I have had an odd error I cannot explain. Basically, I am running a query to my SQL database using excel and am having non-existent data pop up when it comes to a very particular order in my database.
Here is a simple query surrounding this order:
select * from OR200100 where OR200100.OR20001='0000793605'
Here is the output in EXCEL
And here is the same output in SQL
what is happening here? How could the same query generate 2 different results?
Run SQL Server Profiler against the database if you can, then compare the output to the sql query that you are running in ssms.
OK, so it's SQL Server then, that's important because different SQL products can have very different idiosyncrasies and controls.
The next things to check are these:
Is OR200100 a Table or a View? If it's a view then post it's code.
Are you using the same Login/account from both Excel and SSMS?
Are you sure that you are connecting to the same Server and Database? SSMS tells you what you are connected to, but client apps like Excel do not and it is very common for this type of problem to be caused by the app connecting to a Dev or QA version of the database. See here for some of the different ways that this can happen:
So I had a very similar problem, my query was grouping by week numbers. What I found was that one of the queries had set datefirst 5 set whilst the other didn't. I guess the key thing here is make sure, if you are using any SET operations in your ssms queries, these are identical to those in the Excel query string.
Related
I try to create a pretty complex database on ms Access 2013, so I wanted to type it directly in SQL. It has no errors, as other DBMS can fully build the database from the script I wrote (for example, phpmyadmin imports it with no difficulty).
On this tutorial, it is showed how to write a SQL query in order to build tables. I thought this way matched well with my goal as I could copy-paste my script in the query and run it to create the whole thing.
But when I tried to open/double-click on the query a pop-up appears saying "Select data source", waiting for me to select an ODBC, either from a file or a host, before continuing and executing the query.
I tried other types of queries (creating only one table at time, trying on a blank file, or even SELECT * FROM *), bt this message keeps showing up and I really don't know how to deal with it as I don't want to connect to anything but the infile database.
Does anyone got a hint about what to do in this case?
Or, even better, how could Access import my SQL script in order to create the database?
You should configure the database connection in the ODBC and check whether the connection is established or not. Once the connection is established, you can run the query to fetch the data or create tables as per your requirement.
I want to edit the data in a rather large mssql table that is in a Windows Azure SQL Database. So, I try this by creating a query with a "where" clause, and then I expect to edit some cells by choosing them directly from the results pane.
I try to use Microsoft SQL Server Data Tools (last, 11.1.30618.1), VS 12.
I found two modes:
http://i.stack.imgur.com/1UsOf.png — i can't edit cell's
http://i.stack.imgur.com/Fh1lc.png — i can't found my query to add where section
I ve tried another solution:
http://darrylbajaro.wordpress.com/2011/09/25/how-to-edit-ms-sql-records-with-filtering-on-sql-management-studio/
But since I'm using a Windows Azure SQL Database, it does not have the same options and so will not work (ssms 11.0.2100.60): http://i.stack.imgur.com/X0J7x.png
I d like something like heidli sql (I've used it many years for mysql), but for azure+mssql, maybe someone knows?
I have the following code:
select order_number,received_date
from order_head
where order_head.order_number not in (select order_number from csa_log group by order_number)
and ordernature in ('02','03')
and received_date > '01.01.2010'
and buyer_code = 'GAP'
group by order_number,received_date
order by received_date desc
When run in crystal reports does not pull the same data as sql server express. It is pulling only one record as opposed to 7. Anybody have some insight? Thank you in advance. (I have a suspicion it has something to do with the nested statement).
Several possibilites come to mind.
First are you absolutely sure that Crystal Reports and the database you are querying are the same one. Amazing how often one is querying dev and another prod when you have these kinds of issues. Even if you don't believe this to be the case, check this anyway.
Permissions could be another reason for the discrepancy.
Finally confirm that the two queries are exactly the same. Use Profiler if possible to confirm this.
Usually I use SQL server profiler to check what SQL Statements Crystal is running behind the scenes. In your case is not possible because you are running SQL Server Express.
In Crystal you have the option of checking the actual SQL statement that Crystal is running by selecting "Database" and "Show SQL Statement" in the top menu.
Make sure that under Reports menu you are not putting any conditions in the Select Records.
Check that you are showing the fields in the detail and not in the header or footer. That is a common mistake.
i have a view that is using linked server to retrieve data from a remote server in SQL Server. On each time viewing the view, the results returned are vary. For example, 1st time execution may return 100 rows of records but on 2nd time of execution, rows returned are 120 rows. Any ideas what is the cause?
I have witnessed odd linked-server results that are a product of non-determinism written into the SQL itself, I.e. a TOP query written without an ORDER BY clause.
This problem, for example, where the chap had multiple non-unique foreign keys coming from a table source on the left hand side of a linked-server INNER JOIN, and wanted 10 rows from a remote sub-query to the right, where the end result was restricted to 10 rows itself, when it should have been greater than 10 rows.
Should definitely give your SQL a quick eye for such curiosities.
The data on the linked server changed between executions?
Is your SQL Server fully patched? SQL Server 2008 and 2005 both have bug fixes out related to incorrect query results from linked servers.
Here is one example:
969997 FIX: You receive an incorrect result when you query data from a linked server that is created by using an index OLE DB provider in SQL Server 2005 or in SQL Server 2008
Is the linked server also a SQL Server? If not, perhaps a buggy driver? I've seen odd results, for example, due to an old Informix ODBC driver. Are you able to run something akin to SQL Profiler on the linked server to see what command it's receiving?
I'm not sure what the answer is, but (assuming that your counts of 100 and 120 are accurate) can you not capture the data from the two runs and compare it? That might give you some clues as to what's going on. For example, is it completely different datat, or is it duplicate rows (in the 120 row batch).
I have written SQL statements (stored in a text document) that load data into a SQL Server database. These statements need to be repeated daily. Some of the statements use the NewId() function to populate a keyed field in the database, and this works fine.
While I'm in the process of writing an application to replicate these statements, I want to use Access queries and macros instead of copying and pasting queries into SQL Server, thus saving me time on a daily basis. All is working fine but I can't find any function that will replace the SQL Server NewId() function. Does one exist or is there a work around?
I'm using SQL Server 2005 and Access 2007.
On top of matt's answer, you could simply use a pass-through query and just use your existing, working queries from MS Access.
A solution would be to insert the stguidgen() function in your code, as you can find it here: http://trigeminal.fmsinc.com/code/guids.bas https://web.archive.org/web/20190129105748/http://trigeminal.fmsinc.com/code/guids.bas
The only workaround I can think of would be to define the column in your access database of type "Replication ID" and make it an autonumber field. That will automatically generate a unique GUID for each row and you won't need to use newid() at all. In SQL server, you would just make the default value for the column "newid()".
Again, there seems to be confusion here.
If I'm understanding correctly:
You have an Access front end.
You have a SQL Server 2005 back end.
What you need is the ability to generate the GUID in the SQL Server table. So, answers taht suggest adding an AutoNumber field of type ReplicationID in Access aren't going to help, as the table isn't a Jet table, but a SQL Server table.
The SQL can certainly be executed as a passthrough query, which will hand off everything to the SQL Server for processing, but I wonder why there isn't a default value for this field in SQL Server? Can SQL Server 2005 tables not have NewId() as the default value? Or is there some other method for having a field populate with a new GUID? I seem to recall something about using GUIDs and marking them "not for replication" (I don't have access to a SQL Server right at the moment to look this up).
Seems to me it's better to let the database engine do this kind of thing, rather than executing a function in your SQL to do it, but perhaps someone can enlighten me on why I'm wrong on that.