I want to find the lowest visited value for a specific id AND the lowest for entire table.
In one query.
MyTab
ID VISITED
101 2009
102 2010
103 2011
104 2012
105 2013
Can I do it in one query?
Right now I do like:
select
min(visited)
from
mytab
where
id = 100;
and then I do the second query.
select
min(visited)
from
mytab;
What I want is something like below (but can one make it more simple?)
select
min( a.visited ),
min( b.visited )
from
(select visited from mytab where id=100) as a,
(select visited from mytab) as b;
Query run for e.g. id 103 and 100 would be:
id 103 will give 2011,2009
id 100 will give null,2009
Thanks
You can use MIN with CASE:
select
min(case when id = 100 then visited end) minbyid,
min(visited) minoverall
from mytab
SQL Fiddle Demo
select min(visited) as GlobalMin
, min(case when id = 100 then visited end) as MinForId100
from mytab
Related
my query as below , i want to minus some rows from query1 when query2 have rowdata , but i don't know how to do:
my query:
with query1 as(
select wm_concat(linkman_name) name,
wm_concat(phone_num) phone,
t.org_id
from (
select linkman_name, phone_num, LINK_ORG_ID, org_id
from TD_SM_LINKMAN
where STATE = '2'
and (LINK_ORG_ID is null or LINK_ORG_ID = '')) t
group by t.org_id) ,
query2 as(
select wm_concat(linkman_name) name,
wm_concat(phone_num) phone,
org_id
from (select linkman_name, phone_num, LINK_ORG_ID, org_id
from TD_SM_LINKMAN
where STATE = '2'
and (LINK_ORG_ID = '55')) t
group by org_id)
select *
from query1
union all
select *
from query2 minus
-- this doesn't work ,i want to minus the rowdata from query 1 when query1.org_id = query2.org_id. the query2 is marked as outer query column.
(select * from query1 where query1.ORG_ID = query2.ORG_ID)
;
sample table
name phone link_org_id org_id
lily 133 1
ming 144 1
hao 333 2
jane 1234 55 2
bob 666 3
herry 555 3
query 1 result:
name phone org_id
lily,ming 133,144 1
hao 333 2
bob,herry 666,555 3
query 2 result:
name phone org_id
jane 1234 2
such like this , jane selected by query2 and hao selected by query 1 . All of them are from a same org which org_id =2 . but i don't need hao ,i just need jane. how to do?
i means if query2 can find result , then no need query1's result. but if query2 can't find any data, then i need query1's data.
The way it is now, you'll first have to split names (and phones) into rows, and then apply set operators (UNION, MINUS) to such a data.
Which means that you shouldn't use WM_CONCAT at all; at least, not at the beginning, because
first you concatenate data
then you'd have to split it back into rows
UNION / MINUS sets
Doing useless job in the first 2 steps.
I'd suggest you to UNION / MINUS data first, then aggregate them using WM_CONCAT. By the way, which database version do you use? WM_CONCAT is a) undocumented, b) doesn't even exist in latest Oracle database versions so you'd rather switch to LISTAGG, if possible.
I am pretty new to SQL and I thought I was comfortable using it after a while but it still is tough. I am trying to increment ids. I know I could use auto-increment but in this case there are id has relationship with several categories so it has to start with different numbers so I can't do it.
The table looks something like this:
id category
----------------
1000 1
1000 1
...
2000 2
2000 2
...
And I want to make it:
id category
------------------
1000 1
1001 1
1002 1
...
2000 2
2001 2
...
I tried:
UPDATE T1
SET id = CASE
WHEN EXISTS (SELECT id FROM STYLE WHERE T1.id = id)
THEN (SELECT MAX(CAST(id AS INT)) + 1
FROM STYLE
WHERE category = T1.category)
END
FROM STYLE T1
WHERE idStyle = idStyle
But it just added 1 to all rows. How could I go 1 by 1 so it could actually get the incremented max id? Thank you.
In the absense of real sample data, this is a pseudo-sql, however, something like...
UPDATE YT
----SELECT NULL as Ihave no context of other fields in your table
SET id = id + ROW_NUMBER() OVER (PARTITION BY category ORDER BY (SELECT NULL)) - 1
FROM YourTable YT;
You can use row_number() function instead :
select *,
concat(cid, row_number() over (partition by id order by category)-1) as NewId
from style s;
I have APPLICATIONSTATUSLOG_ID primary key field on my table.
In order to find out the last updated record in my DB and the MAX(APPLICATIONSTATUSLOG_ID) is presumed to be the most recent record.
I tried this code :
SELECT
MAX(CASE WHEN MAX(d.ApplicationStatusLog_ID) = d.ApplicationStatusLog_ID THEN d.ApplicationStatusID END) AS StatusID,
FROM
ApplicationStatusLog d
But I get error:
Msg 130, Level 15, State 1, Line 53 Cannot perform an aggregate function on an expression containing an aggregate or a subquery.
My table looks like
ApplicationID - ApplicationStatusID - ApplicationStatusLogID
10000 17 100
10000 08 101
10000 10 102
10001 06 103
10001 10 104
10002 06 105
10002 07 106
My output should be:
10000 10
10001 10
10002 07
Please help me understand and resolve my problem.
If you want to just find the last updated row, given that it has max value in APPLICATIONSTATUSLOG_ID column. The query would be:
SELECT *
FROM ApplicationStatusLog
WHERE ApplicationStatusLog_ID = (SELECT MAX(ApplicationStatusLog_ID) FROM ApplicationStatusLog )
EDIT
So as you stated in comment, the query for it will be:
DECLARE #statusId INT
SELECT #statusId = STATUSID
FROM ApplicationStatusLog
WHERE ApplicationStatusLog_ID = (SELECT MAX(ApplicationStatusLog_ID) FROM ApplicationStatusLog )
EDIT 2:
The query as per your edit in question will be:
WITH C AS
(
SELECT ApplicationID,ApplicationStatusID,ApplicationStatusLogID, ROW_NUMBER() OVER (PARTITION BY ApplicationID ORDER BY ApplicationStatusLogID DESC) AS ranking
FROM ApplicationStatusLog
)
SELECT ApplicationID,ApplicationStatusID
FROM C
WHERE ranking = 1
You can join same table twice like this:
select IT.JoiningID, JT.MAXAPPLICATIONSTATUSID FROM dbo.[Table] IT
INNER JOIN (
Select JoiningID, MAX (APPLICATIONSTATUSID) MAXAPPLICATIONSTATUSID
FROM dbo.[Table]
GROUP BY JoiningID
) JT ON IT.JoiningID = JT.JoiningID
Now you have MAXAPPLICATIONSTATUSID per ID so you can write what you wand based on MAXAPPLICATIONSTATUSID.
Without full query
SELECT
x.StatusId
...
FROM <Table> a
CROSS APPLY
(
SELECT x.APPLICATIONSTATUSID as StatusId
FROM <Table> x
HAVING MAX(APPLICATIONSTATUSLOG_ID) = a.APPLICATIONSTATUSLOG_ID
GROUP BY x.APPLICATIONSTATUSID
)
I'm looking to filter out rows in the database (PostgreSQL) if one of the values in the status column occurs. The idea is to sum the amount column if the unique reference only has a status equals to 1. The query should not SELECT the reference at all if it has also a status of 2 or any other status for that matter. status refers to the state of the transaction.
Current data table:
reference | amount | status
1 100 1
2 120 1
2 -120 2
3 200 1
3 -200 2
4 450 1
Result:
amount | status
550 1
I've simplified the data example but I think it gives a good idea of what I'm looking for.
I'm unsuccessful in selecting only references that only have status 1.
I've tried sub-queries, using the HAVING clause and other methods without success.
Thanks
Here's a way using not exists to sum all rows where the status is 1 and other rows with the same reference and a non 1 status do not exist.
select sum(amount) from mytable t1
where status = 1
and not exists (
select 1 from mytable t2
where t2.reference = t1.reference
and t2.status <> 1
)
SELECT SUM(amount)
FROM table
WHERE reference NOT IN (
SELECT reference
FROM table
WHERE status<>1
)
The subquery SELECTs all references that must be excluded, then the main query sums everything except them
select sum (amount) as amount
from (
select sum(amount) as amount
from t
group by reference
having not bool_or(status <> 1)
) s;
amount
--------
550
You could use windowed functions to count occurences of status different than 1 per each group:
SELECT SUM(amount) AS amount
FROM (SELECT *,COUNT(*) FILTER(WHERE status<>1) OVER(PARTITION BY reference) cnt
FROM tc) AS sub
WHERE cnt = 0;
Rextester Demo
I have a table like below
id name year
--------------
1 A 2000
2 B 2000
2 B 2000
2 B 2000
5 C 2000
1 D 2001
3 E 2001
as well as you see in the year 2000 we missed id '3' and id '4' and in the year 2001 we missed id '2'. I want to generate my second table which includes missed items.
2nd table :
From-id to-id name year
--------------------------------
3 4 null 2000
2 null null 2001
Which method in a SQL query can solve my problem?
Gaps and Islands in Sequences is the name of this problem. you read this article
Here's something to get you started:
WITH cte AS
(
SELECT *
FROM
(VALUES
(1),(2),(3),(4),(5)
) Tally(number)
), cte2 as
(
SELECT DISTINCT [year]
FROM
(VALUES
(2000),(2000),(2001)
)tbl([year])
), cte3 as
(
SELECT *
FROM cte
CROSS JOIN cte2
)
SELECT *
FROM cte3
LEFT OUTER JOIN YourTable ON cte3.number = YourTable.id AND cte3.[year] = YourTable[year)
A few notes: please avoid using reserved keywords as column names (such as year).
Furthermore, since I didn't know how you'd handle multiple missing ranges I did not format the output to reflect a range. For example: What would be your expected output if only one row with id=3 would be in your table?
I'd probably use ROW_NUMBER for this
This query gives you what the correct ID should be (if I interpreted your question right):
SELECT
ROW_NUMBER() OVER (PARTITION BY yr ORDER BY name, yr) as "Correct ID", *
FROM misorder
It assigns a row number (so a number starting from 1 increasing by 1 every time the year is the same).
And to let you know which ones are missing I think this should be a working solution:
WITH missing AS
(
SELECT
ROW_NUMBER() OVER (PARTITION BY yr ORDER BY name, yr) as "Correct ID", *
FROM misorder
)
SELECT * FROM missing
WHERE "Correct ID" != "id"
It takes the first query as a base to select only those records where the assumed correct ID is not equal to the currently assigned ID. You can turn this into a query to include the ranges you mentioned, but not sure if that is really necessary.
Hope this helps.