Let's say we have a Server with a private and public key, the latter available to all Clients and we have a Client who doesn't have any asymmetrical keys of his own. We want to establish secure communication between the Server and the Client and the Client has to ensure Server's authenticity. This is a pretty common situation.
Now, it is my understanding that private/public key pair is usually used in such situations only to ensure authenticity (our Client can use the Server's public key to verify the Server's authenticity). To ensure two-sided communication between the Server and the Client Diffie–Hellman key exchange is used and the communication is then based on a shared secret key.
I can't stop by wonder why Diffie-Hellman is used at all in such situations. From what I understand Public-Key Cryptography could be used to both ensure authenticity AND to share a secret key between the Client and the Server. Server can send to Client a message encoded with its private key and Client can decode it using Server's public key to confirm its identity. Furthermore Client could use the Server's public key to send a new random secret key to the Server. Only Server would know this secret key as only Server knows his private key. I know some people advice not to use a public key to both encode and decode but nobody says why.
Obviously if both Client and Server had their own public/private keys they wouldn't even need to share any secret keys, but that's not a typical situation.
So... to sum it up. Why is Diffie-Hellman used instead of Secret Key Distribution with a Public-Key Cryptography? Any advantages?
I can't stop by wonder why Diffie-Hellman is used at all in such
situations. From what I understand Public-Key Cryptography could be
used to both ensure authenticity AND to share a secret key between the
Client and the Server.
Both Diffie-Hellman and RSA key exchange (where RSA is used for encryption) can be used with SSL/TLS. This depends on the cipher suite.
Server can send to Client a message encoded with its private key and
Client can decode it using Server's public key to confirm its
identity.
This is indeed what happens with DH key exchange with RSA or DSS authentication: the server signs its DH parameters using its private key, and the client can verify the signature.
Furthermore Client could use the Server's public key to send a new
random secret key to the Server. Only Server would know this secret
key as only Server knows his private key.
This is more or less what happens with RSA key exchange: the client encrypts the pre-master secret, which only the server can decipher.
You can read about all this in the Authentication and Key Exchange section of the TLS specification (leaving aside the anonymous key exchange). The choice of cipher suites (See Appendix A.5 and C), which depends on how the client and the server have been configured, will determine the key exchange mechanism used.
Fixed DH exchange is rather rare as far as I know. Ephemeral DH (DHE cipher suites) is more common. It can provider "Perfect Forward Secrecy": even if attackers get hold of the private key, they can't decipher existing traffic, since they would also need to have the DH parameters, which are not the same for all connections. However, this has a cost in terms of performance. You can find more on this topic in this article.
. Why is Diffie-Hellman used instead of Secret Key Distribution with a Public-Key Cryptography? Any advantages?
Ans: let's assume a hacker has been tracking the all messages exchanged between client and server and saving messages , but he can not decrypt those messages because he does not know the shared symmetric key. If private key of server is revealed then in case of diffie-hellman hacker still can not decrypt the messages because diffie Hellman algorithm never send the secret key on wire instead client and server agrees on same key without sharing, it's kind of key agreement algorithm not sharing. To attack diffie Hellman man in the middle should be live and should know server private key which was used for authentication. But in our case hacker has past diffie Hellman messages, so he can not use man in the middle attack. Meanwhile server changes it's private key so there is no damage. But if we use RSA keys to share secret key then on the disclosure of server's private key hacker can get all session symmetric secret keys and can decrypt all the past messages.
Related
I came across a mbedTLS example on an embedded device and i see a server certificate validation (github.com as example) before downloading a firmware but the only certificate/key coded is the one of github (the CA chain, rather than the github cert itself).
My questions are:
If i perform a server CA verification do i only need the CA certs right?
After the verification of the server, is the communication between the two encrypted at all, meaning is the firmware file exposed in clear or is it crypted? Is the encryptiong done using the private key of the server? (which i suppose it is on the github server). If not what's the use of the server private key? Integrity?
Do i also need a client private key to establish an encrypted connection? If not is the client private key supposed to do the same thing of the server private key but on client side?
I've a general idea of what the answers are but i need certainties.
Regards,
If i perform a server CA verification do i only need the CA certs right?
correct
After the verification of the server, is the communication between the two encrypted at all, meaning is the firmware file exposed in clear or is it crypted? Is the encryptiong done using the private key of the server? (which i suppose it is on the github server). If not what's the use of the server private key? Integrity?
The validation of the servers certificate is part of the TLS handshake but not the end of the handshake. Only after the handshake is completed data are encrypted but also no application data are transferred before the handshake is completed. Thus, a firmware transferred over TLS is encrypted with whatever cipher client and server agreed on - which may be a weak or a strong cipher.
The application data are not encrypted by any private key but by symmetric cryptography. For more details see How does SSL/TLS work.
Do i also need a client private key to establish an encrypted connection? If not is the client private key supposed to do the same thing of the server private key but on client side?
A client does not need a private key for encryption. Apart from that the servers private key should be kept secret (private) and therefore it should not be possible that the client can just use the servers private key. Again, see How does SSL/TLS work for details.
Please help me fill out the blanks here -
The server keeps its private key and the public key is shared to the users. So the client trusts the content thats coming from the server using the public key. How does the client encrypt the contents he is sending back to the server ?. Using the public key of the server ? or does the client send a autogenerated private key and encrypts it using the public key which is then decypted by the server along with the message and used for furthter communication by both parties.
A Public and a Private key is required to do ssl communication. This Key pair is generated using a self signed certificate ?. How can a single self signed certificate contain both public and private keys.
One more thing On message level security -- im looking at a current configuration and am pulling my hair out -- Using IBM Ikeyman to look at the producer and Consumer JKS files-- for Message level security(Digital Signing) there is a Personal certificate at the Consumer and a Signer certificate at the Producer ... Isnt this the other way around? Is this current configuration incorrect --- Both the keys are same by the way.
The server keeps its private key and the public key is shared to the users.
Correct.
So the client trusts the content thats coming from the server using the public key.
No. There is no 'so' about it. The client trusts the server certificate because it is signed by someone he trusts, and he knows it belongs to the server because the server provides a digital signature that the client can verify, which only the private key owner can do. Therefore he knows that the server owns that public key.
How does the client encrypt the contents he is sending back to the server ?.
The client and server negotiate a shared session key independently using techniques described in RFC 2246. For the most part they don't involve PKI at all.
Using the public key of the server? or does the client send a autogenerated private key and encrypts it using the public key which is then decypted by the server along with the message and used for furthter communication by both parties.
Neither, see above. This is quite a large subject.
A Public and a Private key is required to do ssl communication.
No. One of the parties must have a private key and a corresponding certificate that the other party trusts, otherwise the communication is insecure.
This Key pair is generated using a self signed certificate
No. The statement doesn't even make sense. Key pairs are generated first, nothing to do with certificates yet. The certificate is a wrapper for the public key.
How can a single self signed certificate contain both public and private keys.
It can't, and it doesn't. Self-signing doesn't have anything to do with it either.
Public-key encryption 101:
The public and private keys form a pair: each key in the pair can decrypt messages encrypted with the other, but cannot decrypt messages encrypted with itself. If the client can decrypt a message with the public key, it knows the message was encrypted by the owner of the public key. Conversely, a message encrypted with the public key can only be decrypted by the owner of the private key.
The basic idea is that the client generates a key for a symmetric-key cypher, encrypts it with the public key, and sends that to the server. Both sides then use that symmetric key and cypher for the majority of the communication.
In SSL communication,when the client wants to interact with some server, the server sends its public key. Always remember a certificate is nothing but a public key with a bunch of supporting information.
The problem here is any hacker can masquerade as a server and can block the communication between server and client. So the server certificate must be signed by some certificate authority. The client only believes the server certificate if it is signed by a certificate authority.In that case the hacker in between can not masquerade as a server because its certificate will not be authenticated by the certificate authority.
So client accepts the certificate and gets the public key of server. Now the client can send its public key encrypted by the public key of the server. Since this encrypted message can only be decrypted by the private key of the server so only server can decrypt it.
But the use of public key and private key over the ssl communication can slow down the connection very much because these keys lengths are 1024 or 2048 bits.
So practically what happens is instead of sending its own public key, the client sends the symmetric key encrypted by the public key of the server. Server decrypts it with its private key and it gets to know the symmetric key. Now the further communication happens with this symmetric key encryption and decryption.Since no third party gets to know the symmetric key, the communication will be secure.
Remember symmetric key lengths are generally 64-128 unlike public keys hence less the time for encryption and decryption.
Does private key is required on web server during SSL communication? I've read:
In SSL, each party calculates the secret key individually using random
values known to each side. The parties then send messages encrypted
using the secret key
and
The private key is a randomly generated key for the session and is not
stored.
Above quotations relate Oracle Application Server SSL communication, but I think it should concern general SSL communication. Could you explain, what is role of private key (so far I think private key is required on web server during SSL).
Yes, the private key is required during the SSL handshake as it is used to prove that the server is indeed the owner of the Public Key of the deployed certificate.
But the Public/Private key pair are not used for encryption of the application messages. They are used only in the handshake which creates in the process a shared key by cryptographic parameters transmitted to the client in order to calculate it and used for the symmetric encryption of data after the handshake completes succesfully.
I was looking into SSL and some of the steps that are involved to set up an encrypted connection between a server and a client computer.
I understand that a server key and certificate is sent to the browser, and that a secret code is being calculated, like they say in the following video:
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=iQsKdtjwtYI
around 5:22, they talk about a master secret code that is being calculated to start talking in an encrypted way.
My question now is: before the connection is actually encrypted (the handshake phase), all communication between the server and the client can be sniffed by a packet sniffer. Isn't it then possible to sniff the encryption key or other data that is used to set up a secure connection?
From the Wikipedia summary, I think the key part you're interested in is:
The client responds with a ClientKeyExchange message, which may
contain a PreMasterSecret, public key, or nothing. (Again, this
depends on the selected cipher.) This PreMasterSecret is encrypted
using the public key of the server certificate.
This is why the public key is so important. If you use the wrong public key, you're vulnerable to man in middle attacks.
Witness the justified worry whenever bogus SSL certificate issues (e.g. DigiNotar).
The secret key itself isn't transmitted at all, so it can't be sniffed. It is computed independently at both ends. The materials it is computed from is called a PreMasterSecret which is encrypted with the public key of the server certificate. So unless the server's private key has been compromised the secret key can be neither sniffed nor calculated independently.
This question already has answers here:
How does browser generate symmetric key during SSL handshake
(2 answers)
Closed 2 years ago.
I have been reading on HTTPS, trying to figure out how exactly it works. To me it doesn't seem to make sense, for example, I was reading this
https://ssl.trustwave.com/support/support-how-ssl-works.php
And notice it says this in the page
Step 4: xyz.com will next create a
unique hash and encrypt it using both
the customer's public key and
xyz.com's private key, and send this
back to the client.
Step 5: Customer's browser will decrypt the hash. This process shows
that the xyz.com sent the hash and
only the customer is able to read it.
What I don't understand is, couldn't a hacker just intercept the public key it sends back to the "customer's browser", and be able to decrypt anything the customer can?
Thanks for any response
Why is HTTPS required?
To verify whether the website is authenticated/certified or not (uncertified websites can do evil things). An authenticated website has a unique personal certificate purchased from one of the CA’s.
Who are CA’s (Certificate Authorities)?
CA’s are globally trusted companies like GoDaddy, GeoTrust, VeriSign etc who provide digital certificates to the websites.
What are public keys and private keys?
Keys are nothing but long random numbers used to encrypt/decrypt data.
Public keys are keys which can be shared with others. Private keys are meant to be kept private.
Suppose Jerry generates a private key and public key. He makes many copies of that public key and shares with others.
Now, others can only encrypt the data using the public key and that data can only be decrypted by the private key of Jerry.
Another approach is to use public keys to only decrypt the data and private keys to only encrypt the data.
How does a company get a certificate?
Website owner first generates a public key and private key, keeping the private key secret.
He gives a Certificate Signing Request file (CSR) and his public key to the CA.
CA then creates a personal certificate based on CSR including domain name, owner name, expiry date, serial no. etc and also adds an encrypted text (= digital signature) to the certificate and finally encrypts the whole certificate with the public key of the server and sends it back to the website owner.
This certificate is then decrypted with the private key of the website owner and finally, he installs it on the website.
Note: That encrypted text is the digital signature of the CA. That
text is encrypted by the private key of the CA and can only be
decrypted by a public key of CA.
When you install your operating
system or Browser, root-certificates from many trusted CA's like
GeoTrust, VeriSign, GoDaddy etc. come with it. These root-certificates
contain the public key of that CA provider which helps decrypt the
signature.
HTTPS security can be split into 2 parts (Handshakes):
1. To validate the certificate of a website:
1) When you enter the URL www.Google.com, Google’s server gives its public key and certificate (which was signed by GeoTrust) to the Browser.
2) Now browser has to verify the authenticity of the certificate i.e. it’s actually signed from GeoTrust or not.
As browsers come with a pre-installed list of public keys from all the major CA’s, it picks the public key of the GeoTrust and tries to decrypt the digital signature of the certificate which was encrypted by the private key of GeoTrust.
3) If it’s able to decrypt the signature (which means it’s a trustworthy website) then it proceeds to the next step else it stops and shows a red cross before the URL.
2. To create a secure connection (encrypts outgoing and incoming data) so that no one else can read it:
1) As I mentioned, Google sends its public key when you enter www.Google.com . Any data encrypted with this public key can only be decrypted by Google’s private key which Google doesn’t share with anyone.
2) After validating the certificate, browser creates a new key let’s call it Session Key and make 2 copies of it. These keys can encrypt as well as decrypt the data.
3) The browser then encrypts (1 copy of session key + other request data) with the Google's public key . Then it sends it back to the Google server.
4) Google’s server decrypts the encrypted data using its private key and gets the session key , and other request data.
Now, see, server and browser both have got the same copies of session
key of the browser. No one else has this key, therefore, only server
and browser can encrypt and decrypt the data. This key will now be
used for both to decrypt and to encrypt the data.
5) When Google sends the data like requested HTML document and other HTTP data to the browser it first encrypts the data with this session key and browser decrypts the data with the other copy of the session key.
6) Similarly, when browser sends the data to the Google server it encrypts it with the session key which server decrypts on the other side.
Note: This session key is only used for that session only. If the user
closes the website and opens again, a new session key would be
created.
can't get enough of web? behind the scenes when u type www.google.com in browser
What I don't understand is, couldn't a hacker just intercept the public key it sends back to the "customer's browser", and be able to decrypt anything the customer can.
First, understand that there are generally two steps of HTTPs communication.
1) Generate a shared symmetric key which can only be known between client and server, no one else knows it
2) With this shared symmetric key, client and server is able to safely communicate with each other without worrying about information being intercepted and decrypted by others.
So the question becomes, how can the client and server generate a secret shared key without being known by others in this open internet? This is the asymmetric algorithm coming to play, a demo flow is like below:
-- Client receives public key from server.
-- Client generates a key string "DummySharedKey" which will be later used as shared key, and encrypt it into "7$&^^%####LDD!!#" with server's public key, Man-in-the-middle may have the public key and might be able to intercept the encrypted data, but the data is useless to him as the data can only be decrypted by sever's private key.
-- Server receives the encrypted key string "7$&^^%####LDD!!#", and decrypt it into "DummySharedKey" with its private key
Above key exchange steps makes sure that only Client and Server can know the shared key is "DummySharedKey", no one else knows it.
So it's critical to understand that it is Client's responsibility to generate the shared key, NOT SERVER! (i think this is what confused you)
I also recommend you to take a look at this video which explains HTTPs very well.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=JCvPnwpWVUQ&list=FLt15cp4Q09BpKVUryBOg2hQ&index=3
What I don't understand is, couldn't a hacker just intercept the public key it sends back to the "customer's browser", and be able to decrypt anything the customer can.
Public/private key encryption is based on modulo arithmetics using prime numbers.
Such asymmetric encryption was only discovered in the mid-1970s. It is credited to Diffie and Hellman, and to Rivest, Shamir and Adleman. (Though, both actually rediscovered things already known by the British secret services.)
The wikipedia page on Diffie-Hellman has a detailed example of a secret key exchange through a public channel. While it does not describe SSL itself, it should be handy to make sense of why knowing a public key doesn't reveal the contents of a message.
You might also find this simple RSA example interesting.
I'm studying related topics and read several blogs like how-https-works and how-does-https-work-rsa-encryption-explained/.
I have summarized a sequence diagram based on my study and hope it can be helpful to someone who comes to this thread.
For more details, you can check the blog mentioned.
I have written a small blog post around SSL Handshake between the server/client. Please feel free to take a look.
SSL Handshake
A small snippet from the same is as follows:
"Client makes a request to the server over HTTPS. Server sends a copy of its SSL certificate + public key. After verifying the identity of the server with its local trusted CA store, client generates a secret session key, encrypts it using the server's public key and sends it. Server decrypts the secret session key using its private key and sends an acknowledgment to the client. Secure channel established."
It also describes the symmetric/asymmetric encryption which is used for SSL certificates and data transfer once secure transport is established.
For detailed explanation of SSL, see https://www.ietf.org/rfc/rfc2246.txt
Here are the brief ideas of SSL to answer your question:
1) Using certificates to authenticate. Server certificate is a must and client certificate is optional (only when the server requests it). A certificate is like something to prove who you are and it also contains a public key for asymmetric encryption.
2) Using asymmetric encryption (with public key in the server certificate) to establish a shared symmetric key which is used to transfer data between client and server securely by symmetric encryption (for performance reason because symmetric encryption is faster than asymmetric encryption).
The shared symmetric key is established by exchanging a premaster secret from client side (encrypted with server public key) and is derived from the pre-master secret together with client random and server random (thanks #EJP for pointing this out in the comment):
master_secret = PRF(pre_master_secret, "master secret",
ClientHello.random + ServerHello.random)
We need the server random and client random to prevent replay attacks that an attacker can capture the previous session and replay it for the new session.
What I don't understand is, couldn't a hacker just intercept the
public key it sends back to the "customer's browser", and be able to
decrypt anything the customer can.
The hacker cannot decrypt the message since he does not know the server private key. Be aware that public key cannot be used to decrypt the message.