #ssID + '%' OR #ssID IS NULL)
AND (serialNo LIKE '%' + #serialNo + '%' OR #serialNo IS NULL)
AND (category = #category OR #category IS NULL)
end
This looks very strange at first glance, since it is checking the parameters for IS NULL, but it works.
Try adding OR clauses for the nulls. SO for example change 'and category = #category' to 'and ((category = #category) or (category is null)).
Do this for all the items for whiuch you want to have a null imput essectially disable that particular test.
There are two ways:
Way 1, ADD OR Clause: It can kill the performance ....
SELECT *
FROM tblSource
WHERE (Code IN (
SELECT Value
FROM funcListToTableInt(#Code,',')
) OR #Code IS NULL)
and (SiteSourceID LIKE '%' + #ssID + '%' OR #SSID IS NULL)
and (serialNo LIKE '%' + #serialNo + '%' OR #serialNo IS NULL)
and (category = #category OR #category)
Way 2: Conditional logic
Considering you have 4 parameters and each may have a value or may not have a value, So you have 2*2*2*2 , 16 different cases. You can write something like:
IF (#SSID IS NULL AND #Code IS NULL AND #serialNo IS NULL AND #category IS NOT NULL) THEN
-- SEARCH only of category
ELSE IF (#SSID IS NULL AND #Code IS NULL AND #serialNo IS NOT NULL AND #category IS NULL) THEN
-- SEARCH only on Serial Number
.
.
.
.
.
As in SQL Server each If block cache its own plan, it will be more performing but based on parameter and there possible combinations this approach may or may not be desired ...

How do I create a stored procedure that will optionally search columns?

I'm working on an application for work that is going to query our employee database. The end users want the ability to search based on the standard name/department criteria, but they also want the flexibility to query for all people with the first name of "James" that works in the Health Department. The one thing I want to avoid is to simply have the stored procedure take a list of parameters and generate a SQL statement to execute, since that would open doors to SQL injection at an internal level.
Can this be done?
While the COALESCE trick is neat, my preferred method is:
CREATE PROCEDURE ps_Customers_SELECT_NameCityCountry
#Cus_Name varchar(30) = NULL
,#Cus_City varchar(30) = NULL
,#Cus_Country varchar(30) = NULL
,#Dept_ID int = NULL
,#Dept_ID_partial varchar(10) = NULL
AS
SELECT Cus_Name
,Cus_City
,Cus_Country
,Dept_ID
FROM Customers
WHERE (#Cus_Name IS NULL OR Cus_Name LIKE '%' + #Cus_Name + '%')
AND (#Cus_City IS NULL OR Cus_City LIKE '%' + #Cus_City + '%')
AND (#Cus_Country IS NULL OR Cus_Country LIKE '%' + #Cus_Country + '%')
AND (#Dept_ID IS NULL OR Dept_ID = #DeptID)
AND (#Dept_ID_partial IS NULL OR CONVERT(varchar, Dept_ID) LIKE '%' + #Dept_ID_partial + '%')
These kind of SPs can easily be code generated (and re-generated for table-changes).
You have a few options for handling numbers - depending if you want exact semantics or search semantics.
The most efficient way to implement this type of search is with a stored procedure. The statement shown here creates a procedure that accepts the required parameters. When a parameter value is not supplied it is set to NULL.
CREATE PROCEDURE ps_Customers_SELECT_NameCityCountry
#Cus_Name varchar(30) = NULL,
#Cus_City varchar(30) = NULL,
#Cus_Country varchar(30) =NULL
AS
SELECT Cus_Name,
Cus_City,
Cus_Country
FROM Customers
WHERE Cus_Name = COALESCE(#Cus_Name,Cus_Name) AND
Cus_City = COALESCE(#Cus_City,Cus_City) AND
Cus_Country = COALESCE(#Cus_Country,Cus_Country)
Taken from this page: http://www.sqlteam.com/article/implementing-a-dynamic-where-clause
I've done it before. It works well.
Erland Sommarskog's article Dynamic Search Conditions in T-SQL is a good reference on how to do this. Erland presents a number of strategies on how to do this without using dynamic SQL (just plain IF blocks, OR, COALESCE, etc) and even lists out the performance characteristics of each technique.
In case you have to bite the bullet and go through the Dynamic SQL path, you should also read Erland's Curse and Blessings of Dynamic SQL where he gives out some tips on how to properly write dynamic SQLs
It can be done, but usually these kitchen-sink procedures result in some poor query plans.
Having said all that, here is the tactic most commonly used for "optional" parameters. The normal approach is to treat NULL as "ommitted".
SELECT
E.EmployeeID,
E.LastName,
E.FirstName
WHERE
E.FirstName = COALESCE(#FirstName, E.FirstName) AND
E.LastName = COALESCE(#LastName, E.LastName) AND
E.DepartmentID = COALESCE(#DepartmentID, E.DepartmentID)
EDIT:
A far better approach would be parameterized queries.
Here is a blog post from one of the world's foremost authorities in this domain, Frans Bouma from LLBLGen Pro fame:
Stored Procedures vs. Dynamic Queries
Using the COALESCE method has a problem in that if your column has a NULL value, passing in a NULL search condition (meaning ignore the search condition) will not return the row in many databases.
For example, try the following code on SQL Server 2000:
CREATE TABLE dbo.Test_Coalesce (
my_id INT NOT NULL IDENTITY,
my_string VARCHAR(20) NULL )
GO
INSERT INTO dbo.Test_Coalesce (my_string) VALUES (NULL)
INSERT INTO dbo.Test_Coalesce (my_string) VALUES ('t')
INSERT INTO dbo.Test_Coalesce (my_string) VALUES ('x')
INSERT INTO dbo.Test_Coalesce (my_string) VALUES (NULL)
GO
DECLARE #my_string VARCHAR(20)
SET #my_string = NULL
SELECT * FROM dbo.Test_Coalesce WHERE my_string = COALESCE(#my_string, my_string)
GO
You will only get back two rows because in the rows where the column my_string is NULL you are effective getting:
my_string = COALESCE(#my_string, my_string) =>
my_string = COALESCE(NULL, my_string) =>
my_string = my_string =>
NULL = NULL
But of course, NULL does not equal NULL.
I try to stick with:
SELECT
my_id,
my_string
FROM
dbo.Test_Coalesce
WHERE
(#my_string IS NULL OR my_string = #my_string)
Of course, you can adjust that to use wild cards or whatever else you want to do.
Copying this from my blog post:
USE [AdventureWorks]
GO
CREATE PROCEDURE USP_GET_Contacts_DynSearch
(
-- Optional Filters for Dynamic Search
#ContactID INT = NULL,
#FirstName NVARCHAR(50) = NULL,
#LastName NVARCHAR(50) = NULL,
#EmailAddress NVARCHAR(50) = NULL,
#EmailPromotion INT = NULL,
#Phone NVARCHAR(25) = NULL
)
AS
BEGIN
SET NOCOUNT ON
DECLARE
#lContactID INT,
#lFirstName NVARCHAR(50),
#lLastName NVARCHAR(50),
#lEmailAddress NVARCHAR(50),
#lEmailPromotion INT,
#lPhone NVARCHAR(25)
SET #lContactID = #ContactID
SET #lFirstName = LTRIM(RTRIM(#FirstName))
SET #lLastName = LTRIM(RTRIM(#LastName))
SET #lEmailAddress = LTRIM(RTRIM(#EmailAddress))
SET #lEmailPromotion = #EmailPromotion
SET #lPhone = LTRIM(RTRIM(#Phone))
SELECT
ContactID,
Title,
FirstName,
MiddleName,
LastName,
Suffix,
EmailAddress,
EmailPromotion,
Phone
FROM [Person].[Contact]
WHERE
(#lContactID IS NULL OR ContactID = #lContactID)
AND (#lFirstName IS NULL OR FirstName LIKE '%' + #lFirstName + '%')
AND (#lLastName IS NULL OR LastName LIKE '%' + #lLastName + '%')
AND (#lEmailAddress IS NULL OR EmailAddress LIKE '%' + #lEmailAddress + '%')
AND (#lEmailPromotion IS NULL OR EmailPromotion = #lEmailPromotion)
AND (#lPhone IS NULL OR Phone = #lPhone)
ORDER BY ContactID
END
GO
We can use Generic #Search Parameter and pass any value to it for searching.
GO
SET ANSI_NULLS ON
GO
SET QUOTED_IDENTIFIER ON
GO
-- =============================================
-- Author: --
-- Create date:
-- Description: --
-- =============================================
CREATE PROCEDURE [dbo].[usp_StudentList]
#PageNumber INT = 1, -- Paging parameter
#PageSize INT = 10,-- Paging parameter
#Search VARCHAR(MAX) = NULL, --Generic Search Parameter
#OrderBy VARCHAR(MAX) = 'FirstName', --Default Column Name 'FirstName' for records ordering
#SortDir VARCHAR(MAX) = 'asc' --Default ordering 'asc' for records ordering
AS
BEGIN
SET NOCOUNT ON;
--Query required for paging, this query used to show total records
SELECT COUNT(StudentId) AS RecordsTotal FROM Student
SELECT Student.*,
--Query required for paging, this query used to show total records filtered
COUNT(StudentId) OVER (PARTITION BY 1) AS RecordsFiltered
FROM Student
WHERE
--Generic Search
-- Below is the column list to add in Generic Serach
(#Search IS NULL OR Student.FirstName LIKE '%'+ #Search +'%')
OR (#Search IS NULL OR Student.LastName LIKE '%'+ #Search +'%')
--Order BY
-- Below is the column list to allow sorting
ORDER BY
CASE WHEN #SortDir = 'asc' AND #OrderBy = 'FirstName' THEN Student.FirstName END,
CASE WHEN #SortDir = 'desc' AND #OrderBy = 'FirstName' THEN Student.FirstName END DESC,
CASE WHEN #SortDir = 'asc' AND #OrderBy = 'LastName' THEN Student.LastName END,
CASE WHEN #SortDir = 'desc' AND #OrderBy = 'LastName' THEN Student.LastName END DESC,
OFFSET #PageSize * (#PageNumber - 1) ROWS FETCH NEXT #PageSize ROWS ONLY;
END
My first thought was to write a query something like this...
SELECT EmpId, NameLast, NameMiddle, NameFirst, DepartmentName
FROM dbo.Employee
INNER JOIN dbo.Department ON dbo.Employee.DeptId = dbo.Department.Id
WHERE IdCrq IS NOT NULL
AND
(
#bitSearchFirstName = 0
OR
Employee.NameFirst = #vchFirstName
)
AND
(
#bitSearchMiddleName = 0
OR
Employee.NameMiddle = #vchMiddleName
)
AND
(
#bitSearchFirstName = 0
OR
Employee.NameLast = #vchLastName
)
AND
(
#bitSearchDepartment = 0
OR
Department.Id = #intDeptID
)
...which would then have the caller provide a bit flag if they want to search a particular field and then supply the value if they are to search for it, but I don't know if this is creating a sloppy WHERE clause or if I can get away with a CASE statement in the WHERE clause.
As you can see this particular code is in T-SQL, but I'll gladly look at some PL-SQL / MySQL code as well and adapt accordingly.
I would stick with the NULL/COALESCE method over AdHoc Queries, and then test to make sure you don't have performance problems.
If it turns out that you have slow running queries because it's doing a table scan when you're searching on columns that are indexed, you could always supplement the generic search stored procedure with additional specific ones that allow searching on these indexed fields. For instance, you could have a special SP that does searches by CustomerID, or Last/First Name.
Write a procedure to insert all employee data whose name start with A in table??