I am trying to retrieve the line number in dojo data grid. rowIndex function would not help me much because I need the 'line number' and NOT 'row number' when sorted.
The scenario:
I would like to set the focus on one specific row and this focus should remain even after sorting. But if I use the code below, it does not select the correct row.
For example, the index 1 is on the 5th line after sorting. However, the e.item.id still remains as 1, expected is 5.
calendar.on("itemClick", function (e)
{
MyGrid.doclick({ rowIndex: e.item.id });
MyGrid.scrollToRow(e.item.id);
});
Additionally, I also tried...
calendar.on("itemClick", function (e)
{
var identity = MyGrid._by_idx[e.item.id].idty;
var gridItem = MyGrid.getItem(identity);
var gridItemIndex = MyGrid.getItemIndex(gridItem);
MyGrid.doclick({ rowIndex: gridItemIndex });
MyGrid.scrollToRow(e.item.id);
});
Could you please let me know how to get the correct row after fitering? I thank you for your time.
Wishes,
Santosh
Okay, I figured out the answer.
GetGridItemIndexByGridItem = function (gridItem) {
var indexLength = MyGrid._by_idx.length;
var element = null;
var gridItemIndex = -1;
for (var i = 0; i < indexLength; i++) {
element = MyGrid._by_idx[i];
if (element.item.Guid == gridItem.Guid) {
gridItemIndex = i;
}
}
return gridItemIndex;
}
Best Wishes
Related
I really need some idea on this. Basically, i'm working to sort list by click a button. If i click up button, the list will go up which the index of selected list will reduced by one. And when i click down button, the list will go down which the index of selected list will increased by one. I used the approach to remove the selected list for a temporary, then insert the list to the different index according to user. i have settled the remove part but i have no idea on insert part. Please help.
These are the code to remove selected list.
var removeSelectedItems = Ext.getCmp('SearchRefSlipMain_List').getSelection()[0]; Ext.getCmp('SearchRefSlipMain_List').getStore().remove(removeSelectedItems);
What left is only to insert the row of list that i have been removed to another row (different index) according to user.
the button:
{
xtype: 'button',
iconCls: 'arrow_down',
handler: function () {
RowDown();
}
}
This is the function:
function RowDown(){
var direction = 1 // 1 or -1
var record = Ext.getCmp('Settings_SetTreatmentList_TreatmentDetail_List').getSelection()[0]; //list id
if (!record) {
return;
}
var index = Ext.getCmp('Settings_SetTreatmentList_TreatmentDetail_List').getStore().indexOf(record);
if (direction < 0) {
index--;
if (index < 0) {
return;
}
} else {
index++;
if (index >= Ext.getCmp('Settings_SetTreatmentList_TreatmentDetail_List').getStore().getCount()) {
return;
}
}
Ext.getCmp('Settings_SetTreatmentList_TreatmentDetail_List').getStore().remove(record);
Ext.getCmp('Settings_SetTreatmentList_TreatmentDetail_List').getStore().insert(index, record);
}
***if move the selected list up, change the direction = -1
* https://www.sencha.com/forum/showthread.php?48472-how-to-move-the-grid-s-row-up-and-down (i got the solution from here, just change a bit according to Sencha Touch)
Usually you do not change the list, but the store that fills the list.
If this does not help, can you setup a fiddle here:
https://fiddle.sencha.com/#view/editor
(just save it and add the link to the fiddle in your question)
I changed your answer, which should have the same result, but way faster:
function RowDown() {
var direction = 1, // 1 or -1
treatmentDetail = Ext.getCmp('Settings_SetTreatmentList_TreatmentDetail_List'),
// or use reference
// treatmentDetail = this.lookup('Settings_SetTreatmentList_TreatmentDetail_List'),
record = treatmentDetail.getSelection()[0], //list id
store, index;
if (!record) {
return;
}
store = treatmentDetail.getStore(),
index = store.indexOf(record);
index = index + (1 * direction);
if (index >= store.getCount() || index < 0) {
return
}
store.remove(record);
store.insert(index, record);
}
I am looping through an object however in the asynchronous part the i variable is always five.
How can I maintain that value, or pass it into the function
getProductData: function() {
var vm = this;
for (var i = 0; i < vm.recommendationResponse['recommendedItems'].length; i++) {
var sku = vm.recommendationResponse['recommendedItems'][i]['items'][0]['id'];
vm.$http.get('http://127.0.0.1:8000/models/api/productimage/' + sku).then(response => {
// get body data
vm.recommendationResponse['recommendedItems'][i]['items'][0]['image_url'] = response.body['product_image_url'];
vm.recommendationResponse['recommendedItems'][i]['items'][0]['price'] = response.body['price'];
}, response => {
vm.recommendationResponse['recommendedItems'][i]['items'][0]['image_url'] = '';
vm.recommendationResponse['recommendedItems'][i]['items'][0]['price'] = '';
});
}
}
I I do something like this:
vm.$http.get('http://127.0.0.1:8000/models/api/productimage/' + sku).then((response, i) => ...
then i is undefined
Who do I keep the index of the loop or should I go about it a different way?
Always use let to initialize variables in for loop when dealing with async operations. Similar things goes to having for loops in intervals. By using let you make sure you always have a unique variable assigned to i.
for (let i = 0, recommendationlength = vm.recommendationResponse['recommendedItems'].length; i < recommendationlength; i++)
Little bonus, if you cache array length in the beginning you get a small performance boost :-)
You could use Array.prototype.forEach instead:
var vm = this;
vm.recommendataionResponse['recommendedItems'].forEach((item, i) => {
var sku = vm.recommendationResponse['recommendedItems'][i]['items'][0]['id'];
vm.$http.get('http://127.0.0.1:8000/models/api/productimage/' + sku).then(response => {
// get body data
vm.recommendationResponse['recommendedItems'][i]['items'][0]['image_url'] = response.body['product_image_url'];
vm.recommendationResponse['recommendedItems'][i]['items'][0]['price'] = response.body['price'];
}, response => {
vm.recommendationResponse['recommendedItems'][i]['items'][0]['image_url'] = '';
vm.recommendationResponse['recommendedItems'][i]['items'][0]['price'] = '';
});
})
This way, since there is a unique scope for each i value, each .then callback will be able to reference the correct value.
I'm absolutely newbie in the Dojo, so my question may be too evident. Sorry.
I've programmatically created the complex menu, including MenuBar, based on the rows, selected from the DB.
All problems were solved besides one: the alignment of the final items and submenu items differ.How it looks like All submenus primarily were rendered in the same line. Only by adding the MenuSeparator I was able to divide them.
I'm lost I've found the example in the Internet, that shows exactly what I need (including the right-hand arrow for submenus) Example . I've used exactly the same algorithm to create menu. But I cannot get the same result.
Please, help.
I've noted that the image is not accessible.
In pure text it looks like:
Final 1
Final 2
Final 3
DropDown 1
DropDown 2
Indent depends on the submenu width.
Think, now I know what happened (don't know though, how to work around it).
The problem is the widget rendering.
The final menu option (leaf) is rendered as table row (tr and td tags).
The PopupMenuItem is rendered as div between rows.
Once more, I have no clue, how to avoid it.
Here is the code. A couple of notes:
1.The rows is the two dimensional array
2.The rows with ParentID=0 are the MenuBarItems
3.pM is the MenuBar widget
createMenu: function (rows, pM) {
var me = this; // for references from the event handlers, where 'this' means event origin (instead of lang.hitch)
// First define the indexes of the DB fields
var xMenu_Id;
var xMenu_Title;
var xParent;
var xURL;
var xUser_Roles;
var i;
for (i = 0; i < rows[0].length; i++) {
switch (rows[0][i]) {
case 'Menu_Id':
xMenu_Id = i;
break;
case 'Menu_Title':
xMenu_Title = i;
break;
case 'Parent':
xParent = i;
break;
case 'URL':
xURL = i;
break;
case 'User_Roles':
xUser_Roles = i;
break;
}
}
// Define the function to filter the menu rows
// Parameters: r - two-dimentional rows array
// p - criterion (the parent menu ID)
// idx - index of needed field
// f - returned filtered array (no need to use in calling statement)
var filterArray = function (r, p, idx, f) {
f = dojo.filter(r, function (item) {
return item[idx] == p;
});
return f;
}
// Define the recurcive function to create the sub menu tree for Menu bar item
// Parameters: parentMenu - the menu to add childs
// parentID - the ID of parent menu to select direct children
// role - current user role
var subMenuFactory = function (parentMenu, parentID, role) {
var i;
var fa = filterArray(rows, parentID, xParent);
var sub;
for (i = 0; i < fa.length; i++) {
if (fa[i][xUser_Roles].indexOf(role) >= 0 || fa[i][xUser_Roles] == 'all') {
if (fa[i][xURL] != '0') { // leaf
url = fa[i][xURL];
parentMenu.addChild(new MenuItem({
dir: 'ltr',
label: fa[i][xMenu_Title],
action: fa[i][xURL],
onClick: function () { me.menuAction(this.action); }
}));
}
else { // DropDown Node
sub = new DropDownMenu({ dir: 'ltr' });
subMenuFactory(sub, fa[i][xMenu_Id], role);
parentMenu.addChild(new MenuSeparator({}));
parentMenu.addChild(new PopupMenuBarItem({
dir: 'ltr',
label: fa[i][xMenu_Title],
popup: sub
}));
}
}
}
}
// Get array of Menu bar items
var filtered = filterArray(rows, 0, xParent);
var pSub;
var user_Role = this.user.Role;
for (i = 0; i < filtered.length; i++) {
if (filtered[i][xUser_Roles].indexOf(user_Role) >= 0 || filtered[i][xUser_Roles]=='all') {
if (filtered[i][xURL] != '0') // leaf
{
pM.addChild(new MenuBarItem({
dir: 'ltr',
label: filtered[i][xMenu_Title],
action: filtered[i][xURL],
onClick: function () { me.menuAction(this.action); }
}));
}
else { // DropDown Node
pSub = new DropDownMenu({ dir: 'ltr' });
subMenuFactory(pSub, filtered[i][xMenu_Id],user_Role);
pM.addChild(new PopupMenuBarItem({
dir: 'ltr',
label: filtered[i][xMenu_Title],
popup: pSub
}));
}
}
}
},
I've found what's the problem. In the required array of define I erroneously import PopupMenubarItem instead of PopupMenuItem. In the function the parameter is named right - PopupMenuItem, but evidently it couldn't help a lot...
Thanks to everyone who tried to help me.
Regards,
Gena
Sorting Image Issue
Greeting,
I am writing a code in dojo that compares the date column in grid for the sorting. below is the code :
function(a,b){
var a1=new Date(a);
var a2=new Date(b);
var x = dojo.date.locale.format(a1, {datePattern: "yyyy-MM-dd", selector: "date"});
var y = dojo.date.locale.format(a2, {datePattern: "yyyy-MM-dd", selector: "date"});
if((a!=null)&&(b!=null)){
if (x.toLowerCase() < y.toLowerCase())
{
debugger;
return -1;
}
else if (x.toLowerCase() > y.toLowerCase())
{
debugger;
return 1;
}
else
{
debugger;
return 0;
}
}
Code works fine for me when the Language in the browser is English but when I changes to Dutch or any other then it doesnt sorts the values properly.
Please guide.
Thanks
I'm not sure why you're having this problem since those format calls ought to be returning the same result regardless, but that code seems severely overcomplicated.
If you are simply trying to sort dates in chronological order, you should merely need to compare them as numbers.
var a = [ '2015-10-18', '2015-10-12', '2015-10-16' ];
a.sort(function (a, b) {
a = new Date(a);
b = new Date(b);
if (a > b) {
return 1;
}
if (a < b) {
return -1;
}
return 0;
});
console.log(a); // ["2015-10-12", "2015-10-16", "2015-10-18"]
Hi I just want to populate the select or comboBox.
I am able to populate both with the searchAttr to any string from JSON. But not so when there are null values.
JSON string :
[{"batch":"0000001000"},{"batch":"0000"},{"batch":""},{"batch":null}]
dojo code:
var selBatch = new ComboBox //located at the left side of the page and it is the second select box in a row
(
{ id:'ID_selBatch',
value:'',
searchAttr:'batch',
placeHolder:'Select...',
style:{width:'150px'},
}, 'node_selBatch'
);
on(selTest, 'change', function(valueCard)
{
var selectedTest = this.get('displayedValue');
var selBatch = registry.byId('ID_selBatch');
console.debug('Connecting to gatherbatches.php ...');
request.post('gatherbatches.php',
{ data:{nameDB:registry.byId('ID_selPCBA').value, nameCard : valueCard},
handleAs: "json"}).then
(
function(response)
{
var memoStore2 = new Memory({data:response});
selBatch.set('store', memoStore2);
selBatch.set('value','');
console.debug('List of batches per Test is completed! Good OK! ');
},
function(error)
{
alert("Batch's Error:"+error);
console.debug('Problem: Listing batches per Test in select Test is BAD!');
}
);
selBatch.startup();
});
Error :
TypeError: _32[this.searchAttr] is null
defer() -> _WidgetBase.js (line 331)
_3() -> dojo.js (line 15)
_f.hitch(this,fcn)(); -> _WidgetBase.js (line 331)
Please advise though it might strange to have null values populate in the select box but these null values are related to data in other columns in database, so the null values included so that I can apply mysql scripts later. Or do you have other better suggestion?
Clement
You can create a QueryFilter as in this jsfiddle to achieve what you want, but it might be simpler to have two data items. Your original model with possibly null batch properties, and the model you pass to the store which is used by the ComboBox.
But anyway, this can work:
function createQueryFilter(originalQuery, filter) {
return function () {
var originalResults = originalQuery.apply(this, arguments);
var results = originalResults.filter(filter);
return QueryResults(results);
};
}
and
var memoStore = new Memory({
data: data
});
memoStore.query = createQueryFilter(memoStore.query, function (item) {
console.log(item);
return !!item.batch;
});
and the dummy data:
function createData1() {
var data = [];
for (var i = 0; i < 10; i++) {
data.push({
name: "" + i,
batch: (0 === i % 2) ? "batch" + i : null
});
}
return data;
}
Screenshot. The odd numbered batch items are null in my example.