I made a test case with Selenium IDE that makes 25 addresses using a while-loop; starting with housenumber 1.
What I actually would like is that the maximum housenumber is picked up from the database, so we can reuse this case endlessly.
In SQL: select max(housenumber) from tbl_address where streetname = ‘Testingstreet’;
Is this possible, and if so… how?.
(As Slanec pointed out, the comments should probably be an answer).
This is way outside the scope of the IDE. You have reached a point where the IDE is not capable of doing what you want your tests to do, therefore you will either have to workaround this issue somehow, or (better IMO), scrap the IDE altogether and use WebDriver & a programming language directly.
I would use the IDE to export your current tests into whatever language you want, then use the language to find out some library or API that allows you to connect to the database.
Usually, keeping to the same programming language and database libraries as your application under test uses, is a good idea.
One way around the limitations in IDE is to create an internal webpage that you can pass queries through to your db and return the response as a table. Interacting through that page would get you the data you need.
Like the answers before me, I suggest going with the WebDriver, but if you MUST use IDE this could be a solution for you!
Related
I have a situation where the IDs of all elements are unique GUIDs, regenerated on each page load.
So I can't use IDs, although Selenium IDE defaults to IDs for obvious reasons.
My workaround is to record with Selenium IDE, then go back and manually edit the IDs to replace them with the right XPath, but this is really time-consuming.
Is there a way it can be set to use XPaths instead of IDs, by default?
Or is there another similar application/extension which can do this?
Selenium IDE/Katalon... recordings can be an OK starting point, depending on who you ask, but you need to go over them.
XPath expressions are specially tricky and often need to be worked on after a recording tool obtains them.
There is no way around this even if you can get the tool you are using to use xpath by default somehow.
I'm able to automate using webdriver but there are few syntax like
driver.manage().setscriptTimeout(100, Seconds);
(copied from other site). How to know that after manage(), setscriptTimeout() follows?
That means how to predict correct methods for timeouts or something like that in webdriver.
Copy paste can be done, but few companies doesn't prefer copy paste job, they need genuine testers who can put the syntax in brain. Please let me know how to master syntax.
What language are you using? An IDE such as IntelliJ (Java), Rubymine(Ruby), Visual STudio(C#), etc. will give you auto complete (also known as Intellisense)
How to integrate RFT with Testing Environments?
Is there a way, that I can store all the test assets inside the RFT instead of on the PC?
Does RFT has version control capabilities?
Does RFT has ability to handle minor UI changes?
Can we use RFT to operate across different applications? (for e.g. If I am in a webbrowser, can I include another action from another application)
Does RFT has ability to link different modules to create a long end to end script? (Like keywords or functions or merging different scripts)
Thank you so much in advance.
You setup RFT, "enable" environments on your system and start recording your first script.
Use ClearCase to store them on a shared place.
Yes, but only ClearCase is supported.
Yes, it has an object recognition algorithm, which gives test objects (objects on the application under test-AUT) some recognition scores. This score determines if an object is eligible or not. Minor changes in AUT affect this score a little, which does not break script execution.
5.6. Yes.
well this is very common problem that can be resolved using data driven frame work, use xml to read the data and to print the result as well, copy ur workspace in any location will save ur data but the limitation is that u may not be able to select individual test case using this frame work, for that we have made a java based GUI tool which allows end user to run single test case also,if u want u can try this.
Here's the situation that I'm working with:
Build tests in Selenium
Get all the tests running correctly (in Firefox)
Export all the tests to MSTest (so that each test can be run in IE, Chrome and FF)
If any test needs to be modified, do that editing in Selenium IDE
So it's a very one-way workflow. However, I'd now like to do a bit more automation. For instance, I'd like every test to run under each of two accounts. I'm getting into a maintenance issue. If I have 6 tests that I want to run under two accounts, suddenly I'd need 12 tests in the Selenium IDE tests. That's too much editing. But a ton of that code is exactly the same.
How can I share chunks of Selenium tests among tests? Should I use Selenium IDE to develop the test first time then never use it again (only doing edits in VS after that)?
Selenium code is very linear after you export it from the IDE.
For example (ignore syntax):
someTestMethod() {
selenium.open("http://someLoginPage.com");
selenium.type("usernameField", "foo");
selenium.type("passwordField", "bar");
selenium.click("loginButton");
selenium.waitForPageToLoad("30000");
assertTrue(selenium.isTextPresent("Welcome * foo"));
}
This is the login page. Every single one of your tests will have to use it. You should refactor it into a method.
someTestMethod(){
selenium.open("http://someLoginPage.com");
String username = "foo";
String password = "bar";
performLogin(username, password);
}
performLogin(String username, String password){
selenium.type("usernameField", username);
selenium.type("passwordField", password);
selenium.click("loginButton");
selenium.waitForPageToLoad("30000");
assertTrue(selenium.isTextPresent("Welcome * foo"));
}
The performLogin() method does not have to be in the same file as your test code itself. You can create a separate class for it with your methods and share it between your tests.
We have classes that correspond to certain functionalities on our UI. For example, we have many ways to search in our app. All methods that helps you with search functionality will be in the SearchUtil class.
Structuring your tests similarly will give you the following advantages:
If the UI changes (an id of a field), you go to your one method, update the id and you are good to go
If the flow of your logic changes you also have only one place to update
To test whether your changes worked, you only have to run one of the tests to verify. All other tests use the same code so it should work.
A lot more expressive as you look at the code. With well named methods, you create a higher level of abstraction that is easier to read and understand.
Flexible and extensible! The possibilities are limitless. At this point you can use conditions, loops, exceptions, you can do your own reporting, etc...
This website is an excellent resource on what you are trying to accomplish.
Good Luck!
There are two aspects to consider regarding code reuse:
Eliminating code duplication in your own code base -- c_maker touched on this.
Eliminating code duplication from code generated by Selenium IDE.
I should point out that my comments lean heavily to the one-way workflow that you are using, jcollum, but even more so: I use IDE to generate code just once for a given test case. I never go back to the IDE to modify the test case and re-export it. (I do keep the IDE test case around as a diagnostic tool when I want to experiment with things while I am fine-tuning and customizing my test case in code (in my case, C#).
The reasons I favor using IDE tests only as a starting point are:
IDE tests will always have a lot of code duplication from one test to another; sometimes even within one test. That is just the nature of the beast.
In code I can make the test case more "user-friendly", i.e. I can encapsulate arcane locators within a meaningful-named property or method so it is much clearer what the test case is doing.
Working in code rather than the IDE just provides much greater flexibility.
So back to IDE-generated code: it always has massive amounts of duplication. Example:
verifyText "//form[#id='aspnetForm']/div[2]/div/div[2]/div[1]/span" Home
generates this block of code:
try
{
Assert.AreEqual("Home",
selenium.GetText("//form[#id='aspnetForm']/div[2]/div/div[2]/div[1]/span"));
}
catch (AssertionException e)
{
verificationErrors.Append(e.Message);
}
Each subsequent verifyText command generates an identical block of code, differing only by the two parameters.
My solution to this pungent code smell was to develop Selenium Sushi, a Visual Studio C# project template and library that lets you eliminate most if not all of this duplication. With the library I can simply write this one line of code to match the original line of code from the IDE test case:
Verify.AreEqual("Home",
selenium.GetText("//form[#id='aspnetForm']/div[2]/div/div[2]/div[1]/span"));
I have an extensive article covering this (Web Testing with Selenium Sushi: A Practical Guide and Toolset) that was just published on Simple-Talk.com in February, 2011.
You can also put some fragments or one-liners, e.g.
note( "now on page: " . $sel->get_location() . ", " . $sel->get_title() ;
into the "code snippets" collection of your IDE ( I use Eclipse).
That's not true reuse, but hey it works for me for throwaway testscripts or quick enhancements of existing testscripts.
I am trying to build a macro in selenium ide that stores the page source to a file. I see there is a command storeHtmlSource() that stores the page source to a variable, but I can't figure out how to store the contents of the variable to a file. Is there some direct way to do this or do I need to somehow have it execute javascript to do that?
I am totally new to selenium if that was not already obvious, but I have looked around the docs for a while and haven't figured it out.
Unfortunately you can not do this with Selenium IDE. The IDE has not been designed to do things like this since there is Selenium Rc that allows you to do what the IDE can do and more since you use your favourite language to speak to a proxy and then use that language's ability to write things to the disk.
The IDE is designed to help you get the skeleton of a test case with the record function, you then tweak it, replay to see it works and then export to your favourite language