Wanting to use Orchard 1.7 with Media storage on S3 (as I'm deploying to AppHarbor)
So far I'm looking at the S3 Storage provider But its a bit out of date.
Has anyone done this ? is there a better way to use S3 with the new media manager?
I've got images uploading to s3, but they don't display when I click the folder.
here is the Gist of my updated S3Provider
Missing methods for create file, rename folder, get file, and Get storage path. any help on how to complete these would be appreciated.... however stepping through the debugger in VS this doesn't seem to be the root cause of my displaying images issue above.
Edit
Looks like the file is up loading to s3 but not to the database, due to the GetFile method throwing an error...
Edit 2
Added some code to the Get file method. Now that works; (gist updated) Can up load images. However the thumbnails are still not working, they just come back as empty tags ...Think this is because the media manager is using the Open get method - which is supposed to open a file so you can write a stream to it. Don't know how to achieve this with S3... any ideas welcome
As Part of the AWSSKD NuGet package version 1.5.28.3 you can access a S3FileInfo object. I've used this in my S3 Storage File and updated the S3 Storage provider.
This seem to work, need to do a bit more testing on it.
NOTE: I had to add some code on the GetFile Method to ensure the permissions where set correctly otherwise the updating of thumbnails overwrote permissions on the file.... I'm sure there is a better way to do this.
Related
I have quite common situation, as I suppose. I have website that is lcoated on amazon EC2 and I'd like to move all dynamic files to amazon S3. Everything seems ok, except 2 points:
I'm using library PDFNet with their WebViewer. To display pdf files in browser Webviwer use special ".xod" format. PDFNet provide functionality to convert pdf files to xod format. Let's see an example, when PDF file was upload on S3 and no xod file was created (I'm going to use Lambda to avoid it in future, but still). So in this case I have to download file to my local machine, convert it to xod file and upload xod file on S3(I don't see any other opportunities to do it, but it can take a lot of traffic)?
Second problem is almost the same, but it's linked with thumbnails. Currently I'm dynamically resize thumbnails depending on the required resolution and I'd like to keep it. Amazon Lambda is not situable in this case, what is the best way to do it?
Why do you say that Lambda is not suitable here?
For pt#1 PDFNet gives a library for Java, you can write a lambda function in java (its possible now) and use that to get infinite scale.
For pt#2: Amazons tutorial (http://docs.aws.amazon.com/lambda/latest/dg/with-s3-example.html) gives a detailed example of how to resize images when uploaded to S3. The example is in nodeJs, you can write a java version as well if you like.
Note that if you want to have custom logic for decision making, you can add attributes while uploading the file in S3 (http://docs.aws.amazon.com/AmazonS3/latest/dev/UsingMetadata.html#User-Defined Metadata) which you can use in your lambda function to take decisions while resizing.
Is there a way to run imagemagick or some other tool on s3 servers to resize the images.
The way I know is first downloading all the image files on my machine and then convert these files and reupload them on s3 server. The problem is the number of file is more than 10000. I don't want to download all the files on my local machine.
Is there a way to convert it on s3 server itself.
look at it: https://github.com/Turistforeningen/node-s3-uploader.
It is a library providing some features for s3 uploading including resizing as you want
Another option is NOT to change the resolution, but to use a service that can convert the images on-the-fly when they are accessed, such as:
Cloudinary
imgix
Also check out the following article on amazon's compute blog.. I found myself here because i had the same question. I think i'm going to implement this in Lambda so i can just specify the size and see if that helps. My problem is i have image files on s3 that are 2MB.. i dont want them at full resolution because I have an app that is retrieving them and it takes a while sometimes for a phone to pull down a 2MB image. But i dont mind storing them at full resolution if i can get a different size just by specifying it in the URL. easy!
https://aws.amazon.com/blogs/compute/resize-images-on-the-fly-with-amazon-s3-aws-lambda-and-amazon-api-gateway/
S3 does not, alone, enable arbitrary compute (such as resizing) on the data.
I would suggest looking into AWS-Lambda (available in the AWS console), which will allow you to setup a little program (which they call a Lambda) to run when certain events occur in a S3 bucket. You don't need to setup a VM, you only need to specify a few files, with a particular entry point. The program can be written in a few languages, namely node.js python and java. You'd be able to do it all from the console's web GUI.
Usually those are setup for computing things on new files being uploaded. To trigger the program for files that are already in place on S3, you have to "force" S3 to emit one of the events you can hook into for the files you already have. The list is here. Forcing a S3 copy might be sufficient (copy A to B, delete B), an S3 rename operation (rename A to A.tmp, rename A.tmp to A), and creation of new S3 objects would all work. You essentially just poke your existing files in a way that causes your Lambda to fire. You may also invoke your Lambda manually.
This example shows how to automatically generate a thumbnail out of an image on S3, which you could adapt to your resizing needs and reuse to create your Lambda:
http://docs.aws.amazon.com/lambda/latest/dg/walkthrough-s3-events-adminuser-create-test-function-create-function.html
Also, here is the walkthrough on how to configure your lambda with certain S3 events:
http://docs.aws.amazon.com/lambda/latest/dg/walkthrough-s3-events-adminuser.html
I uploaded a lot of files (about 5,800) to Amazon S3, which seemed to work perfectly well, but a few of them (about 30) had their filenames converted to lowercase.
The first time, I uploaded with Cyberduck. When I saw this problem, I deleted them all and re-uploaded with Transmit. Same result.
I see absolutely no pattern that would link the files that got their names changed, it seems very random.
Has anyone had this happen to them?
Any idea what could be going on?
Thank you!
Daniel
I let you know first that Amazon S3 object URLs are case sensitive. So when you upload file file with upper case and access that file with same URL, it was working. But after renaming objects in lower case and I hope you are trying same older URL so you may get access denied/NoSuchKey error message.
Can you try Bucket Explorer to generate the file URL for Amazon S3 object and then try to access that file?
Disclosure: I work for Bucket Explorer.
When I upload to Amazon servers, I always use Filezilla and STFP. I never had such a problem. I'd guess (and honestly, this is just a guess since I haven't used Cyberduck nor Transmit) that the utilities you're using are doing the filename changing. Try it with Filezilla and see what the result is.
I have a program which takes input from S3, generates a text file, and then sends it to the mapper class. I am unable to write the file to S3, from where the mapper can read it later. Now, I realize that we cannot write files to S3 directly, so I am trying to upload the text file created to S3 using copyFromLocalFile(). However, I get a null pointer exception in the following line:
fs.copyFromLocalFile(true, new Path(tgiPath), mapIP);
I am creating the text file in main function, so I am not sure where exactly it's being created. The only reason behind the null pointer exception, that I can think of is that the text file is not being written on the local disk. So my question is: How do I write files on the local disk? If I just specify the name of the file while creating it, where is it created and how do I access it?
Have a look at Jets3t
This seems to be exactly what you need.
Jets3t is awesome, but I am using Google's App Engine, and it doesn't work on there because of threading limitations.
I banged my head against the wall until I came up with a solution that worked on App Engine by combining a bunch of existing libraries: http://socialappdev.com/using-amazon-s3-with-google-app-engine-02-2011
We're using Amazon S3 for file storage and recently found out that we need to keep some sort of directory structure. Since S3 doesn't allow that, we know we can name the files according to their structure for storage. For example...
abc/123/draft.doc
What I want to know is if I want to provide a public link to this particular file is there anyway that the file can simply be draft.doc instead of abc/123/draft.doc ?
I feel stupid. After some more investigation I realized that by creating a GET url to the resource, I get exactly what I need.