I installed an add-on for bulk action (called ba_importer v 1.1.24), I upload an Excel file with my data and create a group of products.
I can set the categories' tree or manually add ID of main categories and associated. I tried with no luck to use the tree features (like Home/Products/etc) and so I use all the ID of main category and all the associated. The result is a product with the correct categories set, but with no specific price from the customer group linked to a category.
I tried to edit a single product, remove all categories and set it one by one (set one, save, set one, save etc.) and then the specific price from the group linked to a category appears to the product.
Is there a better solution? I'm thinking about make a personal PHP page that reads an Excel file and sets all the information about the product, but I'm scared to face the same problem with the specific price.
There is no such thing as "category-related specific price",
if you have specific prices tied to customer groups , these are created as a result of the add/update product action with ps_specific_price DB entries having id_group with your restricted ID.
It is likely that the bulk module acts directly with DB queries to speed up things and bypasses this operation, I've seen this behaviour with those kind of modules in the past.
Since you are talking of a paid add-on, I would definitely seek help from the developer.
I was reading about DDD and I realize that sometimes an entity might be a VO or VO might be an entity. You can know which one is better depends on the context. I was checking different examples. For example, shopping cart DDD example. Product is an aggregate root, Cart is an aggregate root and items is a entity of Cart, so if you want to add a product to the cart you would do something like this:
$cart->addProduct(id $id, $name, $price)
class Cart
{
private items;
function addProduct(ProductId $id, ProductName $name, ProductPrice $price) {
this->items[] = new Item(
new ItemProductId($id->ToString()),
new ItemName($name->ToString()),
new ItemPrice($price->ToString()),
new ItemCartId(this->id->ToString())
);
}
}
There are two reasons why I think it is a VO:
You cannot modify the value's item ( only if the product's
price has been modify there is a event that would modify its price).
The item doesn't have id, it's has a reference of the
product(ItemProductId) and a reference of the cart (ItemCartId)
I was reading about DDD and I realize that sometimes an entity might be a VO or VO might be an entity. You can know which one is better depends on the context.
Usually its pretty clear whats entity and whats an value object. If it contains data that's fixed at the time of assignation, its a value object. For example "order address" on the order aggregate. When the order is placed, the address is set. "Addresses" may be an entity in user aggregate (i.e. a list of his common addresses), but for an order its an value object since its not supposed to change when the user edits or deletes one of his addresses.
cart->addProduct(id $id, $name, $price)
class Cart
{
private items;
function addProduct(ProductId $id, ProductName $name, ProductPrice $price) {
this->items[] = new Item(
new ItemProductId($id->ToString()),
new ItemName($name->ToString()),
new ItemPrice($price->ToString()),
new ItemCartId(this->id->ToString())
);
}
}
That's a pretty bad example. Why would or should the value object be ItemPrice? Does that makes it any special? Why string? A price is usually just a numeric value but also involves a currency, passing it as string kinda beats that.
On top of that, having ItemCartId in the it does
a) leak data persistence knowledge into your domain. The fact, it's contained inside this->items[] already establishes a relationship between the entity (or aggregate) and the value object. ItemCartId as no meaning in the domain, other than that it's required for relational database engines (=persistence knowledge)
There are two reasons why I think it is a VO:
You cannot modify the value's item ( only if the product's price has been modify there is a event that would modify its price).
You sure? Why would a eCommerce business want to have the prices in the card anyways?
Prices are informational only, they could change before the order is placed. Same as availability.
A lot of users put stuff in their cart and check on next day. In that time, the price could change.
No company would want to sell a product for the price when it was put into the shopping cart, if the price increased in the time since it was put in there. That would mean a financial loss.
Prices in the shopping carts are informational, not compulsory. You need know the exact process of the company.
The item doesn't have id, it's has a reference of the product(ItemProductId) and a reference of the cart (ItemCartId)
Again. Why do you think ItemCartId belongs to the Item object? That's leaked persistence knowledge, since its only important for relational database systems.
All you really need in a shopping cart is
* product or article number (not necessary the id, that's typically db knowledge)
* quantity
Nothing else. If you may want to change the user when the price changed and show the old and new price, the take the price (=currency value object, not ItemPrice) to it too as a value to compare to an old state.
Finally and probably most importantly: Consider if the shopping cart is an aggregate at all (or does fit into ddd).
After all, most shopping carts are only a value bag w/o a lot of business logic into it. The real logic (checking the real price, product availability, asking for shipping location, calculation of taxes and shipping costs) happens during the checkout process, not while putting stuff into the cart.
For example you can check out eShops on Containers demo project showing an example shopping service based on microservices and ddd.
Some microservices apply DDD (such as Ordering microservice), where others don't (Catalog microservice or the Basket (cart) Microservice).
Applying DDD doesn't mean everything needs to be done with DDD. If its simple crud based services, then you don't need DDD for these. DDD adds a value where you have complex systems and complex business logic.
A catalog has neither, it just presents data which come from a different system (i.e. ERP which on other side may be built on using DDD).
I don't understand what are you asking exactly, but the code you are providing could be improved.
First of all I suggest you to read the red book by Vaughn Vernon https://www.amazon.co.uk/Implementing-Domain-Driven-Design-Vaughn-Vernon/dp/0321834577: you can find 3 chapters describing how to define entities, value objects and aggregates, with some rules of thumbs.
One of those advices, is to keep your aggregates as small as possible, in order to improve your performance and keep the code easy to read and maintain. Imagine that you have a Blog aggregate that contains a list of Post entities: if you manage all of them in a single aggregate, when you want to modify the blog Author, for example, you are forced to retrieve all of the blog's post, without any reason, and that means that you are doing a join and slowing down your application. The more your aggregates grows, the slower those queries with their joins.
So, in the case of the Cart, I suggest you to build the cart without any item or product, instead you can add the CartId to the Item. Cart does not know which items it contains, but items know in which cart they are.
About value objects: is a tool that allows you to wrap some validation and business logic inside a class that is represented by its state and not by its id (like entities), so in the case of the cart, if you put two identical bottles of water inside it, how can you know that they are different? Do you need to know that they are different? Are they different if they are physically (or logically different) or are they different if some of their attribute is different?
In my opinion an item or a product, in your case, are entities because they are not measuring anything, and when you put an item twice, you actually have two different items (and you use an id to recognize them).
This is not necessary like this, sometime you can use a value object and sometimes an entity, it depends on your context. A good example to understand that difference is with money:
if you want to measure an amount, for example 10 dollars, probably a value object will work for you, because you don't care if it a bill or another, you just want to measure 10 dollars; in this case if you have 10 dollars, is not important if you have a bill or another, the important thing is that is 10 and not 5
in the case that you need to recognize different physical bills, for any reason (you need to track money for the police), you should use an entity, because any printed bill has a unique serial number, and a 10 dollar bill, in this context, is actually different from another 10 dollar bill
Hope this can help you.
Goodbye!
The shopify store I edit has a 'sale' collection. This consists of products which have been auto-tagged on the condition that the 'compare at price' is higher than the actual price.
I want to create a new 'clearance' section, which would consist of products where the actual price is cheaper than the compare at price by 50% or greater. I can't find a simple way to do this (i.e. by using the inbuilt collection creator).
Can anyone help me out?
Discounts are applied at the checkout, not when browsing a product. That is why the Smart Collection logic has no conditions based on discounts. If I were you I would try and work out how to build a collection "clearance" with conditions that make sense, and then you could create a price rule/discount that would apply to that collection (50% off). It seems like that is the way to go.
Greetings.
I am working on a eCommerce website based on shopify. And for product I want to set a custom price. For example, The standard price of product is $500 but price will vary if user increased the quantity i.e. On 5 - 10 it will cost $450, On 11 - 15 it will cost $400 and on 20+ quantity it will cost $300.
I have searched module for this and also found a module i.e. https://apps.shopify.com/quantity-breaks. But its working on the basis of "Percent" that I don't need. Because I want to place price manually on the basis of quantity.
So please help me out from this and provide your valuable thoughts on the same.
Thanks in advance.
The way this is generally done in Shopify is to create variants where the option values are the price breaks. You have to modify your theme so that when a Qty > price break is entered the product page selects the variant that corresponds to that price level.
Other than the coding portion of this the main issue becomes inventory management since Shopify treats each variant as a separate inventory item but if you use variants to manage price breaks they are not actually separate items.
I think the easiest way to do this would be with a Shopify App. There are many that have price breaks etc. and they are usually easier to set up than using variants as the price break amounts.
Don't laugh but I'm a Lotus Notes (non-relational database!) developer trying to work with SQL and, although I have the basic concepts nailed, I'm stuck on something I'd consider to be "advanced".
Imagine a user reaches an online checkout having added a set of products to their basket. I need to apply promotions to the basket.
These promotions look at the items in the basket and add "points" for any combination that matches a pre-defined "bundle". The promotions also need to be able to target users in specific countries (information gained at point of registration) and other personal details.
The promotions are entered and maintained by the site admin team and need to be as flexible as possible. So they can reward people for things like "Buy X products of type Y and get 50% extra points" or "3 or more XE-123s and get 500 points added" etc.
Right now I'm looking for general direction. How should I store the criteria that matches the items in a basket to any of the running promotions? Would one big Stored Procedure do or should the C# code that builds the basket loop through all promotions and see which fit?
Right now I don't even have a table schema. Just the knowledge of how it should work and little idea where to start.
Jake
My suggestion is to not use SQL for this sort of business logic.
The database is a good place to keep information about products like whether they are type Y or type X. This keeps the database design pretty straightforward.
What you mention about C# seems like a better direction. There is a lot of searchable information about 3-tier architecture that can help explain the benefits of this strategy well.
'As flexible as possible' is a red flag (IMHO). I'd try to nail that down to:
"Fixed-point and/or percentage (of total basket / bundle points) bonus (three columns in a helper table)
When the basket contains a combination that matches a pre-defined 'bundle', where 'bundle' is contained in a helper table, with multiply rows, with a bundleID and a row for each item in the bundle, containing at least ItemID and Quantity.
And no other kinds of reward possible. This to keep the project / requirement manageable.
Then have a SP which checks for the presence of bundles within the basket and applies relevant promotions (as stored in the first helper table).
Also make sure you know the requirement whether 1 or multiple promotions are possible.