I don't know if this is a bug/feature but I need to find a way to make it work.
To recreate, use VS2012, open a new SL5 project with RIA services enabled. Create another project, add a simple WCF service (or a SL enabled WCF) and add a method that accepts or returns a simple object (I have an object with one string property in it). Try and add this as a service reference to your SL project. You'll receive this error, among others, in the warnings:
Custom tool warning:
No endpoints compatible with Silverlight 5 were found. The generated client class will not be usable unless endpoint information is provided via the constructor.
and no generated code is actually generated.
I found that if I remove the object from the service method and use a simple string/int/bool instead, the reference is added just fine. Also, if I add the same service to a regular SL app without RIA, everything works like you would expect it to. Once I enable RIA on this app where the service is working, and update the service reference, the generated code is gone again.
I remember this used to work because I had projects that used both RIA and external WCF services. Is this a new VS2012 thing? Is there a way to solve this issue?
Thanks,
Eyal
I can duplicate the problem, and it only seems to happen if the Silverlight client has the 2 System.ServiceModel.DomainServices.Client and System.ServiceModel.DomainServices.Client.Web assemblies in its referenced assemblies. And only if it targets SL 5.
I have found 2 workarounds I recommend you try if your situation permits:
1) Change the Silverlight application to target Silverlight 4, not 5, or
2) Right-click the Service Reference and ask to Configure it.
Click the checkbox to "Reuse types in specified referenced assemblies"
and select all assembles except the 2 mentioned above.
This does appear to be a bug related to either SL 5 or VS2012. I will repost if I find a more satisfactory answer.
The problem is because of silverlight 5 and vs 2012 has some bug. [It can solve itself by restarting the vs2012]
If you look at your ServiceRefrences.ClientConfig will see it is empty. You need to enter your service refrences manually here. I have attached an example of my config page, you need to change the names accordingly
<configuration>
<system.serviceModel>
<bindings>
<basicHttpBinding>
<binding name="BasicHttpBinding_IService2" maxBufferSize="2147483647"
maxReceivedMessageSize="2147483647">
<security mode="None" />
</binding>
</basicHttpBinding>
</bindings>
<client>
<endpoint address="../Service2.svc" binding="basicHttpBinding"
bindingConfiguration="BasicHttpBinding_IService2" contract="ServiceReference1.IService2"
name="BasicHttpBinding_IService2" />
</client>
</system.serviceModel>
I have upgraded a WCF Service to .NET Framework 4.5. After doing so I noticed a blue squiggly line around the IMetaDataExchange in the host config file.
This is what the services section of the config looks like:
<services>
<service behaviorConfiguration="MyBehavior" name="MyServiceHost">
<endpoint binding="wsHttpBinding" bindingConfiguration="noSecurityBinding" contract="MyServiceContract"/>
<endpoint address="mex" binding="mexHttpBinding" contract="IMetadataExchange"/>
</service>
When I hover the mouse over IMetadataExchange the error says:
The 'contract' attribute is invalid - The value 'IMetadataExchange' is invalid according to its datatype 'serviceContractType' - The Enumeration constraint failed.
The service seems to work fine. So I am curious why is this invalid.
Can you delete .SUO (solution Users Option file) file after closing VS? This will reset the cache for XMLEditor component in VS and will fix your problem.
I added System.ServiceModel to the references for the project and it went away
I had a similar problem to this - several name and contract attributes showing in the App.Config of my WCF Service with the dreaded blue squiggly, and warnings showing up in the Error List.
In my case the problem was that after creating the services and contracts I had refactored the namespaces of the service project, so the generated solution-specific *.xsd was using the new namespaces but my refactoring tool hadn't updated the App.Config with the changes. Going in and adding the fully-specified namespaces fixed the issue.
Perhaps not the answer for the OP, but others with this problem should check that [ServiceContract] is declared for the interface of your services, because this produces the exact error.
IF you running Intellisense on the warning. It will bring up a list for you to choose from you can Explicitly call that member.
If deleting the .SUO file doesn't work, check your references to ensure that you have the System.ServiceModel reference. That ended up being the issue that brought me here.
I found the problem to be that the contract attribute is case sensitive.
I had a different solution that referenced the same service, but did not have any warnings in the app.config. i ran compare in notepad++ on the system.serviceModel section of the app.config and it highlighted the difference in case between the two contract attributes.
as soon as i modified the contract attribute to the correct case sensitive spelling the warning went away instantly
Closing VS2013 Prof, removing the "obj" folder and recompiling has done the job for me.
I've solved the problem.
If you ever change your C# class in Service1.cs and IService1.cs. Also update the name attribute in the service element "<namespace>.<classname>" and contract attribute in the endpoind element "<namespace>.<classname>" in your App.config.
BTW. sorry for the bad english :)
I had the same problem on client side. For me the solution was to delete and add the service reference again.
Could it be that you lost your references when you upgraded the project? I noticed this error when my project containing my client had no reference to my project with my service.
I've added a proxy to a webservice to a VS2008/.NET 3.5 solution. When constructing the client .NET throws this error:
Could not find default endpoint element that references contract 'IMySOAPWebService' in the ServiceModel client configuration section. This might be because no configuaration file was found for your application or because no endpoint element matching this contract could be found in the client element.
Searching for this error tells me to use the full namespace in the contract. Here's my app.config with full namespace:
<client>
<endpoint address="http://192.168.100.87:7001/soap/IMySOAPWebService"
binding="basicHttpBinding" bindingConfiguration="IMySOAPWebServicebinding"
contract="Fusion.DataExchange.Workflows.IMySOAPWebService" name="IMySOAPWebServicePort" />
</client>
I'm running XP local (I mention this because a number of Google hits mention win2k3)
The app.config is copied to app.exe.config, so that is also not the problem.
Any clues?
"This error can arise if you are calling the service in a class library and calling the class library from another project."
In this case you will need to include the WS configuration settings into the main projects app.config if its a winapp or web.config if its a web app. This is the way to go even with PRISM and WPF/Silverlight.
I solved this (I think as others may have suggested) by creating the binding and endpoint address instances myself - because I did not want to add new settings to the config files (this is a replacement for some existing library code which is used widely, and previously used an older Web Service Reference etc.), and so I wanted to be able to drop this in without having add new config settings everywhere.
var remoteAddress = new System.ServiceModel.EndpointAddress(_webServiceUrl);
using (var productService = new ProductClient(new System.ServiceModel.BasicHttpBinding(), remoteAddress))
{
//set timeout
productService.Endpoint.Binding.SendTimeout = new TimeSpan(0,0,0,_webServiceTimeout);
//call web service method
productResponse = productService.GetProducts();
}
Edit
If you are using https then you need to use BasicHttpsBinding rather than BasicHttpBinding.
Having tested several options, I finally solved this by using
contract="IMySOAPWebService"
i.e. without the full namespace in the config. For some reason the full name didn't resolve properly
I've had this same issue. It turns out that for a web REFERENCE, you have to supply the URL as the first parameter to the constructor:
new WebService.WebServiceSoapClient("http://myservice.com/moo.aspx");
For a new style web SERVICE REFERENCE, you have to supply a name that refers to an endpoint entry in the configuration:
new WebService.WebServiceSoapClient("WebServiceEndpoint");
With a corresponding entry in Web.config or App.config:
<client>
<endpoint address="http://myservice.com/moo.aspx"
binding="basicHttpBinding"
bindingConfiguration="WebService"
contract="WebService.WebServiceSoap"
name="WebServiceEndpoint" />
</client>
</system.serviceModel>
Pretty damn hard to remove the tunnel vision on "it worked in an older program"...
I had a situation like this, where i had
WCF Service Hosted somewhere
Main Project
Consumer Project of type 'class Library' which has Service reference to a WCF Service
Main project calls methods from consumer project
Now the Consumer project had all the related configuration setting in <system.serviceModel> Tag of my app.config, its was still throwing the same error as the above.
All i did is added the same tag <system.serviceModel> to my main project's app.config file, and finally we were good to go.
The Real problem, as far as in my case was, it was reading the wrong configuration file. Instead of consumer's app.config, it was referring main proj's config. it took me two hours to figure that out.
"This error can arise if you are calling the service in a class library and calling the class library from another project."
"In this case you will need to include the WS configuration settings into the main projects app.config if its a winapp or web.config if its a web app. This is the way to go even with PRISM and WPF/Silverlight."
Yes, but if you can't change main project (Orchard CMS for example), you can keep WCF service config in your project.
You need to create a service helper with client generation method:
public static class ServiceClientHelper
{
public static T GetClient<T>(string moduleName) where T : IClientChannel
{
var channelType = typeof(T);
var contractType = channelType.GetInterfaces().First(i => i.Namespace == channelType.Namespace);
var contractAttribute = contractType.GetCustomAttributes(typeof(ServiceContractAttribute), false).First() as ServiceContractAttribute;
if (contractAttribute == null)
throw new Exception("contractAttribute not configured");
//path to your lib app.config (mark as "Copy Always" in properties)
var configPath = HostingEnvironment.MapPath(String.Format("~/Modules/{0}/bin/{0}.dll.config", moduleName));
var configuration = ConfigurationManager.OpenMappedExeConfiguration(new ExeConfigurationFileMap { ExeConfigFilename = configPath }, ConfigurationUserLevel.None);
var serviceModelSectionGroup = ServiceModelSectionGroup.GetSectionGroup(configuration);
if (serviceModelSectionGroup == null)
throw new Exception("serviceModelSectionGroup not configured");
var endpoint = serviceModelSectionGroup.Client.Endpoints.OfType<ChannelEndpointElement>().First(e => e.Contract == contractAttribute.ConfigurationName);
var channelFactory = new ConfigurationChannelFactory<T>(endpoint.Name, configuration, null);
var client = channelFactory.CreateChannel();
return client;
}
}
and use it:
using (var client = ServiceClientHelper.GetClient<IDefaultNameServiceChannel>(yourLibName)) {
... get data from service ...
}
See details in this article.
This one drove me crazy.
I'm using Silverlight 3 Prism (CAB) with WCF
When I call a WCF service in a Prism module, I get the same error:
Could not find default endpoint element that references contract
'IMyService' in the service model client configuaration section. This
might be because no configuaration file was found for your application
or because no end point element matching this contract could be found
in the client element
It turns out that its looking in the Shell's .xap file for a ServiceReferences.ClientConfig file, not in the module's ServiceReferences.ClientConfig file. I added my endpoint and binding to the existing ServiceReferences.ClientConfig file in my Silverlight Shell application (it calls it's own WCF services).
Then I had to rebuild the Shell app to generate the new .xap file for my Web project's ClientBin folder.
Now this line of code finally works:
MyServiceClient myService = new MyServiceClient();
Several responses here hit upon the correct solution when you're facing the mind-numbingly obscure error of referencing the service from a class file: copy service config info into your app.config web.config of your console or windows app. None of those answers seem to show you what to copy though. Let's try and correct that.
Here's what I copied out of my class library's config file, into my console app's config file, in order to get around this crazy error for a service I write called "TranslationServiceOutbound".
You basically want everything inside the system.serviceModel section:
<system.serviceModel>
<bindings>
<basicHttpBinding>
<binding name="BasicHttpBinding_ITranslationServiceOutbound" />
</basicHttpBinding>
</bindings>
<client>
<endpoint address="http://MyHostName/TranslationServiceOutbound/TranslationServiceOutbound.svc"
binding="basicHttpBinding" bindingConfiguration="BasicHttpBinding_ITranslationServiceOutbound"
contract="TranslationService.ITranslationServiceOutbound" name="BasicHttpBinding_ITranslationServiceOutbound" />
</client>
I was getting this error within an ASP.NET application where the WCF service had been added to a class library which is being added to the ASP.NET application as a referenced .dll file in the bin folder. To resolve the error, the config settings in the app.config file within the class library referencing the WCF service needed to be copied into the web.config settings for the ASP.NET site/app.
I had the same problem, but changing the contract namespace didn't work for me. So I tried a .Net 2 style web reference instead of a .Net 3.5 service reference. That worked.
To use a Web reference in Visual Studio 2008, click on 'Add Service Reference', then click 'Advanced' when the dialog box appears. In that you will find an option that will let you use a Web reference instead of a Service reference.
I found (as well as copying to the client UI's App.config as I was using a Class Library interface) I had to prefix the name of the binding with the name of the Service Reference (mine is ServiceReference in the below).
e.g.:
<endpoint address="http://localhost:4000/ServiceName" binding="basicHttpBinding"
bindingConfiguration="BasicHttpBinding_ISchedulerService"
contract="ServiceReference.ISchedulerService"
name="BasicHttpBinding_ISchedulerService" />
instead of the default generated:
<endpoint address="http://localhost:4000/ServiceName" binding="basicHttpBinding"
bindingConfiguration="BasicHttpBinding_ISchedulerService"
contract="ISchedulerService"
name="BasicHttpBinding_ISchedulerService" />
Unit testing a non-library application that consumes a service can cause this problem.
The information that others have entered addresses the root cause of this. If you are trying to write automated test cases and the unit you are testing will actually invoke the service interface, you need to add the service reference to the test project. This is a flavor of the application using library type of error. I did not immediately realize this though because my code that consumes the interface is not in a library. However, when the test actually runs it will be running from the test assembly, not the assembly under test.
Adding a service reference to the unit test project resolved my issue.
I have a situation which in the Unit test. I copied the app.config file to the unit test project. So the unit test project also contains endpoint information.
I faced this problem once. It was because i was still developing the interface that uses WCF service. I configured test application and continued development. Then in development, i changed some of the services' namespaces. So i double checked "system.serviceModel -> client -> endpoint -> contract" in web.config to match WCF class. Then problem is solved.
The namespace in your config should reflect the rest of the namespace path after your client's default namespace (as configured in the project properties). Based on your posted answer, my guess is that your client is configured to be in the "Fusion.DataExchange.Workflows" namespace. If you moved the client code to another namespace you would need to update the config to match the remaining namespace path.
This error can arise if you are calling the service in a class library and calling the class library from another project.
I Have a same Problem.I'm Used the WCF Service in class library and calling the class library from windows Application project.but I'm Forget Change <system.serviceModel> In Config File of windows application Project same the <system.serviceModel> of Class Library's app.Config file.
solution: change Configuration of outer project same the class library's wcf configuration.
Hi I've encountered the same problem but the best solution is to let the .NET to configure your client side configuration. What I discover is this when I add a service reference with a query string of http:/namespace/service.svc?wsdl=wsdl0 it does NOT create a configuration endpoints at the client side. But when I remove the ?wsdl-wsdl0 and only use the url http:/namespace/service.svc, it create the endpoint configuration at the client configuration file. for short remoe the " ?WSDL=WSDL0" .
Do not put service client declaration line as class field,
instead of this, create instance at each method that used in.
So problem will be fixed. If you create service client instance as class field, then design time error occurs !
In case if you are using WPF application using PRISM framework then configuration should exist in your start up project (i.e. in the project where your bootstrapper resides.)
There seem to be several ways to create/fix this issue. For me, the CRM product I am using was written in native code and is able to call my .NET dll, but I run into the configuration information needing to be at/above the main application. For me, the CRM application isn't .NET, so I ended up having to put it in my machine.config file (not where I want it). In addition, since my company uses Websense I had a hard time even adding the Service Reference due to a 407 Proxy Authentication Required issue, that to required a modification to the machine.cong.
Proxy solution:
To get the WCF Service Reference to work I had to copy the information from the app.config of my DLL to the main application config (but for me that was machine.config). And I also had to copy the endpoint information to that same file. Once I did that it starting working for me.
Ok. My case was a little diffrent but finally i have found the fix for it:
I have a Console.EXE -> DLL -> Invoking WS1 -> DLL -> Invoking WS2
I have had both the configurations of the service model of WS1, and WS2 in the Console.EXE.config as recommended. - didnt solve the issue.
But it still didn't work, until i have added the WebReference of WS2 to WS1 also and not only to the DLL that actually creating and invoking the proxy of WS2.
If you reference the web service in your class library then you have to copy app.config to your windows application or console application
solution: change Configuration of outer project same the class library's wcf configuration.
Worked for me
I had the same Issue
I was using desktop app and using Global Weather Web service
I deleted the service reference and added the web reference and problem solved
Thanks
Solution for me was to remove the endpoint name from the Endpoint Name attribute in client web.config
this allowed the proxy to use
ChannelFactory<TService> _channelFactory = new ChannelFactory<TService>("");
only took all day to work out.
Also the contract name was wrong once this fix was in place although it had been wrong when the initial error appear.
Double then triple check for contract name strings people !!
attrib: Ian
Allow me to add one more thing to look for. (Tom Haigh's answer already alludes to it, but I want to be explicit)
My web.config file had the following defined:
<protocolMapping>
<add binding="basicHttpsBinding" scheme="https" />
</protocolMapping>
I was already using basicHttpsBinding for one reference, but then I added a new reference which required basicHttpBinding (no s). All I had to do was add that to my protocolMapping as follows:
<protocolMapping>
<add binding="basicHttpBinding" scheme="http" />
<add binding="basicHttpsBinding" scheme="https" />
</protocolMapping>
As L.R. correctly points out, this needs to be defined in the right places. For me, that meant one in my Unit Test project's app.config as well as one in the main service project's web.config.
I had this error when I was referencing the Contract in the configuration file element without the global scope operator.
i.e.
<endpoint contract="global::MyNamepsace.IMyContract" .../>
works, but
<endpoint contract="MyNamepsace.IMyContract" .../>
gives the "Could not find default endpoint element that references contract" error.
The assembly containing MyNamepsace.IMyContract is in a different assembly to the main application, so this may explain the need to use the global scope resolution.
When you are adding a service reference
beware of namespace you are typing in:
You should append it to the name of your interface:
<client>
<endpoint address="http://192.168.100.87:7001/soap/IMySOAPWebService"
binding="basicHttpBinding"
contract="MyNamespace.IMySOAPWebService" />
</client>
I got same error and I have tried many things but didn't work, than I noticed that my "contract" was not same at all projects, I changed the contract as would be same for all projects inside solution and than it worked.
This is project A
<client>
<endpoint address="https://xxxxxxxx" binding="basicHttpBinding" bindingConfiguration="basic" contract="ServiceReference.IIntegrationService" name="basic" />
</client>
Project B :
<client>
<endpoint address="xxxxxxxxxxxxx" binding="basicHttpBinding" bindingConfiguration="basic" contract="ServiceReference1.IIntegrationService" name="basic" />
</client>
Finally I changed for both as :
<client>
<endpoint address="https://xxxxxxxxxxx" binding="basicHttpBinding" bindingConfiguration="basic" contract="MyServiceReferrence.IIntegrationService" name="basic" />
</client>
I had the same issue and it was solved only when the host application and the dll that used that endpoint had the same service reference name.