I have this query in sql
select cartlines.id,cartlines.pageId,cartlines.quantity,cartlines.price
from orders
INNER JOIN
cartlines on(cartlines.orderId=orders.id)where userId=5
I want to get rows distinct by pageid ,so in the end I will not have rows with same pageid more then once(duplicate)
any Ideas
Thanks
Baaroz
Going by what you're expecting in the output and your comment that says "...if there rows in output that contain same pageid only one will be shown...," it sounds like you're trying to get the top record for each page ID. This can be achieved with ROW_NUMBER() and PARTITION BY:
SELECT *
FROM (
SELECT
ROW_NUMBER() OVER(PARTITION BY c.pageId ORDER BY c.pageID) rowNumber,
c.id,
c.pageId,
c.quantity,
c.price
FROM orders o
INNER JOIN cartlines c ON c.orderId = o.id
WHERE userId = 5
) a
WHERE a.rowNumber = 1
You can also use ROW_NUMBER() OVER(PARTITION BY ... along with TOP 1 WITH TIES, but it runs a little slower (despite being WAY cleaner):
SELECT TOP 1 WITH TIES c.id, c.pageId, c.quantity, c.price
FROM orders o
INNER JOIN cartlines c ON c.orderId = o.id
WHERE userId = 5
ORDER BY ROW_NUMBER() OVER(PARTITION BY c.pageId ORDER BY c.pageID)
If you wish to remove rows with all columns duplicated this is solved by simply adding a distinct in your query.
select distinct cartlines.id,cartlines.pageId,cartlines.quantity,cartlines.price
from orders
INNER JOIN
cartlines on(cartlines.orderId=orders.id)where userId=5
If however, this makes no difference, it means the other columns have different values, so the combinations of column values creates distinct (unique) rows.
As Michael Berkowski stated in comments:
DISTINCT - does operate over all columns in the SELECT list, so we
need to understand your special case better.
In the case that simply adding distinct does not cover you, you need to also remove the columns that are different from row to row, or use aggregate functions to get aggregate values per cartlines.
Example - total quantity per distinct pageId:
select distinct cartlines.id,cartlines.pageId, sum(cartlines.quantity)
from orders
INNER JOIN
cartlines on(cartlines.orderId=orders.id)where userId=5
If this is still not what you wish, you need to give us data and specify better what it is you want.
Related
I write this script in SQL server And I want get the food name with the Max of order count From this Joined Table . I can get Max value correct but when I add FoodName is select It give me an error.
SELECT S.FoodName, MAX(S.OrderCount) FROM
(SELECT FoodName,
SUM(Number) AS OrderCount
FROM tblFactor
INNER JOIN tblDetail
ON tblFactor.Factor_ID = tblDetail.Factor_ID
WHERE FactorDate = '2020-10-30'
GROUP BY FoodName)S
Here is The Error Message
Column 'S.FoodName' is invalid in the select list because it is not contained in either an aggregate function or the GROUP BY clause.
also I know I can use order by and top to achieve the food Name and Max order number but I want use the way I use in this script . Thank you for your answers
If I follow you correctly, you can use ORDER BY and TOP (1) directly on the result of the join query:
SELECT TOP (1) f.FoodName, SUM(d.Number) AS OrderCount
FROM tblFactor f
INNER JOIN tblDetail d ON f.Factor_ID = d.Factor_ID
WHERE f.FactorDate = '2020-10-30'
GROUP BY f.FoodName
ORDER BY OrderCount DESC
Notes:
I added table aliases to the query, and prefixed each column with the table it (presumably !) comes from; you might need to review that, as I had to make assumptions
If you want to allow top ties, use TOP (1) WITH TIES instead
You have an aggregation function in the outer query MAX() and an unaggregated column. Hence, the database expects a GROUP BY.
Instead, use ORDER BY and LIMIT:
SELECT FoodName, SUM(Number) AS OrderCount
FROM tblFactor f INNER JOIN
tblDetail d
ON fd.Factor_ID = d.Factor_ID
WHERE FactorDate = '2020-10-30'
GROUP BY FoodName
ORDER BY OrderCount DESC
LIMIT 1;
Note: In a query that references multiple tables, you should qualify all column references. It is not clear where the columns come from, so I cannot do that for this query.
I'm an entry level trying to learn more about SQL,
I have a question "can we use order by in subquery?" I did look for some article says no we could not use.
But on the other hand, I saw examples using top(n) with order by in subquery:
select c.CustomerId,
c.OrderId
from CustomerOrder c
inner join (
select top 2
with TIES CustomerId,
COUNT(distinct OrderId) as Count
from CustomerOrder
group by CustomerId
order by Count desc
) b on c.CustomerId = b.CustomerId
So now I'm bit confused.
Could anyone advise?
Thank you very much.
Yes, you are right we cannot use order by in a inner query. Because it is acting as a table. A table in itself needs to be sorted when queried for different purposes.
In your query itself the inner query is select some records using Top 2. Eventhough these are top 2 records only, they form a table with 2 records which is enough for it to recognized as a table and join it with another table
The right query will be:-
SELECT * FROM
(
SELECT c.CustomerId, c.OrderId, DENSE_RANK() OVER(ORDER BY b.count DESC) AS RANK
FROM CustomerOrder c
INNER JOIN
(SELECT CustomerId, COUNT(distinct OrderId) as Count
FROM CustomerOrder GROUP BY CustomerId) b
ON c.CustomerId = b.CustomerId
) a
WHERE RANK IN (1,2);
Hope I have answered your question.
Yes we can use order by clause in sub query, for example i have a table named as product (check the screen shot of table http://prntscr.com/f15j3z). Chek this query on your side and revert me in case of any doubt.
select p1.* from product as p1 where product_id = (select p2.product_id from product as p2 order by product_id limit 0,1)
yes we can use order by in subquery,but it is pointless to use it.
It is better to use it in the outer query.There is no use of ordering the result of subquery, because result of inner query will become the input for outer query and it does not have to do any thing with the order of the result of subquery.
I am wondering if someone could hep me. I am trying to make a join on two tables and return an id if an id is there but if there is no id return null but still return the row for that product and not ignore it. My query below returns twice the amount the records to which I can not figure out why.
SELECT
T2.ProductID, FirstChild.SupplierID, SecondChild.AccountID
FROM
Products T2
LEFT OUTER JOIN
(
SELECT TOP(1) SupplierID, Reference,CompanyID, Row_Number() OVER (Partition By SupplierID Order By SupplierID) AS RowNo FROM Suppliers
)
FirstChild ON T2.SupplierReference = FirstChild.Reference AND RowNo = 1AND FirstChild.CompanyID =T2.CompanyID
LEFT OUTER JOIN
(
SELECT TOP(1) AccountID, SageKey,CompanyID, Row_Number() OVER (Partition By AccountID Order By AccountID) AS RowNo2 FROM Accounts
)
SecondChild ON T2.ProductAccountReference = SecondChild.Reference AND RowNo2 = 1 AND SecondChild.CompanyID =T2.CompanyID
Example of what I am trying to do
ProductID SupplierID AccountID
1 5 2
2 6 NULL
3 NULL NULL
OUTER APPLY and ditching the ROW_NUMBER Seems like a better choice here:
SELECT
p.ProductId
,FirstChild.SupplierId
,SecondChild.AccountId
FROM
Products p
OUTER APPLY (SELECT TOP (1) s.SupplierId
FROM
Suppliers s
WHERE
p.SupplierReference = s.SupplierReference
AND p.CompanyId = s.CompanyId
ORDER BY
s.SupplierId
) FirstChild
OUTER APPLY (SELECT TOP (1) a.AccountId
FROM
Accounts
WHERE
p.ProductAccountReference = a.Reference
AND p.CompanyId = a.CompanyId
ORDER BY
a.AccountID
) SecondChild
The way your query is written above there is no correlation for the derived tables. Which means you would always get what ever SupplierId SQL chooses based on optimization and if that doesn't happen to always be Row1 you wont get the value. You need to relate your Table and select top 1, adding an ORDER BY in your derived table is like identifying the row number you want.
If it's just showing duplicate records, wouldn't an inelegant solution just be to add distinct in the select line?
I have four tables,in which First has one to many relation with rest of three tables named as (Second,Third,Fourth) respectively.I want to sum only Distinct Rows returned by select query.Here is my query, which i try so far.
select count(distinct First.Order_id) as [No.Of Orders],sum( First.Amount) as [Amount] from First
inner join Second on First.Order_id=Second.Order_id
inner join Third on Third.Order_id=Second.Order_id
inner join Fourth on Fourth.Order_id=Third.Order_id
The outcome of this query is :
No.Of Orders Amount
7 69
But this Amount should be 49,because the sum of First column Amount is 49,but due to inner join and one to many relationship,it calculate sum of also duplicate rows.How to avoid this.Kindly guide me
I think the problem is cartesian products in the joins (for a given id). You can solve this using row_number():
select count(t1234.Order_id) as [No.Of Orders], sum(t1234.Amount) as [Amount]
from (select First.*,
row_number() over (partition by First.Order_id order by First.Order_id) as seqnum
from First inner join
Second
on First.Order_id=Second.Order_id inner join
Third
on Third.Order_id=Second.Order_id inner join
Fourth
on Fourth.Order_id=Third.Order_id
) t1234
where seqnum = 1;
By the way, you could also express this using conditions in the where clause, because you appear to be using the joins only for filtering:
select count(First.Order_id) as [No.Of Orders], sum(First.Amount) as [Amount]
from First
where exists (select 1 from second where First.Order_id=Second.Order_id) and
exists (select 1 from third where First.Order_id=third.Order_id) and
exists (select 1 from fourth where First.Order_id=fourth.Order_id);
I keep getting the wrong sum value when I join 3 tables.
Here is a pic of the ERD of the table:
(Original here: http://dl.dropbox.com/u/18794525/AUG%207%20DUMP%20STAN.png )
Here is the query:
select SUM(gpCutBody.actualQty) as cutQty , SUM(gpSewBody.quantity) as sewQty
from jobOrder
inner join gpCutHead on gpCutHead.joNum = jobOrder.joNum
inner join gpSewHead on gpSewHead.joNum = jobOrder.joNum
inner join gpCutBody on gpCutBody.gpCutID = gpCutHead.gpCutID
inner join gpSewBody on gpSewBody.gpSewID = gpSewHead.gpSewID
If you are only interested in the quantities of cuts and sews for all orders, the simplest way to do it would be like this:
select (select SUM(gpCutBody.actualQty) from gpCutBody) as cutQty,
(select SUM(gpSewBody.quantity) from gpSewBody) as sewQty
(This assumes that cuts and sews will always have associated job orders.)
If you want to see a breakdown of cuts and sews by job order, something like this might be preferable:
select joNum, SUM(actualQty) as cutQty, SUM(quantity) as sewQty
from (select joNum, actualQty, 0 as quantity
from gpCutBody
union all
select joNum, 0 as actualQty, quantity
from gpSewBody) sc
group by joNum
Mark's approach is a good one. I want to suggest the alternative of doing the group by's before the union, simply because this can be a more general approach for summing along multiple dimensions.
Your problem is that you have two dimensions that you want to sum along, and you are getting a cross product of the values in the join.
select joNum, act.quantity as ActualQty, q.quantity as Quantity
from (select joNum, sum(actualQty) as quantity
from gpCutBody
group by joNum
) act full outer join
(select joNum, sum(quantity) as quantity
from gpSewBody
group by joNum
) q
on act.joNum = q.joNum
(I have kept Mark's assumption that doing this by joNum is the desired output.)