Simply cannot make SignalR (asp.net mvc4) and require.js work together - asp.net-mvc-4

I've seen similar posts around the web and nothing anyone has suggested works for me. I'm really faced with the choice of dumping one or the other it seems at this point.
This "Getting Started with SignalR and MVC 4 tutorial":
http://www.asp.net/signalr/overview/getting-started/tutorial-getting-started-with-signalr-and-mvc-4
says you need two script includes to make signalR work:
<!--Reference the SignalR library. -->
<script src="~/Scripts/jquery.signalR-1.0.1.js"></script>
<!--Reference the autogenerated SignalR hub script. -->
<script src="~/signalr/hubs"></script>
I'm at a loss as to how to make the second one, the autogenerated SignalR hub script, happen in require.js. Unless I'm missing something there just doesn't seem to be a viable require.js syntax for inclusion of autogenerated scripts. Without it you get this error at line 159 of jquery.signalR-1.1.2.js:
"JavaScript runtime error: SignalR: Error loading hubs. Ensure your hubs reference is correct, e.g. "
The code at that point in jquery.signalR is doing this:
signalR.hub = {
start: function () {
// This will get replaced with the real hub connection start method when hubs is referenced correctly
throw new Error("SignalR: Error loading hubs. Ensure your hubs reference is correct, e.g. <script src='/signalr/hubs'></script>.");
}
};
Has anyone actually made this autogenerated script thing happen via require.js?
Been studying this a bit more. Let me add some detail:
I'm using this approach - Structuring scalable client side applications: (http://johndavidmathis.wordpress.com/2013/04/23/structuring-scalable-client-side-applications/) to make a more scalable structure. Second part in that series "Permit modules to utilize multiple files and a logical folder structure" http://johndavidmathis.wordpress.com/2013/04/23/structuring-scalable-client-side-applications/ has me splitting my actual signalr code out into a separate Marionette chat module (separate from my main app.js file) to achieve a better file structure. I really like this approach. The rest of my project is set up like this now and it really is showing benefits when it comes to finding code. I think that extra split is where I'm stuck. Can't seem to get that second dependency, the autogenerated script, into that separate chat module file. I'm still studying this but it looks like this to me at this point. require.js gets the dependency into my Marionette app:
require(["marionette","handlebars", "signalr", "signalr.hubs"], function (Marionette) {
window.App = new Marionette.Application();
App.addRegions({
headerRegion: "#header",
contentRegion: "#content",
footerRegion: "#footer",
});
require(["modules/main/loader", "modules/chat/loader"], function () {
App.start();
});
})
If I want chat that dependency to make its way further into the app, into the chat module in another file?
Something like?
define(dependencies,
function () {
App.module("ChatModule", function (ChatModule, App, Backbone, Marionette, $, _, "signalr.hubs", "signalr.hubs") {
// SignalR Proxy created on the fly
var chat = $.connection.chatHub;
// Start the connection
$.connection.hub.start();
//more chat code...
An update:
The answer below does work in my dev environment. But it does not work when I publish the code to a real production server.
When the code is published to a real production server (IIS 6.1 on Windows Server Enterprise 2008 R2) the browser console once again shows a "404" for the autogenerated reference.
Specifically, the console shows the "?" is being added into the reference path before ".js", like this...
http://mydomain.com/myapp/Scripts/application/signalr/hubs?.js...
Tried taking the "?" out but then it removes my app name from the path, like this...
http://mydomain.com/signalr/hubs.js.
I think what would get me there is the first one, without the "?", like...
http://mydomain.com/myapp/Scripts/application/signalr/hubs.js
I'm just not seeing how to make that happen.
FINAL UPDATE:
Final piece of the puzzle for production server is the site's virtual directory. Here's final code that worked for me. Thanks Raciel R for your help:
requirejs.config({
paths: {
//core
"jquery": "jquery-1.9.1",
"signalr": "jquery.signalR-1.1.2",
"signalr.hubs": "/productionservervirtualdirectory/signalr/hubs?"
},
shim: {
"jquery": {exports: "$"},
"signalr": { deps: ["jquery"] },
"signalr.hubs": { deps: ["signalr"] }
});
//Then all you have to do is to make signalr.hubs required in your modules. Ie:
require(["signalr.hubs"], function(){
//your code here
});

requirejs.config({
paths: {
//core
"jquery": "jquery-1.9.1",
"signalr": "jquery.signalR-1.1.2",
"signalr.hubs": "/signalr/hubs?"
},
shim: {
"jquery": {exports: "$"},
"signalr": { deps: ["jquery"] },
"signalr.hubs": { deps: ["signalr"] }
});
Then all you have to do is to make signalr.hubs required in your modules. Ie:
require(["signalr.hubs"], function(){
//your code here
});

I set up RequireJS successfully using #raciel-r's solution but I was still having problems with other JavaScript modules like karma that were also confused by the dynamic proxy. I converted the signalr proxy to a static file and used that with RequireJS instead:
Import Microsoft.AspNet.SignalR.Utils
Run packages/Microsoft.AspNet.SignalR.Utils.2.X.X/tools/signalr.exe
ghp /path:my/bin /o:path/to/scripts/server.js where /my/bin is the directory containing the assemblies with your SignalR Hubs.
Replace your reference in to /signalr/hubs with server:
requirejs.config({
paths: {
// ...
"signalr.hubs": "path/to/scripts/server"
},
// ....
If you are using the convenience methods of the generated proxy, you will also have to rewrite them (see How to create a physical file for the SignalR generated proxy)

Related

<video> tag. DOMException: The element has no supported sources, when not utilizing require()

I am trying to play a video when developing locally with VueJS 2.
My code is the following :
<video class="back_video" :src="`../videos/Space${videoIndex}.mp4`" id="background-video"></video>
...
data :
function() {
return {
videoIndex:1
}
}
...
const vid = document.getElementById("background-video");
vid.crossOrigin = 'anonymous';
let playPromise = vid.play();
if (playPromise !== undefined) {
playPromise.then(function() {
console.log("video playing");
}).catch(function(error) {
console.error(error);
});
}
This code is causing the exception given in title. Tried in several browsers, always the same.
If I change the src by :
:src="require(`../videos/Space${videoIndex}.mp4`)"
it works.
But in that case building time is very long as I have many different videos in my videos directory, because adding require() will force to copy all videos in the running directory at build phase (vue-cli serve), and this is really annoying. In other words I want to refer videos that are outside the build directory to avoid this (but also to avoid having videos in my git).
It is interesting to note that when I deploy server side, it works perfectly with my original code
:src="`../videos/Space${videoIndex}.mp4`"
Note also that if i replace my code with simply
src="../videos/Space1.mp4"
it works too. So the video itself, or its location, are not the source of the problem.
Any clue ?
You can host your videos on a CDN to have something faster and easier to debug/work with.
Otherwise, it will need to bundle it locally and may take some time.

Vue.js including non-npm JavaScript library

I'm a total beginner with Vue.js and struggling to find the answer to what I feel is a fairly basic need.
I have a JavaScript library that cannot be installed locally and must be imported via script tag in the index.html file in the old-fashioned way:
<script src="https://foo.bar/scriptyscripts.js"></script>
This library has a bunch of methods in it that I need to use in various spots throughout my app, so it's not going to be a problem to load it globally. The issue I'm facing is that it's loading fine, but the methods are not being recognised in components.
I can use the methods and whatnot if I put them all in a script tag in the index.html however doing that rather defeats the whole point of having components.
Can anyone help me with the step that I'm missing to register all of the methods in this loaded js file so my components don't get mad?
Specifically, the script contains require.js and a collection of other things including JQuery.
Including the library makes the method 'require' available, which is used to load other modules on demand - the example being "js/qlik" in the below snippet. "js/qlik" loads JQuery and a stack of stuff associated with "qlik".
//async login method here. not relevant to this problem
login().then(() => {
require.config({
baseUrl:
(config.isSecure ? "https://" : "http://") +
config.host +
(config.port ? ":" + config.port : "") +
config.prefix +
"resources",
webIntegrationId: config.webIntegrationId,
});
//Load js/qlik after authentication is successful
require(["js/qlik"], function (qlik) {
qlik.on("error", function (error) {
$("#popupText").append(error.message + "<br>");
$("#popup").fadeIn(1000);
});
$("#closePopup").click(function () {
$("#popup").hide();
});
var app = qlik.openApp("caa866be-c8e1-44c8-b67b-dac9d24421fa", config);
});
});
The problem I have is that if I load this library in the index.html file and then try to execute the methods in the snippet above in any component, it does not know that the methods are available.
I see:
'Module not found: Error: Can't resolve 'js/qlik'
66:11 error '$' is not defined
which indicates that the components are unaware of the methods because they're not registered like they would be if I were importing a packaged afterinstalling it locally via NPM
i.e. Your original js code: function abc(){// sth...}
What you need: window.abc = ()=>{// sth...}
Even if you want it in Vue dom.
You should add vue.prototype.abc = ()=>{//sth...}

requirejs loading file from different path

I've a webpage , where I've included the requirejs via script tag like -
<script data-main="/media/course-book-app/courses.require.main.js" src="/media/common/vendor/requirejs/require.js"></script>
On Safari browser, I'm getting error like -
What is causing this issue?
This issue is very frequent on Safari but on chrome it is less frequent.
Testing URL
From https://requirejs.org/docs/errors.html#scripterror (which is linked right there in the error). Follow the instructions and look at the script that caused the error
This occurs when the script.onerror function is triggered in a
browser. This usually means there is a JavaScript syntax error or
other execution problem running the script. To fix it, examine the
script that generated the error in a script debugger.
This error may not show up in IE, just other browsers, and instead, in
IE you may see the No define call for ... error when you see "Script
error". This is due to IE's quirks in detecting script errors.
Here is the way to use requirejs correctly. This ensures the configuration gets loaded before loading any module -
define('requireconfig', function(){
require.config({
paths: {
"jquery": "/common/vendor/jquery/jquery-1.9.1.min",
"backbone": "/common/vendor/backbone/backbone.min-1.1.2",
"underscore": mediaPath + "/common/vendor/underscore/underscore.min-1.7.0"
},
shim: {
backbone : {
deps: ["jquery","underscore"],
exports: "Backbone"
},
}
});
});
define('main', ['requireconfig'], function () {
'use strict';
});
// loading main module which loads the requirejs configuration
requirejs(['main'],()=>{
requirejs(['jquery'], ($)=>{//jquery loaded});
}, ()=>{//error loading module})

How to inject external JS library into a module?

I'm using SeedStack to create a web application. In order to do that, I use W20 to develop my frontend. I need specific JavaScript libraries into that project. How can I inject an external javascript library into it ? I want to use Chart.js http://www.chartjs.org/ to visualize data into charts. To do that, I suppose that I have to inject ChartJS as a dependency module in Angular.
Thank you for your help.
Before getting to the specific answer, please note that SeedStack already has an add-on for charts. As for integrating a library with W20, you have two main things to do:
Configure RequireJS to load the JS file and be able to inject it as a dependency.
Integrate the library with the AngularJS framework, which is often done by writing some directive.
Fortunately for you, Angular directives are already available for Chart.js, thanks to the angular-chart.js library. You just need to configure RequireJS to load it. Add a requireConfig section to the manifest of one of your fragments:
{
"id": "my-fragment",
...
"requireConfig": {
"paths": {
"{angular-chart.js}": "${components-path:bower_components}/angular-chart.js/dist",
"{chart.js}": "${components-path:bower_components}/chart.js/dist"
},
"map": {
"{angular-chart.js}/angular-chart": {
"angular": "{angular}/angular",
"chart": "{chart.js}/Chart"
}
}
}
}
The paths section declares locations of the two Chart.js libraries. Note that we use a variable named components-path with a default value of bower_components here. This is useful when using the W20 bridge add-on.
The map section declares a mapping between the expected and the real paths for dependencies of angular-chart.js.
You can then use the angular-chart.js library according to its documentation:
define([
'{angular}/angular',
'{angular-chart.js}/angular-chart',
], function(angular) {
var module = angular.module('myModule', ['ngResource', 'chart.js']);
module.controller('ContentController', [ '$scope', function($scope) {
// your JS code here
// (with your markup in a corresponding angular template)
}]);
});

Getting Unknown Provider error when injecting a Service into an Angular unit test

I'm fairly new to Angular and have reviewed all the similarly related questions on Stack Overflow but none have helped me. I believe I have everything set up correctly but am still getting an 'Unknown Provider' error when attempting to inject a service into a unit test. I have laid out my code below - hopefully someone can spot an obvious error!
I define my modules in a seperate .js file like this:
angular.module('dashboard.services', []);
angular.module('dashboard.controllers', []);
Here is where I define a service called EventingService (with logic removed for brevity):
angular.module('dashboard.services').factory('EventingService', [function () {
//Service logic here
}]);
Here is my controller that uses the EventingService (this all works fine at runtime):
angular.module('dashboard.controllers')
.controller('Browse', ['$scope', 'EventingService', function ($scope, eventing) {
//Controller logic here
}]);
Here is my unit test - its the line where I attempt to inject the EventingService that causes an error when I run the unit test:
describe('Browse Controller Tests.', function () {
beforeEach(function () {
module('dashboard.services');
module('dashboard.controllers');
});
var controller, scope, eventingService;
beforeEach(inject(function ($controller, $rootScope, EventingService) {
scope = $rootScope.$new();
eventingService = EventingService
controller = $controller('Browse', {
$scope: scope,
eventing: eventingService
});
}));
it('Expect True to be True', function () {
expect(true).toBe(true);
});
});
When I run the test I get this error:
Error: Unknown provider: EventingServiceProvider <- EventingService
I have ensured that my jasmine specrunner.html file has all the necessary source files (this is an Asp.Net MVC project):
<!-- Include source files here... -->
#Scripts.Render("~/bundles/jquery")
<script type="text/javascript" src="#Url.Content("~/Scripts/angular.js")"></script>
<script type="text/javascript" src="#Url.Content("~/Scripts/angular-mocks.js")"></script>
<script type="text/javascript" src="#Url.Content("~/App/scripts/app.js")"></script> <!-- Angular modules defined in here -->
<script type="text/javascript" src="#Url.Content("~/App/scripts/services/eventing.js")"></script> <!-- My Eventing service defined here -->
<script type="text/javascript" src="#Url.Content("~/App/scripts/controllers/browse.js")"></script> <!-- My Browse controller defined here -->
<!-- Include spec files here... -->
<script type="text/javascript" src="#Url.Content("~/App/tests/browse.js")"></script> <!-- The actual unit test here -->
I just can not fathom why Angular is throwing this error complaining about my EventingService. My controller works fine at runtime - it's just when I try to test it that I am getting an error so I am curious as to whether I have screwed something up with the mocking/injection.
The Angular help on testing is rubbish so I am stumped at present - any help or suggestions anyone can give would be very appreciated. Thanks.
I just ran into this and solved it by switching to getting the service using the $injector explicitly:
var EventingService, $rootScope;
beforeEach(inject(function($injector) {
EventingService = $injector.get('EventingService');
$rootScope = $injector.get('$rootScope');
}));
I wish I could tell you why this works and why the simple
beforeEach(inject(function(EventingService) { .... }));
does not, but I don't have the time to investigate the internals. Always best to use one coding style and stick to it.
This style is better in that the name of the variable that you use in your tests is the correct name of the Service. But it is a bit verbose.
There is another angular magic feature that uses strange variable names like $rootScope but I don't like the hacky look of that.
Note that the most of the time people get this error because they didn't include the modules:
beforeEach(module('capsuling'));
beforeEach(module('capsuling.capsules.services'));
If your controllers (defined under dashboard.controllers module) depend on some services which are enclosed in different module (dashboard.services) than you need to reference the dependency modules in your module signature:
angular.module('dashboard.services', []);
angular.module('dashboard.controllers', ['dashboard.services']);
While this question is fairly old i lost significant time solving a problem similar to this one, i.e.:
Error: Unknown provider: SomeServiceProvider <- SomeService
Hence, i'm leaving here another possible cause to this issue. Hopefully, it would helpful to someone.
In my case, i had in my project two modules with the exactly same name but with different dependencies being created, i.e., two different .js files with:
angular.module('moduleName', [dependencies]))
From angular documentation:
Passing one argument retrieves an existing angular.Module, whereas passing more than one argument creates a new angular.Module
Conclusion: It turns out that what was being injected in the test was the module with the wrong dependencies. Removing the second argument from the module that was erroneously being created solved the problem.
Have you tried defining an additional module that depends on your other aggregated modules like so:
angular.module( 'dashboard', [ 'dashboard.services', 'dashboard.controllers' ] )
So you can in the beforeEach specify the one module that has both submodules defined in it like so:
describe('Browse Controller Tests.', function () {
beforeEach(function () {
module('dashboard');
});
var controller, scope, eventingService;
beforeEach(inject(function ($controller, $rootScope, EventingService) {
scope = $rootScope.$new();
eventingService = EventingService
controller = $controller('Browse', {
$scope: scope,
eventing: eventingService
});
}));
it('Expect True to be True', function () {
expect(true).toBe(true);
});
});