ASP.NET Web API OData Action on the EDM Model Root - vb.net

I'm building a Web API service using OData, and would like to expose a method as an Action in the service as follows.
http://myServer/odata/myAction
I'm currently mapping the OData routes as follows:
Dim modelBuilder As ODataModelBuilder = New ODataConventionModelBuilder
modelBuilder.EntitySet(Of Product)("Products")
Dim myAction = modelBuilder.Action("myAction")
myAction.Parameter(Of String)("Parameter1")
myAction.Returns(Of Boolean)()
Dim model As IEdmModel = modelBuilder.GetEdmModel
config.Routes.MapODataRoute("ODataRoute", "odata", model)
This wonderful tutorial shows how to associate an action with an entity like this:
http://myServer/odata/Products(1)/myAction
Following the tutorial, I can then write the method for the action in the ProductsController class after creating the model with the following line:
Dim myAction = modelBuilder.Entity(Of Product).Action("myAction")
However, if I don't want to associate the action with an entity, where would I write the method for the action? Is there a DefaultController class I need to write?

We currently do not have support for this out of the box, but its very easy to do it yourself. Example below (This nice sample is actually from Mike Wasson which is yet to be made public :-))
------------------------------------------------------
// CreateMovie is a non-bindable action.
// You invoke it from the service root: ~/odata/CreateMovie
ActionConfiguration createMovie = modelBuilder.Action("CreateMovie");
createMovie.Parameter<string>("Title");
createMovie.ReturnsFromEntitySet<Movie>("Movies");
// Add a custom route convention for non-bindable actions.
// (Web API does not have a built-in routing convention for non-bindable actions.)
IList<IODataRoutingConvention> conventions = ODataRoutingConventions.CreateDefault();
conventions.Insert(0, new NonBindableActionRoutingConvention("NonBindableActions"));
// Map the OData route.
Microsoft.Data.Edm.IEdmModel model = modelBuilder.GetEdmModel();
config.Routes.MapODataRoute("ODataRoute", "odata", model, new DefaultODataPathHandler(), conventions);
--------------------------------------------------------------
// Implements a routing convention for non-bindable actions.
// The convention maps "MyAction" to Controller:MyAction() method, where the name of the controller
// is specified in the constructor.
public class NonBindableActionRoutingConvention : IODataRoutingConvention
{
private string _controllerName;
public NonBindableActionRoutingConvention(string controllerName)
{
_controllerName = controllerName;
}
// Route all non-bindable actions to a single controller.
public string SelectController(ODataPath odataPath, System.Net.Http.HttpRequestMessage request)
{
if (odataPath.PathTemplate == "~/action")
{
return _controllerName;
}
return null;
}
// Route the action to a method with the same name as the action.
public string SelectAction(ODataPath odataPath, System.Web.Http.Controllers.HttpControllerContext controllerContext, ILookup<string, System.Web.Http.Controllers.HttpActionDescriptor> actionMap)
{
if (controllerContext.Request.Method == HttpMethod.Post)
{
if (odataPath.PathTemplate == "~/action")
{
ActionPathSegment actionSegment = odataPath.Segments.First() as ActionPathSegment;
IEdmFunctionImport action = actionSegment.Action;
if (!action.IsBindable && actionMap.Contains(action.Name))
{
return action.Name;
}
}
}
return null;
}
}
--------------------------------------------------
// Controller for handling non-bindable actions.
[ODataFormatting]
[ApiExplorerSettings(IgnoreApi = true)]
public class NonBindableActionsController : ApiController
{
MoviesContext db = new MoviesContext();
[HttpPost]
public Movie CreateMovie(ODataActionParameters parameters)
{
if (!ModelState.IsValid)
{
throw new HttpResponseException(HttpStatusCode.BadRequest);
}
string title = parameters["Title"] as string;
Movie movie = new Movie()
{
Title = title
};
db.Movies.Add(movie);
db.SaveChanges();
return movie;
}
protected override void Dispose(bool disposing)
{
db.Dispose();
base.Dispose(disposing);
}
}

Related

FluentValidation with IActionFilter in Asp.net Core 2.1 [duplicate]

I have a logic to apply in case the request received is a BadRequest, to do this I have created a filter:
public class ValidateModelAttribute : ActionFilterAttribute
{
public override void OnActionExecuting(ActionExecutingContext context)
{
if (!context.ModelState.IsValid)
{
// Apply logic
}
}
}
In Startup:
public void ConfigureServices(IServiceCollection services)
{
services.AddMvc(options => { options.Filters.Add<ValidateModelAttribute>(); });
}
Controller:
[Route("api/[controller]")]
[ApiController]
public class VerifyController : ControllerBase
{
[Route("test")]
[HttpPost]
[ValidateModel]
public ActionResult<Guid> validationTest(PersonalInfo personalInfo)
{
return null;
}
}
Model:
public class PersonalInfo
{
public string FirstName { get; set; }
[RegularExpression("\\d{4}-?\\d{2}-?\\d{2}", ErrorMessage = "Date must be properly formatted according to ISO 8601")]
public string BirthDate { get; set; }
}
The thing is when I put a break point on the line:
if (!context.ModelState.IsValid)
execution reaches this line only if the request I send is valid. Why it is not passing the filter if I send a bad request?
The [ApiController] attribute that you've applied to your controller adds Automatic HTTP 400 Responses to the MVC pipeline, which means that your custom filter and action aren't executed if ModelState is invalid.
I see a few options for affecting how this works:
Remove the [ApiController] attribute
Although you can just remove the [ApiController] attribute, this would also cause the loss of some of the other features it provides, such as Binding source parameter inference.
Disable only the Automatic HTTP 400 Responses
Here's an example from the docs that shows how to disable just this feature:
services.AddControllers()
.ConfigureApiBehaviorOptions(options =>
{
// ...
options.SuppressModelStateInvalidFilter = true;
// ...
}
This code goes inside of your Startup's ConfigureServices method.
Customise the automatic response that gets generated
If you just want to provide a custom response to the caller, you can customise what gets returned. I've already described how this works in another answer, here.
An example of intersection for logging is describe in Log automatic 400 responses
Add configuration in Startup.ConfigureServices.
services.AddControllers()
.ConfigureApiBehaviorOptions(options =>
{
// To preserve the default behavior, capture the original delegate to call later.
var builtInFactory = options.InvalidModelStateResponseFactory;
options.InvalidModelStateResponseFactory = context =>
{
var logger = context.HttpContext.RequestServices.GetRequiredService<ILogger<Startup>>();
// Perform logging here.
//E.g. logger.LogError($”{context.ModelState}”);
logger.LogWarning(context.ModelState.ModelStateErrorsToString());
// Invoke the default behavior, which produces a ValidationProblemDetails response.
// To produce a custom response, return a different implementation of IActionResult instead.
return builtInFactory(context);
};
});
public static String ModelStateErrorsToString(this ModelStateDictionary modelState)
{
IEnumerable<ModelError> allErrors = modelState.Values.SelectMany(v => v.Errors);
StringBuilder sb = new StringBuilder();
foreach (ModelError error in allErrors)
{
sb.AppendLine($"error {error.ErrorMessage} {error.Exception}");
}
return sb.ToString();
}
As the attribute filter in the life cycle of the .Net Core you can’t handle it. The filter layer with ModelState will run after the model binding.
You can handle it with .Net Core middleware as the following https://learn.microsoft.com/en-us/aspnet/core/fundamentals/middleware/?view=aspnetcore-2.1&tabs=aspnetcore2x
If you want to SuppressModelStateInvalidFilter on individual action, consider to use custom attribute suggested on https://learn.microsoft.com/en-us/answers/questions/297568/how-to-suppress-suppressmodelstateinvalidfilter-at.html. (And similar answer https://github.com/aspnet/Mvc/issues/8575)
public class SuppressModelStateInvalidFilterAttribute : Attribute, IActionModelConvention
{
private const string FilterTypeName = "ModelStateInvalidFilterFactory";
public void Apply(ActionModel action)
{
for (var i = 0; i < action.Filters.Count; i++)
{
//if (action.Filters[i] is ModelStateInvalidFilter)
if (action.Filters[i].GetType().Name == FilterTypeName)
{
action.Filters.RemoveAt(i);
break;
}
}
}
}
Example of use
[ApiController]
public class PersonController
{
[SuppressModelStateInvalidFilter]
public ActionResult<Person> Get() => new Person();
}

Custom Model Binder Provider always null .net core

I'm having a problem trying to get custom model binders to work as a query parameter like I have gotten to work previously in .net framework 4.7.
To ensure this wasn't a scenario where my object was too complex, I reduced the model to a simple string but even then I cannot get this to work.
I have a simple model I would like to be binded from query parameters.
public class SearchModel {
public string SearchTerms { get; set; }
}
And I have configured the ModelBinder and ModelBinderProvider as shown here like so.
public class TestModelBinder : IModelBinder {
public Task BindModelAsync(ModelBindingContext bindingContext) {
if (bindingContext.ModelType != typeof(SearchModel)) {
throw new ArgumentException($"Invalid binding context supplied {bindingContext.ModelType}");
}
var model = (SearchModel)bindingContext.Model ?? new SearchModel();
var properties = model.GetType().GetProperties();
foreach(var p in properties) {
var value = this.GetValue(bindingContext, p.Name);
p.SetValue(model, Convert.ChangeType(value, p.PropertyType), null);
}
return Task.CompletedTask;
}
protected string GetValue(ModelBindingContext context, string key) {
var result = context.ValueProvider.GetValue(key);
return result.FirstValue;
}
}
public class TestModelBinderProvider : IModelBinderProvider {
public IModelBinder GetBinder(ModelBinderProviderContext context) {
if (context == null) {
throw new ArgumentNullException(nameof(context));
}
if (context.Metadata.ModelType == typeof(SearchModel)) {
var returnType = new BinderTypeModelBinder(typeof(TestModelBinder));
return returnType;
}
return null;
}
}
As stated in the last step in Microsoft documentation I updated my ConfigureServices method in Startup.cs to include the BinderProvider.
services.AddMvc(options => {
options.ModelBinderProviders.Insert(0, new TestModelBinderProvider());
})
.SetCompatibilityVersion(CompatibilityVersion.Version_2_1);
But when I call my Search endpoint with a url such as "https://localhost:44387/api/testbinding?searchTerms=newSearch" I am always seeing a return of "request == null True" even though I see it properly hit the custom binding and bind correctly if I step through debugging, can anyone please point me in the right direction as to what I am doing wrong?
[Route("api/[controller]")]
[ApiController]
public class TestBindingController : ControllerBase {
[HttpGet()]
public IActionResult GetResult([FromQuery] SearchModel request) {
return Ok($"request == null {request == null}");
}
}
I think what you're missing if the statement that sets the result of the model binding operation, as you can see in the AuthorEntityBinder code sample in this section of the docs:
bindingContext.Result = ModelBindingResult.Success(model);
Your implementation of the model binder does create an instance of SearchModel, but doesn't feed it back to the model binding context.
As a separate note, I don't think you need to add a custom model binder is the query string segments match the properties names of the model you're trying to bind.

Add values to Web API model using ActionFilter or Custom Model Binder?

I'm using WebAPI 2 and I'm finding that most of my API POST endpoints are requiring the same two values be added to the model: UserId from HttpContext.Current.User.Identity.GetUserId() and SignalR_ConnectionId from a custom request header. I'd like to add these two values to the model without repeating the same code within each request handler.
I like the idea of using an ActionFilter because then I can easily decorate the endpoints that need this functionality with the annotation. So far my ActionFilter looks like the following:
public class AddUserIdActionFilter : ActionFilterAttribute
{
public override void OnActionExecuting(HttpActionContext actionContext)
{
var headerValues = actionContext.Request.Headers.GetValues("SignalRId");
if (HttpContext.Current.User.Identity != null)
{
Guid userId = Guid.Parse(HttpContext.Current.User.Identity.GetUserId());
}
else
{
throw new HttpResponseException(new HttpResponseMessage(HttpStatusCode.Unauthorized));
}
//Modify the model??
}
}
How do I modify the model within the ActionFilter? (I assume that each model that is decorated with the attribute would descend from a base class with a property for userId and SignalRId).
If I can't add the values to the model, I'll have to consider a Custom Model Binder. I don't want to change the default model binding, just add my two properties to what's already happening. How do I approach this in Web API 2?
The following worked fine.
public class AddUserIdActionFilter : ActionFilterAttribute
{
public override void OnActionExecuting(HttpActionContext actionContext)
{
IEnumerable<string> headers;
string connectionId;
Guid userId;
if(actionContext.Request.Headers.TryGetValues("SignalR_Id", out headers))
{
connectionId = headers.First();
}
else
{
throw new HttpResponseException(new HttpResponseMessage(HttpStatusCode.BadRequest));
}
if (HttpContext.Current.User.Identity != null)
{
userId = Guid.Parse(HttpContext.Current.User.Identity.GetUserId());
}
else
{
throw new HttpResponseException(new HttpResponseMessage(HttpStatusCode.Unauthorized));
}
try
{
var model = (BaseCommand)actionContext.ActionArguments.Values.First();
model.UserId = userId;
model.ConnectionId = connectionId;
}
catch
{
throw new HttpResponseException(new HttpResponseMessage(HttpStatusCode.InternalServerError));
}
}
}

How does one determine the route of an Web API 2.2 Action implemented in a base class?

Assume for a moment that I have an abstract controller
public abstract class ResourceController<TResource> : ApiController where TResource: Resource,new()
{
[Route("{id}")]
[HttpGet]
public async Task<IHttpActionResult> FindById([FromUri] string id)
{
TResource resource = null;
// go fetch the resource from a database or something
return Ok(resource)
}
[Route("")]
[HttpPost]
public async Task<IHttpActionResult> Create(TResource resource)
{
TResource resource = null;
// go create the resource or something
return CreatedAtRoute("XXXXX", new { id = resource.Id }, resource);
}
// more methods
}
[RoutePrefix("foo")]
public class FooResourceController : ResourceController<Foo>
{
}
[RoutePrefix("baa")]
public class BaaResourceController : ResourceController<Baa>
{
}
public class Resource
{
public string Id { get; set; }
// some other properties all resources shared
}
At this stage all the actions work, except for creating a new resource. Without overriding the Create method in every subclass, how do I find the correct route of the FindById of the respective controllers from the ResourceController Create method?
For example, if I create a foo resource with id 123 then it would return foo/123. If I created a resource baa with id 456, then it woulds return baa/456.
I'm unable to name the route using attributes, since only one can exist for the application.
Had the same problem. I fixed it by using the Created method in combination with the calling url.
This will only work if yout post doesn't have a dedicated template
My get:
[HttpGet("{id:int}")]
public async Task<IActionResult> GetAsync(int id)
{
try
{
var codetabel = await _reader.GetAsync(id);
var model = Mapper.Map<TCodeTabelModel>(codetabel);
return OkResult(model);
}
catch ....
}
And post:
[HttpPost()]
public async Task<IActionResult> InsertAsync(TCodeTabelModel model)
{
if (!ModelState.IsValid)
return BadRequestResult(ModelState);
try
{
var entity = Mapper.Map<TCodeTabelEntity>(model);
var insertedEntity = await _writer.InsertAsync(entity);
return Created($"{Request.Path.Value}/{insertedEntity.Id}" , Mapper.Map<TCodeTabelModel>(insertedEntity));
}
catch ....
}

how to handle ActionResult in custome class?

i have a class (in project by mvc4 razor on .net 4.5) and want to handle a Redirecting method on it and do not want inherit from controller class.
how can i handle this?it returns ActionResult to redirecting user in some cases like log outing
my main class:
public class SecuritySrv
{
public ActionResult Redirect()
{
return RedirectToAction("Logout", "Account", new { area = "" });
}
}
and i want to use it in some controllers like below:
public ActionResult AccountHome()
{
SecuritySrv SecurityService =new SecuritySrv()
if(.....)
return SecurityService.Redirect();
return view();
}
You can use this code anywhere, and you don't need an UrlHelper or access to the context, so you don't need to inherit the Controller class.
RouteValueDictionary rvd = new RouteValueDictionary
{
{"controller", "Profile"},
{"action", "Users"},
{"area", ""}
};
return new RedirectToRouteResult(rvd);
The RedirectToAction method of controller is just a helper for creating RedirectToRouteResult, you can create it by yourself in your class:
public class SecuritySrv
{
public ActionResult Redirect()
{
RouteValueDictionary routeValues = new RouteValueDictionary();
routeValues["action"] = "Logout";
routeValues["controller"] = "Account";
routeValues["area"] = "";
return new RedirectToRouteResult(routeValues);
}
}
And call this method from your controller in the way you wanted to.