I am creating a report in SSRS 2008 with MS SQL Server 2008 R2. I have data based on the Aggregate value of Medical condition and the level of severity.
Outcome Response Adult Youth Total
BMI GOOD 70 0 70
BMI MONITOR 230 0 230
BMI PROBLEM! 10 0 10
LDL GOOD 5 0 5
LDL MONITOR 4 0 4
LDL PROBLEM! 2 0 2
I need to display the data based on the Response like:
BMI BMI BMI
GOOD MONITOR PROBLEM!
Total 70 230 10
Youth 0 0 0
Adult 70 230 10
LDL LDL LDL
GOOD MONITOR PROBLEM!
Total 5 4 2
Youth 0 0 0
Adult 5 4 2
I first tried to use SSRS to do the grouping based on the Outcome and then the Response but I got each response on a separate row of data but I need all Outcomes on a single line. I now believe that a pivot would work but all the examples I have seen is a pivot on one column of data pivoted using another. Is it possible to pivot multiple columns of data based on a single column?
With your existing Dataset you could so something similar to the following:
Create a List item, and change the Details grouping to be based on Outcome:
In the List cell, add a new Matrix with one Column Group based on Response:
You'll note that since you have individual columns for Total, Youth, Adult, you need to add grand total rows to display each group.
The end result is pretty close to your requirements:
For your underlying data, to help with report development it might be useful to have the Total, Youth, Adult as unpivoted columns, but it's not a big deal if the groups are fairly static.
Related
I have data like this
EmployeeID Value
1 7
2 6
3 5
4 3
I would like to create a DAX calculated column (or do I need a measure?) that gives me for each row, Value - AVG() of selected rows.
So if the AVG() of the above 4 rows is 5.25, I would get results like this
EmployeeID Value Diff
1 7 1.75
2 6 0.75
3 5 -0.25
4 3 -1.75
Still learning DAX, I cannot figure out how to implement this?
Thanks
I figured this out with the help of some folks on MSDN forums.
This will only work as a measure because measures are selection aware while calculated columns are not.
The Average stored in a variable is critical. ALLSELECTED() gives you the current selection in a pivot table.
AVERAGEX does the row value - avg of selection.
Diff:=
Var ptAVG = CALCULATE(AVERAGE[Value],ALLSELECTED())
RETURN AVERAGEX(Employee, Value - ptAVG)
You can certainly do this with a calculated column. It's simply
Diff = TableName[Value] - AVERAGE(TableName[Value])
Note that this averages over all employees. If you want to average over only specific groups, then more work needs to be done.
I'm new to mdx and need your help:
[Item].[Segment] [Country].[World] [Measures].[Periodic]
1 Region A 150
2 Region B 60
3 Region C 1400
4 Region D 20
I have two dimensions Segment and World. If I take only world, I get no values. But I want to achieve to combine the two dimensions to one dimension on segment level as following:
[Item].[Segment] [Measures].[Periodic]
1 150
2 60
3 1400
4 20
Would an aggregation be useful in this case?
Thanks in advance!
The Structure is like following:
Cube_Structure
--> I need to combine both dimensions Segment and World in order to have one dimension on the row which shows me the values for the segments only!
I have two tables (sql server), as shown below:
locations
id cubicfeet order
-------------------------------------
1 5 1
2 10 1
3 6 1
items
id cubic feet order
--------------------------------------
1 6 1
2 6 1
3 6 1
I need a query to tell me if all the items will fit into all the locations (for a given order). If all items will not fit into 1 or all locations then I need to create a new location for that given order - and then move any items that DID fit into the locations before to the new location (as many as fit). The new location will only be given a certain amount of cubic feet also - say 17. In this example, sum won't work because all 3 records are 6 so the sum is 18, which is less than the sum of 5,10,6, but the location with volume 5 can't fit any of the items since they are all volume 6 cubic feet.
the only way I think I can do it is creating temp tables in my sp and using a while loop to go through them and update the locations 1 at a time to see if it still fits more...
Excel build-in functions are, at most of the time, effective. However, there are some functions really like implemented half-way and some how dictated their usage. The SUBTOTAL function is one of them.
My data is presented in the following format:
Value Count
100 20
102 3
105 4
102 5
And I want to build a table in this format:
Value Count
100 20
101 0
102 8
103 0
104 0
105 4
I've read this in SO but my situation is a bit differ. Pivot table will be able to give you the subtotals of the values appears in the original data and I don't want to have a loop to insert missing values in the original data (if it is gonna to be a loop over the original data, the loop could use to build the table - which I would prefer to avoid at all)
Here is my data (apologies for poor formatting, maybe that should have been my first question!):
Customer Percentage Increase
1 2%
2 12%
3 -50%
4 87%
5 -20%
6 -1%
7 123%
8 -98%
9 10%
10 13%
I created a pivot table in Excel with Percentage Increase as the Row Labels and Count of Customer as the value.
Row Labels Count of Customer
-98% 1
-50% 1
-20% 1
-1% 1
2% 1
10% 1
12% 1
13% 1
87% 1
123% 1
Grand Total 10
I then wanted to group the percentages to something easier to read, but the percentage ranges do not show percentages, instead they show regular numbers.
Row Labels Count of Customer
<-0.5 1
-0.5--0.25 1
-0.25-0 2
0-0.25 4
0.75-1 1
>1 1
Grand Total 10
How do I get the number formatting of my percentage ranges to be percentages, i.e. 0% - 25%, etc?
Thank you.
The only way I know is to change them by hand, i.e., click into the cell with the label and change it to say what you want.
If you do this, I'd also create the labels for the categories that don't show up yet, e.g., 25% to 50% (and 50% to 75%) in your example. To do this, choose Field Settings>Layout & Print and check "Show items with no data". Change the labels for those ranges as well. Once you do, you can uncheck "Show items with no data", and in the future if there are counts in new ranges the new labels will still be what you entered. (At least it seems to work that way).