What does -J stand for in the jvm argument -J-Xmx? - jvm

What does -J stand for in the jvm argument -J-Xmx ? I have always used -Xmx only and it is the first time I have come across 'J'

The -J flag is used by a few command-line tools, themselves written in Java, to let you pass command-line arguments directly to the JVM they're running in. So, for example, you can't pass "-Xmx1000m" as an argument to javac.exe, but you can pass "-J-Xmx1000m", and javac.exe will (effectively) use it as an option to java.exe.

Related

What is the entry point for WSL 1?

Imagine we have a statically linked Linux executable.
How should I name it in the imported tar.gz so the WSL 1 will run it by default, when created and started like:
# import an archive as a WSL distro
wsl --import static tmp-root-dir static.tar.gz
# boot distro to a default app??
wsl -d static
PS WSL uses own proprietary boot process and seems doesn't use traditional Unix /sbin/init.
Short answer:
The smallest bootable (without errors or warnings) WSL rootfs will consist of three files:
/main: Your statically-linked application. It can be named whatever you want, as long as the name matches what is in passwd.
/etc/passwd: Defines the application (i.e. shell) to load for the default user.
/etc/wsl.conf: To suppress normal WSL functionality and (optionally) define the non-root user.
More detail:
This probably isn't exactly what you are wanting, but it will hopefully meet your needs.
To start with, the entry point for WSL (the first time a Linux ELF binary is started inside the instance) seems to be its /init binary, which, in addition to some "normal" Linux init process tasks, sets up some of the Windows-interop functionality. To my knowledge, it cannot currently be changed. As far as I can tell, for WSL1, it is injected into the instance by the LXSS manager when starting a WSL instance.
Note: WSL2 might be slightly different in this regard, as it does seem to use a kernel-processed initrd to load /init. It is possible to override the kernel command-line, but that would impact all WSL2 instances, so it's probably not a practical solution.
It's not quite clear from your question whether you want the "default application" to:
Run as the default application/shell every time wsl -d static is run, even if it was already running.
Or just run once when starting the WSL1 instance for the first time.
I believe you are looking for the first option.
Run as the default application
In the first case, the standard WSL1 /init process might get you to where you need to be. As part of the startup, as you would expect, it reads /etc/passwd to determine the user shell to start. It also reads /etc/wsl.conf to determine the default user ID (but falls back to the registry if there is no default user set in wsl.conf).
So, to start a different application (let's call it main), you can:
Place the binary in the root directory of your image.
Set the application as the "shell" of the root user in a single-line /etc/passwd:
user:x:1000:1000:user:/:/main
Side-note that this also sets the home directory to / so we don't have to create another directory.
Define a etc/wsl.conf with the following contents:
[user]
default=user
[automount]
enabled=false
mountFsTab=false
[interop]
appendWindowsPath=false
This will prevent WSL from performing the following startup tasks, which would produce an error without additional image support:
Mounting Windows drives into the instance
Attempting to process /etc/fstab (since we have no mount command in the image).
Appending Windows paths (since our instance won't have access to the Windows drives)
It also sets the default user to the UID 1000 user we created in /etc/passwd. This isn't strictly necessary - There's likely no concern with running as root in this single-use instance, but I've included a non-root user as a "best practice".
That should be it. The smallest bootable WSL rootfs will consist of just those three files:
/etc/wsl.conf
/etc/passwd
/main
This will work on WSL1 as well as WSL2, although for WSL2, you should invoke with wsl ~ -d static to make sure that it doesn't try to start on a Windows drive that it can't access. Otherwise, you'll receive an init error, but your application will still be invoked.
Run once
If you are looking for something that will, for instance, start up a daemon when the instance is started for the first time, then there are a few alternatives that I document in this answer. If you are on Windows 11, then there's a built-in mechanism via /etc/wsl.conf. Otherwise, on Windows 10, you'll probably need to include some binary that can handle conditional logic. Something like execline would probably be perfect for this, but I've had issues with it under WSL2, at least, and I'm not sure that it would run under WSL1 (but it might).
Side-note for WSL1/musl
musl is a commonly used alternative libc implementation. For instance, Rust (AFAICT), can only generate truly statically-linked executables using musl. Note, however, that WSL1 cannot run musl-based statically linked binaries.
WSL2 can handle them just fine.
I managed to get it working. Initially I missed an executable bit on the app when created TAR archive.
Take standard 64-bit assembly:
.data
msg:
.ascii "Hello, world!\n"
.set len, . - msg
.text
.globl _start
_start:
# write
mov $1, %rax
mov $1, %rdi
mov $msg, %rsi
mov $len, %rdx
syscall
# exit
mov $60, %rax
xor %rdi, %rdi
syscall
and create a minimal WSL system:
wsl as -64 -o minimal.o minimal.s
wsl ld -melf_x86_64 -o minimal minimal.o
tar czf minimal.tar.gz \
--mode=a=rx \
--xform='s#^minimal#/\0#' minimal
wsl --import minimal rootfs-minimal minimal.tar.gz --version 1
wsl --list
wsl -d minimal -e /minimal
To make executable default (shorten wsl -d minimal -e /minimal to wsl -d minimal) we need an extra file /etc/passwd:
root:x:0:0:root:/root:/minimal
First line of this file determine a default user and so path to the executable (entry point) unless you override the user with /etc/wsl.conf:
[user]
default=user
Basically WSL 1 treats only 2 files as magical (in addition to ignoring /sbin/init):
/etc/wsl.conf
/etc/passwd

What does SQLite3 -batch CLI option do?

There is no documentation that I can find beyond the oneliner provided by the command-line utility. It says:
-batch force batch I/O
So what's going on here if I pass it a query or multiple queries?
When the sqlite3 shell is run interactively, it shows a startup message and the sqlite> prompt, and (on Windows) tries to converts the input to UTF-8.
If the automatic console detection does not work as intended, it can be overridden with -batch or -interactive.

Default c-shell, change to bash but allow for scp

Hi so I am trying to modify my .cshrc file to make bash my default. It is on a school account so I cannot change the main settings but can change the profile. The problem is that when I use the command:
bash
in my .cshrc it works when I am logging in just fine. But anytime I try to scp files it does not work because it launches the .cshrc and scp gets confused when it changes to the bash terminal.
Does anyone know how to get around this? Possibly launch bash in quiet mode...
In general, you shouldn't do anything that invokes an interactive application or produces visible output in your .cshrc. The problem is that .cshrc is sourced for non-interactive shells. And since your default shell is csh, you're going to have csh invoked non-interactively in a lot of cases -- as you've seen with scp.
Instead, I'd just invoke bash -- or, better, bash -l -- manually from the csh prompt. You can set up an alias like, say, alias b bash -l.
If you're going to invoke a new shell automatically on login (which is still not a good idea), put it in your .login, not your .cshrc.
This is assuming chsh doesn't work, but it should -- try it.

Multiple Job (j3)

I am trying to run a GNU make file with multiple jobs.
When I try executing ' make.exe -r -j3', the receive the following to errors:
make.exe: Do not specify -j or --jobs if sh.exe is not available.
make.exe: Resetting make for single job mode.
Do I have to add ' $(SH) -c' somewhere in the makefile? If so, where?
The error message suggests that make cannot find sh.exe. The file names indicate you are probably on CygWin. I would investigate setting the PATH to include the location of sh.exe, or defining the value of SHELL to the name (or, even, full path) of your shell.
Are you running this on Windows (more specifically, in the "windows" shell?). If you are, you might want to read this:
http://www.gnu.org/software/make/manual/make.html#Parallel
more specifically:
On MS-DOS, the ā€˜-jā€™ option has no effect, since that system doesn't support multi-processing.
Once again, assuming you're running on windows, you should get MinGW or CygWin

How are the vxWorks "kernel shell" and "host shell" different?

In the vxWorks RTOS, there is a shell that allows you to issue command to your embedded system.
The documentation refers to kernel shell, host shell and target shell. What is the difference between the three?
The target shell and kernel shell are the same. They refer to a shell that runs on the target. You can connect to the shell using either a serial port, or a telnet session.
A task runs on the target and parses all the commands received and acts on them, outputting data back to the port.
The host shell is a process that runs on the development station. It communicates with the debug agent on the target. All the commands are actually parsed on the host and only simplified requests are sent to the target agent:
Read/Write Memory
Set/Remove Breakpoints
Create/Delete/Suspend/Resume Tasks
Invoke a function
This results in less real-time impact to the target.
Both shells allow the user to perform low level debugging (dissassembly, breakpoints, etc..) and invoke functions on the target.
There are some differences between host shell and target shell, you can use h command to get the actual commands the two shell support.
The host shell support more command line edit functions like auto complement and symbol lookup etc.