i need your help to insert into from select but my query is too complex for me. My logic is below
INSERT INTO TheTable(A,CustomerNo,item,B,C,D)
SELECT DISTINCT
case when ((select count(*) from hesap where CustomerNo=e.CustomerNo)0) then
select top 1, A,CustomerNo,item+1,B,C,D
from dbo.Table1 order by ekno desc
) else select 100,e.CustomerNo,e.item,0,e.defterid,'C'
from Table2 e end
But i can not do that...
You can do case on column basis only.
What you can do is UNIONing two selects, and insert the result. Something like
INSERT INTO TheTable(A,CustomerNo,item,B,C,D)
SELECT ...
WHERE (select count(*) from hesap where CustomerNo=e.CustomerNo) = 0
UNION
SELECT select 100,e.CustomerNo,e.item,0,e.defterid,'C'
WHERE (select count(*) from hesap where CustomerNo=e.CustomerNo) > 0
I'm sorry, I cannot always follow your Select, but I hope you got the idea. You have to separate the 2 possibilities before you UNION them, so only 1 row can exist for each original row.
Can you try removing the comma after top 1 Like this:
INSERT INTO TheTable(A,CustomerNo,item,B,C,D)
SELECT DISTINCT
case when ((select count(*) from hesap where CustomerNo=e.CustomerNo)0) then
select top(1) A,CustomerNo,item+1,B,C,D
from dbo.Table1 order by ekno desc
)
else select 100,e.CustomerNo,e.item,0,e.defterid,'C'
from Table2 e end
Related
i need help on HAVING COUNT , i have a result set of data below:
CREATE TABLE #tmpTest1 (Code VARCHAR(50), Name VARCHAR(100))
INSERT INTO [#tmpTest1]
(
[Code],
[Name]
)
SELECT '160215-039','ROBIN'
UNION ALL SELECT '160215-039','ROBIN'
UNION ALL SELECT '160215-046','SENGAROB'
UNION ALL SELECT '160215-046','BABYPANGET'
UNION ALL SELECT '160215-045','JONG'
UNION ALL SELECT '160215-045','JAPZ'
UNION ALL SELECT '160215-044','AGNES'
UNION ALL SELECT '160215-044','AGNES'
UNION ALL SELECT '160215-041','BABYTOT'
UNION ALL SELECT '160215-041','BABYTOT'
UNION ALL SELECT '160215-041','BABYTOT'
i want to show only the rows that have the same code but different name , so in this case my expected result is below since those are have the same code but different name:
160215-045 JAPZ
160215-045 JONG
160215-046 BABYPANGET
160215-046 SENGAROB
but when i try to group the two columns then use the having count, below is my query:
SELECT [Code], [Name] FROM [#tmpTest1]
GROUP BY [Code], [Name] HAVING COUNT([Code]) > 1
It gives me wrong result below which have the rows that have the same code and name, it is the opposite of what i want.
160215-044 AGNES
160215-041 BABYTOT
160215-039 ROBIN
How can i get my expected output ?
Thanks in advance, any help would much appreciated.
I believe this query will give you the result you want, although your original question is a bit unclear.
SELECT t1.[Code], t1.[Name]
FROM [#tmpTest1] t1
INNER JOIN
(
SELECT [Code]
FROM [#tmpTest1]
GROUP BY [Code]
HAVING COUNT(DISTINCT [Name]) > 1
) t2
ON t1.[Code] = t2.[Code]
Follow the link below for a running demo:
SQLFiddle
If you want rows with the same code and name, then use window functions:
select t.*
from (select t.*, count(*) over (partition by code, name) as cnt
from #temptest1 t
) t
where cnt >= 2;
From your comment
if there is 1 different name for the codes , i want to show those
records for me to know that there is one differs to others..
This sounds like an exists query because you want to check if another row with the same code but different name exists.
select * from [#tmpTest1] t1
where exists (
select 1 from [#tmpTest] t2
where t2.code = t1.code
and t2.name <> t1.name
)
I'm trying to do multiple select from diff tables and just have a result in one column.
SELECT COUNT(*) FROM tb1 union
SELECT COUNT(*) FROM tb2 union
SELECT COUNT(*) FROM tb3;
output should be like:
593643
18103600
0
Problem with this is that the result is being arranged on desc order.
Like below:
0
593643
18103600
I would want the result to be as I put the select statement.
Please advise. Btw, I'm using teradata.
Thank you.
SQL result sets are inherently unordered, unless you explicitly specify an order by clause. You can do this with a subquery:
select cnt
from ((SELECT COUNT(*) as cnt, 1 as ord FROM tb1)
union all
(SELECT COUNT(*), 2 FROM tb2)
union all
(SELECT COUNT(*), 3 FROM tb3)
) t
order by ord
If you want specific order, add ORDER BY clause. It would also be good to use UNION ALL so you always get 3 rows, even with duplicate results (two tables having the same number of rows):
SELECT 'tbl1' AS tablename, COUNT(*) AS cnt, 1 AS ord FROM tb1 UNION ALL
SELECT 'tbl2', COUNT(*), 2 FROM tb2 UNION ALL
SELECT 'tbl3', COUNT(*), 3 FROM tb3
ORDER BY ord ;
I tried the sql query given below:
SELECT * FROM (SELECT *
FROM TABLE_A ORDER BY COLUMN_1)DUMMY_TABLE
UNION ALL
SELECT * FROM TABLE_B
It results in the following error:
The ORDER BY clause is invalid in views, inline functions, derived
tables, subqueries, and common table expressions, unless TOP or FOR
XML is also specified.
I need to use order by in union all. How do I accomplish this?
SELECT *
FROM
(
SELECT * FROM TABLE_A
UNION ALL
SELECT * FROM TABLE_B
) dum
-- ORDER BY .....
but if you want to have all records from Table_A on the top of the result list, the you can add user define value which you can use for ordering,
SELECT *
FROM
(
SELECT *, 1 sortby FROM TABLE_A
UNION ALL
SELECT *, 2 sortby FROM TABLE_B
) dum
ORDER BY sortby
You don't really need to have parenthesis. You can sort directly:
SELECT *, 1 AS RN FROM TABLE_A
UNION ALL
SELECT *, 2 AS RN FROM TABLE_B
ORDER BY RN, COLUMN_1
Not an OP direct response, but I thought I would jimmy in here responding to the the OP's ERROR messsage, which may point you in another direction entirely!
All these answers are referring to an overall ORDER BY once the record set has been retrieved and you sort the lot.
What if you want to ORDER BY each portion of the UNION independantly, and still have them "joined" in the same SELECT?
SELECT pass1.* FROM
(SELECT TOP 1000 tblA.ID, tblA.CustomerName
FROM TABLE_A AS tblA ORDER BY 2) AS pass1
UNION ALL
SELECT pass2.* FROM
(SELECT TOP 1000 tblB.ID, tblB.CustomerName
FROM TABLE_B AS tblB ORDER BY 2) AS pass2
Note the TOP 1000 is an arbitary number. Use a big enough number to capture all of the data you require.
There will be times when you need to do something like this :
Pull top 5 from table 1 based on a sort
and bottom 5 from table 2 based on another sort
and union these together.
solution
select * from (
-- top 5 records
select top 5 col1, col2, col3
from table1
group by col1, col2
order by col3 desc ) z
union all
select * from (
-- bottom 5 records
select top 5 col1, col2, col3
from table2
group by col1, col2
order by col3 ) z
this was the only way i was able to get around the error and worked fine for me.
SELECT * FROM (SELECT *
FROM TABLE_A ORDER BY COLUMN_1)DUMMY_TABLE
UNION ALL
SELECT * FROM TABLE_B
ORDER BY 2;
2 is column number here .. In Oracle SQL you can use the column number by which you want to sort the data
This solved my SELECT statement:
SELECT * FROM
(SELECT id,name FROM TABLE_A
UNION ALL
SELECT id,name FROM TABLE_B ) dum
order by dum.id , dum.name
where id and name columns available in tables and you can use your columns .
Simply use that , no need parenthesis or anything else
SELECT *, id as TABLE_A_ID FROM TABLE_A
UNION ALL
SELECT *, id as TABLE_B_ID FROM TABLE_B
ORDER BY TABLE_A_ID, TABLE_B_ID
ORDER BY after the last UNION should apply to both datasets joined by union.
The solution shown below:
SELECT *,id AS sameColumn1 FROM Locations
UNION ALL
SELECT *,id AS sameColumn2 FROM Cities
ORDER BY sameColumn1,sameColumn2
select CONCAT(Name, '(',substr(occupation, 1, 1), ')') AS f1
from OCCUPATIONS
union
select temp.str AS f1 from
(select count(occupation) AS counts, occupation, concat('There are a total of ' ,count(occupation) ,' ', lower(occupation),'s.') As str from OCCUPATIONS group by occupation order by counts ASC, occupation ASC
) As temp
order by f1
I need to count rows in more than one table in SQL Server 2008. I do this:
select count(*) from (select * from tbl1 union all select * from tbl2)
But it gives me an error of incorrect syntax near ). Why?
PS. The actual number of tables can be more than 2.
In case you have different number of columns in your tables try this way
SELECT count(*)
FROM (
SELECT NULL as columnName
FROM tbl1
UNION ALL
SELECT NULL
FROM tbl2
) T
try this:
You have to give a name to your derived table
select count(*) from
(select * from tbl1 union all select * from tbl2)a
I think you have to alias the SELECT in the FROM clause:
select count(*)
from
(
select * from tbl1
union all
select * from tbl2
) AS SUB
You also need to ensure that the * in both tables tbl1 and tbl2 return exactly the same number of columns and they have to be matched in their type.
I don't like doing the union before doing the count. It gives the SQL optimizer an opportunithy to choose to do more work.
AlexK's (deleted) solution is fine. You could also do:
select (select count(*) from tbl1) + (select count(*) from tbl2) as cnt
In Microsoft SQL Server 2005 or above, I would like to get the first row, and if there is no matching row, then return a row with default values.
SELECT TOP 1 ID,Name
FROM TableName
UNION ALL
SELECT 0,''
ORDER BY ID DESC
This works, except that it returns two rows if there is data in the table, and 1 row if not.
I'd like it to always return 1 row.
I think it has something to do with EXISTS, but I'm not sure.
It would be something like:
SELECT TOP 1 * FROM Contact
WHERE EXISTS(select * from contact)
But if not EXISTS, then SELECT 0,''
What happens when the table is very full and you might want to specify which row of your top 1 to get, such as the first name? OMG Ponies' query will return the wrong answer in that case if you just change the ORDER BY clause. His query also costs about 8% more CPU than this modification (though it has equal reads)
SELECT TOP 1 *
FROM (
SELECT TOP 1 ID,Name
FROM TableName
ORDER BY Name
UNION ALL
SELECT 0,''
) X
ORDER BY ID DESC
The difference is that the inner query has a TOP 1 also, and which TOP 1 can be specified there (as shown).
Just for fun, this is another way to do it which performs very closely to the above query (-15ms to +30ms). While it's more complicated than necessary for such a simple query, it demonstrates a technique that I don't see other SQL folks using very often.
SELECT
ID = Coalesce(T.ID, 0),
Name = Coalesce(T.Name, '')
FROM
(SELECT 1) X (Num)
LEFT JOIN (
SELECT TOP 1 ID, Name
FROM TableName
ORDER BY ID DESC
) T ON 1 = 1 -- effective cross join but does not limit rows in the first table
Use:
SELECT TOP 1
x.id,
x.name
FROM (SELECT t.id,
t.name
FROM TABLENAME t
UNION ALL
SELECT 0,
'') x
ORDER BY id DESC
Using a CTE equivalent:
WITH query AS (
SELECT t.id,
t.name
FROM TABLENAME t
UNION ALL
SELECT 0,
'')
SELECT TOP 1
x.id,
x.name
FROM query x
ORDER BY x.id DESC
CREATE TABLE #sample(id INT, data VARCHAR(10))
SELECT TOP 1 id, data INTO #temp FROM #sample
IF ##ROWCOUNT = 0 INSERT INTO #temp VALUES (null, null)
SELECT * FROM #temp
put the top oustide of the UNION query
SELECT TOP 1 * FROM(
SELECT ID,Name
FROM TableName
UNION ALL
SELECT 0,''
) z
ORDER BY ID DESC
IF EXISTS ( SELECT TOP 1 ID, Name FROM TableName )
BEGIN
SELECT TOP 1 ID, Name FROM TableName
END
ELSE
BEGIN
--exists returned no rows
--send a default row
SELECT 0, ''
END