I need some help creating an LINQ select, i have a table with some columns in it, but only 2 of interest to this problem.
userid, type
Now this table have many thousands entries, and I only want the top, let’s say 50. So far so good, but the hard part is that there a lot of rows in success that should only be counted as 1.
Example
Type UserId
============
Add 1
Add 1
Add 1
Add 2
I would like this to only be counted as 2 in the limit of rows I am taking out, but I would like all the rows to be outputted still.
Is this possible with a single SQL request, or should I find another way to do this?
Edit: I can add columns to the table, with values if this would solve the problem.
Edit2: Sotred procedures are also an solution
Example 2: This should be counted as 3 rows
Type UserId
============
Add 1
Add 1
Add 2
Add 1
Are you stuck on LINQ?
Add a PK identity.
Order by PK.
Use a DataReader and just count the changes.
Then just stop when the changes count is at your max.
If you are not in a .NET environment then same thing with a cursor.
Since LINQ is deferred you might be able to just order in LINQ and then on a ForEach just exit.
I'm not close to a computer right now so I'm not sure is 100% correct syntax wise, but I believe you're looking for something like this:
data.Select(x => new {x.Type, x.UserId})
.GroupBy(x => x.UserId)
.Take(50);
You could do it with Linq, but it may be a LOT slower than a traditional for loop. One way would be:
data.Where((s, i) => i == 0 ||
!(s.Type == data[i-1].Type && s.UserId == data[i-1].UserId))
That would skip any "duplicate" items that have the same Type and UserID as the "previous" item.
However this ONLY works if data has an indexer (an array or something that implements IList). An IEnumerable or IQueryable would not work. Also, it is almost certainly not translatable to SQL so you'd have to pull ALL of the results and filter in-memory.
If you want to do it in SQL I would try either scanning a cursor and filling a temp table if one of the values change or using a common table expression that included a ROW_NUMBER column, then doing a look-back sub-query similar to the Linq method above:
WITH base AS
(
SELECT
Type,
UserId,
ROW_NUMBER() OVER (ORDER BY ??? ) AS RowNum
FROM Table
)
SELECT b1.Type, b1.UserId
FROM base b1
LEFT JOIN base b2 ON b1.RowNum = b2.RowNum - 1
WHERE (b1.Type <> b2.Type OR b1.UserId <> b2.UserId)
ORDER BY b1.RowNum
You can do this with LINQ, but I think it might be easier to go the "for(each) loop" route...
data.Select((x, i) => new { x.Type, x.UserId, i })
.GroupBy(x => x.Type)
.Select(g => new
{
Type = g.Key,
Items = g
.Select((x, j) => new { x.UserId, i = x.i - j })
})
.SelectMany(g => g.Select(x => new { g.Type, x.UserId, x.i }))
.GroupBy(x => new { x.Type, x.i })
.Take(50);
.SelectMany(g => g.Select(x => new { x.Type, x.UserId }));
Related
Imagine that an entity has many fields and I just want to make changes in 1-2 fields, Is it possible to do that in Select? I don't want to mention all fields in my Select cause.
Ex: I want to return all fields and make a tiny change in OrderId field at the same time.
_context.Set<Table>.Select(t=>t.OrderId=t.OrderId+1)
A workaround I've found is to use select and copy every field to a new instance of your entity/object and change the field you want a computed value for, like:
_context.Operations
.Where(t => t.SessionId == sessionId)
.Select(o => new Operation
{
OperationId = o.OperationId + 1;
SessionId = o.SessionId,
Amount = o.Amount,
Date = o.Date,
});
I'm running a query that will get results based on a location search and date. I have a geography column with location points (lat/long) that's indexed. When I search for an event on a date it searches for all events within a distance (radius) on that date.
The problem is that if there are, say 10 events, all at the same location on the same date, all 10 results will come back in the first page. I'd like to mix this up and only show 2-3 from each location to give the result set some variety, so the user doesn't just see all events from one location.
I know I can use distinct to only fetch one event from each location, but how would I use it to get me 2-3 distinct values?
Here is my query so far.
viewModel.Events = dbContext.YogaSpaceEvents
.Where(i => i.EventDateTime >= adjustedSearchDate &&
i.LocationPoints.Distance(location) <= radius)
.Distinct()
.OrderBy(i => i.EventDateTime)
.Select(i => new EventResult
{
//fill view model here
})
.ToPagedList(Page, 10);
I don't think there's a way to get EF to generate such a query, which for SQL Server would be something like this:
with q as
(
select *,
( row_number() over (partition by StateProvinceId order by CityID) -1 ) / 3 MyRanking
from Application.Cities
)
select CityId, CityName,StateProvinceID
from q
order by MyRanking, StateProvinceID, CityID
offset 10 rows
fetch next 20 rows only
Note that this example doesn't use distance. But the idea is identical: the first 3 cities in each state are returned first, then the next 3, etc.
Or you could fetch all the matching events and sort them in memory.
I think you should be able to do something like:
dbContext.YogaSpaceEvents
.Where(i => i.EventDateTime >= adjustedSearchDate &&
i.LocationPoints.Distance(location) <= radius)
.GroupBy(i => i.Geography)
.SelectMany(g => g.OrderBy(x => x.EventDateTime).Take(3))
.Select(i => new EventResult { //fill view model here })
.ToPagedList(Page, 10);
The proper syntax in Linq for this SQL query is eluding me. I'd appreciate any hand with this.
SQL:
SELECT TOP 1 posdate
FROM dailypos
GROUP BY posdate
HAVING Count(DISTINCT customernumber) = 3
ORDER BY posdate DESC)
Essentially, I get files from 3 different customers and I need a quick way to determine the most recent date for which I have data from all 3. I'm open to a different approach, but this SQL works for what I need.
I can do the group, but I don't know how to handle the 4th line (HAVING Count(Distinct...))
Thanks in advance.
Try something like this:
var result = context.dailypos
.GroupBy(x => x.posdate)
.Where(g => g.Select(x => x.customernumber).Distinct().Count() == 3)
.Select(g => g.Key)
.OrderByDescending(x => x)
.Take(1);
I'm trying to get something similar to the SQL below via QueryOver:
SELECT
docs.*,
(SELECT TOP 1 eventDate from events WHERE id=docs.id
AND type=4 ORDER BY eventDate DESC) as eventDate
FROM documents as docs
WHERE doc.accountId = ...
I've got close with a projection, however I'm not sure how to get the entire documents table back. Documents has a one-to-many relationship with Events, I don't want to outer join as it will bring multiple results, and an inner join may not bring back a row:
var query = QueryOver<Document>
.Where(d => d.Account == account)
.SelectList(list => list
.Select(d => d)
.Select(d => d.Events.OrderByDescending(e => e.EventDate).FirstOrDefault(e => e.Type == 4))
)
.List<object[]>()
.Select(d => return new DocumentSummary(d[0],d[1]) etc.);
Is there an easier way of performing subqueries for columns? I'm reluctant to replace this with the property performing a query in its get.
After some research it looks like HQL (which QueryOver is converted into) does not support TOP inside subqueries.
My solution: create a view which includes the computed properties, and then mark these properties in the mappings files as insert="false" and update="false"
Imagine the following (simplified) database layout:
We have many "holiday" records that relate to going to a particular Accommodation on a certain date etc.
I would like to pull from the database the "best" holiday going to each accommodation (i.e. lowest price), given a set of search criteria (e.g. duration, departure airport etc).
There will be multiple records with the same price, so then we need to choose by offer saving (descending), then by departure date ascending.
I can write SQL to do this that looks like this (I'm not saying this is necessarily the most optimal way):
SELECT *
FROM Holiday h1 INNER JOIN (
SELECT h2.HolidayID,
h2.AccommodationID,
ROW_NUMBER() OVER (
PARTITION BY h2.AccommodationID
ORDER BY OfferSaving DESC
) AS RowNum
FROM Holiday h2 INNER JOIN (
SELECT AccommodationID,
MIN(price) as MinPrice
FROM Holiday
WHERE TradeNameID = 58001
/*** Other Criteria Here ***/
GROUP BY AccommodationID
) mp
ON mp.AccommodationID = h2.AccommodationID
AND mp.MinPrice = h2.price
WHERE TradeNameID = 58001
/*** Other Criteria Here ***/
) x on h1.HolidayID = x.HolidayID and x.RowNum = 1
As you can see, this uses a subquery within another subquery.
However, for several reasons my preference would be to achieve this same result in NHibernate.
Ideally, this would be done with QueryOver - the reason being that I build up the search criteria dynamically and this is much easier with QueryOver's fluent interface. (I had started out hoping to use NHibernate Linq, but unfortunately it's not mature enough).
After a lot of effort (being a relative newbie to NHibernate) I was able to re-create the very inner query that fetches all accommodations and their min price.
public IEnumerable<HolidaySearchDataDto> CriteriaFindAccommodationFromPricesForOffers(IEnumerable<IHolidayFilter<PackageHoliday>> filters, int skip, int take, out bool hasMore)
{
IQueryOver<PackageHoliday, PackageHoliday> queryable = NHibernateSession.CurrentFor(NHibernateSession.DefaultFactoryKey).QueryOver<PackageHoliday>();
queryable = queryable.Where(h => h.TradeNameId == website.TradeNameID);
var accommodation = Null<Accommodation>();
var accommodationUnit = Null<AccommodationUnit>();
var dto = Null<HolidaySearchDataDto>();
// Apply search criteria
foreach (var filter in filters)
queryable = filter.ApplyFilter(queryable, accommodationUnit, accommodation);
var query1 = queryable
.JoinQueryOver(h => h.AccommodationUnit, () => accommodationUnit)
.JoinQueryOver(h => h.Accommodation, () => accommodation)
.SelectList(hols => hols
.SelectGroup(() => accommodation.Id).WithAlias(() => dto.AccommodationId)
.SelectMin(h => h.Price).WithAlias(() => dto.Price)
);
var list = query1.OrderByAlias(() => dto.Price).Asc
.Skip(skip).Take(take+1)
.Cacheable().CacheMode(CacheMode.Normal).List<object[]>();
// Cacheing doesn't work this way...
/*.TransformUsing(Transformers.AliasToBean<HolidaySearchDataDto>())
.Cacheable().CacheMode(CacheMode.Normal).List<HolidaySearchDataDto>();*/
hasMore = list.Count() == take;
var dtos = list.Take(take).Select(h => new HolidaySearchDataDto
{
AccommodationId = (string)h[0],
Price = (decimal)h[1],
});
return dtos;
}
So my question is...
Any ideas on how to achieve what I want using QueryOver, or if necessary Criteria API?
I'd prefer not to use HQL but if it is necessary than I'm willing to see how it can be done with that too (it makes it harder (or more messy) to build up the search criteria though).
If this just isn't doable using NHibernate, then I could use a SQL query. In which case, my question is can the SQL be improved/optimised?
I have manage to achieve such dynamic search criterion by using Criteria API's. Problem I ran into was duplicates with inner and outer joins and especially related to sorting and pagination, and I had to resort to using 2 queries, 1st query for restriction and using the result of 1st query as 'in' clause in 2nd creteria.