I've got a view that iterates a collection and calls DisplayFor() for each element in the collection.
I need to manually iterate (as opposed to passing the collection to DisplayFor) in order to tell the template if a break in the list should be drawn. The items in the list will only be of 2 types, ordered by them, so I only need to show this break once.
My template is found and called correctly.
I can see the HTML it generates correctly, ie: DisplayFor().ToHtmlString()
I can set this HTML as a scoped variable, ie: var html = DisplayFor().ToHtmlString() ..
But even Html.Raw(html) does not render it in the browser - the HTML has simply vanished.
What's going on?
var renderBreakInList = Model.Items.Any(x => x.IsSomeType);
foreach(var item in Model.Items)
{
var renderBreak = renderBreakInList && item.IsOtherType;
Html.DisplayFor(x => item, new { renderBreak = renderBreak });
if (renderBreak)
{
renderBreakInList = false;
}
}
The Html.DisplayFor method in itself does not render anything to the response just returns the generated HTML as a MvcHtmlString.
In order to actually write the rendered HTML to the response you need to tell this to Razor with using the # sign:
#Html.DisplayFor(x => item, new { renderBreak = renderBreak })
So your whole code should look like this:
#{
var renderBreakInList = Model.Items.Any(x => x.IsSomeType);
foreach(var item in Model.Items)
{
var renderBreak = renderBreakInList && item.IsOtherType;
#Html.DisplayFor(x => item, new { renderBreak = renderBreak })
if (renderBreak)
{
renderBreakInList = false;
}
}
}
Or you can use the WebPageBase.Write method (which gets called under the hood when using the # sign):
Write(Html.DisplayFor(x => item, new { renderBreak = renderBreak }));
finally figured this out after trying a lot of different things and reworking how I tell the Template to draw the break.
Rather than send a bool which I'd prefer to make the template more robust (if the order changes), I'm passing in the ID of the item that should draw the break.
#{
var breakItem = Model.Items.FirstOrDefault(x => renderBreakInList && x.IsSomeType);
var breakID = breakItem == null ? (long?)null : (long)breakItem.ID;
}
#Html.DisplayFor(x => x.Items, new { breakID = breakID })
Also like nemesv pointed out, Html.DisplayFor() needs to be prepended with #. I got out of the habit of doing this inside code blocks because I would always get the 'once inside a code block you don't need #` error..
Related
I'm trying to add a route parameter to all pages in a Razor Pages Area so every URL within an Area has an OrgId e.g. /dashboard/{orgId}/{page}/{route}. I can add them using the AddAreaPageRoute as shown below, but I can't help feeling there's a way to apply this to all pages without having to define an entry for every page in the Area. Is there a way to create a route for all pages in an Area?
.AddRazorPages(options =>
{
options.Conventions.AddAreaPageRoute("Dashboard", "/Index", "Dashboard/{orgId}");
options.Conventions.AddAreaPageRoute("Dashboard", "/AddItem", "Dashboard/{orgId}/AddItem");
options.Conventions.AddAreaPageRoute("Dashboard", "/Items", "Dashboard/{orgId}/Items");
options.Conventions.AddAreaPageRoute("Dashboard", "/Items/Index", "Dashboard/{orgId}/Items/{id}");
})
You can change your code like below:
services.AddRazorPages(options =>
{
options.Conventions.AddAreaFolderRouteModelConvention("Dashboard", "/", model =>
{
foreach (var selector in model.Selectors)
{
var c = selector.AttributeRouteModel.Template.ToString();
selector.AttributeRouteModel = new AttributeRouteModel
{
Order = -1,
Template =c.Replace("Dashboard", "Dashboard/{orgId}")
};
}
});
});
You can see the details in the doc.
I have succesfully rendered my own component as the cellEditor and would like and on-leave I would like it to try to validate the value and prevent the closing if it fails.
If I look at this then https://www.ag-grid.com/javascript-grid-cell-editing/#editing-api there's cancelable callback functions for editing. But in this callback function is there a way to access the current instantiated component? I would think that would be the easiest way to handle this.
I'm using vee-validate so the validation function is async, just to keep in mind.
Use Full row editing.
Create a global variable like
var problemRow = -1;
Then Subscribe to this events:
onRowEditingStarted: function (event) {
if (problemRow!=-1 && event.rowIndex!=problemRow) {
gridOptions.api.stopEditing();
gridOptions.api.startEditingCell({
rowIndex: problemRow,
colKey: 'the column you want to focus',
});
}
},
onRowEditingStopped: function (event) {
if (problemRow==-1) {
if (event.data.firstName != "your validation") {
problemRow = event.rowIndex
gridOptions.api.startEditingCell({
rowIndex: problemRow,
colKey: 'the column you want to focus',
});
}
}
if (problemRow == event.rowIndex) {
if (event.data.firstName != "your validation") {
problemRow = event.rowIndex
gridOptions.api.startEditingCell({
rowIndex: problemRow,
colKey: 'the column you want to focus',
});
}
else{
problemRow=-1;
}
}
},
I had a similar issue - albeit in AngularJS and the non-Angular mode for ag-grid - I needed to prevent the navigation when the cell editor didn't pass validation.
The documentation is not very detailed, so in the end I added a custom cell editor with a form wrapped around the input field (to handle the niceties such as red highlighting etc), and then used Angular JS validation. That got me so far, but the crucial part was trying to prevent the user tabbing out or away when the value was invalid so the user could at least fix the issue.
I did this by adding a value parser when adding the cell, and then within that if the value was invalid according to various rules, throw an exception. Not ideal, I know - but it does prevent ag-grid from trying to move away from the cell.
I tried loads of approaches to solving this - using the tabToNextCell events, suppressKeyboardEvent, navigateToNextCell, onCellEditingStopped - to name a few - this was the only thing that got it working correctly.
Here's my value parser, for what it's worth:
var codeParser = function (args) {
var cellEditor = _controller.currentCellEditor.children['codeValue'];
var paycodeId = +args.colDef.field;
var paycodeInfo = _controller.paycodes.filter(function (f) { return f.id === paycodeId; })[0];
// Check against any mask
if (paycodeInfo && paycodeInfo.mask) {
var reg = new RegExp("^" + paycodeInfo.mask + '$');
var match = args.newValue.match(reg);
if (!match) {
$mdToast.show($mdToast.simple().textContent('Invalid value - does not match paycode format.').position('top right').toastClass('errorToast'))
.then(function(r) {
_controller.currentCellEditor.children['codeValue'].focus();
});
throw 'Invalid value - does not match paycode format.';
}
}
return true;
};
The _controller.currentCellEditor value is set during the init of the cell editor component. I do this so I can then refocus the control after the error has been shown in the toast:
CodeValueEditor.prototype.init = function (params) {
var form = document.createElement('form');
form.setAttribute('id', 'mainForm');
form.setAttribute('name', 'mainForm');
var input = document.createElement('input');
input.classList.add('ag-cell-edit-input');
input.classList.add('paycode-editor');
input.setAttribute('name', 'codeValue');
input.setAttribute('id', 'codeValue');
input.tabIndex = "0";
input.value = params.value;
if (params.mask) {
input.setAttribute('data-mask', params.mask);
input.setAttribute('ng-pattern','/^' + params.mask + '$/');
input.setAttribute('ng-class',"{'pattern-error': mainForm.codeValue.$error.pattern}");
input.setAttribute('ng-model', 'ctl.currentValue');
}
form.appendChild(input);
this.container = form;
$compile(this.container)($scope);
_controller.currentValue = null;
// This is crucial - we can then reference the container in
// the parser later on to refocus the control
_controller.currentCellEditor = this.container;
$scope.$digest();
};
And then cleared in the grid options onCellEditingStopped event:
onCellEditingStopped: function (event) {
$scope.$apply(function() {
_controller.currentCellEditor = null;
});
},
I realise it's not specifically for your components (Vue.js) but hopefully it'll help someone else. If anyone has done it a better way, I'm all ears as I don't like throwing the unnecessary exception!
I have a large Dijit-based form with many Dijits in collapsible TitlePanes.
When the form validates, any invalid items hidden inside closed TitlePanes (obviously) cannot be seen. So it appears as though the form is just dead and won't submit, though, unbeknownst to the user, there's actually an error hidden in a closed TitlePane which is preventing the form processing.
What's the solution here? Is there an easy way to simply open all TitlePanes containing Dijits that are in an error state?
If validation is done by following, it will work:-
function validateForm() {
var myform = dijit.byId("myform");
myform.connectChildren();
var isValid = myform.validate();
var errorFields = dojo.query(".dijitError");
errorFields.forEach(fieldnode){
var titlePane = getParentTitlePane(fieldnode);
//write a method getParentTitlePane to find the pane to which this field belongs
if(titlePane) {
titlePane.set('open',true);
}
}
return isValid;
}
function getParentTitlePane(fieldnode) {
var titlePane;
//dijitTitlePane is the class of TitlePane widget
while(fieldnode && fieldnode.className!="dijitTitlePane") {
fieldnode= fieldnode.parentNode;
}
if(fieldnode) {
mynode = dijit.getEnclosingWidget(fieldnode);
}
return titlePane;
}
Lets say if the following is the HTML and we call the above validateForm on submit of form.
<form id="myform" data-dojo-type="dijit/form/Form" onSubmit="validateForm();">
......
</form>
Here's what I ended up doing (I'm not great with Javascript, so this might sucked, but it works -- suggestions for improvement are appreciated):
function openTitlePanes(form) {
// Iterate through the child widgets of the form
dijit.registry.findWidgets(document.getElementById(form.id)).forEach(function(item) {
// Is this a title pane?
if (item.baseClass == 'dijitTitlePane') {
// Iterate the children of this title pane
dijit.registry.findWidgets(document.getElementById(item.id)).forEach(function(child) {
// Does this child have a validator, and -- if so -- is it valid?
if (!(typeof child.isValid === 'undefined') && !child.isValid()) {
// It's not valid, make sure the title pane is open
item.set('open', true);
}
});
}
});
}
I need to have multiple radio button groups in my form like this:
I know it's simply done by specifying the same "name" html attribute for each group.
HOWEVER
MVC doesn't let you specify your own name attribute when using html helper like this:
#Html.RadioButtonFor(i => item.id, item.SelectedID, new { Name = item.OptServiceCatId })
Because it looks at each tag's "name" attribute (not "id") to map/bind the form to the model which the controller receives, etc.
Some said that specifying each with the same "GroupName" attribute will solve the problem, but it didn't work either.
So, is there any way which works ?
EDIT:
Here's my view (simplified):
#model Service_Provider.ViewModels.SelectOptServicesForSubServiceViewModel
#foreach (var cat in Model.OptServices)
{
//A piece of code & html here
#foreach (var item in cat.OptItems.Where(i => i.MultiSelect == false))
{
#Html.RadioButtonFor(i => item.id, item.SelectedID, new { GroupName = item.OptServiceCatId })
<br />
}
}
NOTE:
My model is a List<OptServices>:
public List<OptServices> Cats {get; set;}
And OptServices has a List of OptItems inside:
public class OptServices
{
//a few things
public List<OptItems> Items {get; set;}
}
all you need is to tie the group to a different item in your model
#Html.RadioButtonFor(x => x.Field1, "Milk")
#Html.RadioButtonFor(x => x.Field1, "Butter")
#Html.RadioButtonFor(x => x.Field2, "Water")
#Html.RadioButtonFor(x => x.Field2, "Beer")
Ok here's how I fixed this
My model is a list of categories. Each category contains a list of its subcategories.
with this in mind, every time in the foreach loop, each RadioButton will have its category's ID (which is unique) as its name attribue.
And I also used Html.RadioButton instead of Html.RadioButtonFor.
Here's the final 'working' pseudo-code:
#foreach (var cat in Model.Categories)
{
//A piece of code & html here
#foreach (var item in cat.SubCategories)
{
#Html.RadioButton(item.CategoryID.ToString(), item.ID)
}
}
The result is:
<input name="127" type="radio" value="110">
Please note that I HAVE NOT put all these radio button groups inside a form. And I don't know if this solution will still work properly in a form.
Thanks to all of the people who helped me solve this ;)
I fixed a similar issue building a RadioButtonFor with pairs of text/value from a SelectList. I used a ViewBag to send the SelectList to the View, but you can use data from model too. My web application is a Blog and I have to build a RadioButton with some types of articles when he is writing a new post.
The code below was simplyfied.
List<SelectListItem> items = new List<SelectListItem>();
Dictionary<string, string> dictionary = new Dictionary<string, string>();
dictionary.Add("Texto", "1");
dictionary.Add("Foto", "2");
dictionary.Add("VĂdeo", "3");
foreach (KeyValuePair<string, string> pair in objBLL.GetTiposPost())
{
items.Add(new SelectListItem() { Text = pair.Key, Value = pair.Value, Selected = false });
}
ViewBag.TiposPost = new SelectList(items, "Value", "Text");
In the View, I used a foreach to build a radiobutton.
<div class="form-group">
<div class="col-sm-10">
#foreach (var item in (SelectList)ViewBag.TiposPost)
{
#Html.RadioButtonFor(model => model.IDTipoPost, item.Value, false)
<label class="control-label">#item.Text</label>
}
</div>
</div>
Notice that I used RadioButtonFor in order to catch the option value selected by user, in the Controler, after submit the form. I also had to put the item.Text outside the RadioButtonFor in order to show the text options.
Hope it's useful!
I was able to use the name attribute that you described in your example for the loop I am working on and it worked, perhaps because I created unique ids? I'm still considering whether I should switch to an editor template instead as mentioned in the links in another answer.
#Html.RadioButtonFor(modelItem => item.Answers.AnswerYesNo, "true", new {Name = item.Description.QuestionId, id = string.Format("CBY{0}", item.Description.QuestionId), onclick = "setDescriptionVisibility(this)" }) Yes
#Html.RadioButtonFor(modelItem => item.Answers.AnswerYesNo, "false", new { Name = item.Description.QuestionId, id = string.Format("CBN{0}", item.Description.QuestionId), onclick = "setDescriptionVisibility(this)" } ) No
You can use Dictonary to map
Assume Milk,Butter,Chesse are group A (ListA)
Water,Beer,Wine are group B
Dictonary<string,List<string>>) dataMap;
dataMap.add("A",ListA);
dataMap.add("B",ListB);
At View , you can foreach Keys in dataMap and process your action
In one of my projects I use a dijit.Tree control. I need to add a search to the tree and show only those nodes/leafs which have the searched term in them. However I can't seem to figure out how that can be achieved. Could anybody please help me?
im not entirely sure that your question entirely but it should give hint whereas to go.
Lets use reference documentation example as offset, there is 1) a store 2) a model and 3) the tree
var store = new ItemFileReadStore({
url: "{{dataUrl}}/dijit/tests/_data/countries.json"
});
var treeModel = new ForestStoreModel({
store: store,
query: {"type": "continent"}, // note, this bit
rootId: "root",
rootLabel: "Continents",
childrenAttrs: ["children"]
});
new Tree({
model: treeModel
}, "treeOne");
Interpret the above as such; You have loaded all known countries and continents but 'user' has selected only to show continents by using query on the model - and the hierachy is then represented in a tree structure.
You want a textbox with searching capeabilities, so we hook into onChange
new dijit.form.TextBox({
onChange: function() {
...
}
});
First bit, getting variables
var searchByName = this.get("value");
var oQuery = treeModel.query;
Next, set a new query on the model - preserving the old ones with an object mixin
treeModel.query = dojo.mixin(oQuery, { name: '*'+searchByName+'*' });
Last, notify the model and its tree that changes has occurred - and requery the visible items.
treeModel._requeryTop();
NB If the top-level item (for ForestModel) is not visible, none of its child elements will show, even if the search-string matches those. (Examplewise, Alabama is not shown if US Continent is not matched by query)
EDIT
As OP has the agenda to go by the 'NB', this may not fit needs 100% but its what dojo offers with dijit.Tree.. As it will get rather a lengthy process to recode the model/store queries to include parentbranches up until root i will not do this here - but there are a few tricks still ;)
var tree = new dijit.Tree( {
/**
* Since TreeNode has a getParent() method, this abstraction could be useful
* It sets the dijit.reqistry id into the item-data, so one l8r can get parent items
* which otherwise only can be found by iterating everything in store, looking for item in the parent.children
*
*/
onLoad : function() {
this.forAllNodes(function(node) {
// TreeNode.item <-- > store.items hookup
node.item._NID = node.domNode.id
});
},
/* recursive iteration over TreeNode's
* Carefull, not to make (too many) recursive calls in the callback function..
* fun_ptr : function(TreeNode) { ... }
*/
forAllNodes : function(parentTreeNode, fun_ptr) {
parentTreeNode.getChildren().forEach(function(n) {
fun_ptr(n);
if(n.item.children) {
n.tree.forAllNodes(fun_ptr);
}
})
}
});
(non-tested, but might just work) Example:
// var 'tree' is your tree, extended with
tree.forAllNodes = function(parentTreeNode, fun_ptr) {
parentTreeNode.getChildren().forEach(function(n) {
fun_ptr(n);
if(n.item.children) {
n.tree.forAllNodes(fun_ptr);
}
})
};
// before anything, but the 'match-all' query, run this once
tree.forAllNodes(tree.rootNode, function(node) {
// TreeNode.item <-- > store.items hookup
node.item._NID = node.domNode.id
});
// hopefully, this in end contains top-level items
var branchesToShow = []
// run fetch every search (TextBox.onChange) with value in query
tree.model.store.fetch(query:{name:'Abc*'}, onComplete(function(items) {
var TreeNode = null;
dojo.forEach(items, function(item) {
TreeNode = dijit.byId(item._NID+'');
while(TreeNode.getParent()
&& typeof TreeNode.getParent().item._RI == 'undefined') {
TreeNode = TreeNode.getParent();
}
branchesToShow.push(TreeNode.item);
});
}});
// Now... If a success, try updating the model via following
tree.model.onChildrenChange(tree.model.root, branchesToShow);