I want to make my code more modular and flexible.
So rather than setting a the tableViewDelegate as the UIViewController, I have a subclass of UITableViewController as the tableView data source and delegate.
Basically, the original UIViewController provides the view for the subclass of UITableViewController.
That way similar tables can be used by several UIViewController's subclasses.
In some cases, UIViewController's provide the tableView and I just switch the tableView delegate at run time.
Works well.
Here is the code for BGTableViewDelegateMother that inherits from UITableViewController (that inherits from UIViewController.
#implementation BGTableViewDelegateMother
-(void) setDelegate:(id<BGTableViewDelegateMother>)delegate
{
_delegate=delegate;
self.view = self.delegate.tvDelegated; //So that viewWillAppear would work fine
[self view]; //load the view view didload is not called either
self.delegate.tvDelegated.delegate =self;
self.delegate.tvDelegated.dataSource=self;
}
Okay. The UITableViewController.view is used for one thing. Now that it points to the correct tableView, I expect viewWillAppear to be called. It's not
I think everytime the tableView will be shown, I should at least reloadData
-(void) viewWillAppear:(BOOL)animated
{
[super viewWillAppear:animated];//never called
[self.delegate.tvDelegated reloadData];
}
This code never called. Even though the view will indeed appear. Why?
viewDidLoad is also never called.
Make the table view controller a child view controller of your view controller while its view is linked (and it is the data source) and could be on screen. This tells the view controller hierarchy that the table view needs to know about the appearance callbacks.
Related
Two objective-c methods, -(void) viewDidLoad and -(void)loadView are methods called upon execution of a program but whats the different between them?
Do you mean viewDidLoad and loadView? viewDidLoad is a method called when your view has been fully loaded. That means all your IBOutlets are connected and you can make changes to labels, text fields, etc.
loadView is a method called if you're (typically) not loading from a nib. You can use this method to set up your view controller's view completely in code and avoid interface builder altogether.
You'll typically want to avoid loadView and stick to viewDidLoad.
Use -(void)loadView when you create the view. Typically usage is:
-(void)loadView {
UIView *justCreatedView = <Create view>;
self.view = justCreatedView;
}
Use -(void)viewDidLoad when you customize the appearance of view. Exapmle:
-(void)viewDidLoad {
self.view.backgroundColor = [UIColor blackColor];
...
}
i think you are talking about loadView and viewDidLoad.
loadView is a method that you not using a nib file - you use it to programmatically 'write' your interface
viewDidLoad fires automatically when the view is fully loaded. you can then start interacting with it.
more to read read in the discussion here iPhone SDK: what is the difference between loadView and viewDidLoad?
Using Xcode 4.3.1, ipad app for iOS 5.1, no core-data
On my storyboard I have a master-detail project. The master obviously has a TableView, and that works fine: by selecting an item in the master tableview my detail data is set in the detail view controller by the template code call setDetailItem (which I call from 'didSelectRowAtIndexPath'). That works fine.
My DetailView/Scene contains (another) UITableView (amongst other, also some TextFields etc.)
This UITAbleView's datasource and delegate are connected to the detail view controller.
In the detail viewcontroller's interface file I adde the protocols UITableViewDataSource and UITableViewDelegate (next to the pre-configured UISplitViewControllerDelegate).
I implemented the methods numberOfSectionsInTableView, numberOfRowsInSection, cellForRowAtIndexPath, didSelectRowAtIndexPath methods in the detail view controller.
However, these are only called when the master tableview's list is build up, not when I select an item in the master list/tableview. When I select an item in the master list/tableview the detail data get's set in the detail viewcontroller, but for instance the 'cellForRowAtIndexPath' in the detail controller is never called, and the detail TableView is not updated/initialised. (The textfield in the detail view however is loaded with the correct data).
I guess I am missing something. Do I have to give the tableview a kick at the point I prepared it's data? And if so, how...? The tableview itself is not connected to an outlet or action, should it?
Thanks!
You need to implement a custom delegate (one-to-one communication) from RootView to Detailview.
Like the following,
Implement the Delegate in RootView,
#protocol RootViewControllerDelegate <NSObject>
-(void)didchangeSelectionInRootViewList:(id)toItem;
#end
And call the delegate when needed as (in your case on table view didSelectRowAtIndexPath),
//a delegete need in caes of splitview to refresh the detailview.
-(void)callDelegate:(id)sender {
if(self.delegate && [self.delegate respondsToSelector:#selector(didchangeSelectionInRootViewList:)]) {
[self.delegate didchangeSelectionInRootViewList:sender];
}
}
And don't forgot to set the delegate in Rootview as detailview while creating splitview controller.
And also catch the delegate in Detailview and reload the TableView with sufficient data to load.
thanks,
Naveen Shan
I have a universal app, where I am sharing the same controller for a IPad and IPhone storyboard.
I have put a UILongPressGestureRecognizer on a UITableView, that when a cell is pressed on iPhone it calls an action that perform a segue:
-(IBAction)showDetail:(id)sender {
UILongPressGestureRecognizer *gesture = (UILongPressGestureRecognizer*)sender;
if (gesture.state == UIGestureRecognizerStateBegan) {
CGPoint p = [gesture locationInView:self.theTableView];
NSIndexPath *indexPath = [self.theTableView indexPathForRowAtPoint:p];
if (indexPath != nil) {
[self performSegueWithIdentifier:SEGUE_DETAIL sender:indexPath];
}
}
}
the segue is a detail view performed as a 'push'. The first thing you should notice is that the sender is an NSIndexPath, is the only way I found for passing the selected cell. Maybe there's a better solution.
Everything works fine, in a sense that the segue is performed, and before the prepareForSegue is called too.
However it happens that on iPad, I have changed the segue identifier to Popover.
Now things are working in part, the segue is performed, but prepareForSegue is not called and therefore the destination view controller is not set up as it should be.
What am I doing wrong ?
What I have discovered so far, is that with any segue identifier that is not popover these are the invocations made by iOS:
prepareForSegue (on source controller)
viewDidLoad (on destination controller)
while in popover segue the invocation order is:
viewDidLoad (on destination controller)
prepareForSegue (on source controller)
just because I put all my logic in viewDidLoad, the controller was not properly initialized, and a crash happened. So this is not exactly true that prepareForSegue is not called, the truth is that I was getting an exception, and I wrongly mistaken as prepareForSegue not getting called.
I couldn't put everything in viewWillAppear because a call to CoreData had to be made and I didn't want to check if entities were ok each time the view display.
How did I solve this ? I created another method in destination controller
-(void)prepareViewController {
// initialization logic...
}
and changing the prepareForSegue method in source controller itself:
-(void)prepareForSegue:(UIStoryboardSegue *)segue sender:(id)sender {
MyViewController *mvc = (MyViewController*)[segue destinationViewController];
// passing variable
// with segue style other than popover this called first than viewDidLoad
mvc.myProp1=#"prop1";
mvc.myProp2=#"prop2";
// viewWillAppear is not yet called
// so by sending message to controller
// the view is initialized
[mvc prepareViewController];
}
don't know if this is expected behavior with popover, anyway now things are working.
I've noticed that the boiler plate code for Xcode's Master-Detail template (iPhone) uses the following pattern for configuring the detail VC's view:
the detail VC's setters (for properties) are overwritten in order to invoke the configureView method (configureView would update all your controls in the view, e.g., labels, etc.)
the detail VC's viewDidLoad method also invokes the configureView method
I did not follow this pattern the other day when I was trying to re-use a detail VC in my movie app, and this gave me trouble.
I don't have much experience with popovers; however, if the pattern above is used with a detail VC that is displayed inside a popover, then wouldn't the detail VC's view get configured when you set the detail VC's properties from within the prepareForSegue method?
This one is probably something simple, still learning the ins-and-outs on this but I've run out of searches for this one with no available answer.
I've got a UIViewController with several elements displayed on it, one such element is a UITableView. The UITableView has it's own class and is allocated in the UIViewControllers viewWillAppear
- (void)viewWillAppear:(BOOL)animated
{
UITableView *insideTableView = [[UITableView alloc] init];
tableView.delegate = insideTableView;
tableView.dataSource = insideTableView;
}
Everything is working fine in regards to the tableview. Today I am experimenting with a few additions, one of which is a new view popup on cell selection within that tableview.
Inside my TableView Class, I have the following:
- (void)tableView:(UITableView *)tableView didSelectRowAtIndexPath:(NSIndexPath *)indexPath
{
NSLog(#"Cell Pressed, Present View");
PopupView *popupView = [[PopupView alloc] initWithNibName:#"PopupView" bundle:nil];
popupView.modalTransitionStyle = UIModalTransitionStyleCoverVertical;
[self presentModalViewController:popupView animated:YES];
}
Now it gets called fine, verified by the NSLog, however the view doesn't appear. I know the problem is related to the fact that I want PopUp to appear over the TableViews Parent rather than itself.
I'm just not sure how to properly call it in this instance.
The delegate is a UIViewController which doesn't have its view property set, which is why presentModalViewController:: doesn't work.
You need the view controller containing the table view to present the modal view controllers, but note that that view controller is not the parent of the table view delegate. This is because you have no view controller hierarchy in place.
The easiest way to fix this is to put those methods inside the view controller whose view contains the table view. Alternatively the table view delegate needs to hold a reference to the view controller so it can call presentModalViewController:: on it.
The latter approach can lead to retain cycle, so you have to use a non-retaining reference. The nicest implementation is the delegate pattern.
Also, you don't want to do the instantiation in viewWillAppear: because that can be called multiple times during the lifecycle of a view controller. Put the code in viewDidLoad and balance it in dealloc. Right now you are leaking memory every time your view appears, which when your modal view controller is working will be every time the modal view controller is presented and dismissed.
I might be confused here and asking the wrong question.
If I use a class like the UISplitViewController inside the appdelete.m, will the only message i will receive is the message the UISplitViewController calls and not any VIEW message? for example:
in my myappdelegate.m
....
UISplitViewController *mySplitViewController = [[UISplitViewController alloc] init];
mySplitViewController.viewControllers = [NSArray arrayWithObjects:leftside,rightside,nil];
...
mySplitViewController.delegate = self;
....
[windows addSubView:mySplitViewController.view];
....
-(void) viewWillAppear:(BOOL) animated {
}
in myappdelegate.h I included UISplitViewControllerDelegate
I expected viewWillAppear to fire but it is not. I assume if I had subclass UISplitViewControler it would have fire. right?
BTW: I am doing this without using IB. Do I need to set the target for the mySplitViewController?
What I want to do is setup the orientation of the splitviewcontroller when it rotates.
the viewWillAppear method and other view related methods will be called on the view or view controller themselves, not on the delegate.
That means that if you make a subclass of UISplitViewController called SplitViewControllerSubClass, the view... methods will be called on the instance of SplitViewControllerSubClass, not on the delegate object.
But considering you are creating the views and displaying them programmatically, you already know exactly when the view will appear (i.e., right before you add it to the window), so I believe you could do whatever setup you want at that point.