Suppose we have AMD GPU (for example Radeon HD 7970) and minimal linux system without X and etc.
What should be installed and what should be launched and how it should be launched to have proper OpenCL environment? In best case it should be headless environment.
Requirements to environment:
GPU visible by OpenCL programs (clinfo for example)
It is possible to monitor temperature and set fan speed (for example using aticonfig).
P.S. Simple install Xserver, catalyst and run X :0 won't work properly. See X server with fglrx driver won't responce after exactly 49 accesses to X server
UPD When you use AMD GPU on linux, OpenCL applications don't see AMD GPU if Xserver isn't launched.
I had similar problem, asked a question and had succeed solving it by myself.
For R9 290 cards and newer i assume you have:
Built kernel 4.14 or later, with amdgpu driver support. There is option in linux kernel config under Graphics Support.
All nesesary firmware .bin blobs are incorporated. To do so easily you may edit buildroot/package/linux-firmware/* contents for buildroot, and manually add BR2_PACKAGE_LINUX_FIRMWARE_AMDGPU option by yourself, along with BR2_PACKAGE_LINUX_FIRMWARE_RADEON (use it as a template). Actually we should post that update to their git.
When booting you should see appropriate dmesg messages about amdgpu initializing, per each adapter. And screen mode should be switched. If you still see large console text and no videomode switch occured during init then you have problem in kernel/firmware, you should fix that out first.
To answer second question, controlling fan speeds/temperatures is achieved via powerplay filesystem, eg /sys/class/drm/.. like this:
cd sys/class/drm/card0/device/hwmon/hwmon0
echo 1 > pwm1_enable
cat pwm1_max > pwm1
You may dig a bit deeper and find powertune parameters nearby, in device folder.
But instead of using /sys/class/drm/card0/device/pp_dpm_sclk i highly recommend flashing that values directly in cards' bios. Set with required frequencies/voltages, as it is more reliable, stable and api independent - you either init it, or not :)
PS. Also put away 7970, buy something a bit newer. I dont know if it is still supported in the latest drivers, we havent such an old card by hands right now. I tested 290, 390, 480, 580 cards series. (for R9 270, miner fails to build cl code). For older cards better to use some older software <=16.40 and maybe a bit older kernel <=4.13
Related
I'm trying to run jetracer on the 2GB version of Jetson Nano along with Waveshare's JetRacer Pro AI Kit but all the release files listed in the docs are for the 4GB version. The Waveshare wiki also features files for the 4GB version only. I've seen someone mention there being a pre-built 2GB version for Waveshare cars available on the wiki alongside the 4GB version but it's not there anymore (he meant the AI Kit instead of Pro AI Kit I have but still, it's unavailable for either anymore).
Is there no way to run the AI capabilities for self driving RC cars on a 2GB jetson, then? I thought these were cross platform and worst case scenario, there'd be worse performance - but not impossibility to run it altogether. Would it make sense to flash the card by hand using Jetson's official docs and then trying to follow the Jetracer Setup Guide from step #2 instead? This seems to have a chance of working cause step #1 (the one with ready-baked files) is just an installation of Jetcard anyway so one should be able to bypass it by flashing the card yourself instead of using the provided image. At the same time, I contacted Waveshare's support and they just told me straight away that Jetracer and their kit won't work with a 2GB Jetson and that's that...
Is there a possibility to run Jetracer on a 2GB Jetson then?
I'm using an Asus Chromebook with a CPU(I think).
This is what the Error says:
Warning: Could not find a matching GPU name. Things may not behave as expected.
Detected OpenGL configuration:
Vendor: Red Hat
Renderer: virgl
/run/user/1000/gvfs/ non-existent directory
found bundled python: /home/sekhong5417/blender/2.90/python
This works on my Friend's Chromebook who has a GPU.
Also I am kinda young so I can't replace anything or buy a new device.
There are images at the bottom
If anyone still runs into this issue, there is an incompatibility with Blender and Intel ChromeOS GPU drivers.
See https://developer.blender.org/T77651#1172666 for more details and an updated working build of v2.93.
Hopefully, the fix gets included in the next release.
I use Acer Chromebook spin 13 and I just met the same issue with you. I think it is maybe the Debian within Chromebook don't have the driver that matches the Intel GPU. My Chromebook uses Intel HD graphics 620. I tried many ways to install the driver but they all failed. Linux works easier with Nvidia GPU though. So my idea is you can try to find intel a drive which matches your Graphic card and try again.
I tried to run the Vulkan cube example after downloading the Vulkan SDK but get the following
vkEnumerateInstanceExtensionProperties failed to find the VK_KHR_surface extension.
Do you have a compatible Vulkan installable client driver (ICD) installed?
I have a Nvidia GK107M [Geforce GT 755M] graphics card.
Regarding the graphics driver, the output of
lshw -c video | grep 'configuration' is
configuration: driver=nvidia latency=0
configuration: driver=i915 latency=0
And when I see through the driver manager it shows Nvidia-352 graphics driver. Earlier I was using Nouveau display driver which I disabled thinking that it might not support Vulkan and the Nvidia driver would. But still the same thing persists.
On running .\vulkaninfo I got a message saying that vulkan instance creation failed with VK_ERROR_INCOMPATIBLE_DRIVER.
P.S: I am using the latest Vulkan SDK releases today only. I am going to try the older SDK versions. Maybe they would work.
P.P.S: I have run into a black /blank screen issue after updating Nvidia driver to 370 and rebooting.
Optimus. Well, there you have it. To quote directly from the driver package documents:
Some designs incorporating supported GPUs may not be compatible with the NVIDIA Linux driver: in particular, notebook and all-in-one desktop designs with switchable (hybrid) or Optimus graphics will not work if means to disable the integrated graphics in hardware are not available. Hardware designs will vary from manufacturer to manufacturer, so please consult with a system's manufacturer to determine whether that particular system is compatible.
So, you need to disable it (in BIOS) if possible (as it says above).
Or get updated driver from the notebook manufacturer (Well, as much chance as seeing Android update on chinatablet. If they even bother with linux support.).
Or expect exactly the kind of problems and hackery with no guaranteed success you face.
The v352 driver you have wouldn't support Vulkan. It is older than Vulkan.
Nouveau to my knowledge doesn't support Vulkan (yet) either.
There's 3 places that the Vulkan loader looks to find a Linux driver's JSON definition file:
/etc/vulkan/icd.d
/usr/share/vulkan/icd.d
And wherever you define "VK_DRIVERS_PATH" to.
If you don't have a JSON in one of those locations for your Nvidia driver that would be a problem.
Secondly, if you do have the JSON file, but it's "library_path" entry doesn't point to a valid driver, that would also not work.
Try looking for those files.
I wonder by any chance is there a way to install vxworks on vdx86d(vdx6354)? I searched a lot on the net and did not find NO to this question, but no manual or help could be find by me. anybody did this before and know how to do it?
VxWorks certainly runs on PC architecture x86 targets; there is probably already a suitable 80486 BSP that will suit this board. You can search for a suitable BSP here. There is only one BSP explicitly listed for 486 targetted at VxWorks 5.4/Tornado 2.0 - so it is as antique as 486 architecture itself. VxWorks 6.9 however has a single unified BSP for x86 which will no doubt work with your board.
VxWorks is not "installed" as such in the same way as a GPOS such as Linux or Windows; rather you link your application with the VxWorks libraries to create an application image that runs directly on boot. How the bootstrap process works varies between architectures and hardware implementation, but as a generic PC architecture board, booting a VxWorks application on your board will be the same as any other PC target. As such what you need to look for are directions on booting VxWorks on PC architecture rather then being specific about your actual board.
On PC architecture you can boot from mass-storage, or from a network server. Booting via a network connection is the normal method during debug/development. A great deal of the information available is for older versions of VxWorks. However it seems that it is possible to boot VxWorks via a VxWorks specific bootstrap, or from a generic PC bootloader such a s U-Boot.
Ultimately Wind River Support is probably a good starting point.
As i know java programs are able to run on any Operating System.
and there are JVM's for any kind of machines.
I need a JVM that runs on my PC stand alone, and not on my OS (windows or any thing else).
I mean a JVM that acts like a boot, instead of the OS boot
i searched for all versions of JVM on "www.java.com/en/download/manual.jsp", but i did not get the suitable JVM.
the following link helped me a little but that was not enough
http://java-virtual-machine.net/other.html#jvm
my PC CPU is AMD Athlon(tm) 64X2 Dual Core Processor 5200 + 2.69 GHz
any body can help me to find the suitable jvm version ?!
Sure, have a look at JRockit Virtual Edition. As I understand it it's basically a micro kernel especially tailored for the JRockit VM.
From this page:
Java without the OS: JRockit Virtual Edition (VE)
Am I the only one that's never heard of this before? The Oracle JRockit team is looking at eliminating the OS from the stack required to run Java. This product will be called JRockit VE (not out yet)
JavaOS
Good lucking getting hold of it, though, it's nothing more than a historical curiosity.
There are two JVMs that I am aware of, which have this property:
The Fiji WM: http://www.fiji-systems.com/index.html
According to http://rtjava.blogspot.com/2009/11/new-real-time-vm-was-born-fiji-vm.html it also runs on bare metal.
The next possibility is JNode: an open source operating system where most parts are written in Java (the rest in assembly): http://www.jnode.org/
JNode is still beta, though.
No.
There was an idea of making a machine that could run a JVM as an actual machine (non virtualized), similiar to LISP machines, but that idea never took off...
You need a host OS to run a JVM.
Googling "java real machine" might give you some interesting articles.
I've found two: one from 2004, talking about how such a machine could be built and another one, talking about how JVM runs as a real machine on hardware such as mobile devices.
Still, no dice with a plain PC.