Row_Number() in Access select statement - sql

I believe similar questions have been asked but I can't quite find a solution that works for me.
I've got a database that I use to sort through digitised books and their pages and I'm trying to sort through several thousand pages that contain maps. Of the two tables I'm using the first lists all the pages in a book and the order they occur in the book, it's got three columns (bookID, pageOrder, pageID), each page has its own row. The second table lists all the places (in a map) that occur on each page, it has two columns (pageID, placeID) if there are multiple places on one page then a new row is added to the table for each place.
What I need to do is create a select statement that gives every pageID/placeID combination a unique number but the numbers must go in the order they appear in the book. In SQL Server I would do this:
SELECT ROW_NUMBER() OVER(ORDER BY bp.bookID, bp.pageOrder, pp.placeID) AS uniqueNumber, pp.pageID, pp.placeID
FROM booksAndPages AS bp INNER JOIN pagesAndPlaces AS pp ON bp.pageID = pp.pageID
Unfortunately, I'm stuck using Access. Ideally I'd like to do it (if possible) with a single SQL statement, similar to the one above but I would also try it using VBA.
Any help is greatly appreciated.

This is the query that you want:
SELECT ROW_NUMBER() OVER (ORDER BY bp.bookID, bp.pageOrder, pp.placeID) AS uniqueNumber,
pp.pageID, pp.placeID
FROM booksAndPages AS bp INNER JOIN
pagesAndPlaces AS pp
ON bp.pageID = pp.pageID;
You can get the same result using a correlated subquery. More complicated and more expensive, but possible:
SELECT (select count(*)
from booksAndPages AS bp2 INNER JOIN
pagesAndPlaces AS pp2
ON bp2.pageID = pp2.pageID
where bp2.bookID < bp.bookID or
(bp2.bookID = bp.bookID and bp2.pageOrder < bp.pageOrder) or
(bp2.bookID = bp.bookID and bp2.pageOrder = bp.pageOrder and
bp2.placeId <= pp.PlaceId
)
) as uniqueNumber,
pp.pageID, pp.placeID
FROM booksAndPages AS bp INNER JOIN
pagesAndPlaces AS pp
ON bp.pageID = pp.pageID;
This assumes that the combination bookId, pageOrder, placeId` is unique.

I know this is an old question, but this was a top search and I haven't seen any other solutions on the internet so I hope this will help others.
My solution works for any dataset regardless of if it has a unique identifier or not.
Add the following VBA code into a module:
Public row as Variant
Function RowNum(dummy) As Integer
row = row + 1
RowNum = row
End Function
Function GetRowNum(dummy) As Integer
GetRowNum = row
End Function
Function ResetRowNum()
row = 0
End Function
Now here's a sample query:
SELECT Table1.Field1, Table1.Field2, RowNum([Field1]) AS RowId,
"Row: "&GetRowNum([Field1]) AS RowText
FROM Table1
You can add any 'ORDER BY' or even 'GROUP BY' if you wish. You can use any field that will be in the query output as the input for RowNum and GetRowNum. Important to note is to only use RowNum for the first time you want the row number and use GetRowNum every time after. This is to prevent one row increasing the counter more than once.
The last thing you need to do is create a macro that runs ResetRowNum and run it after every query you use with this method, or if you're running a series of queries through a macro or VBA, make sure to run ResetRowNum after every query that uses these functions.
Also avoid datasheet view, as it seems to constantly recalculate the formulas when you scroll, making the numbers steadily increase.

Query to sort and/or group
SELECT Table1.Field1,
Table1.SomeDate,
Table1.Field2,
RowNumber([Field1]) AS RowId,
"Row: " & GetRowNum([Field1]) AS RowText
FROM Table1
ORDER BY Table1.Field1, Table1.SomeDate;
Field1 Field2 RowId RowText
James 2 1 Row: 1
James 35 2 Row: 2
James 6 3 Row: 3
James 86 4 Row: 4
James 67 5 Row: 5
James 35 6 Row: 6
Maria 4 1 Row: 1
Maria 54 2 Row: 2
Samuel 46 1 Row: 1
Samuel 32 2 Row: 2
Samuel 7 3 Row: 3
Thomas 43 1 Row: 1
Thomas 65 2 Row: 2
Thomas 5 3 Row: 3
Public StoredRowNumber As Variant
Public OldlastField As Variant
Function RowNumber(TheField) As Integer
If OldlastField = TheField Then
'nada
Else
ResetRowNum
End If
StoredRowNumber = StoredRowNumber + 1
RowNumber = StoredRowNumber
OldlastField = TheField
End Function
Function GetRowNum(TheField) As Integer
GetRowNum = StoredRowNumber
End Function
Function ResetRowNum()
StoredRowNumber = 0
'OldFieldItem = Null
End Function

Related

Oracle SQL Count function

I am hoping someone can advise on the below please?
I have some code (below), it is pulling the data I need with no issues. I have been trying (in vain) to add a COUNT function in here somewhere. The output I am looking for would be a count of how many orders are assigned to each agent. I tried a few diffent things based on other questions but can't seem to get it correct. I think I am placing the COUNT 'Agent' statement and the GROUP BY in the wrong place. Please can someone advise? (I am using Oracle SQL Developer).
select
n.ordernum as "Order",
h.employee as "Name"
from ordermgmt n, orderheader h
where h.ordernum = n.ordernum
and h.employee_group IN ('ORDER.MGMT')
and h.employee is NOT NULL
and n.percentcomplete = '0'
and h.order_status !='CLOSED'
Output I am looking for would be, for example:
Name Orders Assigned
Bob 3
Peter 6
John 2
Thank you in advance
Name
Total
49
49
49
49
49
John
4
John
4
John
4
John
4
Peter
2
Peter
2
Bob
3
Bob
3
Bob
3
for example. so there are 49 blank rows summed up as 49 in the Total column. I did not add the full 49 blank columns to save space
Would be easier with sample data and expected output, but maybe you are looking for something like this
select
n.ordernum as "Order",
h.employee as "Name",
count(*) over (partition by h.employee) as OrdersAssigned
from ordermgmt n, orderheader h
where h.ordernum = n.ordernum
and h.employee_group IN ('ORDER.MGMT')
and h.employee is NOT NULL
and n.percentcomplete = '0'
and h.order_status !='CLOSED'
The use of COUNT (as other aggregate functions) is simple.
If you want to add an aggregate function, please group all scalar fields in the GROUP BY clause.
So, in the SELECT you can manage field1, field2, count(1) and so on but you must add in group by (after where conditions) field1, field2
Try this:
select
h.employee as "Name",
count(1) as "total"
from ordermgmt n, orderheader h
where h.ordernum = n.ordernum
and h.employee_group IN ('ORDER.MGMT')
and h.employee is NOT NULL
and n.percentcomplete = '0'
and h.order_status !='CLOSED'
GROUP BY h.employee

SQL Query with 2 joins and different values

I'm quite the beginner so I suppose some of you would have an easy time on my task but I need some help:
I have 3 DBs. dbo_A_Personal, dbo_Z_Ferien and dbo_Z_ERFASSUNG
A_Pers has a Pers_ID (LPE_ID) that I can use to join Z_Ferien and Z_ERFASSUNG on.
In Z_Ferien I have 4 rows with that pers_ID and in Z_ERFASSUNG 96.
What I need is a result that has columns that are basically like that:
PersID
Erf
Fer
1224
5
0
1234
4
0
1234
6
0
1234
0
6
so far I have this:
SELECT dbo_A_PERSONAL.LPE_ID, dbo_Z_Ferien.ZFE_TAGE, dbo_Z_ERFASSUNG.ZER_Std100
FROM dbo_A_PERSONAL
INNER JOIN dbo_Z_Ferien ON dbo_A_PERSONAL.LPE_ID = dbo_Z_Ferien.ZFE_LPE_ID
INNER JOIN dbo_Z_ERFASSUNG ON dbo_A_PERSONAL.LPE_ID = dbo_Z_ERFASSUNG.ZER_LPE
WHERE dbo_A_PERSONAL.LPE_ID=804 AND dbo_Z_ERFASSUNG.ZER_EIGENSCH = 3;
I need that so I can sum up the value I need from Z_ERFASSUNG and Z_Ferien but I don't know how to make it so each value is only "printed" once.
I hope I explained it well enough so you guys can help me out.
If I understand correctly an aggerate function is what you need here.
I added a sum function of both dbo_Z_Ferien & dbo_Z_ERFASSUNG, as well as adding a group by statement for LPE_ID. Which tells SQL to partition the sum only on LPE_ID
SELECT dbo_A_PERSONAL.LPE_ID, sum(dbo_Z_Ferien.ZFE_TAGE), sum(dbo_Z_ERFASSUNG.ZER_Std100)
FROM dbo_A_PERSONAL
INNER JOIN dbo_Z_Ferien ON dbo_A_PERSONAL.LPE_ID = dbo_Z_Ferien.ZFE_LPE_ID
INNER JOIN dbo_Z_ERFASSUNG ON dbo_A_PERSONAL.LPE_ID = dbo_Z_ERFASSUNG.ZER_LPE
WHERE dbo_A_PERSONAL.LPE_ID=804 AND dbo_Z_ERFASSUNG.ZER_EIGENSCH = 3
GROUP BY dbo_A_PERSONAL

Max match same numbers from each row

To generate 1mln rows of report with the below mentioned script is taking almost 2 days so, really appreciate if somebody could help me with different script which the report can be generated within 10-15mins please.
The requirement of the report is as following;
Table “cover” contains 5mln rows & 6 columns of data and likewise table “data” contains 500,000 rows and 6 columns.
So, each numbers of the rows in table cover has to go through table date and provide the maximum matches.
For instance, as mentioned on the below tables, there could be 3 matches in row #1, 2 matches in row #2 and 5 matches in row #3 so the script has to select the max selection which is 5 in row #3.
Sample table
UPDATE public.cover_sheet AS fc
SET maxmatch = (SELECT MAX(tmp.mtch)
FROM (
SELECT (SELECT CASE WHEN fc.a=drwo.a THEN 1 ELSE 0 END) +
(SELECT CASE WHEN fc.b=drwo.b THEN 1 ELSE 0 END) +
(SELECT CASE WHEN fc.c=drwo.c THEN 1 ELSE 0 END) +
(SELECT CASE WHEN fc.d=drwo.d THEN 1 ELSE 0 END) +
(SELECT CASE WHEN fc.e=drwo.e THEN 1 ELSE 0 END) +
(SELECT CASE WHEN fc.f=drwo.f THEN 1 ELSE 0 END) AS mtch
FROM public.data AS drwo
) AS tmp)
WHERE fc.code>0;
SELECT *
FROM public.cover_sheet AS fc
WHERE fc.maxmatch>0;
As #a_horse_with_no_name mentioned in the comment to the question, your question is not clear...
Seems, you want to get the number of records which 6 fields from both tables are equal.
I'd suggest to:
reduce the number of select statements, then the speed of query execution will increase,
split your query into few smaller ones (good practice), to check your logic,
use join to get equal data, see: Visual Representation of SQL Joins
use subquery or cte to get result on which you'll be able to update table.
I think you want to get result as follow:
SELECT COUNT(*) mtch
FROM public.cover_sheet AS fc INNER JOIN public.data AS drwo ON
fc.a=drwo.a AND fc.b=drwo.b AND fc.c=drwo.c AND fc.d=drwo.d AND fc.e=drwo.e AND fc.f=drwo.f
If i'm not wrong and above query is correct, the time of execution of above query will reduce to about 1-2 minutes.
Finally, update query may look like:
WITH qry AS
(
-- proper select statement here
)
UPDATE public.cover_sheet AS fc
SET maxmatch = qry.<fieldname>
FROM qry
WHERE fc.code>0 AND fc.<key> = qry.<key>;
Note:
I do not see your data and i know nothing about its structure, relationships, etc. So, you have to change above query to your needs.

The MIN() Function Ms Access

this is a sample sql query that i created ms access query. i am trying to get only one row the min(DATE). how ever when i run my query i get multiple lines. any hits? thanks
SELECT tblWarehouseItem.whiItemName,
tblWarehouseItem.whiQty,
tblWarehouseItem.whiPrice,
Min(tblWarehouseItem.whiDateIn) AS MinOfwhiDateIn,
tblWarehouseItem.whiExpiryDate,
tblWarehouseItem.whiwrhID
FROM tblWarehouseItem
GROUP BY tblWarehouseItem.whiDateIn,
tblWarehouseItem.whiItemName,
tblWarehouseItem.whiQty,
tblWarehouseItem.whiPrice,
tblWarehouseItem.whiExpiryDate,
tblWarehouseItem.whiwrhID;
If i have my sql code like that is working as it should:
SELECT MIN(tblWarehouseItem.whiDateIn) FROM tblWarehouseItem;
In the first query, you group by a number of columns. That means the minimum value will be calculated for each group, which in turn means you may have multiple rows. On the other hand, the second query will only get the minimum value for the specified column from all rows, so that there is only one row in the result set.
A simple example is shown below to illustrate the above.
Table:
Key Value
1 1
1 2
2 3
2 4
On Group By Key:
GroupKey MinValue
1 = min(1,2) = 1 -> Row 1
2 = min(3,4) = 3 -> Row 2
On Min (Value)
MinValue
=min(1,2,3,4) = 1 -> Row 1
For a table like above, if you want to select all rows and also show the minimum value from whole table rather than per group, you can do something like this:
select key, (select min(value) from table)
from table
SELECT WI.*
FROM tblWarehouseItem AS WI INNER JOIN (SELECT whiimtID, MIN(tblWarehouseItem.whiDateIn) AS whiDateIn
FROM tblWarehouseItem
GROUP BY whiimtID) AS MinWI ON (WI.whiDateIn = MinWI.whiDateIn) AND (WI.whiimtID = MinWI.whiimtID);

Finding contiguous regions in a sorted MS Access query

I am a long time fan of Stack Overflow but I've come across a problem that I haven't found addressed yet and need some expert help.
I have a query that is sorted chronologically with a date-time compound key (unique, never deleted) and several pieces of data. What I want to know is if there is a way to find the start (or end) of a region where a value changes? I.E.
DateTime someVal1 someVal2 someVal3 target
1 3 4 A
1 2 4 A
1 3 4 A
1 2 4 B
1 2 5 B
1 2 5 A
and my query returns rows 1, 4 and 6. It finds the change in col 5 from A to B and then from B back to A? I have tried the find duplicates method and using min and max in the totals property however it gives me the first and last overall instead of the local max and min? Any similar problems?
I didn't see any purpose for the someVal1, someVal2, and someVal3 fields, so I left them out. I used an autonumber as the primary key instead of your date/time field; but this approach should also work with your date/time primary key. This is the data in my version of your table.
pkey_field target
1 A
2 A
3 A
4 B
5 B
6 A
I used a correlated subquery to find the previous pkey_field value for each row.
SELECT
m.pkey_field,
m.target,
(SELECT Max(pkey_field)
FROM YourTable
WHERE pkey_field < m.pkey_field)
AS prev_pkey_field
FROM YourTable AS m;
Then put that in a subquery which I joined to another copy of the base table.
SELECT
sub.pkey_field,
sub.target,
sub.prev_pkey_field,
prev.target AS prev_target
FROM
(SELECT
m.pkey_field,
m.target,
(SELECT Max(pkey_field)
FROM YourTable
WHERE pkey_field < m.pkey_field)
AS prev_pkey_field
FROM YourTable AS m) AS sub
LEFT JOIN YourTable AS prev
ON sub.prev_pkey_field = prev.pkey_field
WHERE
sub.prev_pkey_field Is Null
OR prev.target <> sub.target;
This is the output from that final query.
pkey_field target prev_pkey_field prev_target
1 A
4 B 3 A
6 A 5 B
Here is a first attempt,
SELECT t1.Row, t1.target
FROM t1 WHERE (((t1.target)<>NZ((SELECT TOP 1 t2.target FROM t1 AS t2 WHERE t2.DateTimeId<t1.DateTimeId ORDER BY t2.DateTimeId DESC),"X")));