How to use a local gem in console with bundled environment - ruby-on-rails-3

I want to customize my development environment with a few extra gems. I am using bundler with rails 3.0.x. I have those extra gems in my local system and i dont want to add them into my Gemfile. How can i by pass bundler and require these gems in my console which was opened using bundle exec ?

I found one way to do it, though it's a little hacky.
$ gem install gem_name
$ gem which gem_name
# outputs <full path to gem>/lib/gem_name.rb
$ rails console
> $LOAD_PATH << "<full path to gem>/lib"
> require 'gem_name'
I'm doing this to play around with different Ruby performance gems, although it might just be easier to add it to your Gemfile, bundle, and then revert before you push up your changes.

Related

An error occurred while installing pg (0.12.2), and Bundler cannot continue

I'm following the Michael Hartl Ruby on Rails Tutorial & there is a part where he is he he instructs you to update your Gemfile to include:
group :production do
gem 'pg', '0.12.2'
end
And then enter the below commands in your terminal:
bundle update
bundle install --without production
When you run the bundle update command it throws back the below errors.
sample_app:$ bundle update
Fetching gem metadata from https://rubygems.org/.........
Fetching gem metadata from https://rubygems.org/..
Resolving dependencies...
Using rake (10.0.3)
Using i18n (0.6.4)
etc
[omitted lines for brevity]
etc
Using railties (3.2.12)
Using coffee-rails (3.2.2)
Installing diff-lcs (1.1.3)
Using jquery-rails (2.0.2)
Installing pg (0.12.2)
Gem::Installer::ExtensionBuildError: ERROR: Failed to build gem native extension.
/home/ross/.rvm/rubies/ruby-1.9.3-p392/bin/ruby extconf.rb
checking for pg_config... no
No pg_config... trying anyway. If building fails, please try again with
--with-pg-config=/path/to/pg_config
checking for libpq-fe.h... no
Can't find the 'libpq-fe.h header
*** extconf.rb failed ***
Could not create Makefile due to some reason, probably lack of
necessary libraries and/or headers. Check the mkmf.log file for more
details. You may need configuration options.
Provided configuration options:
--with-opt-dir
--without-opt-dir
--with-opt-include
etc
[omitted lines for brevity]
etc
Gem files will remain installed in /home/ross/.rvm/gems/ruby-1.9.3-p392/gems/pg-0.12.2 for inspection.
Results logged to /home/ross/.rvm/gems/ruby-1.9.3-p392/gems/pg-0.12.2/ext/gem_make.out
An error occurred while installing pg (0.12.2), and Bundler cannot
continue.
Make sure that `gem install pg -v '0.12.2'` succeeds before bundling.
sample_app:$
I was able to overcome this error easily be removing the 'pg', '0.12.2' gem from the Gemfile & replacing it after running the bundle update command. This seems to work fine as the 'pg', '0.12.2' gem is aslo omitted in the without production flag in the latter bundle install --without production.
The 'pg', '0.12.2' gem is only needed for deploying to heroku with the correct database & everything works fine even when I deployed it to heroku but I'm just wondering if this is an error in the Tutorial or am I missing something bigger here?
It's also annoying to have to remove this Gem everytime I run bundle update, is bundle update really that necessary?
Thanks in Advance
I'm following the same tutorial and I think it's redundant to run update without modifying existing dependency, but in this case it's even causing problems because update command has not --without argument.
I stumbled upon Rails 3 cheatsheet which mentions bundler workflow this way:
After adding or removing dependencies from Gemfile
$ bundle
Commit Gemfile and Gemfile.lock
After modifying existing dependency versions
$ bundle update
Commit Gemfile and Gemfile.lock
I read man pages for bundle update and tried RECOMMENDED WORKFLOW which consists of running bundle update after bundle install.
In my case (some output omitted):
$ bundle install --without production
Resolving dependencies...
Using rake (10.0.3)
...
Installing rspec-core (2.11.1)
Your bundle is complete!
Gems in the group production were not installed. <-- check
$ bundle update
Resolving dependencies...
Using rake (10.0.3)
...
Using uglifier (1.2.3)
Your bundle is updated!
Gems in the group production were not installed. <-- check
I tried it with new RVM gem set and everything was installed correctly.
After that Gemfile.lock contains pg (0.12.2) and deploying to Heroku works.
RECOMMENDED WORKFLOW
In general, when working with an application managed with bundler, you
should use the following workflow:
After you create your Gemfile for the first time, run
$ bundle install
Check the resulting Gemfile.lock into version control
$ git add Gemfile.lock
When checking out this repository on another development machine, run
$ bundle install
When checking out this repository on a deployment machine, run
$ bundle install --deployment
After changing the Gemfile to reflect a new or update dependency,
run
$ bundle install
Make sure to check the updated Gemfile.lock into version control
$ git add Gemfile.lock
If bundle install reports a conflict, manually update the specific
gems that you changed in the Gemfile
$ bundle update rails thin
If you want to update all the gems to the latest possible versions
that still match the gems listed in the Gemfile, run
$ bundle update
Installation of postgres fails with this error : "Can't find the 'libpq-fe.h header"
Looks like a lot of people faced this problem, good news is : stackoverflow has the answer ;)
Can't find the 'libpq-fe.h header when trying to install pg gem
(or at least it should help you to look in the right direction)

require gem issue

I have installed google api client with the following code and it installed successfuly.
gem install google-api-client
I am using rails 3.0.3 so i also included the above line bundler and ran bundle install which went successfully.
I have also rvm installed. And created a gemset.
And when I run the following command in the terminal:
gem environment | grep INSTALLATION | awk '{print $4}'
It gives me the following result
/home/jamal/.rvm/gems/ruby-1.9.3-p194
When i try to execute the following code in scintilla outside the project directory. It gives me an error.
require 'rubygems'
require 'google/api_client'
ERROR:
usr/local/lib/site_ruby/1.8/rubygems/custom_require.rb:31:in `gem_original_require': no such file to load -- google/api_client (LoadError)
from /usr/local/lib/site_ruby/1.8/rubygems/custom_require.rb:31:in `require'
What is the main reason of this kind of error?
Possible chances are your editor does not loading the specific gemset in which you install the gem.
Please provide output of gem list google-api-client -d in your questions. So that I can figure it out exactly what is going one.
EDIT:
Another issue which usually occurs are the dual installation of ruby. When we do have a system level installation and a rvm installation, many editor got confused in it. They load up original system installed ruby which do have prefixes like 1.8.7, 1.9.1and available in /usr/share/bin/. Where was you had installed the gem in rvm profile. To overcome this problem you must run your code from terminal after choosing the right gemset
I had that google/api_client (LoadError) message but, it concerned another Google gem.
gem 'google_drive', '~> 0.3.10'
gem 'google-api-client'
I just removed the , '~> 0.3.10' part in case of it was a compatibility problem. That did the trick:
Using google-api-client 0.7.1 (was 0.9.4)
Installing google_drive 1.0.6 (was 0.3.11)

'bundle install' is creating ./rails folder

I'm running a Rails 3.0.3 app using RVM (Ruby 1.8.7). When I run bundle install all the gems install and then I get this message Your bundle is complete! It was installed into ./rails. But the app isn't recognizing/see those gems. Not sure what I've done wrong that it's doing this. Let me know if you need any other information.
I bet you accidentally ran bundle install rails at one point, which configured your bundler to install your gems into the ./rails directory.
To reset that, remove the ./.bundle directory (or remove the BUNDLE_PATH line from ./.bundle/config). Then bundle install will put them in the right spot.

RVM Gemset - Bundler & Capistrano in Production

I'm deploying a rails app to a VPS with capistrano, bundler and rvm.
Here is part of my deploy.rb
$:.unshift(File.expand_path('./lib', ENV['rvm_path']))
require "rvm/capistrano"
require "bundler/capistrano" # Load RVM's capistrano plugin.
set :rvm_type, :system
set :rvm_ruby_string, '1.9.2#gemset_name'
my .rvmrc
rvm --create use 1.9.2#gemset_name
When I logged into the server I noticed that the rvm gemset was created, however all the gems were installed in /shared/bundle/ruby/1.9.1/gems --not in the gemset(/usr/local/rvm/gemset)
I use RVM in development and I think it's great but when is time to deploy to production. what are the best practices? Is there a way to tell bundler to install the gems in the gemset?
Do I even need a gemset at all? (seems like bundler is already isolating gemsets), Am I missing something?
Please help me understand!
Thank you very much
I use RVM in development and production as well. However, while I use gemsets in development to separate gems between my rails projects, I only use RVM to install rubies on my production VPS and let Bundler handle the versions of my gems.
Using the bundler integration via require "bundler/capistrano" automatically sets some things up for bundler. You can see the code behind this in Bundlers Github page. The basic settings are so that bundle executes this command:
bundle install --gemfile Gemfile --path shared/bundle --deployment --quiet --without development test
As you can see, the --deployment and --path flags are given, which tells Bundler to bundle your gems with your application in the shared/bundle directory, and only use the versions specified in your Gemfile.lock (i.e. the versions that are working in development). Since the bundle directory is shared between deployments, I find it comparable to using RVM gemsets for each application, just easier.
If you still want to put gems in separate gemsets I'd recommend this tutorial from Darcy Laycock for further reading.

Using RVM, Rails 3.0.7 is messed up after installing Rails 3.1.0 beta1

Using rvm I installed and am using Ruby 1.9.2p180.
I created a gemset called rails3tutorial and, using it, installed Rails 3.0.7, created "sample_app", then used bundle to install. Very nice.
Then I created a new gemset called rails310b1, installed Rails 3.1.0 Beta 1, created an app, and bundle install'd...but it turned out I was not actually switched to the rails310b1 gemset, and so I ended up installing to ruby-1.9.2p180's default gemset (is that #global?...). I then manually deleted all the gems that had been installed!
Then I switched to rails310b1, and bundle install'd, created an app, fired up the app -- golden.
Now I switch back to the rails3tutorial gemset, and cd to the app created using it, and I get errors when running rails commands like...
$ rails generate integration_test layout_links
/Users/paul/.rvm/gems/ruby-1.9.2-p180#rails3tutorial/bin/rails:19:in `load': no such file to load -- /Users/paul/.rvm/gems/ruby-1.9.2-p180#rails3tutorial/gems/rails-3.1.0.beta1/bin/rails (LoadError)
from /Users/paul/.rvm/gems/ruby-1.9.2-p180#rails3tutorial/bin/rails:19:in `<main>'
It's looking for /Users/paul/.rvm/gems/ruby-1.9.2-p180#rails3tutorial/gems/rails-3.1.0.beta1/bin/rails but why?! $PATH looks fine.
Any suggestions as to what is messed up and how to clean this up, or is it best if I wipe out all my gems/gemsets and start over?...
Thanks!
There is nice screencast with basics of RVM http://screencasts.org/episodes/how-to-use-rvm but it mostly comes to using rubies:
rvm install 1.9.3
cd ~/projects/my-app
touch Gemfile
rvm use --create --rvmrc 1.9.3#rails32
gem install bundler rails
bundle exec rails new .
bundle install
bundle exec rails generate integration_test layout_links
please note you need to prefix most of the commands with bundle exec there is my gem that should save you from this problem rubygems-bundler.
also make sure you use .rvmrc files for every project so when you switch dir in console the proper ruby environment is set, the --rvmrc switch used above will generate one for you.