I would like to have SublimeText show the HTML result of parsing my HAML in another window, live, as I type the HAML.
Does anyone have an idea of how to make this happen? In, e.g., WebStorm there are file watchers that do this, but is there something like that built into ST2?
I did something similar to this with Typescript, only I only updated the Javascript output when I saved the file. First, I would say to take a look at SublimeBuildOnSave. That'll show you how to hook into the save function and see what file is being saved.
When you've got the general idea, you can take a look here and mess around with opening another pane (or using the existing pane) to show the compiled output.
It's pretty simple to make a simple version of this. If you want more advanced features like live compiling, it'll take a bit more effort, but it's not impossible. But the above scenario worked just fine for Typescript for me. (If I find where I left that code, I'll post it.)
Related
I saw in the html_document help page an easy-way to customize the anchor style by adapting the anchor-section class. This works well for individual Rmd documents.
I would like to know how to achieve the same thing within blogdown. I thought that I could simply customize the static/rmarkdown-libs/anchor-sections/anchor-sections.css file.
This actually work temporarily, but is not working properly since this file is automatically regenerated every time any Rmd file is rendered.
I'm sorry I did not include a reprex, this is more of a technical question.
I've just installed mogenerator using one of tutorials. I have added run script to my new target, and clicked Cmd+B. I should get some new files, but i didn't. In my .xcdatamodeld i have 2 entities (User and Repos). Below you can find my print screen of my project.
Where is the problem in my thinking? What should i do more? Please, help me, because i haven't found the solution on the web yet.
This all looks fine (judging by your screenshot).
One thing to check - which caused me the same issue - is that, when you've created your Entities in the xcdatamodelId file, make sure that you click on the Data Model Inspector icon, and that each entity has a Name value, and a matching "Class" value.
Miss out the Class name, and nothing will get generated.
Btw, when you click on Build, do you get a "Build succeeded" message ?
Here's the tutorial I followed to get mogenerator working:
RaptureInVenice
I should say, I've used mogenerator in a few projects, and this command line bit is always the piece that gives me trouble. Sometimes, I have to select my xcdatamodelId file, and create a new Version of it, before mogenerator will use it. But once it is working, it's a blessing.
Anything to avoid having to use the needlessly over-complicated CoreData stuff.
Someone should remind Apple that it's 2014...
Is there anyone who successfully used either require.js or one of the commonJS implementations in apple tv apps? I wanted to give a try to require.js, but spotted right away that require.js uses window object and maybe some other stuff that simply doesn't exist on apple tv. So maybe I should look for other options? How do you guys deal with modules? My predecessor just concatenated bunch of .js files and made a mess with literally tens of thousands lines of code. Incredibly messy.
upd: Still trying to make require.js work but apple tv won't let me have data-main attribute in script tag, I guess you can run require.config in the next script that loads right after
upd2: Doesn't work... apple tv doesn't have window object... Darn you Apple... I'll try to make changes to require.js file itself
No... definitely require.js not suited, even after major refactoring and changing browser specific stuff in the lib to ATV specific, still doesn't work. :(
I use the Dojo framework, which I load from an url.
How should I deal with the 'dojo' was used before it was defined errors, and the alike?
Yes, my feeling really get hurt, when running code through JSlint.
Perhaps you can put something like
/* globals dojo */
in the beggining of your file to tell JSLint that dojo exists?
I personaly use JSHint (a fork of JSLint that is less nitpicky) instead and one of the preconfigured options is support for Dojo.
Sounds like you need to put Dojo first in your JavaScript. The message suggests that you have an ordering problem.
Don't take it personally. You are not your code. Just make it better, learn something, and don't do it again.
If you scroll all the way down to the bottom there is a "predefined" textbox. Simply put in any of the variables you need into there (comma separated).
I was started to work on my first sample of the dijit.Tree control.
When it didn't work, I added a couple of dijit.form.Textbox'es to the screen, and they didn't work either, even though I have them working fine on a similar form.
Interesting enough, when I killed FireFox and restarted it, I was got a clear message in FireBug console on what was wrong with my tree control, and got it fixed.
But now I'm rather puzzled while the simple dijits like NumberTextBox that I added are not working.
My Samples:
1) http://3wcloud-com-provisioning-qa.appspot.com/testDijitDate - this works great
(except the initial date value not showing - I have a separate question open on that)
2) http://3wcloud-com-provisioning-qa.appspot.com/testDijitTree
I've done several "diff"s on the two files, and I kind find the difference that would cause one to work and one not to work.
Thanks,
Neal
You should put your dojo.require statements immediately in a script block, not wrapped in the onload callback. Also, your input tags should be HTML style without the XHTML style slash (you didn't declare XHTML in your document) though I doubt that's the problem. See if either of those things help.