I am trying to place a variable in the parameter of a #uses path, like so...
{#uses parameter="/p/a/t/h/{variable}/e/t/c"}
...
{/uses}
Here is a more pragmatic example...
{#uses parameter="/api/{user}/profile"}
...
{/uses}
Needless to say, its not working. So, what is the correct way to approach this?
Thanks in advance for the help!
Related
If one looks at the (e.g.) ggplot2::scale_y_continuous, the default value of many of the arguments is set to waiver(), e.g. for breaks:
‘waiver()’ for the default breaks computed by the
transformation object
How does one figure out/look at how these defaults are computed? Let's say I want to find the breaks for scale_y_log10(). ?scales::log10_trans doesn't say anything about computation of breakpoints.
I think log10_trans()$breaks might do it, which is the same as ?log_breaks. Not sure how to figure this out in general, though ...
I'm new to Lua so please bear with this simple question :)
I'm simply trying to iterate over a table, and modify it's values. however, it seems I can't modify directly the "value" part?
code:
for id,value in pairs(some_table) do
value = value * some_math_here
end
will i actually need to modify some_table[id] instead, or is there a more elegant way?
You will actually need to modify
some_table[id]
instead. value does not actually represent some_table[id]
I am a perfectionist and need a good name for a function that parses data that has this type of format:
userID:12,year:2010,active:1
Maybe perhaps
parse_meta_data()
I'm not sure what the correct name for this type of data format is. Please advise! Thanks for your time.
parse_dict or parse_map
Except for the lack of braces and the quotes around the keys, it looks like either JSON or a Python dict.
parse_tagged_csv()
parse_csv()
parse_structured_csv()
parse_csv_with_attributes()
parse csvattr()
If it’s a proprietary data format, you can name it whatever you want. But it would be good to use a common term like serialized data or mapping list.
If it's just a list of simple items, each of which has a name and a value, then "key-value pairs" is probably the right term.
I would go with:
parse_named_records()
ParseCommaSeparatedNameValuePairs()
ParseDelimitedNameValuePairs()
ParseCommaSeparatedKeyValuePairs()
ParseDelimitedKeyValuePairs()
From the one line you gave, ParseJson() seems appropriate
This is probably quite a simple question, but I can't remember how to do it off hand.
I have an e-mail address of "foo#bar.com".
I want to grab the # and everything after it and then I'll be adding a prefix to the front of the address as I go.
I'm just wonderng how I get hold of the #bar.com from the string?
I know I should know how to do this as this is a really simple operation.
Thanks in advance for any help.
"foo#bar.com".Split("#")(1)
You can use simple string operations for this:
email.Substring(email.IndexOf("#"C))
Here is the single line from one of my functions to test if any objects in my array have a given property with a matching value
Return ((From tag In DataCache.Tags Where (tag.FldTag = strtagname) Select tag).Count = 1)
WHERE....
DataCache.Tags is an array of custom objects
strtagname = "brazil"
and brazil is definitely a tag name stored within one of the custom objects in the array.
However the function continually returns false.
Can someone confirm to me that the above should or should not work.
and if it wont work can someone tell me the best way to test if any of the objects in the array contain a property with a specific value.
I suppose in summary I am looking for the equivalent of a SQL EXISTS statement.
Many thanks in hope.
Your code is currently checking whether the count is exactly one.
The equivalent of EXISTS in LINQ is Any. You want something like:
Return DataCache.Tags.Any(Function(tag) tag.FldTag = strtagname)
(Miraculously it looks like that syntax may be about right... it looks like the docs examples...)
Many Thanks for the response.
Your code did not work. Then I realised that I was comparing to an array value so it would be case sensitive.
However glad I asked the question, as I found a better way than mine.
Many thanks again !