We have a bunch of 3rd party merge modules attached to our WiX installer and during the build we get a bunch of TRCH1115 warnings. I was looking at Trying to use EnsureTable in WiX to fix Validation Errors.
But in this article the warnings/errors that they see for the Validation errors refer to the table that has the validation error. In my case the only table that it mentions is the _validation table it self. So if I am going to try an use the EnsureTable element to fix for these warnings then how would I go about finding out what table Id I should be using in the EnsureTable element?
The warnings I gets look like the following:
warning TRCH1115: The value '0' in table '_Validation', column
'KeyColumn' is invalid according to the column's validation
information. The decompiled output includes a best-effort
representation of this value.
Thanks for any help on this issue.
Related
I am testing the azure-devops-migration-tools and have create a project using https://azuredevopsdemogenerator.azurewebsites.net/ (Parts Unlimited). I have generated the configuration.json and changed the Source and Target so I can test a migration, but I'm getting errors while migrating Work Items.
[15:14:41 ERR] Error running query
Microsoft.TeamFoundation.WorkItemTracking.Client.ValidationException: TF51005: The query references a field that does not exist. The error is caused by «ReflectedWorkItemId».
I've tried different options on the "ReflectedWorkItemIDFieldName" field, Scrum, Basic, Agile, Custom, empty but am still unable to migrate the work items.
How can I get the value to put on this field for the specific project?
Thanks,
Bruno
Quick Solution: Most ADO instances use the prefix 'custom' for new fields. Try "Custom.ReflectedWorkItemId" in your configuration.json to see if that resolves the problem.
More details: It's hard to tell without an actual configuration.JSON file to review. One possible problem is that you need to use the actual and full internal 'Name' of the ReflectedWorkItemID field. This doesn't show in ADO, or the Process Template when created. The recommendation is that you create a query referencing your custom field, and export the WIQL file (query file). Once you export the WIQL file, you can then open the file and see the full syntax of the custom field.
Exporting Queries: If you don't know how to do this, it can be done with VisualStudio. If you don't know how to do that, you can install this extension. It's a handy WIQL import/Export and editor. Install, and your ADO Queries with have an Edit in WIQL Editor option. Create a query that exposes your 'ReflectedWorkItemID' as a column, then edit that query in the WIQL editor and see the full names of the Reflected Work Items ID Feild. https://marketplace.visualstudio.com/items?itemName=ottostreifel.wiql-editor
SELECT
[System.Id],
[System.WorkItemType],
[System.Title],
[System.AssignedTo],
[System.ChangedBy],
[Custom.ReflectedWorkItemId]
FROM workitems
WHERE ...
I found a possible solution. I have created a custom process, change the process from the projects to this new one and add a new field. This is the field I'm using on the configuration.json and now I'm able to migrate work items
To make the migration in the "ReflectedWorkItemIDFieldName" you must do:
"Organization Settings" -> Process -> Select the process where you project are (Basic, Scrum, Agil, or CMMI).
then click on the 3 dots and create a new Inherited process.
Then with the inherited process, you are able to create a new field for each work item type. The name that you type (could be "IronMan") that name will be in your configuration file.
I am trying to create a Dynamic Multi-Select List. I tried to add a DynamicDropdown and added Multiple in Fields properties but throws an error:
An error has occurred, sorry for that.
java.lang.IllegalStateException:
org.onehippo.forge.selection.frontend.plugin.DynamicDropdownPlugin
does not support fields that are multiple: please use
org.onehippo.forge.selection.frontend.plugin.DynamicMultiSelectPlugin
for that. Field name is *. Failed to instantiate plugin class
'org.onehippo.forge.selection.frontend.plugin.DynamicDropdownPlugin'
for wicket id
'home.cluster.cms-static.plugin.servicesLoader.cluster.cms-services.plugin.defaultEditorFactory.cluster.cms-editor0.plugin.editorPlugin.cluster.default.plugin.preview.cluster.default.plugin.dynamicdropdown-preview.cluster..plugin.home.cluster.cms-static.plugin.servicesLoader.cluster.cms-services.plugin.defaultEditorFactory.cluster.cms-editor0.plugin.editorPlugin.cluster.default.plugin.preview.cluster.default.plugin.dynamicdropdown.cluster.default.service.wicket.id'
in plugin
'home.cluster.cms-static.plugin.servicesLoader.cluster.cms-services.plugin.defaultEditorFactory.cluster.cms-editor0.plugin.editorPlugin.cluster.default.plugin.preview.cluster.default.plugin.dynamicdropdown-preview.cluster..plugin.home.cluster.cms-static.plugin.servicesLoader.cluster.cms-services.plugin.defaultEditorFactory.cluster.cms-editor0.plugin.editorPlugin.cluster.default.plugin.preview.cluster.default.plugin.dynamicdropdown.cluster.default.plugin.root'
(JcrPluginConfig:/hippo:namespaces/system/DynamicDropdown/editor:templates/default/root)
Indeed the DynamicDropdownPlugin is not meant for multi-selects, you should use the DynamicMultiSelectPlugin. Easiest to install using Essentials set=up tool, see 'Add a Selection Field to a Document Type
Using the Setup Application' at https://documentation.bloomreach.com/library/concepts/plugins/selections/configuration.html
HTH
Jeroen
In my project Mockito.times(1) is often used when verifying mocks:
verify(mock, times(1)).call();
This is redundant since Mockito uses implicit times(1) for verify(Object), thus the following code does exactly what the code above does:
verify(mock).call();
So I'm going to write an a structural search drive inspection to report such cases (let's say, named something like Mockito.times(1) is redundant). As I'm not an expert in IntelliJ IDEA structural search, my first attempt was:
Mockito.times(1)
Obviously, this is not a good seach template because it ignores the call-site. Let's say, I find it useful for the following code and I would not like the inspection to trigger:
VerificationMode times = Mockito.times(1);
// ^ unwanted "Mockito.times(1) is redundant"
So now I would like to define the context where I would like the inspection to trigger. Now the inspection search template becomes:
Mockito.verify($mock$, Mockito.times(1))
Great! Now code like verify(mock, times(1)).call() is reported fine (if times was statically imported from org.mockito.Mockito). But there is also one thing. Mockito.times actually comes from its VerificationModeFactory class where such verification modes are grouped, so the following line is ignored by the inspection:
verify(mockSupplier, VerificationModeFactory.times(1)).get();
My another attempt to fix this one was something like:
Mockito.verify($mock$, $times$(1))
where:
$mock$ is still a default template variable;
$times$ is a variable with Text/regexp set to times, Whole words only and Value is read are set to true, and Expression type (regexp) is set to (Times|VerificationMode) -- at least this is the way I believed it should work.
Can't make it work. Why is Times also included to the regexp? This is the real implementation of *.times(int), so, ideally, the following line should be reported too:
verify(mockSupplier, new Times(1)).get();
Of course, I could create all three inspection templates, but is it possible to create such a template using single search template and what am I missing when configuring the $times$ variable?
(I'm using IntelliJ IDEA Community Edition 2016.1.1)
Try the following search query:
Mockito.verify($mock$, $Qualifier$.times(1))
With $Qualifier$ text/regexp VerificationModeFactory|Mockito and occurrences count 0,1 (to find it when statically imported also).
To also match new Times(1) you can use the following query:
Mockito.verify($mock$, $times$)
With $times$ text/regexp .*times\s*\(\s*1\s*\) and uncheck the Case sensitive checkbox.
Would like to ask on how you can get the id of the comodel inside the ir.actions.act_window.
See my source code: https://gist.github.com/renesansz/2642b02875475383605e
Currently, I cannot get the sprint_id.project_id.current_sprint reference since it's giving me an error of Uncaught Error: NameError: name 'sprint_id' is not defined. So what I wanted to happen is that upon opening the project it should add a default filter for the current sprint of the project.
Do I have any alternative for this kind of approach?
Tried doing domain, but still no luck solving the issue.
Try this: make related field and then use this field in xml view.
Another individual said this error is generally caused by "a widget template that is referencing a property via ${...} that doesn't actually exist in the widget."
I've researched and can't seem to find a way to resolve this error. Any advice or leads to help solve this issue? How do you FIND this bit of code to correct the issue?
Got some assistance from SitePen.
Here's the trace Stack -
**string.substitute/<()string.js (line 147) string.substitute()string.js
(line 141) ._updatePaginationStatus()Pagination.js (line 395)
.gotoPage/
return transform(value, key).toString();
instrum...tion.js (line 20)**
The Pagination was failing - potentially trying to pull data before it was actually there.
"Code is trying to do a string.substitute call, but the transformation you're trying to do isn't valid. It looks like the Pagination extension is failing on this. Given the number of steps related to Deferreds, it looks like something is trying to parse data before that data is available. For example, you have an async call, but are treating the data synchronously.
That said, when using the Pagination extension, I think you use the normal Grid rather than the OnDemandGrid."
I switched from OnDemandGrid to Grid - left pagination. Error still there. Switched back to OnDemandGrid - eliminated Pagination. Error Gone.
Also found this little note that I had overlooked in documentation: "Note that the Pagination extension is incompatible with OnDemandGrid, since each has its own way of dealing with collection ranges. Pagination should be mixed into Grid, not OnDemandGrid."
http://dgrid.io/tutorials/0.4/grids_and_stores/
thankyousitepen