Here is my url : /creations/stock?id=3
When I click to my link creations_stock_path(:id => creation.id) I have an error Couldn't find Creation with id=stock. I really don't understand the problem, I have the same for another object (products) and it works.
When I check what are send with my params, I have
>> params
=> {"id"=>"stock", "action"=>"show", "controller"=>"creations"}
Why ??? In my controller, I wrote :
def stock
#creation = Creation.find(params[:id])
end
So I don't understand first why rails want to use Show action and also why my params are wrong...
Any idea ?
Edit : My routes.rb file :
get "creations/stock"
get "products/stock"
The error means that there's no Creation record in the database that has an id equal to params[:id]. Check your db to see if the record exists. This exception shows a 404 page when running in production mode or at least when config.consider_all_requests_local is false.
If you don't want it to raise an exception, try find_by_id instead which will return nil when the record is not found.
Related
I am having a destroy method in employees controller as:
# DELETE /employees/1
def destroy
if #employee.destroy
redirect_to employees_url, notice: ‘Employee record was successfully destroyed.'
else
alert = ['Employee record could not be destroyed']
alert += #employee.errors.full_messages.map{ |s| "#{s}." } #because of some reason
alert = alert.join(' ')
redirect_back :fallback_location => #employee, :alert => alert
end
end
Output alert message: Employee record could not be destroyed because of some other
reason
It is redirecting to same show page but when I am navigating to some other page, the same alert message is persisted wherever I navigate.
I tried modifying it using flash[:alert], flash.now.alert and etc but no luck.
Could you please suggest how to fix this from controller end?
Rails redirect_to API documents an undesirable scenario that might happen when you are making a request with something other than a GET or POST (in this case using a DELETE)
If you are using XHR requests other than GET or POST and redirecting after the request then some browsers will follow the redirect using the original request method. This may lead to undesirable behavior such as a double DELETE. To work around this you can return a 303 See Other status code which will be followed using a GET request.
The solution is to try adding a status on your options array in the redirect_back
redirect_back fallback_location: #employee, alert: alert, status: 303
We have implemented an error handler for Yii 1. Also we have implemented the mail functionality with this as any error occurred an email will be send to us but the problem is we are not getting the current URL on which error is generating. Like one page controller/action can contain many images favicons etc. So if any image is missing then we are getting the image URL which showing 404 from:
$url = Yii::app()->createAbsoluteUrl(Yii::app()->request->url);
But we are not getting current URL not even in $error = Yii::app()->errorHandler->error.
So we are not getting the page in which image is absent. Please let me know if is there any way to get current page URL as I have tried many ways but all they are returning the missing images URL instead of main page URL for which images are missing.
createAbsoluteUrl() expects route as first argument - it may return random results if you provide URL instead of route (like in your code snippet).
If you want absolute URL of current request, you may use combination of getUrl() and getHostInfo():
$url = Yii::app()->request->getHostInfo() . Yii::app()->request->getUrl();
In case of error you can get current page url using Yii::app()->request->requestUri in Yii 1.
I am working on one server that resolve GraphQL queries. I used the graphql-kotlin library: https://github.com/ExpediaDotCom/graphql-kotlin.
I defined three resolve functions(could be viewed as three fields): getxxx(arguments...), getTarget(arguments...) and getSource(arguments...).
The problem is if one of my queried field failed, I will only get the 'errors' field. All other successful executed results(data) are dropped.
If I try to catch the exception for the failed field, then I will not get the 'error' field at last.
This is the image that had exception and dropped all fetched data:
The objective is returning both the successful fetched data in 'data' field and error message for failed field in 'errors' field.
I have checked this: How to return both error and data in a graphql resolver?
If I set a field that throw one error or exception intentionally, I will only get 'errors' field at last(Like the picture above).
In addition, many websites like this:https://itnext.io/the-definitive-guide-to-handling-graphql-errors-e0c58b52b5e1 suggest we should return partial result and error message, but in my case if I meet exception, only error message would be returned.
In our example application we have two top level queries
{
onlyCake(msg: "cake")
generateNumber
}
If I run this code this will return a random number and onlyCake returns the string <3. However if I modify the input of onlyCake to something that is not the string cake I will get an error. This is expected because the field onlyCake has a directive to implement this behavior.
https://github.com/ExpediaDotCom/graphql-kotlin/blob/2961b64d6e4cceb4034aec198d667e5f965decd2/example/src/main/kotlin/com/expedia/graphql/sample/directives/CakeOnlyDirectiveWiring.kt#L18-L19
The question is though, if I want to return the data still for generateNumber can I do that and have both errors and data in the response?
The answer is it's possible but not with the current schema. The issue is that our schema for onlyCake and generateNumber are both non-nullable fields. So as a client if I see that there is a data field I should expect to see both there otherwise I would have a parsing issue in my code. This is why we can't have this behaviour with the schema as is. If you want to implement this behaviour, the schema developer needs to decide where they can return null for some response and modify the errors field appropriately with a DataFetcherExceptionHandler
Or the other option is that we support the behaviour in graphql-java to return a DataFetcherResult<T> instead of just T from the kotlin functions. See the section Returning data and errors here: https://www.graphql-java.com/documentation/v13/execution/
I have created an issue to continue this discussion with other team members: https://github.com/ExpediaDotCom/graphql-kotlin/issues/244
I have one POST call related to search.It is like I am sending some data as parameters to call and some in payload.after getting 302 it gets redirected.But the issue is once it gets redirected,POST call gets converted to GET call and payload is lost.As a result I am unable to get desired search result.Is there anything related to config that I might be missing??
Yes this is the correct behavior. Sounds like you need to disable automatic re-directs for this test, see configure. You can do:
* configure followRedirects = false
And then get the redirect location manually as follows:
* def location = responseHeaders['Location'][0]
Refer to this test for an example: redirect.feature
My application is generating some absolute links via $this->get('request')->getHost().
Problem is: when I try to run testcases, I get following error message:
[exception] 500 | Internal Server Error | Twig_Error_Runtime
[message] An exception has been thrown during the rendering of a template ("Undefined index: HTTP_HOST") in "::base.html.twig" at line 69.
Somehow it's clear to me that there is no host when calling my app via CLI, but I think there must be a way to prevent Symfony2 from throwing that error.
Anyone knows how to get rid of it?
You could create the request like this:
$request = Request::create('http://example.com/path');
That will make the HTTP host be set.
Maybe what you could do is to inject the host you need directly in the request headers before calling the getter. The host is retrieved by looking at various parameter values. First, the headers parameter X_FORWARDED_HOST is checked to see if it is set. If it is set, it is returned otherwise the method getHost checks if the headers parameter HOST is set then the if the server parameter SERVER_NAME is set and finally if the server parameter SERVER_ADDR is set.
What you could try is to set the header parameter HOST like this before calling the getHost method:
$request = $this->get('request');
$request->headers->set('HOST', 'yourhosthere');
$request->getHost(); // Should return yourhosthere
That being said, I'm not sure this will solve the problem because the error you mentioning tells us that the template tries to retrieve the value of the index HTTP_HOST but it is not defined. Looking at the methods $request->getHost and $request->getHttpHost, I don't see anything trying to retrieve a value having HTTP_HOST as the index but I could have missed it. Could you post the file ::base.html.twig to see if the problem could be lying there.
Regards,
Matt
Thanks guys- your answers lead me into the right direction.
This is no Symfony2 issue, as i figured out:
It's just the facebook API PHP wrapper which directly accesses the SERVER parameters. This code solved my issue:
$facebook = $this->container->get('facebook');
$returnUrl = 'http://'.$request->getHost();
$returnUrl .= $this->container->get('router')->generate('_validate_facebook');
$_SERVER['HTTP_HOST'] = $request->getHost();
$_SERVER['REQUEST_URI'] = $request->getRequestUri();
$loginUrl = $facebook->getLoginUrl(array(
'req_perms' => 'publish_stream',
'next' => $returnUrl,
));
return $loginUrl;
now my app runs from web and CLI again