I’m developing a system with php to essay’s correction. The student sends an essay in pdf and I have to make, someway, marks on this text to add comments (corrections) in it. For example, mark/select a paragraph and comment something about it. When the user click or pass de mouse up on the mark on the text, the respective comment/correction will be showed. My difficulty is to make the marks/selections on the pdf’s text and map this to add the comments and corrections. Has someone any idea of how this could be implemented?
Oh, that's a tought question boy. I faced the same problem months ago until I found a library called Fabric.js. It will help you to add annotacions and whatever you want over an image file. What about pdf? There is a similar solution which uses that same fabricjs as its core. Check it out: https://github.com/RavishaHesh/PDFJsAnnotations
I have been searching for this in many places. Tried PDFSam but not working for me in this situation. I would like to extract pages without comments or sticky notes or pencil mark in Acrobat as a separate pdf to check why these pages were not commented on. I am not a coder, but I have a little Javascript knowledge and I have never written a JS code for Acrobat. Kindly guide me in the right direction to write this javascript code.
Thank you for your help!
an easy way to get around this is, you can extract the pages you want. And then delete all the comments.
This 2-step way helps solve your problem.
Note that you don't want to delete the comments one by one.
You click the comments button usually sitting on the lower left corner, which will show all the comments on the left pane. Click any one of it, and hit Ctrl+A and then hit Delete key on your key board. Save and you are done.
It saves you the pain you may get from writing a JS code.
Hope this helps!
I am trying to create a Qlikview report with our company theme incorporated. How do I make it so the margins are not white, but the color I want? And I am also interested in having our logo spread across the top of each page -- the issue I am having now is I have included a picture as header but it only spreads across the middle 1/3 of the top, so it is small and there is a lot of white space.
I have created a Qlikview theme with the color scheme of our company included in it, but I haven't been successful in applying it.
Thanks.
You can use line objects and format the way you like .
Regards,
Nadeem
SEO issue red characters
Hi all
I'm building webstes using dreamweaver, but when I look at the source code it is red for " characters. I'm told anything appearing in red puts off Google's seo. Does anyone know why this appears in red?
For example when I view code source on the site i get the gt; in red
Find out more>></span>
</div>
Thanks for your help
Regards
Judi
I'm told anything appearing in red puts off googles seo.
That is garbage.
Does anyone know why this appears in red?
Probably because it is an entity and has been marked by the syntax highlighter so you can spot in amongst literals.
Google SEO aside, it's important to understand that there's a world of difference between using CSS to control the colour of text, and the syntax highlighting done by the DreamWeaver editor.
Colours seen when you are viewing the HTML source of your page in a tool like Dreamweaver have nothing to do with the colours seen when viewing your page in a browser.
All that's happening is that Dreamweaver is syntax colouring HTML escape characters in red, I am pretty sure that you have nothing to worry about.
Edit
You clarified that in fact you're not viewing the HTML source in Dreamweaver.
Are you viewing source from Firefox?
Firefox syntax colours HTML in its "source of" viewer. HTML escape codes are shown in red (Firefox 3.6, Windows). The point still stands however that this is just syntax colouring and has nothing to do with how your page gets rendered by the browser, or anything to go with Google SEO.
This might be a bit off topic and of course no-brainer for you guys, but anyway:
Firefox highlights all open lines as red. If you have for example:
meta content="text...
and there is no /> at the end of the line, then Firefox makes that line appear red when you use "view page source".
Though that's not the reason for red highlight in your case.
I can view source in Firefox 11 (Win) and see bolded and non-bolded red highlighted markup. If I hover over the bolded red markup, I see a pop-up description of the problem Firefox is finding with the HTML source. For example:
Start tag seen without seeing a doctype first. Expected "<!DOCTYPE html>"
Start tag "div" seen in "table"
Stray end tag "table"
Stray end tag "div"
In non-bolded red highlighted syntax I see entities such as:
, &, >
Firefox 11 allows you to configure and use an external application to View Source. It also has several configuration values in about:config ("view_source.syntax.highlight" for example) that control how the feature is delivered.
The bolded red source highlighting in Firefox View Source may or may not cause issues with SEO. It's an indication that the browser is finding an issue with the HTML markup in the page you're viewing.
The issue of how much invalid HTML harms you with respect to SEO is debated. (And as pointed out in a separate answer, also depends on where the invalid markup appears.) This youtube video discusses HTML validation and Google SEO: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=2XlKn6I9rSc.
I'm told anything appearing in red puts off googles seo
No. Just no. Google's SEO works on a text-basis, it ignores any colouring or formatting within a page.
The colour of the text in the source code is simply based on DreamWeaver's syntax highlighting - if you run and view your page in a browser, it shouldn't be this colour (assuming you aren't actually setting the colour of this to red).
Google will check for color on same color text and background to make sure hidden keywords aren't being used on the page. To google, white on white text is a no-no.
In Dreamweaver, syntax highlight of HTML entities does not translate into a bad 'mark' in the SEO book.
Now on the other hand, if you have key phrases in your link text that includes (>)'s, then your SEO work for the key phrase is shot because the >'s are counted as part of the key phrase.
You can probably turn red highlighting of entities off in Dreamweaver's preferences....
Is it possible to have different colors for on screen and hardcopy display of hyperref links in the same file?
In my thesis, I like the functionality of linking reference numbers to the reference entry in the bibliography and I like having the pubmed links in the bibliography work. Having the links be blue or red helps indicate that they are clickable. But the links don't have any use in a printed copy. As is they come out a shade of grey when printed.
I know I can generate two different PDFs with different color settings, but I was wondering if there is some way to make the links come out solid black when printed but simultaneously display in color on the screen from the same PDF?
Look at the thread "Colored hyperref links" on comp.text.tex.