Is there a way to rename the query string parameter that holds the name of callback function? Say, I've got a legacy app which sources I can't access, I want it to be switched to ServiceStack, but the app uses "function" query string parameter, while SS expects "callback".
You can do it with a response filter, inside AppHost.Configure():
ResponseFilters.Add((req, res, dto) =>
{
var func = req.QueryString.Get("function");
if (!func.isNullOrEmpty())
{
res.AddHeader("Content-Type", ContentType.Html);
res.Write("<script type='text/javascript'>{0}({1});</script>"
.FormatWith(func, dto.ToJson()));
res.Close();
}
});
Related
I am trying to implement embedded language support for SQL in vscode extension using request forwarding mechanism.
According to the documentation we can hijack the completion using middleware option and provide the sub-language completion using an existing language server. As an example user can get CSS language support inside HTML using this mechanism.
In my scenario, I want get SQL Language support inside another language (new language) when writing a SQL query.
Sample Code
let clientOptions: LanguageClientOptions = {
documentSelector: [{ scheme: 'file', language: '.mylang' }],
middleware: {
provideCompletionItem: async (document, position, context, token, next) => {
if (
!isInsideSQLRegion(
myLanguageService,
document.getText(),
document.offsetAt(position)
)
) {
return await next(document, position, context, token);
}
const originalUri = document.uri.toString();
virtualDocumentContents.set(
originalUri,
getSQLVirtualContent(myLanguageService, document.getText())
);
const vdocUriString = `embedded-content://sql/${encodeURIComponent(originalUri)}.sql`;
const vdocUri = Uri.parse(vdocUriString);
return await commands.executeCommand<CompletionList>(
'vscode.executeCompletionItemProvider',
vdocUri,
position,
context.triggerCharacter
);
}
}
};
Here the provideCompletionItem get triggered each time we write a new character in the editor but it seems that it is not getting triggered when user writes " or single quote.
Is there a way to get provideCompletionItem when single or double quotes is being entered ?
I'm on a task to write a simple CRUD program for a users list, following a similar nestjs example. While GET, POST and GET by id works fine, PUT and DELETE does not work properly. I get 'User does not exist' however user exists in database.
Controller
#Controller('users')
export class UsersController {
constructor(private userService: UsersService) {}
.....
//Update a user's details
#Put('/update')
async updateUser(
#Res() res,
#Query('userid') userID,
#Body() createUserDto: CreateUserDto
) {
const user = await this.userService.updateUser(userID, createUserDto);
if (!user) throw new NotFoundException('User does not exist!');
return res.status(HttpStatus.OK).json({
message: 'User has been successfully updated',
user
})
}
//Delete a user
#ApiParam({ name: 'id' })
#Delete('/delete')
async deleteUser(#Res() res, #Query('userid') userID) {
const user = await this.userService.deleteUser(userID);
if (!user) throw new NotFoundException('Customer does not exist');
return res.status(HttpStatus.OK).json({
message: 'User has been deleted',
user
})
}
Service
// Edit user details
async updateUser(userID, createUserDto: CreateUserDto): Promise<User> {
const updatedUser = await this.userModel
.findByIdAndUpdate(userID, createUserDto, { new: true });
return updatedUser;
}
// Delete a customer
async deleteUser(userID): Promise<any> {
const deletedUser = await this.userModel
.findByIdAndRemove(userID);
return deletedUser;
}
I'm using swagger to perform my tests. I'm passing id as a parameter to find and update user.
Based on your code repository, you aren't using URL Parameters, but rather you are using Query Parameters. The difference in the two is how they are passed to the server and how they are told to the server to listen for them.
Query Parameters
With query parameters, you pass them to your server starting with a ? in the url, and concatenating each one after by using a &. An example could look something like http://localhost:3000?name=Test&id=a26408f3-69eb-4443-8af7-474b896a9e70. Notice that there are two Query parameters, one named name and one named id. In Nest, to get these parameters in your route handler, you would use the #Query() decorator. A sample class could look like
#Controller()
export class AppController {
#Get()
getHello(#Query() query: { name: string, id: string }) {
return `Hello ${name}, your ID is ${id}`;
}
}
Notice how with the url above, the route called is the base route (/), with the query parameters added on.
URL Parameters
URL parameters are a way to dynamically build your routes without needing to specify what each possible URL. This is useful for things like IDs that are dynamically generated. Taking a similar URL as above, the sample URL this time could look like http://localhost:3000/Test/a26408f3-69eb-4443-8af7-474b896a9e70. Notice how this time there is no ? or & and it just looks like a full URL. To specify URL Params in nest, you need to a a colon(:) before the param name in the resource declaration decorator, along with any other part of the path necessary. Then to access the URL Parameters, you need to use the #Param() decorator in the route handler, similar to how you would the #Query() decorator. The class sample for this would be
#Controller()
export class AppController {
#Get(':name/:id')
getHello(#Param() params: { name: string, id: string })
return `Hello ${name}, your ID is ${id}`;
}
}
Problem and Solution
You're currently calling off to http://localhost/users/update/<ID> acting as if you are using URL parameters, but in your route handler you are expecting #Query() to grab the id. Because of this, there is no handler to find /users/update/:id and so you are getting a 404 in return. You can either modify your server to listen for URL Parameters as described above, or you can modify the URL to send the request using Query Parameters instead of URL parameters.
I am trying to create some dynamic JSON based on a value of a name like below
this.merchantFirebase.child(firebase.auth().currentUser.uid).update({
this.props.data.name: {
status: this.state.productSwitch
}
});
I was thinking this would create something like
this.merchantFirebase.child(firebase.auth().currentUser.uid).update({
latte: {
status: this.state.productSwitch
}
});
but it is just given me an error of unexpected token
You'll need to use a different notation for this:
var updates = {};
updates[this.props.data.name] = { status: this.state.productSwitch };
this.merchantFirebase.child(firebase.auth().currentUser.uid).update(updates);
By using square-bracket notation, JavaScript "knows" that it needs to evaluate this.props.data.name as an expression, instead of using it as the literal name of the property (as it tries to do in your code).
I am writing a hapi js plugin, and was wondering what's the difference between the two ways of exposing methods that other plugins can use.
Method 1:
server.method("doSomething",
function () {
// Something
});
Method 2:
server.app.doSomething = function () {
// Something
};
In the first approach, the function can later be called as server.doSomething(), while using the second approach as server.app.doSomething().
So why would I use one way instead of another?
Looking at the API docs it sounds like they intended server.methods to be used for functions and server.app to be used for app settings/configuration. My guess is you should stick with server.method if you want to expose server level methods to be used in your plugins.
server.methods
An object providing access to the server methods where each server
method name is an object property.
var Hapi = require('hapi');
var server = new Hapi.Server();
server.method('add', function (a, b, next) {
return next(null, a + b);
});
server.methods.add(1, 2, function (err, result) {
// result === 3
});
server.app
Provides a safe place to store server-specific run-time application
data without potential conflicts with the framework internals. The
data can be accessed whenever the server is accessible. Initialized
with an empty object.
var Hapi = require('hapi');
server = new Hapi.Server();
server.app.key = 'value';
var handler = function (request, reply) {
return reply(request.server.app.key);
};
I'd like to use custom headers to provide some more information about the response data. Is it possible to get the headers in a response from a dojo datagrid hooked up to a jsonRest object via an object store (dojo 1.7)? I see this is possible when you are making the XHR request, but in this case it is being made by the grid.
The API provides an event for a response error which returns the response object:
on(this.grid, 'FetchError', function (response, req) {
var header = response.xhr.getAllResponseHeaders();
});
using this I am successfully able to access my custom response headers. However, there doesn't appear to be a way to get the response object when the request is successful. I have been using the undocumented private event _onFetchComplete with aspect after, however, this does not allow access to the response object, just the response values
aspect.after(this.grid, '_onFetchComplete', function (response, request)
{
///unable to get headers, response is the returned values
}, true);
Edit:
I managed to get something working, but I suspect it is very over engineered and someone with a better understanding could come up with a simpler solution. I ended up adding aspect around to allow me to get hold of the deferred object in the rest store which is returned to the object store. Here I added a new function to the deffered to return the headers. I then hooked in to the onFetch of the object store using dojo hitch (because I needed the results in the current scope). It seems messy to me
aspect.around(restStore, "query", function (original) {
return function (method, args) {
var def = original.call(this, method, args);
def.headers = deferred1.then(function () {
var hd = def.ioArgs.xhr.getResponseHeader("myHeader");
return hd;
});
return def;
};
});
aspect.after(objectStore, 'onFetch', lang.hitch(this, function (response) {
response.headers.then(lang.hitch(this, function (evt) {
var headerResult = evt;
}));
}), true);
Is there a better way?
I solved this today after reading this post, thought I'd feed back.
dojo/store/JsonRest solves it also but my code ended up slightly different.
var MyStore = declare(JsonRest, {
query: function () {
var results = this.inherited(arguments);
console.log('Results: ', results);
results.response.then(function (res) {
var myheader = res.xhr.getResponseHeader('My-Header');
doSomethingWith(myheader);
});
return results;
}
});
So you override the normal query() function, let it execute and return its promise, and attach your own listener to its 'response' member resolving, in which you can access the xhr object that has the headers. This ought to let you interpret the JsonRest result while fitting nicely into the chain of the query() all invokers.
One word of warning, this code is modified for posting here, and actually inherited from another intermediary class that also overrode query(), but the basics here are pretty sound.
If what you want is to get info from the server, also a custom key-value in the cookie can be a solution, that was my case, first I was looking for a custom response header but I couldn't make it work so I did the cookie way getting the info after the grid data is fetched:
dojo.connect(grid, "_onFetchComplete", function (){
doSomethingWith(dojo.cookie("My-Key"));
});
This is useful for example to present a SUM(field) for all rows in a paginated datagrid, and not only those included in the current page. In the server you can fetch the COUNT and the SUM, the COUNT will be sent in the Content-Range header and the SUM can be sent in the cookie.