I'm unsure of what to do here I would like to ask what process should I use or what are the web standards in accomplishing this.
Scenario:
A User inputs information (e.g. a classified ads post). How should I generate the page of the users post? Should I create a new page with the information provided by the user or should I create just one page that dynamically changes with the content requested?
Generally whats the process I should take?
I hear a lot of talk about using cms, but I think I can create my own simple "cms" that can provide my needs. But I need to know what direction should I use. Creating a NEW PAGE or Creating a SINGLE DYNAMIC PAGE?
I agree that you should be able to create your own "CMS" that will meet your needs. If I understand your question, I would definitely create one page that is dynamically loaded from the database. Think about the server load you could create if you created a new page for every entry. One of the things I advise every client that I develop a website for is to think about what they want their website to be doing for their business in 3 years. I would advise you to think through the same question and I believe you will see why I recommend using a dynamic page.
Good luck with your site.
Related
I am new to this site and coding. I have self taught myself html and I understand css. I have been putting together a site of mine using my basic knowledge. I have no college experience but this is MY DREAM to put this site together so I have done a lot of research and read books to get started but I have hit a roadblock now. Here is what I have done:
-I have put together all of the front end pages and design using html/css. So, I have all of the pages that would be involved with the site, ready to go. All designed and have the layout how I wish it to be.
I guess I would call it the "skeleton" of the site. Any page that a user would be directed to, I have in a folder.
I have put together a little "demo" for myself to mimic a user experience. For example, I created a login page that "looks" how i want it to be but it doesnt actually store or save any logins.
This is my first question:
What is my next step? I admit it sounds stupd but I am self taught and I really have the ambition to acheive this I just can not figure out where to go from here in order to actually make a functioning site. All I have right now is my html "demo" where basically I have to follow a certain path down my site that mimics what a user would do on the site. I have it now where I click on the "sign up" button on my html form and it basically just redirects to my "new user" page. Then it is the same formula throughout the rest of my demo. I just put my other html pages I have designed into the html to sort of give a "user experience" to the demo. But I REALLY want to be able to have working accounts and saved data.
How do I create/save a user login to my site? DO i need to get a sql database? Is there a free one to use while i build the site? Honestly i really need someone who is willing to help me out with the steps in this journey without me sharing my entire site (i wish to keep it to my self) but.. i understand this is basic web stuff i just am genuinely lost as how to take it to the next level. I have all of the html done and now i need a way to actually make it work. I wish to conversate with someone please about this kink in the chain i am seeming to find myself in please. Thank you so much and I would be grateful. :)
----basically what programming languages do i need to learn, or when looking for someone to hire, what should they be skilled in? any software or sites or databases that i need? please help!!!
HTML and CSS are the languages that make up the front end of a website, like you said. In order for your website to have dynamic content (content specific to a user) and the ability to actually process logins, etc., there needs to be a server involved. A webpage is a text document that is interpreted by a browser. HTML makes up the content and CSS tells the browser how you want it to look. What you are missing, primarily, is server scripts, most commonly, in my experience, PHP. You can also include JavaScript for client-side effects.
Specific to your question about a user login, yes, you will need a database. The process should look something like this.
User visits login page
User enters information into an HTML form
User clicks submit
Form is submitted to a server URL using the 'POST' method
Server validates the form content
Server checks database for username or email (whichever you are using)
If the username/email exists, it compares the passwords
Server sends a response back to the client, either good or bad
Once the user is validated, you can redirect the user to the dashboard or user section.
Please keep in mind this is a very simplistic version of events. There are more in depth steps that need to be taken, for example, your passwords should never be stored in a database as plain text, you should use a one-way encryption (hashing) algorithm to make them unreadable. Then when a password is given to the server it should be hashed and you should compare the hashes. You can also use salts when hashing for more security. The form should use SSL to prevent man in the middle attacks, etc.
Sounds like you are off to a good start, but in order to make it work you have to add the server logic. Self-teaching will get you as far as you are willing to let it. I taught myself how to do web programming, and now I do it as a business. The Internet is a great resource. There are a ton of great tutorials online that will show you how to do everything I just laid out.
I'm having a problem when trying to A/B test certain nodes in my node-tree in Umbraco.
What I want to do is to copy a node in the node-tree to a specific spot and use that B-structure to see which of the structures works best, using Google analytics.
For example we have two node structures, let's call them "Private" and "Sweden".
Their structure with childnodes and properties are exactly the same. The only difference between them is the propertyvalues (content). The "Private"-URL is www.mysite.com/Private and the "Sweden"-URL is www.mysite.com/Sweden.
What I would like to do is to change every link on the B-structure, so that it points to its match at the A-structure. The problem is that since it's two different structures, it will have two different alternative links.
With other words, it should be a coinsidence that it enters the B-structure, then be moved back to the A-structure in the next click.
We manage what page it should load (either the A-node or the B-node) with scripts, so that it has a 50% chance for each node, and if it lands on the B-node, Google analytics will save data. What we can't manage is that every link on that page will be to the A-node.
I'd appreciate any help I can get.
Regards,
David
There's a couple of ways that seem likely to give you a start at least.
The /config/urlrewriting.config file allows you to set up multiple redirect rules within umbraco so a section like the following might work in sending all requests (whether (/sweden/pagename/ or /private/pagename/) back to the private structure. Not sure how GA will handle it:
rewriteUrlParameter="ExcludeFromClientQueryString" destinationUrl="http://www.mysite.com/private/$1" redirect="Domain" redirectMode="Permanent" ignoreCase="true" />
Secondly a simple httpmodule (http://support.microsoft.com/kb/307996) can process all page requests and redirect as required - you could do a gaq_push here directly or indirectly.
I'd be interested to know how you get on - it seems a good area for extension to Umbraco.
I'm not sure I have understood perfectly what you need to do, so please excuse any assumptions that may prove mistaken. Here's what I think:
Since A & B nodes should share the same html content (besides the links of course), why don't you make the link href attribute dynamic by using a bit of razor in the template or macro:
#{var isANode = CurrentPage.Parent.Name == "Sweden"; }
A similar approach would work if you are using web forms.
We finally came to the final decision to use the alternative template-solution. Since there seem to be no generic solution for my case of this problem we had to create an alternative template with specific macros to render the different information for every documenttype we're using.
Creating dynamic links for every page is a hell of a job in this stage in the project, since there are so many pages and links. Also some links are made in javascript, so there's another problem.
I copied the a-structure to another node, only for the reason to be able to change propertyvalues. There might be a problem logging and track the information with Google Analytics though, so that's the next step for us in this project. In our alternative templates we're getting the propertyvalues from the b-structure.
Still, if anyone have some better solution I'd highly appreciate it!
Regards,
David
I need to create a workflow that would break permission inheritance in a sharepoint subsite.
I am building a sharepoint 2010 site that is highly modular and can expand based on clients needs. The project requirement is that the client must be able to expand the website and add subsites from templates with as little interaction as possible. To this end I have created a list and attached a workflow to this list that creates a new website based on the information supplied in the list fields. The workflow I am using is a solution I found online http://www.ilovesharepoint.com/2011/02/create-site-action-sharepoint-designer.html
After the website is created I need to create security groups (another workflow I found online helps with this).
The problem is that the subsite must inherit security groups from the parent site and then I need to add new ones. In order to do this I need to break inheritance from the parent site and than I can create new groups. Currently my client has to do this manually - very bad thing. So I need create a workflow that would do just that.
The problem is that I am completely clueless as to how to go about doing this.
Ideally, I would like to create some sort of workflow action that would take a site url as input and then break permission. From what I've been able to find I need to use BreakRoleInheritance function to do that. but how do I create a workflow that takes input and how do i convert the string input into an actual site?
Like I said, I don't know anything about coding for sharepoint so please be as specific as possible.
Thank you very much.
P.S. maybe I am mistaken and i don't need to break inheritance to create additional security groups that would work only for a given subsite. If so, please tell me how to do this without breaking inheritance.
I am currently investigating the possibilities of different CMSs for a company-site.
Done quite a few projects in classical ASP, ASP.NET, Joomla etc..
I would like to use Umbraco 5 for the first time.
For that project we have a SQL-Table with Job-Opportunities:
like: JobName, Department, Description, etc..
These should be listed on a page. In ASP.NET I would use something like a Repeater, etc.. with PageSize option and automatic paging.
In the Backend (Backoffice in Umbraco, I assume) there has to be an Insert/Edit/Delete Page with the corresponding input boxes, which are maintained by the company employees, not by web-developers.
Which route should I look at? I am completely stuck, is there an example anywhere?
Can I use my own data-tables, or could/should I use the Umbraco content tables for this?
Thank you,
Reinhard
Welcome to Umbraco.
If you choose to use a pre-existing database, you're going to need the following pieces:
an ORM to access read/write the data
a custom hive provider for that data to allow for Umbrace to read it as an entity
a custom tree to allow for editing and adding data in the backoffice
a macro to display the content on the frontend.
http://web-matters.blogspot.com/2011/11/umbraco-5-hive-provider-tree-editor.html
is a great place to start.
As you're probably picking up on, this is a lot of work.. so, most importantly: Are you trying to maintain two applications?
If so, do you really need to be able to edit the list in both applications? Your task would be much simpler if you only allowed editing from the other application, and displayed the read-only list using web services.
If not, ditch the custom database. Umbraco 5 is a full EAV/CR system, so unlike some CMS products, you'll be able to represent any rdbs structure you can imagine. The simplest way would be to create a custom document type with those properties to represent a job opportunity, and store those job opportunities on a new node in the content tab.
About document types: http://our.umbraco.org/wiki/how-tos/working-with-document-types
I'm a big fan of keeping application logic in the servlet, and keeping the JSP as simple as possible. One of the reasons for this is that any good web designer should be able to expand upon his HTML knowledge to build in a few JSTL tags to do simple iteration, access beans, etc. We also keep the more complex/ajax/js components behind a tag library (similar to displayTag but for our own components).
Most of the time everything works out ok - The servlet does any SQL it needs to, and stores the results in beans for the JSP to access. Where we have a problem is when the records we wish to access are specified by the design.
The clearest example would be the home page - it needs to be eye-catching and effective. It doesn't need to be uniform like rest of the site. There are lots of one-offs or "special cases" here, where we want to query a particular product record, or whatever.
What the designer really wants is a way to get a product bean by the product id so he can access the properties as normal. We obviously don't want to query for all products, and I don't want to query in the presentation.
I'm pretty sure I'm asking the impossible here and that I have to give something up. My question is what?
EDIT
Am I wrong in thinking that all application logic should be complete before calling the JSP? I was under the impression it was considered best practice to do all querying/calculating/processing in the servlet then pass (fairly) dumb beans to a (very) dumb JSP.
There are a couple of methods whereby the actual complexity of the query can be encapsulated in another class (custom tag or bean), and the JSP can call it. This
keeps the JSP simple (goal 1) but the JSP is still "triggering" the query - quite
late in the process.
Have I got this totally wrong and it's fine to do this.
Is it a general rule, but perfectly ok to do this in this instance.
Might I run into problems?
EDIT - Example
I'm hoping this example will help:
The home page isn't a "template" like the category/search pages - it is custom designed to work very well with say a marketing image and a couple of specific product images. It does however have information about those two products which should be obtained dynamically (so the name, and importantly price) stay in sync with the db.
The servlet can't know which products these will be, because if the designer wants to change them/remove them/add more, he should only have to edit the JSP (and possibly XML as one answer suggested).
If I understand correctly, you have logic in the JSP that wants a particular product, but at this point you don't want to query from the DB, and its too late for the servlet to be aware of it.
(A side note, while I respect your will to maintain separation of concerns, the fact that this is an issue clearly shows that your framework has too much logic in the presentation tier...but since we probably can't fix that...moving on).
My recommendation is that your designer creates a configuration XML file that contains whatever special cases it needs for the frontend, and yours servlet can read that, then pass dumb beans back to the JSP.
OR...you break things down into multiple requests using XMLHTTPRequest and call back to the servlet for each individual query, then assemble the page on the client.
It sounds like you need better separation between the display and database code. You should have separate classes that just deal with interacting with the database, and know nothing about display.
Then you just create a method that will look up the product by id and return that bean so the display can pull out the attributes it wants.
You need to create a custom bean which will perform your queries for the front end. Actually, it's probably more like a few beans to get the data for you, according to what you say here.
There's no problem with doing that from a design perspective; it's just that the specific design of the home page has more heterogenous requirements than the rest of your site. Make sure your designer knows that he needs to communicate his needs well to the development team to create the BO for your homepage (or whatever) and thing should go fine.
You are not wrong in thinking that all application logic should be complete before rendering the JSP.
If there is a need to fetch more stuff for displaying in your JSP, it would be another request to the server and another Page cycle. If you are looking for 'interactive' loading experience, you could use AJAX.
In a single page life-cycle, I find it hard to understand why do you have to invoke database calls from a JSP. Hasn't the page been previously posted with all the required form variables to help you find the data in Servlet/Helper classes?
If you could give an example of a case, it would be helpful.
[Edit] Looking at your example, yes your designer (or the admin of the site) should set that information as a configuration, not a part of JSP. Or, you could have a small app/admin page to maintain the information in a database so that it could be changed on the go. When you show your homepage, read the configs and load the appropriate data.
I am not sure what is the question. I f you want to have sql statements out of your jsp pages then you can put them in a property file and just read the property file from the jsp page.