Auto-start appfabric seems to work sequentially - wcf

I have a couple of wcf services which will call a registration service at startup (through a custom ServiceHostFactory). All these services (including the registration service) are running in the same app pool. I installed appfabric to auto-start all the services. I won't explain all the detailed settings (because I think it's not necessary yet), but in short, the services use net.tcp bindings and is running in IIS 7.5 on Windows 7.
The problem:
When I set all services to auto-start it will begin with one (random) service, this service tries to connect to the registration service. But somehow this registration service won't start-up. It looks like it wants to start all services sequentially.
The (not wanted) solution 1:
When I put the registration service in it's own app pool everything works fine and alle services come online in a matter of seconds and register themself.
The (not wanted) solution 2:
When I disable the auto-start and try to access one of the services after a iisreset, it all works fine. The service will try to register itself and the registration service in his turn will start.
I'm new to appfabric, so it might be some simple configuration issue. The weird thing though is that it won't work whith auto-start, but seems to work fine with a manual start.
Any idea's?

There is no priority in AppFabric Auto Start feature. You can't assume that one service will always be started before the others. Also, you can't assume they will start all at the same time.
For the specific scenario, it's recommanded to use WCF 4.0 Discovery and Announcement. Announcement feature enables service to announce their availability (by sending Hello and Bye announcements) whereas Discovery feature allow clients to discover service address at runtime.
All your services are on the same server ? could be pertinent to use a namedPipeBinding.

Related

IIS Restart Web API in ordered

When IIS Server is the outage, the server is restarted and all applications and web APIs are restarted as well, the problem I'm facing that some Web API depends on BUS. Could we let site/app wait until BUS ready before starting from IIS without touching the application code? In Docker, we can use the WAIT command or other third parties to wait until service is available before starting a container.
The Web API we are built on .Net Core 3.1
Any help is appreciated.
During the startup could you use something like
https://github.com/App-vNext/Polly to enter a period of retry
(https://github.com/App-vNext/Polly#retry). This would allow you to
retry the call to the API until it's hopefully it's available.
Use a windows service to monitor heartbeats of the applications and trigger application pool restarts on applications not working correctly. This should help you get into a running state.
Ultimately I'd try and remove this dependency, if you could give a little more information around the webapi requirements I'd be happy to suggest more ideas.

Failover mechanisum for WCF services serving enterprise application

We have set of WCF services running on single computer which collectively serves an WPF application which could be on same machine or on remote machine (within same network only). We need failover mechanisum so whenver any of the service crashes or hangs - we want to restart the service and initialize it by calling appropriate method.
Since we are not aware of what is the industry standard for implementing failover for WCF service - we have implemented like this way. We start main WCF service hosted in console app along with one more secondary WCF service which constantly checks health of main WCF service by calling exposed method on given endpoint. If main WCF service fails, it takes role of main WCF service and launches another secondary WCF service.
The above approach is working fine but only problem we have seen is memory since we launch services in pair and every host requires 10MB of memory.
Can anyone help me what is the industry practice for implementing failover for this kind of scenario?

Windows Services & WCF

I need to create a Windows Service to watch a folder on our network and action files that are placed within it. The process is quite slow and I need the ability to check the progress from a client application (which will be running in about 10 places on the same network as the machine running the Windows service).
Is hosting some WCF service in the windows service the right way to go about this and if so, are there any resources on how I would do this?
Thanks!
it seems a reasonable approach to me.
you can get details of how to host a WCF service inside a windows service in the MSDN how to
This code project page also has an example.
you might need to debug start up issues with the service, and I find adding a
Debugger.Launch();
to the beginning of the OnStart method is the easiest way of doing that. it enables you to debug through the start up process of your service and see any exceptions that occur.

What services are required for AppFabric to run properly and monitor WCF Services

I'm running AppFabric on IIS7 with Windows 7 for development.
AppFabric works fine for some period of time, but then it will stop updating.
I can send service requests through, and AppFabric doesn't show them in the dashboard when I refresh it.
I think a service is stopping, or there's a permission issue. Does anyone know what services are required to for AppFabric to run properly?
SQL Server and AppFabric Event Collection Service, off the top of my head (for event collection; there are other services, but since you say AppFabric itself runs requests, I presume they're OK). There's also Event Tracing for Windows, but it's not, strictly speaking, a service.
I presume you've also checked the tracking profile is set correctly and have looked in the Application event log?

Moving WCF service from IIS to a Windows service

We have an existing WCF service that makes use of wsDualHttpBinding to enable callbacks to the client. I am considering moving it to netTcpBinding for better performance, but I'm quite wary of moving away from the IIS-hosted service (a "comfort zone" we currently enjoy) into having our own Windows service to host it. I was hoping we could still host this on IIS 7 but Win2K8 won't be reality for us for some time.
What things should I watch out for when creating our own Windows service to host our WCF service? Things like lifetime management and request throttling are features that come free with IIS hosting so I'd also like to know how we can effectively host our service on our own without the convenience of having IIS do the hard work for us. Thanks! :)
So as you cannot host using WAS there are a couple of things to realise.
If the service crashes it doesn't restart by default (although you can change this in service properties)
IIS will recycle the application pool if it hangs or grows too big; you must do this yourself if you want the same sort of reliability.
You must create an account for the service to run under, or use one of the default services. Resit the temptation to run the service as SYSTEM or under an administrator account; if you want to use a built in account use NETWORK SERVICE.
It becomes harder to debug in situ.
Consider using a error logger such as log4net
Having said that I deployed a WCF/Windows service combination for a customer 9 months ago; it's heavily used and hasn't died once.
You can request throttle in a Windows service, it's part of the WCF configuration. Note the defaults are very low, it is likely you will have to increase these.
Hosting in a Windows Service Application (http://msdn.microsoft.com/en-us/library/ms734781.aspx) is a good start.
If you can host your service on Vista, you can also benefit from Windows Process Activation Service (WAS). WAS is a generalization of the IIS process activation, which can be used to activate processes over non-HTTP endpoints (TCP, Named Pipe, MSMQ). To learn more about WCF hosted in WAS, read http://msdn.microsoft.com/en-us/library/ms733109.aspx. To learn how to install and configure WAS, read http://msdn.microsoft.com/en-us/library/ms731053.aspx.