I am using RDLC in asp.net. I want to show the record in this way:
Trace ID: 12345
Address: flat 123, Big Mansion
Street: street 123
Trace ID: 56789
Address: flat 567, Big Mansion
Street: street 567
How can I do that? As I do not know the keyword to search in web. Please help.
Thanks
Use a List, the data source of which contains all the records. In the final report, the List will be replicated for each record in the data set.
Within the List you can place other controls as you whish and attach them to fields within the data set.
Related
I am trying to perform a simply copy activity in Azure Data Factory from CSV to SQL Table, but I'm getting the following error:
{
"errorCode": "2200",
"message": "ErrorCode=DelimitedTextMoreColumnsThanDefined,'Type=Microsoft.DataTransfer.Common.Shared.HybridDeliveryException,Message=Error found when processing 'Csv/Tsv Format Text' source 'organizations.csv' with row number 6696: found more columns than expected column count 41.,Source=Microsoft.DataTransfer.Common,'",
"failureType": "UserError",
"target": "Copy data1",
"details": []
}
The copy activity is as follows
Source
My Sink is as follows:
As preview of the data in source is as follows:
This seems like a very straight forward copy activity. Any thoughts on what might be causing the error?
My row 6696 looks like the following:
3b1a2e5f-d08b-166b-4b91-eb53009b2377 Compassites Software Solutions organization compassites-software https://www.crunchbase.com/organization/compassites-software 318375 17/07/2008 10:46 05/12/2022 12:17 company compassitesinc.com http://www.compassitesinc.com IND Karnataka Bangalore "Pradeep Court", #163/B, 6th Main 3rd Cross, JP Nagar 3rd phase 560078 operating Custom software solution experts Big Data,Cloud Computing,Information Technology,Mobile,Software Data and Analytics,Information Technology,Internet Services,Mobile,Software 01/11/2005 51-100 info#compassitesinc.com 080-42032572 http://www.facebook.com/compassites http://www.linkedin.com/company/compassites-software-solutions http://twitter.com/compassites https://res.cloudinary.com/crunchbase-production/image/upload/v1397190270/c3e5acbde40f36eaf4f8c6f6eda3f803.png company
No commas
As the error message indicates, there is a record at row number 6696 where there is a value containing , as a character in it.
Look at the following demonstration where I have taken a similar case. I have 3 columns in my source. The data looks as shown below:
When I run use similar dataset settings and read these values, the same error would be thrown.
So, the value T1,OG is being considered as if they belong to 2 different columns since they have dataset delimiter within the value.
Such values would throw an error as it is ambiguous to read. One way to avoid this is to enclose such values with quote character (double quote in this case).
Now when I run the copy activity, it would give the desired output.
The table data would look like this:
I'm trying to parse a column of ~175,000 street names. Some of them are just one word (Jamaicaway), and some are multiple words (St. Edwards Pl). I want just the street body (Jamaicaway and St. Edwards, respectively).
I found the address_standardizer package and installed it, but when I run the example below I get the error relation "us_lex" does not exist.
SELECT house_num, name, suftype, city, country, state, unit
FROM standardize_address('us_lex', 'us_gaz', 'us_rules', 'One
Devonshire Place, PH 301, Boston, MA 02109');
I'd expect to get back just "Devonshire," but I'm getting the error instead. There doesn't seem to be much about this on the package page. Any insight?
You will also have to run:
CREATE EXTENSION address_standardizer_data_us;
Which creates the us_lex and other data tables
I still feel like a SPARQL newbie, so I may be way off base about what SPARQL GROUP BY does, but here's my questions.
Suppose I wanted to request all resources in graph database called Categories, and I wanted to get all the items associated with these categories, along with the names of the items and their price.
Right now my SPARQL queries are giving me back something like the following table:
**Categories Item ItemName ItemPrice**
Tools HammerID Hammer $12
Tools SawID Saw $13
Tools WrenchID Wrench $10
Food AppleID Apple $5
Food CornID Corn $1
I wanted to use GROUP BY to group the items under a single category, so that when I start processing it, I can look through each unique category and then display the items that belong in that category.
Right now if I loop through the above results, I will be iterating over 5 entries instead of 2.
The other way I can describe the results I want are by imaging what the corresponding json data would look like. I want something like:
[
tools: [
{id: hammerId
title: hammer
price: $12},
{id: sawId
title: saw
price: $13},
{id: wrenchId
title: wrench
price: $10}
],
food: [
{id: appleId
title: apple
price: $5},
{id: cornId
title: corn
price: $1}
]
]
With the results, like this I can directly loop over the top level items, and then display the results for each.
Can I use GROUP BY to tell SPARQL to give me results like this?
No, you can't. A SPARQL SELECT query-result is defined as a sequence of solutions, with each solution being a set of variable-value pairs (with a value being defined as an IRI, BNode, or literal value). Basically it's a simple table. There is no provision for 'nested' solutions like you'd need for your JSON-like structure.
However the difference is purely syntactic. If you group, you know the result will deliver all solutions belonging to the same group together (one after the other) - so in processing the result you can simply treat the grouped variable as a marker. And of course if you really want, you can easily rewrite the query result into this kind of syntactic structure yourself - it's just a different way of writing down the exact same information, after all.
I am not sure how I should put this question's topic. But I tried my best. Here is the problem:
I have text like
VPN:
1:
Address: 198.168.1.1
Name: Tux
Role: Dex
2:
Address: 198.168.1.2
Name: Pti
Role: JPT
and so on.....
How can I parse this properly. This list is a list of servers, there are 2 servers right now, there could be more than 20 of them.
I think of splitting by line break, checking the number, 1, 2.... then after the number first find line with word Address, Name and Role and so on.....but I'd love to have input of some experts here at SO. I'm using VB.NET
Thanks.
I would take everything to the left of the first colon in each line, then select based on that string: "Address", "Name", "Role", numeric value, or unknown. Then take everything to the right of the first colon as the value for that item. Every time you encounter a numeric value, begin a new record.
An alternative way to do this is with a regular expression, but it may be easier write and maintain just to code it.
I'm trying to use the categoryId in my findItemsAdvanced query:
api.execute('findItemsAdvanced', {
'keywords': 'laptop',
'categoryId': '51148'}
The results I get are, for example (printing the searchResult dictionary):
'itemId': {'value': '200971548007'}, 'isMultiVariationListing': .............
'primaryCategory': {'categoryId': {'value': '69202'}, 'categoryName': {'value': 'Air Conditioning'}}
....."
You can see that the result has a categoryId of 69202, and not 51148.
What am I doing wrong here? I'm just using the finding.py code at:
https://github.com/timotheus/ebaysdk-python
Thanks
Edit
I've done some tests. I extracted the XML that the SDK builds. If I call with:
'categoryId': '177'
The response is:
the request_xml is <?xml version='1.0' encoding='utf-8'?><findItemsAdvancedRequest
xmlns="http://www.ebay.com/marketplace/search/v1/services"><categoryId>177</categoryId>
<itemFilter><name>Condition</name><value>Used</value></itemFilter><itemFilter>
<name>LocatedIn</name><value>GB</value></itemFilter><keywords>laptop</keywords>
<paginationInput><entriesPerPage>100</entriesPerPage><pageNumber>1</pageNumber>
</paginationInput></findItemsAdvancedRequest>
and I get the same with
'categoryId': ['177']
I find this a bit odd, I thought the appropriate name for the XML categoryId was 'CategoryId' with a capital C. If I do that I don't get an error, but the result is not restricted to the categoryId requested.
Doing it like above, I still get the error:
Exception: findItemsAdvanced: Domain: Marketplace, Severity: Error,
errorId: 3, Invalid category ID.
The code below will do a keyword search for 'laptops' across the UK eBay site and restrict the search to the two categories Apple Laptops(111422) and PC Laptops & Netbooks(177). In addition the results are filtered to only show the first 25 used items that are priced between £200 and £400. The results are also sorted by price from high to low.
There are a few things to keep in mind about this example.
It assumes that you have already installed ebaysdk-python.
According to the eBay docs the categoryId field is a string and more than one category can be specified. An array is therefore used to hold the category ids that we are interested in.
Our request needs to search for items in the UK eBay site. We therefore pass EBAY-GB as the siteid parameter.
Category ids are different across each eBay site. For example the category PC Laptops & Netbooks(177) does not exist in Belgium. (Which incidently is the site that is used in the ebaysdk-python finding.py example.)
This example is also available as a Gist
import ebaysdk
from ebaysdk import finding
api = finding(siteid='EBAY-GB', appid='<REPLACE WITH YOUR OWN APPID>')
api.execute('findItemsAdvanced', {
'keywords': 'laptop',
'categoryId' : ['177', '111422'],
'itemFilter': [
{'name': 'Condition', 'value': 'Used'},
{'name': 'MinPrice', 'value': '200', 'paramName': 'Currency', 'paramValue': 'GBP'},
{'name': 'MaxPrice', 'value': '400', 'paramName': 'Currency', 'paramValue': 'GBP'}
],
'paginationInput': {
'entriesPerPage': '25',
'pageNumber': '1'
},
'sortOrder': 'CurrentPriceHighest'
})
dictstr = api.response_dict()
for item in dictstr['searchResult']['item']:
print "ItemID: %s" % item['itemId'].value
print "Title: %s" % item['title'].value
print "CategoryID: %s" % item['primaryCategory']['categoryId'].value
I hope the following will explain why performing a search on the Belgium site results in items that contain the category 177 even though this is not valid for Belgium but is valid for the UK.
Basically eBay allow sellers from one site to appear in the search results of another site as long as they meet the required criteria, such as offering international shipping. It allows sellers to sell to other countries without the need to actually list on those sites.
From the example XML that elelias provided I can see that a keyword search for 'laptop' was made on the Belgium site with the results filtered so that only items located in the UK was to be returned.
<itemFilter>
<name>LocatedIn</name>
<value>GB</value>
</itemFilter>
Because the search was limited to those located in the UK you won't see any Belgium items in the results. Since the items where listed on the UK site they will contain information relevant to the UK. For example the category id 177. eBay does not convert the information to make it relevant to the site that you are searching on.
It is important to remember that what ever you are trying to do with the Finding API can also be repeated using the actual advance search on eBay. For example it is possible to re-create the issue by performing a keyword search for used items on the Belgium site.
This url is the equivalent of your code that was performing the search without specifying the category 177. As you can see from the results it returns items that where listed on the UK site but which are appearing in the Belgium site. It you click on some of the items, for example, you can even see that it displays the UK category PC Laptops & Netbooks (177) even though this does not exist on the Belgium site. This matches the results form your code where it was returning 177 but would not let you specify the same value in the request as you was searching the Belgium site.
I hope this helps.
Because categoryId is repeatable. You will need to pass an array into the call. Something like this should work.
api.execute('findItemsAdvanced', {
'keywords': 'laptop',
'categoryId': [
{'51148'}
]
}
Note: See how the itemFilter element is an array in the sample file of the SDK.
'itemFilter': [
{'name': 'Condition',
'value': 'Used'},
{'name': 'LocatedIn',
'value': 'GB'},
],