JSONP response in Lift Framework - api

Hi I am using Lift for my api and need some help generating a jSONP response. I have a working version of the JSON response and need to add to it so that I can use my api for cross-domain calls. Here is a code snippet of my api currently:
/Request/
case "api" :: "events" :: "person" :: _ Get req => JsonResponse(json_person(personEvents(req, req.request.queryString.mkString("")),person_details(req)))
/response/
def json_person(in : List[Events], person1 : List[Person]) : JValue = {
("person" ->
person1.map(people =>
("name" -> people.main_person_name.is) ~
("alternate_name" -> people.aka.is)
))}

The way I've done this in the past is to check for whether or not a "callback" query parameter was provided in the URL, and if so, use the function name provided to perform the callback. If not provided, send back the object itself.
case "api" :: "events" :: "person" :: _ Get req => {
val jsonObj = json_person(...)
S.param("callback") match {
case Full(callbackName) => JSFunc(callbackName, jsonObj).cmd
case _ => JsonResponse(jsonObj)
}
}

Related

Receive message from an Elm process

I'm toying around with Elm processes in order to learn more about how they work. In parts of this, I'm trying to implement a timer.
I bumped into an obstacle, however: I can't find a way to access the result of a process' task in the rest of the code.
For a second, I hoped that if I make the task resolve with a Cmd, the Elm runtime would be kind enough to perform that effect for me, but that was a naive idea:
type Msg
= Spawned Process.Id
| TimeIsUp
init _ =
( Nothing
, Task.perform Spawned (Process.spawn backgroundTask)
)
backgroundTask : Task.Task y (Platform.Cmd.Cmd Msg)
backgroundTask =
Process.sleep 1000
-- pathetic attempt to send a Msg starts here
|> Task.map ( always
<| Task.perform (always TimeIsUp)
<| Task.succeed ()
)
-- and ends here
|> Task.map (Debug.log "Timer finished") -- logs "Timer finished: <internals>"
update msg state =
case msg of
Spawned id ->
(Just id, Cmd.none)
TimeIsUp ->
(Nothing, Cmd.none)
view state =
case state of
Just id ->
text "Running"
Nothing ->
text "Time is up"
The docs say
there is no public API for processes to communicate with each other.
I'm not sure if that implies that a process can't cummunicate with the rest of the app.
Is there any way to have update function receive a TimeIsUp once the process exits?
There is one way but it requires a port of hell:
make a fake HTTP request from the process,
then intercept it via JavaScript
and pass it back to Elm.
port ofHell : (() -> msg) -> Sub msg
subscriptions _ =
ofHell (always TimeIsUp)
backgroundTask : Task.Task y (Http.Response String)
backgroundTask =
Process.sleep 1000
-- nasty hack starts here
|> Task.andThen ( always
<| Http.task { method = "EVIL"
, headers = []
, url = ""
, body = Http.emptyBody
, resolver = Http.stringResolver (always Ok "")
, timeout = Nothing
}
)
Under the hood, Http.task invokes new XMLHttpRequest(), so we can intercept it by redefining that constructor.
<script src="elm-app.js"></script>
<div id=hack></div>
<script>
var app = Elm.Hack.init({
node: document.getElementById('hack')
})
var orig = window.XMLHttpRequest
window.XMLHttpRequest = function () {
var req = new orig()
var orig = req.open
req.open = function (method) {
if (method == 'EVIL') {
app.ports.ofHell.send(null)
}
return orig.open.apply(this, arguments)
}
return req
}
</script>
The solution is not production ready, but it does let you continue playing around with Elm processes.
Elm Processes aren't a fully fledged API at the moment. It's not possible to do what you want with the Process library on its own.
See the notes in the docs for Process.spawn:
Note: This creates a relatively restricted kind of Process because it cannot receive any messages. More flexibility for user-defined processes will come in a later release!
and the whole Future Plans section, eg.:
Right now, this library is pretty sparse. For example, there is no public API for processes to communicate with each other.

How to test POST json on playframework controller

im trying to test POST json to play controller. Controller itself works, I can make a POST using httpie:
http --print="HhBb" POST localhost:9000/review some="Its a value"
Im trying to test that using:
"should post review" in {
implicit val app = FakeApplication()
val controller = new ReviewController
val request = FakeRequest(POST, "/review")
val home: Future[Result] = route(app, request).get
contentAsString(home) must be ("asd")
}
but I get error in html body:
For request 'POST /review' [Host not allowed: ]
im play noob, do I have to somehow configure which routes this app use? Ive tried to configure app with GuiceApplicationBuilder since FakeApplication is deprecated, but couldnt make it work either.
Controller:
def postReview = Action(parse.json) { implicit request =>
implicit val reviewReads = Json.reads[Review]
val body = request.body
println("Json: " + body)
val review = Json.fromJson[Review](request.body)
println("Json-body: " + Json.parse(body.toString))
review match {
case JsSuccess(r:Review, path: JsPath) =>
println(s"Review: $r")
reviewActor ! review
case e: JsError =>
println("Errors: "+ JsError.toJson(e).toString())
}
Ok(views.html.index(request.body.toString))
}

Elm read HTTP response body for non-200 response

How to read HTTP response body for a non 200 HTTP status
getJson : String -> String -> Effects Action
getJson url credentials =
Http.send Http.defaultSettings
{ verb = "GET"
, headers = [("Authorization", "Basic " ++ credentials)]
, url = url
, body = Http.empty
}
|> Http.fromJson decodeAccessToken
|> Task.toResult
|> Task.map UpdateAccessTokenFromServer
|> Effects.task
The above promotes the error from
Task.toResult : Task Http.Error a -> Task x (Result Http.Error a)
The value of which becomes
(BadResponse 400 ("Bad Request"))
My server responds with what is wrong with the request as a JSON payload in the response body. Please help me retrieve that from the Task x a into ServerResult below.
type alias ServerResult = { status : Int, message : String }
The Http package (v3.0.0) does not expose an easy way to treat HTTP codes outside of the 200 to 300 range as non-error responses. Looking at the source code, the handleResponse function is looking between the hardcoded 200 to 300 range
However, with a bit of copy and pasting from that Http package source code, you can create a custom function to replace Http.fromJson in order to handle HTTP status codes outside the normal "success" range.
Here's an example of the bare minimum you'll need to copy and paste to create a custom myFromJson function that acts the same as the Http package except for the fact it also treats a 400 as a success:
myFromJson : Json.Decoder a -> Task Http.RawError Http.Response -> Task Http.Error a
myFromJson decoder response =
let decode str =
case Json.decodeString decoder str of
Ok v -> Task.succeed v
Err msg -> Task.fail (Http.UnexpectedPayload msg)
in
Task.mapError promoteError response
`Task.andThen` myHandleResponse decode
myHandleResponse : (String -> Task Http.Error a) -> Http.Response -> Task Http.Error a
myHandleResponse handle response =
if (200 <= response.status && response.status < 300) || response.status == 400 then
case response.value of
Http.Text str ->
handle str
_ ->
Task.fail (Http.UnexpectedPayload "Response body is a blob, expecting a string.")
else
Task.fail (Http.BadResponse response.status response.statusText)
-- copied verbatim from Http package because it was not exposed
promoteError : Http.RawError -> Http.Error
promoteError rawError =
case rawError of
Http.RawTimeout -> Http.Timeout
Http.RawNetworkError -> Http.NetworkError
Again, that code snippet is almost entirely copy and pasted except for that 400 status check. Copying and pasting like that is usually a last resort, but because of the library restrictions, it seems to be one of your only options at this point.

How to pass same parameter with different value

I am trying the following API using Alamofire, but this API has multiple "to" fields. I tried to pass an array of "to" emails as parameters. It shows no error but did not send to all emails. API is correct, I tested that from terminal. Any suggestions will be cordially welcomed.
http -a email:pass -f POST 'sampleUrl' from="email#email.com" to="ongkur.cse#gmail.com" to="emailgmail#email.com" subject="test_sub" bodyText="testing hello"
I am giving my code:
class func sendMessage(message:MessageModel, delegate:RestAPIManagerDelegate?) {
let urlString = "http://localhost:8080/app/user/messages"
var parameters = [String:AnyObject]()
parameters = [
"from": message.messageFrom.emailAddress
]
var array = [String]()
for to in message.messageTO {
array.append(to)
}
parameters["to"] = array
for cc in message.messageCC {
parameters["cc"] = cc.emailAddress;
}
for bcc in message.messageBCC {
parameters["bcc"] = bcc.emailAddress;
}
parameters["subject"] = message.messageSubject;
parameters["bodyText"] = message.bodyText;
Alamofire.request(.POST, urlString, parameters: parameters)
.authenticate(user: MessageManager.sharedInstance().primaryUserName, password: MessageManager.sharedInstance().primaryPassword)
.validate(statusCode: 200..<201)
.validate(contentType: ["application/json"])
.responseJSON {
(_, _, jsonData, error) in
if(error != nil) {
println("\n sendMessage attempt json response:")
println(error!)
delegate?.messageSent?(false)
return
}
println("Server response during message sending:\n")
let swiftyJSONData = JSON(jsonData!)
println(swiftyJSONData)
delegate?.messageSent?(true)
}
}
First of all if you created the API yourself you should consider changing the API to expect an array of 'to' receivers instead of multiple times the same parameter name.
As back2dos states it in this answer: https://stackoverflow.com/a/1898078/672989
Although POST may be having multiple values for the same key, I'd be cautious using it, since some servers can't even properly handle that, which is probably why this isn't supported ... if you convert "duplicate" parameters to a list, the whole thing might start to choke, if a parameter comes in only once, and suddendly you wind up having a string or something ...
And I think he's right.
In this case I guess this is not possible with Alamofire, just as it is not possible with AFNetworking: https://github.com/AFNetworking/AFNetworking/issues/21
Alamofire probably store's its POST parameter in a Dictionary which doesn't allow duplicate keys.

Issue with BTC-e API in App Script, method parameter

I am trying to incorporate the BTC-e.com API in to a google docs spreadsheet.
The API documentation is here: https://btc-e.com/api/documentation
The method name is sent via POST parameter method.
As the URLFetchApp requires me to set the type of request as POST by a parameter method and I then have another parameter called method to be set as getInfo.
How can I go about setting the fetch method as POST and have the API parameter method as getInfo.
Below is the function this relates too. Also I am sure there a more issues in my work I am yet to find.
function inventory() {
var nonce=Number(SpreadsheetApp.getActiveSheet().getRange('K2').getValue());
var token=SpreadsheetApp.getActiveSheet().getRange('K1').getValue();
var tokenEndpoint = "https://btc-e.com/tapi";
var sign= 'TEMP'
var head = {
'Content-Type': 'application/x-www-form-urlencoded',
'Key': token,
'Sign': sign
}
var params = {
method : "POST",
method : "getInfo",
headers: head,
contentType: 'application/x-www-form-urlencoded',
method : "getInfo",
nonce: nonce
}
var request = UrlFetchApp.getRequest(tokenEndpoint, params);
var response = UrlFetchApp.fetch(tokenEndpoint, params);
var response2=String(response);
SpreadsheetApp.getActiveSheet().getRange('K2').setValue(nonce+1);
SpreadsheetApp.getActiveSheet().getRange('I16').setValue(response2);
SpreadsheetApp.getActiveSheet().getRange('I17').setValue(nonce);
}
This just yields the error
Attribute provided with invalid value: method
Thanks,
Steve
PS: First time posting, I tried to get the format correct.
I made the following Google JavaScript function to do POST access to BTC-e. You can find this function in action in the example spreadsheet I made to demonstrate the BTC-e API functions.
function btceHttpPost(keyPair, method, params, nonce) {
if (keyPair === undefined) {
return "{'error':'missing key pair'}"
}
if (params === undefined) {
params = '';
}
// Cleanup keypair, remove all \s (any whitespace)
var keyPair = keyPair.replace(/[\s]/g, '');
// Keypair example: "AFE730YV-S9A4FXBJ-NQ12HXS9-CA3S3MPM-CKQLU0PG,96a00f086824ddfddd9085a5c32b8a7b225657ae2fe9c4483b4c109fab6bf1a7"
keyPair = keyPair.split(',');
var pubKey = keyPair[0];
var privKey = keyPair[1];
// As specified on the BTC-e api (https://btc-e.com/api/documentation) the
// nonce POST parameter must be an incrementing integer (>0). The easiest
// implementation is the use of a timestamp (TS), so there is no need
// for persistant storage. Preferable, the resolution of the TS should be
// small enough the handle the desired call-frequency (a sleep of the TS
// resolution can fix this but I don't like such a waste). Another
// consideration is the sizeof the nonce supported by BTC-e. Experiments
// revealed this is a 32 bit unsigned number. The native JavaScript TS,
// stored in a float, can be 53 bits and has a resolution of 1 ms.
if (nonce === undefined)
// This time stamp counts amount of 200ms ticks starting from Jan 1st, 2014 UTC
// On 22 Mar 2041 01:17:39 UTC, it will overflow the 32 bits and will fail
// the nonce key for BTC-e
var nonce = Math.floor((Date.now() - Date.UTC(2014,0)) / 200);
// Construct payload message
var msg = 'nonce=' + nonce + '&method=' + method + params;
var msgSign = Utilities.computeHmacSignature(Utilities.MacAlgorithm.HMAC_SHA_512, msg, privKey);
// Convert encoded message from byte[] to hex string
for (var msgSignHex = [], i = 0; i < msgSign.length; i++) {
// Doing it nibble by nibble makes sure we keep leading zero's
msgSignHex.push(((msgSign[i] >>> 4) & 0xF).toString(16));
msgSignHex.push((msgSign[i] & 0xF).toString(16));
}
msgSignHex = msgSignHex.join('');
var httpHeaders = {'Key': pubKey, 'Sign': msgSignHex};
var fetchOptions = {'method': 'post', 'headers': httpHeaders, 'payload': msg};
var reponse = UrlFetchApp.fetch('https://btc-e.com/tapi', fetchOptions);
return reponse.getContentText();
};
The problem looks to be with your params object . You have method set thrice in the same object, which is a source of confusion.
Next, take a look at the documentation for UrlFetchApp.fetch() ( https://developers.google.com/apps-script/reference/url-fetch/url-fetch-app#fetch(String,Object) ) . The method can take a value of post, get, delete, put.
The getInfo should probably be appended to your URL to make it
var tokenEndpoint = "https://btc-e.com/tapi/getInfo"
Per the docs, you also have to put in more parameters to the request, nonce, api key etc. Use this as a starting point, revisit the documentation and get back to SO if you still have trouble