I am currently working at a logger that uses a MSP430F2618 MCU and SanDisk 4GB SDHC Card.
Card initialization works as expected, I also can read MBR and FAT table.
The problem is that I can't write any data on it. I have checked if it is write protected by notch, but it's not. Windows 7 OS has no problem reading/writing to it.
Though, I have used a tool called "HxD" and I've tried to alter some sectors (under Windows). When I try to save the content to SD card, the tool pop up a windows telling me "Access denied!".
Then I came back to my code for writing to SD card:
uint8_t SdWriteBlock(uchar_t *blockData, const uint32_t address)
{
uint8_t result = OP_ERROR;
uint16_t count;
uchar_t dataResp;
uint8_t idx;
for (idx = RWTIMEOUT; idx > 0; idx--)
{
CS_LOW();
SdCommand(CMD24, address, 0xFF);
dataResp = SdResponse();
if (dataResp == 0x00)
{
break;
}
else
{
CS_HIGH();
SdWrite(0xFF);
}
}
if (0x00 == dataResp)
{
//send command success, now send data starting with DATA TOKEN = 0xFE
SdWrite(0xFE);
//send 512 bytes of data
for (count = 0; count < 512; count++)
{
SdWrite(*blockData++);
}
//now send tow CRC bytes ,through it is not used in the spi mode
//but it is still needed in transfer format
SdWrite(0xFF);
SdWrite(0xFF);
//now read in the DATA RESPONSE TOKEN
do
{
SdWrite(0xFF);
dataResp = SdRead();
}
while (dataResp == 0x00);
//following the DATA RESPONSE TOKEN are a number of BUSY bytes
//a zero byte indicates the SD/MMC is busy programing,
//a non_zero byte indicates SD/MMC is not busy
dataResp = dataResp & 0x0F;
if (0x05 == dataResp)
{
idx = RWTIMEOUT;
do
{
SdWrite(0xFF);
dataResp = SdRead();
if (0x0 == dataResp)
{
result = OP_OK;
break;
}
idx--;
}
while (idx != 0);
CS_HIGH();
SdWrite(0xFF);
}
else
{
CS_HIGH();
SdWrite(0xFF);
}
}
return result;
}
The problem seems to be when I am waiting for card status:
do
{
SdWrite(0xFF);
dataResp = SdRead();
}
while (dataResp == 0x00);
Here I am waiting for a response of type "X5"(hex value) where X is undefined.
But most of the cases the response is 0x00 (hex value) and I don't get out of the loop. Few cases are when the response is 0xFF (hex value).
I can't figure out what is the problem.
Can anyone help me? Thanks!
4GB SDHC
We need to see much more of your code. Many µC SPI codebases only support SD cards <= 2 GB, so using a smaller card might work.
You might check it yourself: SDHC needs a CMD 8 and an ACMD 41 after the CMD 0 (GO_IDLE_STATE) command, otherwise you cannot read or write data to it.
Thank you for your answers, but I solved my problem. It was a problem of timing. I had to put a delay at specific points.
Related
I'm trying to write 4 uint32's of data into the flash memory of my STM32F767ZI so I've looked at some examples and in the reference manual but still I cannot do it. My goal is to write 4 uint32's into the flash and read them back and compare with the original data, and light different leds depending on the success of the comparison.
My code is as follows:
void flash_write(uint32_t offset, uint32_t *data, uint32_t size) {
FLASH_EraseInitTypeDef EraseInitStruct = {0};
uint32_t SectorError = 0;
HAL_FLASH_Unlock();
EraseInitStruct.TypeErase = FLASH_TYPEERASE_SECTORS;
EraseInitStruct.VoltageRange = FLASH_VOLTAGE_RANGE_3;
EraseInitStruct.Sector = FLASH_SECTOR_11;
EraseInitStruct.NbSectors = 1;
//EraseInitStruct.Banks = FLASH_BANK_1; // or FLASH_BANK_2 or FLASH_BANK_BOTH
st = HAL_FLASHEx_Erase(&EraseInitStruct, &SectorError);
if (st == HAL_OK) {
for (int i = 0; i < size; i += 4) {
st = HAL_FLASH_Program(FLASH_TYPEPROGRAM_WORD, FLASH_USER_START_ADDR + offset + i, *(data + i)); //This is what's giving me trouble
if (st != HAL_OK) {
// handle the error
break;
}
}
}else {
// handle the error
}
HAL_FLASH_Lock();
}
void flash_read(uint32_t offset, uint32_t *data, uint32_t size) {
for (int i = 0; i < size; i += 4) {
*(data + i) = *(__IO uint32_t*)(FLASH_USER_START_ADDR + offset + i);
}
}
int main(void) {
uint32_t data[] = {'a', 'b', 'c', 'd'};
uint32_t read_data[] = {0, 0, 0, 0};
HAL_Init();
SystemClock_Config();
MX_GPIO_Init();
flash_write(0, data, sizeof(data));
flash_read(0, read_data, sizeof(read_data));
if (compareArrays(data,read_data,4))
{
HAL_GPIO_WritePin(GPIOB, GPIO_PIN_7,SET);
}
else
{
HAL_GPIO_WritePin(GPIOB, GPIO_PIN_14,SET);
}
return 0;
}
The problem is that before writing data I must erase a sector, and when I do it with the HAL_FLASHEx_Erase(&EraseInitStruct, &SectorError), function, the program always crashes, and sometimes even corrupts my codespace forcing me to update firmware.
I've selected the sector farthest from the code space but still it crashes when i try to erase it.
I've read in the reference manual that
Any attempt to read the Flash memory while it is being written or erased, causes the bus to
stall. Read operations are processed correctly once the program operation has completed.
This means that code or data fetches cannot be performed while a write/erase operation is
ongoing.
which I believe means the code should ideally be run from RAM while we operate on the flash, but I've seen other people online not have this issue so I'm wondering if that's the only problem I have. With that in mind I wanted to confirm if this is my only issue, or if I'm doing something wrong?
In your loop, you are adding multiples of 4 to i, but then you are adding i to data. When you add to a pointer it is automatically multiplied by the size of the pointed type, so you are adding multiples of 16 bytes and reading past the end of your input buffer.
Also, make sure you initialize all members of EraseInitStruct. Uncomment that line and set the correct value!
I have an application running on STM32F429ZIT6 using USB stack to communicate with PC client.
MCU receives one type of message of 686 bytes every second and receives another type of message of 14 bytes afterwards with 0.5 seconds of delay between messages. The 14 bytes message is a heartbeat so it needs to replied by MCU.
It happens that after 5 to 10 minutes of continuous operation, MCU is not able to send data because
hcdc->TxState is always busy. Reception works fine.
During Rx interruption, application only adds data to ring buffer, so that this buffer is later serialized and processed by main function.
static int8_t CDC_Receive_HS(uint8_t* Buf, uint32_t *Len) {
/* USER CODE BEGIN 11 */
/* Message RX Completed, Send it to Ring Buffer to be processed at FMC_Run()*/
for(uint16_t i = 0; i < *Len; i++){
ring_push(RMP_RXRingBuffer, (uint8_t *) &Buf[i]);
}
USBD_CDC_SetRxBuffer(&hUsbDeviceHS, &Buf[0]);
USBD_CDC_ReceivePacket(&hUsbDeviceHS);
return (USBD_OK);
/* USER CODE END 11 */ }
USB TX is also kept as simple as possible:
uint8_t CDC_Transmit_HS(uint8_t\* Buf, uint16_t Len) {
uint8_t result = USBD_OK;
/\* USER CODE BEGIN 12 */
USBD_CDC_HandleTypeDef hcdc = (USBD_CDC_HandleTypeDef*)hUsbDeviceHS.pClassData;
if (hcdc-\>TxState != 0)
{
ZF_LOGE("Tx failed, resource busy\\n\\r"); return USBD_BUSY;
}
USBD_CDC_SetTxBuffer(&hUsbDeviceHS, Buf, Len);
result = USBD_CDC_TransmitPacket(&hUsbDeviceHS);
ZF_LOGD("TX Message Result:%d\\n\\r", result);
/ USER CODE END 12 \*/
return result;
}
I'm using latest HAL Drivers and software from CubeIDE (1.27.1).
I have tried expanding heap min size from 0x200 to larger values but result is the same.
Also Line Coding is set according to what recommended values:
case CDC_SET_LINE_CODING:
LineCoding.bitrate = (uint32_t) (pbuf[0] | (pbuf[1] << 8) | (pbuf[2] << 16) | (pbuf[3] << 24));
LineCoding.format = pbuf[4];
LineCoding.paritytype = pbuf[5];
LineCoding.datatype = pbuf[6];
ZF_LOGD("Line Coding Set\n\r");
break;
case CDC_GET_LINE_CODING:
pbuf[0] = (uint8_t) (LineCoding.bitrate);
pbuf[1] = (uint8_t) (LineCoding.bitrate >> 8);
pbuf[2] = (uint8_t) (LineCoding.bitrate >> 16);
pbuf[3] = (uint8_t) (LineCoding.bitrate >> 24);
pbuf[4] = LineCoding.format;
pbuf[5] = LineCoding.paritytype;
pbuf[6] = LineCoding.datatype;
ZF_LOGD("Line Coding Get\n\r");
break;
Thanks in advance, any support is appreciated.
I don't know enough about the STM32 libraries to really check your code, but I suspect you are forgetting to read the bytes transmitted by the STM32 on PC side. Try opening a terminal program like PuTTY and connecting to the STM32's virtual serial port. Otherwise, the Windows USB-to-serial driver (usbser.sys) will eventually have its buffers filled with data from your device and it will stop requesting more, at which point the buffers on your device will fill up as well.
I am reading samples from a software defined radio device that delivers two channels of Int16 (shorts) that represent audio. I am trying to send this stream to an audio output device on a PC.
I already have this working with a different set of tools but would like to use NAudio in its place since there are other capabilities I could use.
The code starts with the software defined radio method placing an array of shorts (i.e. int16) arranged as left channel then right channel. The array size is 65536, the sample rate is 192,000.
When the packet is received it is place on a Blocking collection to be picked up by a thread that sends out the audio.
So for the purpose of this question, the thread starts by reading the blocking collection which returns 65536 shorts.
StartStream = true;
waveformat = new WaveFormat(192000, 16, 2);
bs = new BufferedWaveProvider(waveformat);
bs.BufferLength = 65536 * 4;
_waveOut.DeviceNumber = 4;
while (true)
{
dspPacket = dsp_Queue.Take(); //take int16[] of queue
int j = 0;
try
{
for (int i = 0; i < 32768; i += 2)
{
byte[] qDataByte = BitConverter.GetBytes(dspShort[i]);
dspBytes[j] = qDataByte[0];
dspBytes[j + 1] = qDataByte[1];
j += 2;
}
if (startStream)
{
bs.AddSamples(dspBytes, 0, 65536);
_waveOut.Init(bs);
_waveOut.Play();
startStream = false;
}
else
{
bs.AddSamples(dspBytes, 0, 65536);
}
}
catch (Exception ex)
{
}
// SendData(dspPacket); //if this is uncommented, everything works correctly with the old method.
}
Now I can feed the output of the waveout device to a virtual audio cable which then feeds it into some spectrum analyser software and then this is what you will see with here:
When I use the old routines, I get a solid line and the sound does not break up.
So, am I doing something wrong here?
Thanks, Tom
I was wondering if anyone has found a way to determine the intention of a master communicating with an stm32f40x chip? From the perspective of the firmware on the stm32f40x chip, the ADDRess sent by the master is not available, and the r/w bit (bit 0 of the address) contained therein is also not available. So how can I prevent collisions? Has anyone else dealt with this? If so what techniques did you use? My tentative solution is below for reference. I delayed any writes to the DR data register until the TXE interrupt occurs. I thought at first this would be too late, and a byte of garbage would be clocked out, but it seems to be working.
static inline void LLEVInterrupt(uint16_t irqSrc)
{
uint8_t i;
volatile uint16_t status;
I2CCBStruct* buffers;
I2C_TypeDef* addrBase;
// see which IRQ occurred, process accordingly...
switch (irqSrc)
{
case I2C_BUS_CHAN_1:
addrBase = this.addrBase1;
buffers = &this.buffsBus1;
break;
case I2C_BUS_CHAN_2:
addrBase = this.addrBase2;
buffers = &this.buffsBus2;
break;
case I2C_BUS_CHAN_3:
addrBase = this.addrBase3;
buffers = &this.buffsBus3;
break;
default:
while(1);
}
// ...START condition & address match detected
if (I2C_GetITStatus(addrBase, I2C_IT_ADDR) == SET)
{
// I2C_IT_ADDR: Cleared by software reading SR1 register followed reading SR2, or by hardware
// when PE=0.
// Note: Reading I2C_SR2 after reading I2C_SR1 clears the ADDR flag, even if the ADDR flag was
// set after reading I2C_SR1. Consequently, I2C_SR2 must be read only when ADDR is found
// set in I2C_SR1 or when the STOPF bit is cleared.
status = addrBase->SR1;
status = addrBase->SR2;
// Reset the index and receive count
buffers->txIndex = 0;
buffers->rxCount = 0;
// setup to ACK any Rx'd bytes
I2C_AcknowledgeConfig(addrBase, ENABLE);
return;
}
// Slave receiver mode
if (I2C_GetITStatus(addrBase, I2C_IT_RXNE) == SET)
{
// I2C_IT_RXNE: Cleared by software reading or writing the DR register
// or by hardware when PE=0.
// copy the received byte to the Rx buffer
buffers->rxBuf[buffers->rxCount] = (uint8_t)I2C_ReadRegister(addrBase, I2C_Register_DR);
if (RX_BUFFER_SIZE > buffers->rxCount)
{
buffers->rxCount++;
}
return;
}
// Slave transmitter mode
if (I2C_GetITStatus(addrBase, I2C_IT_TXE) == SET)
{
// I2C_IT_TXE: Cleared by software writing to the DR register or
// by hardware after a start or a stop condition or when PE=0.
// send any remaining bytes
I2C_SendData(addrBase, buffers->txBuf[buffers->txIndex]);
if (buffers->txIndex < buffers->txCount)
{
buffers->txIndex++;
}
return;
}
// ...STOP condition detected
if (I2C_GetITStatus(addrBase, I2C_IT_STOPF) == SET)
{
// STOPF (STOP detection) is cleared by software sequence: a read operation
// to I2C_SR1 register (I2C_GetITStatus()) followed by a write operation to
// I2C_CR1 register (I2C_Cmd() to re-enable the I2C peripheral).
// From the reference manual RM0368:
// Figure 163. Transfer sequence diagram for slave receiver
// if (STOPF == 1) {READ SR1; WRITE CR1}
// clear the IRQ status
status = addrBase->SR1;
// Write to CR1
I2C_Cmd(addrBase, ENABLE);
// read cycle (reset the status?
if (buffers->txCount > 0)
{
buffers->txCount = 0;
buffers->txIndex = 0;
}
// write cycle begun?
if (buffers->rxCount > 0)
{
// pass the I2C data to the enabled protocol handler
for (i = 0; i < buffers->rxCount; i++)
{
#if (COMM_PROTOCOL == COMM_PROTOCOL_DEBUG)
status = ProtProcRxData(buffers->rxBuf[i]);
#elif (COMM_PROTOCOL == COMM_PROTOCOL_PTEK)
status = PTEKProcRxData(buffers->rxBuf[i]);
#else
#error ** Invalid Host Protocol Selected **
#endif
if (status != ST_OK)
{
LogErr(ST_COMM_FAIL, __LINE__);
}
}
buffers->rxCount = 0;
}
return;
}
if (I2C_GetITStatus(addrBase, I2C_IT_AF) == SET)
{
// The NAck received from the host on the last byte of a transmit
// is shown as an acknowledge failure and must be cleared by
// writing 0 to the AF bit in SR1.
// This is not a real error but just how the i2c slave transmission process works.
// The hardware has no way to know how many bytes are to be transmitted, so the
// NAck is assumed to be a failed byte transmission.
// EV3-2: AF=1; AF is cleared by writing ‘0’ in AF bit of SR1 register.
I2C_ClearITPendingBit(addrBase, I2C_IT_AF);
return;
}
if (I2C_GetITStatus(addrBase, I2C_IT_BERR) == SET)
{
// There are extremely infrequent bus errors when testing with I2C Stick.
// Safer to have this check and clear than to risk an
// infinite loop of interrupts
// Set by hardware when the interface detects an SDA rising or falling
// edge while SCL is high, occurring in a non-valid position during a
// byte transfer.
// Cleared by software writing 0, or by hardware when PE=0.
I2C_ClearITPendingBit(addrBase, I2C_IT_BERR);
LogErr(ST_COMM_FAIL, __LINE__);
return;
}
if (I2C_GetITStatus(addrBase, I2C_IT_OVR) == SET)
{
// Check for other errors conditions that must be cleared.
I2C_ClearITPendingBit(addrBase, I2C_IT_OVR);
LogErr(ST_COMM_FAIL, __LINE__);
return;
}
if (I2C_GetITStatus(addrBase, I2C_IT_TIMEOUT) == SET)
{
// Check for other errors conditions that must be cleared.
I2C_ClearITPendingBit(addrBase, I2C_IT_TIMEOUT);
LogErr(ST_COMM_FAIL, __LINE__);
return;
}
// a spurious IRQ occurred; log it
LogErr(ST_INV_STATE, __LINE__);
}
I'm not shure if I understand you. May you should provide more information or an example about what you would like to do.
Maybe this helps:
My experience is, that in many I2C implementations the R/W-Bit is used together with the 7-bit-address, so most of the times, there is no additional function to set or reset the R/W-Bit.
So that means all addresses beyond 128 should be used to read data from slaves and all addresses over 127 should be used to write data to slaves.
There seems to be no way to determine if the transaction initiated by receipt of the address is a read or a write even though the hardware know whether the LSbit is set or clear. The intention of the master will only be known once the RXNE or TXE interrupt/bit occurs.
I'm working on an SPI SD driver for an LPC4088 microcontroller. However, when I send CMD8 (after CMD0) to detect if I'm working with a V2 or high capacity card, I get a weird response. Instead of getting a correct response( 0x01 for highest bits, 0x1AA for the lower 12) or an error I get 0x00 00 00 02 1F, which doesn't make any sense to me at all.
Code I use for initialization:
bool initialize () {
//0. Initialize SPI
SPI::init();
//1. Set clock to 400kHz
SPI::set_clock(400000);
//2. Assert CS signal (=0)
assert_cs();
// 3. Delay at least 74 clocks
delay8(10);
// 4. Deassert CS signal
deassert_cs();
// 5. Delay at least 16 clocks
delay8(2);
uint8_t argument[4];
reset_argument(argument);
// 6. Send CMD0 (reset, go to idle)
if (!send_command(CMD::GO_IDLE_STATE, CMD_RESPONSE_SIZE::GO_IDLE_STATE, response, argument)) {
return false;
}
// 7. Send CMD8
bool version2;
reset_argument(argument);
pack_argument(argument, 0x1AA);
if (!send_command(CMD::SEND_IF_COND, CMD_RESPONSE_SIZE::SEND_IF_COND, response, argument)) {
return false;
}
if ((response[0] & 0xFE) == 0x04) {
//unknown command. This means we have version1
version2 = false;
} else if (response[0] & 0xFE) {
//other error, let's bail
return false;
} else {
//Response, we're version2
version2 = true;
if (response[4] != 0xAA) {
return false;
}
}
//....
}
send_command code:
bool send_command(CMD::value cmd, uint8_t response_size, uint8_t *response, uint8_t *argument) {
assert_cs();
Crc7_SD crc;
crc += cmd | 0x40;
crc += argument[3] & 0xFF;
crc += argument[2] & 0xFF;
crc += argument[1] & 0xFF;
crc += argument[0] & 0xFF;
SPI::send(cmd | 0x40);
SPI::send(argument[3] & 0xFF);
SPI::send(argument[2] & 0xFF);
SPI::send(argument[1] & 0xFF);
SPI::send(argument[0] & 0xFF);
SPI::send((crc << 1) | 1);
volatile uint8_t data;
{
unsigned int timeout = SD_CMD_TIMEOUT;
do {
data = SPI::receive();
--timeout;
} while(timeout && (data & 0x80));
if (timeout == 0) {
deassert_cs();
return false;
}
}
for (int i = 0; i < response_size; i++) {
//First byte is already read above
if (response) {
response[i] = data;
}
data = SPI::receive();
}
deassert_cs();
return true;
}
To make sure that I didn't had an error in the SPI protocol I've verified the input and output with a logic analyzer. Result: CMD0 followed by CMD8. It seems that I'm sending the correct commands, but still I get this weird response.
Additional info about the setup:
Microcontroller is an LPC4088
Microcontroller is connected with this OEM board
The SD card module is connected to the serial expansion connector of the OEM board
The logic analyzer is connected to the SD card module
I've used 2 different versions of both the microcontroller and the OEM board to rule out that there is a hardware error in one of those. Unfortunately I don't have a second SD controller available.
I've used a SanDisk Ultra SDHC 4GB Class 6 SD card and a Transcend SDHC 4GB Class 4 SD card, both gave exactly the same result.
And last but not least, I have very little experience with embedded software, so it might just be some small stupid error.
It turned out that there was some noise on the MISO line. The code was correct, but due to the noise the microcontroller got a different result then intended. With the help of some electronics guy I was able to filter this by soldering a capacitor between MISO and ground.