I have got very similar problem to this one stated here : Intel CPU OpenCL in Mono killed by SIGXCPU (Ubuntu)
Essentially, I have a very simple C# application using OpenCL (through OpenCL.Net wrapper, but it shouldn't make a difference as it is merely wrapping native functions and nothing more). In the code I just build kernel and then allocate a big array of floats.
To be more specific my platform: It is Ubuntu 12.04, OpenCL 1.1 (with CUDA) and mono 3.0.3.
Problem: When running my code through mono i get CPU LIMIT EXCEEDED error
Few things:
If I set a breakpoint (in monodevelop) somewhere between building the kernel and allocation it works..
Changing array size to small one also makes it work
Strace doesn't show anything useful. I tried also passing a callback to ClBuildProgram (to note: if I comment out line with ClBuildProgram it works).
Any ideas?
That's what worked for me in the end.
There is a major problem with mono - it uses SIGXCPU for GC handling (which is strange btw). Unfortunately OpenCL uses it as well so it conflicts.
Workaround is to modify mono code.
Go to source directory and grep -r SIGXCPU . In my mono (3.0.3) there were 2 imporant files
./libgc/pthread_stop_world.c:# define SIG_THR_RESTART SIGXCPU
./mono/metadata/sgen-os-posix.c:const static int restart_signal_num = SIGXCPU;
Replace SIGXCPU with SIGWINCH and recompile. One note is that I am not sure if it didn't break something, but for now looks OK and OpenCL problem is gone. If it breaks something (like gui) replace SIGWINCH with different signal that you have (signals.h for signals defs)
Related
I am currently using the linux-x86.img which I downloaded from the documentation page for gem5 (http://www.m5sim.org/Download), but since I was not able to compile the fscanf and fopen commands on this image I was wondering if there is a more recent image which I could download and use instead.
The error message throw when trying to compile the lines with fopen and fscanf are
./obj/edgelist.o: In function loadEdgeArray': edgelist.c:(.text+0x148): undefined reference to __isoc99_fscanf'
./obj/edgelist.o: In function loadEdgeArrayInfo': edgelist.c:(.text+0x20c): undefined reference to __isoc99_fscanf'
collect2: ld returned 1 exit status
make: *** [test] Error 1
This error is thrown when trying to compile from both from qemu as well as gem5.
Here's one setup that generates such an image with Buildroot. I'm a fan of Buildroot because it builds everything from source. I don't understand how fscanf and fopen could fail in that image, but I have tested them in the above setup and they work fine.
Boot used to work in the past, but gem5 X86 full system boot has been broken for likely easy to fix reasons for a few months now as of March 2020 on the gem5 side, although there are efforts in place to fix it, and so likely it will work again soon: https://www.gem5.org/project/2020/03/09/boot-tests.html
Other alternatives include:
https://gem5art.readthedocs.io/en/latest/ which Jason has been pushing and uses Packer to generate disk images
You can also extract working disk images from Docker: https://hub.docker.com/_/ubuntu This requires exporting them to a file to give to gem5.
It is also worth noting that when the gem5.org website migrated from the old Wiki to the new static website setup in Q1 2020, we lost the ability of doing directory listing under http://dist.gem5.org/dist/current/arm/ for some reason, and so devs were forced to list them one by one on the static website... https://www.gem5.org/documentation/general_docs/fullsystem/guest_binaries
I am not sure why the error is no longer occurring for me, but documenting the steps I went through which might have fixed something. I reinstalled Ubuntu18.04 therefore had to rebuild gem5 and I used the parsec image (http://www.cs.utexas.edu/~parsec_m5/x86root-parsec.img.bz2) referenced in this answer Booting gem5 X86 Ubuntu Full System Simulation
Background
I have a C++ program that loads a JVM internally and then uses JNI to call code in the JVM. This runs on multiple platforms including AIX. However, when starting the JVM on AIX everything is fine until I call some code that needs to access native code supplied as part of the JRE. I then run into this error message:
java.lang.UnsatisfiedLinkError: net (Not found in com.ibm.oti.vm.bootstrap.library.path)
The problem is that the JVM cannot find the shared library libnet.so. If I dump the value of the com.ibm.oti.vm.bootstrap.library.path system property from Java code running in the JVM I see that by default (i.e. not me setting it) it has the value:
<jre-base-dir>/lib/ppc/default:<jre-base-dir>/lib/ppc
From the error message I guessed it would be a good idea to change this to include the dir where libnet.so is located. However, this shared library is in <jre-base-dir>/lib/ppc which is already in the path set by com.ibm.oti.vm.bootstrap.library.path, so it seems the error message is incorrect.
Experimenting with different values for this system property makes me believe that it is used by the AIX j9vm to load the internal JVM shared libraries only (like libjclse7b_26.so) but not the native code implementations (like libnet.so).
My fix
To fix my problem I had to change the LIBPATH environment variable (which is AIX the equivalent of LD_LIBRARY_PATH in e.g. Linux).
$ LIBPATH=<jre-base-dir>/lib/ppc:<jre-base-dir>/lib/ppc/j9vm ./myprogram
Questions
Can anyone shed some light on the real purpose of the system property com.ibm.oti.vm.bootstrap.library.path on AIX when using the j9vm JVM?
Is my fix the correct way to solve the problem or should I use some other system property? (I have tried java.library.path but it does not seem to help.)
In my case it show error message:
java.lang.UnsatisfiedLinkError: awt (Not found in com.ibm.oti.vm.bootstrap.library.path)
I fix my problem by
copy /usr/java6_64/jre/lib/ppc64/libawt.so to /usr/java6_64/jre/lib/ppc64/j9vm and create symbolic link libawt.a to libawt.so
I set LD_LIBRARY_PATH
LD_LIBRARY_PATH="/usr/java6_64/jre/lib/ppc64:/usr/java6_64/jre/lib/ppc64/j9vm"; export LD_
LIBRARY_PATH
I am working on uclinux porting on coldfire board M5272C3. Right now I have kernel running from RAM with romfs as my rootfile system.
I am not clear about few terms what they mean and when to use them....
Please explain me in a simplest possible manner:
Q1: What is initrd? Why we need that?
Q2: What is ramdisk? Why and where we need this?
Q3: what is initramfs? Why and where we use this?
Q4: What is ramfs? Why and where we use this?
Also please refer document/reference book for in depth knowledge of these terms....
Thanks
Phogat
A ramdisk merely refers to an in-memory disk image. It is implemented using the ramfs VFS driver in the kernel. The contents of the ramdisk would be wiped on the next reboot or power-cycle.
I'll give you details about initrd and initramfs next.
In simple terms, both initrd and initramfs refers to an early stage userspace root filesystem (aka rootfs) that will let you run a very minimal filesystem in memory.
The documentation present at Documentation/filesystems/ramfs-rootfs-initramfs.txt part of the linux kernel source tree, which would also give you a length description of what these are.
What is initrd ?
One common case where there is the need for such an early-stage filesystem is to load driver modules for hard disk controllers. If the drivers were present on the hard drive, it becomes a chicken-and-egg problem. Having these drivers as part of this early-stage rootfs helps the kernel load the drivers for any detected hard disk controllers, before it can mount the actual root filesystem from the hard drive. Another solution to this problem would be to have all the driver modules built into the kernel, but you're going to increase the size of the kernel binary this way. This kind of filesystem image is commonly referred to as initrd. It is implemented using either ramfs or tmpfs. It is emulated using a loopback block device.
The bootloader loads the kernel image into a memory address, the initrd image into another memory address, and tells the kernel where to find the initrd, passes the boot arguments to the kernel, and passes control to the kernel to let it continue the boot process.
So how is it different from initramfs then ?
initramfs is an even earlier stage filesystem compared to initrd which is built into the kernel (controlled by the kernel config of course).
As far as I know, both initrd and initramfs are controlled by this single kernel config, but it could have been changed in the recent kernels.
config BLK_DEV_INITRD
I'm not going deep into how to build your own initramfs, but I can tell you it just uses cpio format to store the files and can be configured using usr/Kconfig while building the kernel. Even if you do not specify your own initramfs image, but have turned on support for initramfs, kernel automatically embeds a very simple initramfs containing /dev/console, /root and some other files/directories.
In addition there is also a newer tmpfs filesystem which is commonly used to implement in-memory filesystems. In fact newer kernels implement initrd using tmpfs instead of ramfs.
UPDATE:
Just happened to stumble upon a similar question
This might also be useful
I compile my .dll with the following command: gcc -mno-cygwin -I"/cygdrive/c/Program Files/Java/jdk1.7.0_04/include" -I"/cygdrive/c/Program Files/Java/jdk1.7.0_04/include/win32" -Wl,--add-stdcall-alias -shared -o CalculatorFunctions.dll CalcFunc.c
I use GlassFish for Eclipse. The whole system is a CORBA client-server. When I start the server from Eclipse - it's fine. But when I try to run the server from the CMD (because I want to set a port and host address for the server) it gives me: Exception: ... .dll: Can't load AI 32-bit .dll on a AMD 64-bit platform
I searched through other topics and saw that I should try with changing my JDK to 32 bit - didn't work again.
So the other solution I read about is to compile the .DLL as 64 bit. What command I need to use or how I do that at all ?
Thanks in advance! :)
You need not only a command but whole 64-bit MinGW toolchain - a 64bit compiler in the first place. Then the parameters to your gcc invocation should work the same.
Beware that 64bit is not just a matter of compilability. Primitive data types have different sizes, so any code making assumptions without sizeof checking is a potential issue. Most prominently, pointer arithmetic.
I have been trying to run valgrind on a MIPS machine.
I successfully cross compiled valgrind and ran a few test from the test suite.
But whenever valgrind tries to create a coredump, an assertion fails.
Its from the file coredump-elf.c
vg_assert(sizeof(*regs) == sizeof(prs->pr_reg));
well apparently this assertion checks if the size of the byte array is same as the struct of registers made by the valgrind.
But i am not able to get past this error.
I am using valgrind on MIPS 32 machine.
thanks
Trunk Valgrind is well supported for MIPS32 LE/BE and MIPS64 LE/BE.
Download the code from the trunk:
svn co svn://svn.valgrind.org/valgrind/trunk valgrind
configure it, make it, and use it. You should not see any MIPS32 issues.