Equivalent of public static final variables - objective-c

I understand that placing the word extern before a variable declaration in a header file declares the existence of a global static variable without initialising it. I also understand that if I import the file containing the extern variables, I can reference them without a class/file name. But where does one define them and their values?
What I am trying to do is create a class of constants with global constants that I want to use throughout an iOS application's code.
Does one put them inside the interface like this?
Example.h
#import <Foundation/Foundation.h>
#interface Constraints : NSObject
{
extern NSString * const PREFS_NAME;
}
Or does one put then outside of the interface like this
Example.h
#import <Foundation/Foundation.h>
extern NSString * const PREFS_NAME;
#interface Constraints : NSObject
{
}
Then in the implementation .m file how would one initialise the extern values?
Inside the implementation area like this?
Example.m
#import "Constraints.h"
#implementation Constraints
/**PRefecences name for the application**/
const NSString * PREFS_NAME = #"MyApp_Prefs";
#end
Or do initialise them outside of the implementation area like this:
Example.m
#import "Constraints.h"
/**PRefecences name for the application**/
const NSString * PREFS_NAME = #"MyApp_Prefs";
#implementation Constraints
#end
Or do I provide them their initial values in a constructor? or some arbitrary a static style method with + in front of it i.e. +(void) setAppConstraints;
I have tried several combinations, but always run into errors, such as "Redefinition of 'xVariable' with a different type". Or a something about "extern does not have an initialise interface" (or something like that, I forget). So I want to know how to declaire and initialise them properly to form the same role as public static final variables in Java.
Also what are the limits of the extern command? I know I can extern an NSInteger or NSString, but what about NSArray?
I am asking this question because there seems to be to much misleading, or incomplete, information regarding the use of extern in Objective-C. Many of the answers seem speculatory. My hope is for this question to be a good resource not only for me, but to limit further similar questions about the basics of extern.

You define it's value in the file inside which it's declared, which in your case is Example.m; You can still re-assign this variable, so the declaration in Example.h would look like this:
extern NSString * PREFS_NAME;
This way every file that imports Example.h has access to this variable. The equivalent of public static final in Objective-C is const. If you also want it to be public you should make it be a class instance variable, but in this case you don't need it because it's already accessible everywhere. So in this case it would be:
// .m file
NSString* const PREFS_NAME = #"MyApp_Prefs";
// .h file
extern NSString* const PREFS_NAME;
Also notice that const NSString* is different from NSString* const. The latter is a const pointer to NSString. The former hasn't sense even if it's a correct syntax. In Objective-C the const qualifier doesn't affect objects, instead there are mutable and immutable classes. It would have sense in C++ meaning that you can use just const methods on the instance.

extern is used to signal the compiler that you will be using a variable or a function that is defined in another compilation unit.
When you say extern const NSString *PREFS_NAME, you're saying "Replace all references in this compilation unit to PREFS_NAME to the variable PREFS_NAME as it is defined in another file." So when you try to assign PREFS_NAME in your .m, all you're doing is trying to assign a variable that, though it has a name, it doesn't exist. Declaring a variable extern is only a declaration of a variable or function, not a definition of that variable or function. It lets the compiler know that the name is in use, and that the linker will take care of what to do with it, but even if you provide a type here, it doesn't actually set aside space for the variable, it's expecting the space to be set aside in the compilation unit that's actually defining the variable.
You compile three or four different source code files together, three of them may declare:
extern int buffer[];
And one may declare
int buffer[BUFSIZE];
In its global scope, and the linker's job is to resolve the three declared references to extern buffer to the fourth's actual definition of the buffer.
extern is to C variables and functions much as #class is to Objective-C classes, it's a forward declaration, a promise to the compiler that you don't have to freak out when you see a name that's undefined here, because the linker will answer whatever lingering questions you may have.

Related

How to use a c-style struct in multiple classes

I want to use a c-style struct in several classes but I am struggling with its (global) access.
I define the struct in the header file of class “Utilities”:
typedef struct
{
int length;
SInt16 *someData;
} NewStruct;
+ (NewStruct *)initStructWithValue:(int)length;
In another class I initialize this struct with the class method of Utitlities:
#property (nonatomic, assign) NewStruct *newStruct;
_newStruct = [Utilities initStructWithValue: 5]
Now I want to use newStruct in other classes. However, when I put
extern NewStruct *newStruct;
at the top of the header-files it doesn’t work, it seems that I don't have access to newStruct.
I get the error: linker command failed with exit code 1 (use -v to see invocation)
What am I doing wrong and what would be the best way to do it? Or might it be better to avoid using this struct as global variable?
The extern keyword means "declare without defining". In other words, it is a way to explicitly declare a variable, or to force a declaration without a definition. But when the linker assembles your object code it needs the variable the be defined somewhere, which means you have to have a source where the variable is there without the extern keyword NewStruct *newStruct;.
With the method above, you are considering this variable as a global singleton. If you need multiple instances, you should just use the #property as you specified above.

What does extern mean in an obj-c header [duplicate]

This question already has answers here:
What does the extern keyword mean?
(3 answers)
Closed 8 years ago.
what does this code mean?
// myheader.h
extern const NSUInteger Something;
#interface MyObject : NSObject
...
#end
What does extern mean here, and how can/will it be used? is it part of the object? is it global in the project? Does it matter where (in which header) is it defined? Is that a good practice?
This is plain C.
What does extern mean here, and how can/will it be used?
extern const NSUInteger Something;
It means:
There is a var with the name Something.
It has the type NSUInteger.
It cannot be changed (const)
Do not create that var, but link to a creation somewhere else in a file contained in the executable (extern).
Let's have an example:
Exporter.h
extern const NSUInteger Something;
Exporter.m (Or Exporter.c, since it is plain C.)
#import "Exporter.h"
const NSUInteger Something = 5; // This is the definition for the declaration above.
After defining that var in Exporter.m and extern declaring it in Exporter.h everyone that imports the Header can use it:
Importer.h or Importer.m (Or Importer.c, since it is plain C.)
#import "Exporter.h" (Or #include, since it is plain C.)
// Now the compiler knows that
// there is a global readonly var called Something,
// its type is int, and
// it is readonly.
Every importer will share one var. Without the extern keyword, there would be different vars.
Is it part of the object?
No. To be precise: An ivar is declared, if it is inside { … }that belongs to an #interface … or to an #implementation …. Whether this is done in a header or in an .m file is without any meaning.
Is it global in the project
It is global in your executable. (You call that "project" what is not precise, but okay.)
Does it matter where (in which header) is it defined?
No. That never matters in C. (The compiler sees the text after resolving imports and includes. It has no idea from where it came.) But in one translation unit (".m") you have to have a definition as shown above in Exporter.m.
Is that a good practice?
The problem with extern var declaration is that everyone importing Exporter.h can read and – that's important – change that var without any notification to other parts of your software dealing with Exporter.h (and Something). So it is nearly impossible to control the data flow.
In nowadays extern global vars are only used for const vars, as in your Q. That vars cannot be changed. So there is no problem and it is commonly accepted practice.

type name does not allow storage class to be specified

#interface Foo : NSObject
{
extern int gGlobalVar;
int i;
}
-(void)setgGlobalVar:(int)val;
#end
#implementation Foo
-(void)setgGlobalVar:(int)val
{
i = 5;
NSLog(#"i = %i", i);
gGlobalVar = val;
}
#end
I can declare i in interface and use it in implementation without any errors. But I cannot declare a variable of the type extern in interface. Why is this so? Why do I get an error which says that: "Type name does not allow storage class to be specified"?
Short Description:
The bracketed section of a class's #interface OR #implementation is only for declaring instance variables (aka "ivar"). The extern keyword is only for use with global variable declarations (or functions, but that's another topic.)
Therefore, you cannot declare an extern ivar.
Gritty Details:
Variables are first declared, and then defined. This distinction is typically blurred for variables in local scopes, as a locally declared variable without an explicit definition will often be allocated and given a default value by the compiler.
Global variables are potentially available in any scope, provided that scope knows the global exists. That's where the keyword extern comes in -- it declares that the global variable exists, and was defined elsewhere. This is only useful when you want to access a global variable in different code files.
Best Practices: Your book has some code that declares an extern variable in an implementation file (e.g. ".m" files, etc.)... that can work, but it's a bad practice because you're making potentially bad assumptions about whether that global actually has a valid definition elsewhere. (But, fancy compilers will discover this type of error.)
Instead, the best practice is to declare an extern variable once in a header file, have an accompanying implementation file that's dedicated to defining the externs in that header, and then include that header in other implementation files that want to use that global variable.

How to use global variables in Objective-C?

How should I declare a global variable in my Objective-C project?
Traditionally, global variables are declared in a header, and defined in a source file. Other source files only need to know how it is declared to use it (i.e. its type and its name). As long as the variable is defined somewhere in a source file, the linker will be able to find it and appropriately link all the references in other source files to the definition.
Somewhere in your header, you would declare a global variable like this:
extern int GlobalInt;
The extern part tells the compiler that this is just a declaration that an object of type int identified by GlobalInt exists. It may be defined later or it may not (it is not the compiler's responsibility to ensure it exists, that is the linker's job). It is similar to a function prototype in this regard.
In one of your source files, you define the GlobalInt integer:
int GlobalInt = 4;
Now, each file that includes the header will have access to GlobalInt, because the header says it exists, so the compiler is happy, and the linker will see it in one of your source files, so it too will be happy. Just don't define it twice!
However
You should consider whether or not this approach is useful. Global variables get messy for a number of reasons (trying to find out exactly where it is defined or declared, threading issues), there is usually not a need for global variables. You should perhaps consider using a singleton approach.
Don't. Global variables are often a sign of poor design. A common replacement in Objective-C is a class method that returns an object (that may or may not be a singleton), such as [NSUserDefaults standardUserDefaults] or [UIDevice currentDevice].
However, if you must use a global variable, read on.
In your header:
extern NSString *someString;
extern NSInteger someInteger;
In your implementation file:
NSString *someString = #"DEFAULT_VALUE";
NSInteger someInteger = DEFAULT_VALUE;
In my experience there are few instances when a program doesn't need, at least, some sort of data or utility/helper methods that can be accessed throughout the program.
They way I deal with this, rather than using global variables is to create what I call a 'project applicance', which is essentially just a class with a bunch of static methods.
It could be implemented multiple ways, but I use a singleton and just have the static methods call through to the single instance of the appliance class. For example, in my project Oovium I have:
Oovium.h:
#interface Oovium : NSObject {
UIWindow* _window;
}
+ (UIWindow*) window;
Oovium.m:
#implementation Oovium
static Oovium* oovium;
- (UIWindow*) window {return _window;}
+ (void) initialize {
oovium = [[Oovium alloc] init];
}
+ (UIWindow*) window {return [oovium window];}
I then include Oovium.h in my Oovium_Prefix.pch file so that it is automatically included in all of my files.
Globals rock! I don't know what everyone is scared of. I used them successfully here.
Passing Data between View Controllers
Also used UIStepper to adjust values in another viewController.
I could see them being an issue is larger programs, and in my opinion the singleton thing is just a masked global. Keep it simple, if your app is simple that is.

What class of Objective-C variable is this?

I am working my way through some Objective-C code that I did not write and have found a variable declaration style that I am unfamiliar with. Can anyone tell me the scope of the variable 'myVar' in the class implementation below? Note that this appears in the '.m' file and not the interface declaration.
#implementation MyClass
#synthesize ivar1, ivar2;
NSString* myVar; // <- What is the intent?
- (id)init {
...
#end
To me the intention appears to be similar to that of a member variable. What are the advantages of declaring a variable in this way instead of using an ivar in the #interface declaration?
It's just a plain old global variable. There's only one instance of it, and it can be accessed by any code within the same file translation unit (the final file you get after running the preprocessor). Other translation units (that is, other .m files) can also access that global variable, but in order to do so, they need to use an extern statement:
extern NSString *myVar;
extern says "this is the name of a global variable, but it's defined in a different translation unit". The linker resolves all of the extern declarations at link time.
a poorly named global variable...
I'm not too experienced in ObjC but I'd say that is a global.