I have a situation where two application are injecting dlls and updating HKLM\SOFTWARE\Microsoft\Windows NT\CurrentVersion\Windows\AppInit_DLLs with its value.
As App_DLLs is REG_SZ type registry. So we can have only value of AppInit_DLLs which is making only application running at one time.
Is there any way that I can append the value of App_DLLs so that both application can use their respective dlls and run concurrently
Working with the AppInit_DLLs registry value
Related
In a simple windows form application on VS 2010 I have put a ovalShape using power packs.
The simple Form
Now automatically this action puts the reference of Microsoft.VisualBasic.PowerPacks.Vs in to project properties.
when deploying this in different PC obviously the (a)powerpacks needed to be installed if this application doesn't work, (b) or it can set to "copy local = true" in reference properties so that it should sit to next with the application.
assuming (b) is not an option, since it is a solitary executable, (a) is the only option. in this way if the target machine does not have powerpacks the requirement is to notify it to the user in the first place.
apparently the dll will be deployed in when using the "VisualBasicPowerPacksSetup"
C:\Windows\assembly\GAC_MSIL\Microsoft.VisualBasic.PowerPacks.Vs\10.0.0.0__b03f5f7f11d50a3a\Microsoft.VisualBasic.PowerPacks.Vs.dll
so the blind approach is just to check if the above file not exist then prompt user to install "VisualBasicPowerPacksSetup". but i feel its more accurate if the application able to actually check in registry level.
in registry "Microsoft.VisualBasic.PowerPacks" records in several location, thus makes a confusion.
how to identify the correct key and what should be correct way of checking this reference in vb ?
You could just try to create an object defined in the dependency and catch the resulting exception.
Handling this you could ask the user to install the package. This is probably not considered good practice but should get the job done.
Is there a way to set a property value to the formatted install date/time?
I'm in the process of creating an MSI installer for an old VB6 application we still depend on (yes, I know, upgrade before it dies).
I'm trying to add a backup folder for the user data files in the install-folder (not my application design, nor my application). Unfortunately every user of this application has their own copy of the data file installed on their system (dedicated machines per user), and the installer has the default file. I would like to create a backup folder so that I can manually (if necessary) go back and retrieve previous versions of the file.
What I'm thinking is
c:\program files (x86)\app*.mdb => c:\program files (x86)\app\backups\201804091125
This will be rushed. Please tell me what is not clear.
Custom Action: In order to implement exactly what you describe, you generally need a custom action. This is always unfortunate since they are very error prone: Why is it a good idea to limit the use of custom actions in my WiX / MSI setups?
Alternative?: If you ask me I would install the database in a component of its own, make the file the key file and set the component to permanent and never overwrite if key path exists.
In the WiX source: for the WiX component element, set these attributes: Permanent="yes" NeverOverwrite="yes"). I am not 100% sure what will happen if you do something stupid such as setting REINSTALLMODE="amus" during installation (force overwrite all files regardless of version). It has been a while since I tested the NeverOverwrite flag. But for normal deployment done the regular way the database file should be left alone and not overwritten.
Custom Action Overview: There are properties called Time and Date that are automatically set in the installer, but the Date property will generally contain characters that are illegal in path names. It is possible to just get the properties and replace the illegal characters. However, the date separation characters are probably different based on regional settings and hence hard to predict. Your code could get messy quickly and testing would be challenging (potentially many locales to test depending on distribution scope - a truly globally capable package is challenging).
I would rather get the date and time some other way - via some programming API call where I can determine what format the data comes back in. You also need to run this custom action elevated in deferred mode to ensure it doesn't fall over with access denied (insufficient user rights for operation). This is always quite a bit of clunk to set up and get working. Maybe try the alternative approach first?
I have long considered adding a custom action to abort the install if REINSTALLMODE="amus" has been specified. I would prefer that and the alternative approach described with "never overwrite" to a custom action doing all this copying.
I have a WiX project in which there is a need to check for certain registry keys that should be added as part of install.
But using the RegistrySearch element, as it is scheduled with AppSearch execute sequence, I always end up getting a blank value because till AppSearch no keys are written.
Is there any way I can determine existence of Registry keys somewhere around PostInstall?
This question is somewhat similar to : this question
Why do you need a search to see if a registry from the package is installed or not? You could simply just check the state of its component. If the state say the component got installed it means the registry is on the machine, and vice versa.
Condition examples.
Using WiX 3.5, I have an MSI with instance transforms allowing me to install the software on the same machine with different product names. To do this, I have a "hard-coded" list of product id's and names in the .wxs file defined conditionally. However, I have only the single Feature-ComponentRef definition that includes both file and non-file resources.
Installation appears to work fine, but uninstalling the instances demonstrates the behaviour mentioned in these two sources:
http://msdn.microsoft.com/en-us/library/aa367797(v=VS.85).aspx
and
http://windows-installer-xml-wix-toolset.687559.n2.nabble.com/Multiple-Instance-Transforms-Walkthrough-Proposed-Simple-Addition-to-WiX-to-Make-Them-Easier-td708828.html
Specifically, none of the non-file resources (in this case, registry entries) get uninstalled save the very last instance of my application. (i.e., if I uninstall in this order: instance1, instance2, and instance3 - only instance3's non-file resources are removed.
I am presuming this is related to not having unique GUID's for nonfile components (whereas this isn't an issue for file components)
So, I was wondering whether a valid approach would be to define a single .wxs file with one product id, name and one set of features, but have a custom bootstrapper generate new GUID's for the product and non-file components which then get inserted into the MSI database at runtime? i.e., Then when it comes time to uninstall or update, I would query the registry for installed instances and retrieve their GUIDs then.
This would permit instances to be created at runtime rather than hardcoded in the .wxs in advance, and to be uninstalled cleanly.
Does that make sense? Will Burn make everything better? :)
As of version v3.6.1511.0, there is now a "MultiInstance" attribute for components. This allows a guid to be generated on the fly for each instance as per Josh Rowes suggestion in his post to the WiX mailing list (see the link in the OP). I have tested and this works correctly to cause registry data to be removed when the current instance is uninstalled, and not when the LAST instance is uninstalled.
You don't need to have unique component ID's but you do need to have unique registry keys. Check out:
Authoring Multiple Instances with Instance Transforms
The article mentions:
To keep the nonfile data of each
instance isolated, the base package
should collect nonfile data into sets
of components for each instance. The
appropriate components should then be
installed based on conditional
statements that depend on the instance
identifier.
I actually don't know what they are talking about there. I created n-Tier multiple instance installers where all the files were isolated by unique INSTALLDIR ( type 51 custom action at runtime to mutate the destination based on the InstanceID ) and all the registry data was mutated using the InstanceID as part of the path as mentioned in the article. I supported up to Sixteen unique instances with unique configuration data and unique version #'s ( each instance could be serviced via major upgrade apart from the other instances. ) All of this was to support a SaaS deployment model for an nTier application and I never ever had to create components with unique GUIDS and/or Conditional expressions.
The only thing wonky I had to do was on the client side they wanted a Shortcut on the desktop. (The Client supported multiple instances also because a site might have v1.0 in Production and v1.1 in Test )
Because I couldn't mutate the folder name (fixed) and because MSI's ShortCut table doesn't support formattable, I had to write a custom action to author the ShortCut dynamically at install table using the InstanceID into a TEMP table and then MSI created the shortcut for me.
I'm installing an Active X control that contains some COM servers. I'm using InstallShield's COM Extract at Build option to generate the registry information. This results in a lot of entries in the Registry and Class tables. (The extracted information is pretty much the same using Wix).
It appears that my COM Sever is correctly being installed except for an additional value called "InprocServer32" in the InprocServer32 key that looks like this:
HKCR\CLSID\{MY-COM-GUID}\InprocServer32
(Default) = C:\Path-to-my\file.ocx
InprocServer32 = 8tYCAGak)9S9&~swl.$?MyFeatureName>*&N$B'fk?As1x2J653?'
The only think I can make out from the extra value is the MyFeatureName which is the internal name of the MSI feature that contains the .ocx file. The key is not listed in the Registry table so it must be generated by the Class table.
The problem I'm having only happens in Windows Server 2008. It seems that the app trying to use the COM server is failing to find the path to the .ocx file from the (Default) value and instead it is finding the InprocServer32 value. This results in the app launching the MSI and then having the MSI being stuck in what seems like an infinte loop.
I'm wondering if this is a known issue in Windows Server 2008 or whether there is a way to prevent that extra value from being generated by msiexec.
I'd read this article and see if it helps you get where you want to be:
RobMen's Recommendation: Do not advertise COM information in MSI
You might want to turn off InstallShield's COM Extract at Build and instead do a One-Time COM Extract on the component in question. Then you can go into the Component Advanced section and manually manipulate the registry / com table information to be how you want it to be.
If you use WiX at all, another workflow / trick is to use Heat to build an MSI or MSM around your COM server. Then use InstallShield to edit the MSI/MSM in direct mode and the Registry view to export the Registry Keys/Values to a .REG file. Then import that .REG file into your Component in your real install project.
I can't help you diagnose what's going on, I'll just mumble a bit about what this all means. This is a counter-measure against DLL Hell. It is supposed to protect your application against some kind of other install program that could overwrite your COM server registry keys. Specifically the (Default) key which gives the location to your server DLL.
From the fake InprocServer32 value, the app can auto-detect that the Default key was overwritten and automatically launch MSI again to repair the damage. Which is what you see happening.
I thoroughly dislike the feature, it is just one more fail point in something that is already hard to troubleshoot when it blows up. And it is a useless feature, it assumes that the other installer doesn't use the exact same counter-measure. Which would have worked 10 years ago.
No idea what you'd do to troubleshoot this particular failure. Other then just punt this cr*p and let the servers just SelfReg themselves. At least you'll have something to work with when that doesn't work.