How could store multiple files with carrierwave on Rails - ruby-on-rails-3

How to upload 2 different files in a form with carrierwave.
At first I create two different uploader to hold the 2 files.
> app/uploaders/cdf_uploader.rb
> app/uploaders/msword_uploader.rb
but when I upload the 2 files , it will auto put the files in 2 different folder.
public/uploads/CONTOLLER/cdf_file
public/uploads/CONTOLLER/msword_file
but how could I store the 2 files in one folder.
but keep my table structure unchange.
http://d.pr/i/7nDu
you can check the form view snapshot here http://d.pr/i/EQWE
Thanks ~

Change the store_dir and rest all will look good then so in your uploaders just defined a common store_dir
something like this
def store_dir
"public/uploads/storage/#{model.id}"
end
NOTE
If the file are of same name and extension you might find odd behavior one overwriting and other and causing problem in carrierwave just and assumption though :)

Related

Is there a way to list the directories in a using PySpark in a notebook?

I'm trying to see every file is a certain directory, but since each file in the directory is very large, I can't use sc.wholeTextfile or sc.textfile. I wanted to just get the filenames from them, and then pull the file if needed in a different cell. I can access the files just fine using Cyberduck and it shows the names on there.
Ex: I have the link for one set of data at "name:///mainfolder/date/sectionsofdate/indiviual_files.gz", and it works, But I want to see the names of the files in "/mainfolder/date" and in "/mainfolder/date/sectionsofdate" without having to load them all in via sc.textFile or sc.Wholetextfile. Both those functions work, so I know my keys are correct, but it takes too long for them to be loaded.
Considering that the list of files can be retrieve by one single node, you can just list the files in the directory. Look at this response.
wholeTextFiles returns a tuple (path, content) but I don't know if the file content is lazy to get only the first part of the tuple.

Which is the best practice either to save image name or full URL in database

Which is the better approach for storing image name in database? I have two choices first one is to store just image name e.g. apple.png and second choice is to store full image URL e.g. abc.com/src/apple.png.
Any help will be appreciated. Thanks.
Best practice is not save full path to image like abc.com/src/apple.png but saving specific domain path to image. Ex:
Users image : /user/{id}/avatar/img.png
Product image: /product/{id}/1.png
In this case you avoid sticking images to defined server, server path, url etc. For example, you will decide to move all your images to another server, in this case you don't need to change all records in DB.
The 2 answers already covered it pretty well. It is indeed best practice to save the directory path instead of saving the entire URL path. Some of the reasons were already covered, such as making it easy to move your folders to another server without having to make any changes whatsoever in your file logic.
What you could do, is also have everything in one directory, refer to that, and then just save the image name. However, I would not recommend that. The other structure simply makes it way easier to navigate and look through. Good file structure is something you'll thank yourself for later in case you ever have to go through things manually for one reason or another.
With that said, I'd like to add this trick into the mix:
$_SERVER['DOCUMENT_ROOT']. This always makes you start from the root directory as opposed to having to do tedious things, such as ../../ etc. It looks like a mess.
So in the end as an image path, you'd have something like:
<img src="<?php echo $_SERVER['DOCUMENT_ROOT'].'/'.$row['filePath']; ?>" >
$row['filePath'] being your stored filepath from the database.
Depending on how your file path is saved, you can lose the / in the image source link.
first of all you need to upload all images in public folder of your project , so no need to save domain name
If you are storing all images in one directory , then there is no problem storing only imagename in database
you can easily access images like <img src="/foldername/imagename.jpg" />
but if in your project there are multiple directory like
profile :to save user avatar image ,
background : to save background images,
then it is better to save image with path in database like "/profile/avatar.jpg"
so you can access image like <img src="imagepathhere" />
Another common way is to create image table with cols
id
type (enum or int)
name (file name)
Define in your app (better in model) types like
USER_AVATAR = 1;
PRODUCT_IMG = 2;
Define path map foreach image type like:
$paths = [
USER_AVATAR => '/var/www/project/web/images/users',
...
];
and use id's from this image table in another tables. It is called polymorphic association. It is most flexible way to store images.

Single file versioning best practices?

User is selecting rather hefty single XML files via an NSOpenPanel. The application is making moderate changes to the file so I'd like to include an option of creating a backup in a subfolder based on the directory the original file was selected. Creating the new subfolder is no problem but does anybody have a good way to to create a backup of said foo.xml, is there a practice for such thing or is it as simple as creating a duplicate and renaming it foo.back01.xml?
Not sure, how much this Approach will fit with your requirement, but this is what i was doing,
-- Have a directory in the Temporary folder of the System : Assuming once the Application is closed all this files will be deleted,
-- To have the uniqueness in the file, generate file name with following pattern , have a function say [+(NSString *) generateFileNameForExtension:(NSString *)extension Create:(bool)bCreate]
Assuming input is .xml and false , it might give fileName something like this,
AppName128908765445.xml , i.e. [AppName][UTCTimeStamp].[Fileextension]
-- Once you think its done, there could be Function call [self addToDeleteList:(NSString *)fileName] which will add a file to delete list,
-- There would be a function, which shall invoke a timer for 1 minute and every one minute it will read all the files gets added into delete list then delete it.
Will share the code with you if needed...

CarrierWave multiple file types validation with single uploader

How to validate the extension of uploaded file when using single uploader for multiple file type?
I am using the single model namely Asset containing the attribute file. Uploader is mounted on file attribute. Asset model having one more attribute called feature_id. feature_id refers to features like video, audio, etc.
So, how should I validate the file type with multiple extension whitelist depending upon feature_id value?
Using ruby 1.9 and rails 3.2.11
Any help will be greatly appreciated.
Although the answer has been accepted but I've got a better way for this. Try this code.
class MyUploader < CarrierWave::Uploader::Base
def extension_white_list
if model.feature_id == 1
%w(jpg jpeg gif png)
elsif model.feature_id == 2
%w(pdf doc docx xls xlsx)
elsif model.feature_id == 3
%w(mp3 wav wma ogg)
end
end
end
feature_id == 1 means you want to allow just picture uploads, feature_id == 2 means that only documents will be allowed to be uploaded and feature_id == 3 will allow you to upload only audio files.
Hopefully it answers the question. You can add more checks for other types of files.
Define your white list in your uploader as shown in the docs for carrierwave.
class MyUploader < CarrierWave::Uploader::Base
def extension_white_list
%w(jpg jpeg gif png)
end
end
I ran into the exact same use case:
In Asset.rb
Validate the format of the filename
validates :asset_file,
format:{
with: %r{\.(pdf|doc|png)$}i, message: "Wrong file format"
}
Use a regular expression to test the file name:
Here you can play with the regex:
http://rubular.com/r/Z3roRDDXAf
Hope this helps!

Systematic way to upgrade from attachment_fu to carrierwave?

I'm working on upgrading an app to Rails 3, and attachment_fu is broken so I'm moving to carrierwave. Is there a systematic process that I can go through to upgrade from attachment_fu to carrierwave? Or a tutorial for it? Right now, I'm more interested in getting everything on the database end right. I'm using the filesystem store option for attachment_fu and carrierwave.
I've found a module, UploaderFu from http://ruby.simapse.com/2011/03/migrate-attachmentfu-to-carrierwave.html that tells carrierwave to use the same directories and filenames as attachment_fu. But it's not the entire answer, just part of it.
For example, in the db, I have a UserImage model, with :filename, :content_type, :size, :width, :height, and :user_id attributes. I added a :user_avatar column, and the following to my model
attr_accessible :user_avatar
mount_uploader :user_avatar, UserAvatarUploader
What exactly gets stored in :user_avatar. Is it just the filename? or something else? Do I just need to write a migration to move the data in :filename (stored like "hello_world.png") to :user_avatar? If that's the case I should just use the original :filename instead of creating a :user_avatar column, right?
The column you mount the uploader on is supposed to store an "identifier" for the uploaded file. By default it's just the filename, but you can override it to be almost anything apart from the ID of the record (because you can't know what that is until after saving).
To override: in your uploader class, add this definition :
def identifier
# This is what gets put in the database column!
model.created_on
end
In this example I've used the created_on attribute from the model. If you want to create your own storage mechanism then you need to be able to uniquely identify files by this identifier so be careful what you choose.
I would suggest renaming the column so it describes the file that's being uploaded (like in the carrierwave example). Then you can always change the identifier from filename to something else later.