I need to pass Some variable values from one ThreadGroup to another,
For this I am using
${__setProperty(USERNAME, ${USERNAME})}
to set username in ThreadGroup1 (I tried to set this value in User defined variable as well as bean assertion) and use
${__property(USERNAME)}
to fetch this value in ThreadGroup1
but it doesn't work.I set other variables/ properties in same way but they also doesn't seem fetched in ThreadGroup2.
what do I do wrong?
JMeter Plugins has Inter-Thread Communication see http://code.google.com/p/jmeter-plugins/wiki/InterThreadCommunication for this purpose.
There are 2 methods to use it:
PostProcessor/PreProcessor
Functions __fifoPut and __fifoPop
PostProcessor/PreProcessor is easier to use.
Related
After creating a teams-tab-app using the vscode teams toolkit, I see that in the default auth-start.html file the script tries to extract the scopes from the URL (that was constructed by the microsoftTeams.authentication.authenticate() method), however I don't see any reference in the documentation on how to pass these scopes in this method.
Does anyone know how to pass these scopes?
I've wondered about this myself when looking at a toolkit, but I haven't used it for any production systems so never bothered to look too deep. I do see that in useTeamsFx.tsx is where it's doing the redirect to startLoginPageUrl, so presumably you need to set REACT_APP_START_LOGIN_PAGE_URL to be the path to the auth-start.html, so you could set it to include a querystring as well. It needs the app Id so you'd need to set that as well, but the useTeamsFx also wants REACT_APP_CLIENT_ID which you'd set as well. As a result, it might make sense to store the scopes you want in your code or in an environment variable as well, and then compose the value you send to initiateLoginEndpoint. Basically, instead of
var startLoginPageUrl = process.env.REACT_APP_START_LOGIN_PAGE_URL;
...
initiateLoginEndpoint: startLoginPageUrl
...
you might instead make it
var startLoginPageUrl = process.env.REACT_APP_START_LOGIN_PAGE_URL;
var scopes = process.env.REACT_APP_SCOPES; // <-- this is added
...
initiateLoginEndpoint: `${startLoginPageUrl}?clientId=${clientId}&scope=${scopes}`
...
but this is untested, so no guarantees.
On a separate but related note, in my sample project, in auth-start, it refers to a very old version of MicrosoftTeams.min.js (v 1.6, and current is 1.11). I might just have a very old Teams Toolkit, but maybe not...
I'd like to enable a test if a certain tag is "included", i.e. passed with option --include-tag of the ConsoleLauncher or useJUnitPlatform.includeTags property in Gradle. Is there any API to retrieve the value of this option in the context of test class or method?
I tried the script-based condition #EnabledIf like this:
#EnabledIf("'true' == systemProperty.get('itest.backendSystemPresent') || junitTags.contains('BackendSystemIT') == true")
But junitTags contains the #Tag annotations of the element in question, not the tags included at runtime.
Reading your question again, my answer is "No". You can't use junitTags to achieve your goals. And no, there's no such API at the moment. You would need something like:
#EnabledIf("'true' == evaluateTagExpression('BackendSystemIT') || ...)
Because you need to take care of tag expression here as well: https://junit.org/junit5/docs/current/user-guide/#running-tests-tag-expressions
But, tags are evaluated earlier in the process. Your condition will not get a chance to be executed when the test was already excluded by tag evaluation. So, I guess, you'll have to stick with the single system property switch to control the enabled state of the test method.
Btw. we are improving the tag expression language with any() and none() tokens, soon. https://github.com/junit-team/junit5/issues/1679
Possible solution:
Annotate your test with #Tag("BackendSystemIT")
Before running your tests, check for itest.backendSystemPresent system property and if it is set, pass a --include-tag "BackendSystemIT" to the test run.
Let Jupiter do the job of evaluating tag expressions
Is there any API to retrieve the value (of this option) of all tags that are attached directly or inherited in the context of test class or method?
Yes. Declare and use a org.junit.jupiter.api.TestInfo parameter in your test method.
#Test
#DisplayName("TEST 1")
#Tag("my-tag")
void test1(TestInfo testInfo) {
assertEquals("TEST 1", testInfo.getDisplayName());
assertTrue(testInfo.getTags().contains("my-tag"));
}
For details see https://junit.org/junit5/docs/current/user-guide/#writing-tests-dependency-injection
But junitTags contains the #Tag annotations of the element in question, not the tags included at runtime.
This is the expected behaviour -- the platform (here: console launcher) already applied the filter passed via --include-tag and other configuration parameters. In short: there's no need to manually check for tags in standard Jupiter tests. If there's problem with the built-in filtering, please create an issue here: https://github.com/junit-team/junit5/issues/new/choose
Dear Stackoverflowers,
this is my first post, so I try to do everything correct.
In the error handler of an OSB component, I need to assign a value from the existing $originalHeader to another variable to reuse it, without entering the value as text.
In an assign-action, the expression $originalHeader/privateMetaAttributesHeader/LoggingCategory
for variable originalLoggingCategory does return the below:
Debugging_VariablesScreen
I do not understand why the value of LoggingCategory is not assigned to variable originalLoggingCategory. Please help me out with this.
Content of $originalHeader:
<soapenv:Header xmlns:soapenv="http://schemas.xmlsoap.org/soap/envelope/"><v1:privateMetaAttributesHeader xmlns:v1="http://www.example.org/scintilla/meta/v1"><SwingMonitoring>...</SwingMonitoring><LoggingCategory>com.schenker.scintilla.AirOcean.WWTAN.LoadPlanInstructionService.v1</LoggingCategory></v1:privateMetaAttributesHeader></soapenv:Header>
Thanks in advance.
Patrick
There is a difference between <privateMetaAttributesHeader> and <v1:privateMetaAttributesHeader>, which OSB rightly respects.
for instance
$originalHeader/privateMetaAttributesHeader/LoggingCategory may be null
$originalHeader/v1:privateMetaAttributesHeader/v1:LoggingCategory will probably return what you want (try selecting just the header at first, then work your way down to the logging category, just in case LoggingCategory isn't in the v1 namespace)
You can define what namespace 'v1' is in the OSB Proxy Stage, or if you don't know, you can use $originalHeader/*:privateMetaAttributesHeader/*:LoggingCategory but that's not recommended.
I have a SoapUI project which contains around 60 plus services. Each service requires some input which will be changed for every execution. So I have created certain Global Properties and assign some values to that properties.
I have to use these properties values in my SoapUI request ( i.e. JSON Format request ).
If it is groovy script means, I will use like this.
String HTiC_Username = com.eviware.soapui.model.propertyexpansion.PropertyExpansionUtils.globalProperties['HTiC_Username'].value;
But, how to get the value of the Global Property in the request?
Hope you understand my question. Please provide proper guidance.
Thanks
To dynamically "expand" (i.e. substitute) the value of a property into a test step, the following syntax is used: ${#scope#propertyName}
...where 'scope' refers to the level at which the property has been defined (e.g. Global, Project, TestSuite, TestCase).
So to expand a property named username defined as a Global property, for example, the following code can be used directly within a Request Test Step (e.g within a JSON body, or header value, etc):
${#Global#username}
To access the same property value within a Groovy Test Step, you can use the following syntax:
context.expand('${#scope#propertyName}')
...as in the following example:
context.expand('${#Global#username}')
What we did was the following:
created a test data file to store all the specific input data for the different services (testdata.properties)
Example content of testdata.properties:
Billing_customerID=1234567
OtherService_paymentid=12121212
....
create a SoupUi global parameter (File/Preferences/Global properties): testdata_filepath=C:\...
For specific services we added a Properties test step. You can specify the "Load from" field to our new global parameter: ${#Global#testdata_filepath} Now you can use the Load button to load parameters.
Finally you can reference the parameter in your xml in the following format: ${Properties#Billing_customerID}
Example content of a service with parameter:
...
<BillingCustomerIdentification>
<BillingCustomerID>${#Properties#Billing_customerID}</BillingCustomerID>
</BillingCustomerIdentification>
...
To set up your projects in this manner also helps to automate service tests eg. using Hudson (see my previous SO answer).
If it is too heavy and automation is not a target, you can simply use ${#Global#someinputvariable} format in your xml ;-)
Disclaimer: Complete beginner in Yii, Some experience in php.
In Yii, Is it OK to override the login method of CWebUser?
The reason i want to do this is because the comments in the source code stated that the changeIdentity method can be overridden by child classes but because i want to send more parameters to this method i was thinking of overriding the login method too (of CWebUser).
Also if that isn't such a good idea how do you send the extra parameters into the changeIdentity method.(By retrieving it from the $states argument somehow ??). The extra parameters are newly defined properties of UserIdentity class.
It is better to first try to do what you wish to do by overriding components/UserIdentity.php's authenticate method. In fact, that is necessary to implement any security system more advanced than the default demo and admin logins it starts you with.
In that method, you can use
$this->setState('myVar', 5);
and then access that anywhere in the web app like so:
Yii::app()->user->getState('myVar');
If myVar is not defined, that method will return null by default. Otherwise it will return whatever it was stored as, in my example, 5. These values are stored in the $_SESSION variable, so they persist as long as the session does.
UPDATE: Okay, took the time to learn how this whole mess works in Yii for another answer, so I'm sharing my findings here as well. The below is mostly copy pasted from a similar answer I just gave elsewhere. This is tested as working and persisting from page to page on my system.
You need to extend the CWebUser class to achieve the results you want.
class WebUser extends CWebUser{
protected $_myVar = 'myvar_default';
public function getMyVar(){
$myVar = Yii::app()->user->getState('myVar');
return (null!==$myVar)?$myVar:$this->_myVar;
}
public function setMyVar($value){
Yii::app()->user->setState('myVar', $value);
}
}
You can then assign and recall the myVar attribute by using Yii::app()->user->myVar.
Place the above class in components/WebUser.php, or anywhere that it will be loaded or autoloaded.
Change your config file to use your new WebUser class and you should be all set.
'components'=>
'user'=>array(
'class'=>'WebUser',
),
...
),